Your SlideShare is downloading. ×
Judicial review
Judicial review
Judicial review
Judicial review
Judicial review
Judicial review
Judicial review
Judicial review
Judicial review
Judicial review
Judicial review
Judicial review
Judicial review
Judicial review
Judicial review
Judicial review
Judicial review
Judicial review
Judicial review
Judicial review
Judicial review
Judicial review
Judicial review
Upcoming SlideShare
Loading in...5
×

Thanks for flagging this SlideShare!

Oops! An error has occurred.

×
Saving this for later? Get the SlideShare app to save on your phone or tablet. Read anywhere, anytime – even offline.
Text the download link to your phone
Standard text messaging rates apply

Judicial review

409

Published on

Published in: Education
0 Comments
0 Likes
Statistics
Notes
  • Be the first to comment

  • Be the first to like this

No Downloads
Views
Total Views
409
On Slideshare
0
From Embeds
0
Number of Embeds
3
Actions
Shares
0
Downloads
5
Comments
0
Likes
0
Embeds 0
No embeds

Report content
Flagged as inappropriate Flag as inappropriate
Flag as inappropriate

Select your reason for flagging this presentation as inappropriate.

Cancel
No notes for slide

Transcript

  • 1. 1 Chapter 16
 The Judiciary

  • 2. 2Copyright © 2013 Cengage
  • 3. 3 The Jurisdiction of the Federal Courts ■ Jurisdiction - the authority of the courts to hear certain cases. ■ Under the Constitution, the federal courts have jurisdiction in cases involving federal law, treaties, and the interpretation of the Constitution.
  • 4. 4 The Jurisdiction of the Federal Courts ■ Original Jurisdiction - lower courts hear cases for the first time (district court) ■ trial with evidence, and jury option ■ Appellate Jurisdiction - courts hear reviews or appeals of decisions from lower courts (Court of Appeals and Supreme Court) ■ Concurrent Jurisdiction - cases to be tried in either federal or state courts
  • 5. 5 The Jurisdiction of the Federal Courts ■ Federal-question cases – Cases concerning the Constitution, federal laws, or treaties ■ Diversity cases – Cases involving citizens of different states who can bring suit in federal courts Copyright © 2013 Cengage
  • 6. 6 Figure 16.4 The Jurisdiction of the Federal Courts Copyright © 2013 Cengage
  • 7. 7 The Structure of the Federal Courts ■ Constitutional Courts - created by Congress under Article III of the Constitution ■ Lower Federal Courts • Constitutional Courts ■ District courts ■ Courts of appeal • Legislative Court ■ Court of Military Appeals & territorial courts Copyright © 2013 Cengage
  • 8. 8 Map 16.1 U.S. District and Appellate Courts Copyright © 2013 Cengage Note: Washington, D.C., is in a separate court. Puerto Rico is in the first circuit; the Virgin Islands are in the third; Guam and the Northern Mariana Islands are in the ninth. The Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit, located in Washington, D.C., is a Title 3 court that hears appeals regarding patents, trademarks, international trade, government contracts, and from civil servants who claim they were unjustly discharged. ! Source: Administrative Office of the United States Courts (January 1983).
  • 9. 9 Structure of the Judicial System ■ Supreme Court - the only court actually created directly by the Constitution ■ Highest Court, Final Authority ■ Has Original and Appellate Jurisdiction ■ 1869 - Current Size Set (9 Judges, 1 Chief Justice, 8 Associate) ■ Nominated by President, Confirmed by Senate
  • 10. 10 Judicial Selection ■ Lower Courts ■ Large number of appointments ■ Handled by Justice Department and White House Staff ■ Senatorial Courtesy - allowing individual senators who represent the state to approve/disapprove nominees to District Court
  • 11. 11 Judicial Selection ■ Supreme Court ■ Selecting Judges • Party affiliation • Judicial Philosophy - ideology • Race, gender, religion, region • Experience - District, Appellate, State • Acceptability (Bar Association, Interest Groups, Justices) • The “Litmus Test” - test of ideological purity using controversial issue like abortion Copyright © 2013 Cengage
  • 12. 12 The Supreme Court in Action ■ Accepting Cases ■ Rule of 4 ■ Brief Orders - returned to lower court for reconsideration ■ Writ of Certiorari - an order by the Court directing lower court to send up the records for review ■ Certificate - lower court askes the Supreme Court about rule of law or procedures in specific cases Copyright © 2013 Cengage
  • 13. 13 The Supreme Court in Action ■ Amicus curiae - friend of the court (filed by interested parties to support or reject arguments of case) ■ Majority opinion - majority of justices agree on the decision and its reasons ■ Concurring opinion - a justice agrees with the majority opinion but not the reasoning ■ Dissenting opinion - a justice who disagrees with the majority opinion
  • 14. 14 Getting to Court ■ In forma pauperis - poor person free of charge ■ Fee Shifting - plaintiff can collect legal fees from defendant if loses ■ Standing - entitled to bring to court ■ Class Action Suits - case on behalf of many persons under similar circumstances Copyright © 2013 Cengage
  • 15. 15 Copyright © 2013 Cengage The U.S. Supreme Court Justices in 2010. Front row: Justices Clarence Thomas and Antonin Scalia, Chief Justice John Roberts, Justices Anthony Kennedy and Ruth Bader Ginsburg; second row: Justices Sonia Sotomayor, Samuel Alito, and Elena Kagan. TIM SLOAN/AFP/Getty Images
  • 16. 16 Judicial Review ■ Defined: the power of the courts to declare laws unconstitutional ■ Over 160 federal laws have been declared unconstitutional ■ The federal courts’ chief weapon in the American government system of checks and balances Copyright © 2013 Cengage
  • 17. 17 Two Approaches to Judicial Review ! ■ Judicial Restraint Approach – judges should decide cases strictly on the basis of the language of the Constitution ■ Activist Approach – judges should discern the general principles underlying the Constitution and apply them to modern circumstances Copyright © 2013 Cengage
  • 18. 18 The Power of the Federal Courts ■ The Power to Make Policy • Stare decisis (let the decision stand) • Political question (avoids) • Remedy (activism) Copyright © 2013 Cengage The activism of federal courts is exemplified by the sweeping orders they have issued to correct such problems as overcrowded prisons, p. 458. Alex Webb/Magnum Photos
  • 19. 19 Courts as Policymakers ■ New Deal Era ■ Supreme Court struck down laws designed to end the Great Depression ■ FDR proposed “court packing” - increase the number of justices ■ Did not pass Congress but placed enough pressure on Court to change voting (“switch in time to save nine”)
  • 20. 20 Warren Court (1953-1969) ■ Termed “most liberal court ever” ■ Active in civil rights and liberties ■ Brown v BOE 1954 (desegregation) ■ Gideon v Wainwright 1963 (attorney) ■ Miranda v Arizona 1966 (read rights at time of arrest)
  • 21. 21 The Burger Court (1969-1986) ■ More conservative ideology, narrowing the rights of defendants ■ Roe v Wade 1973 (abortion) ■ US v Nixon 1974 (executive privilege did not apply) ■ Regents of University of CA v Bakke 1978 (affirmative action legal, but quotas not)
  • 22. 22 Rehnquist and Roberts Courts (1986-Present) ■ Conservative court continued to limit, but not reverse defendants’ rights, abortion, and affirmative action
  • 23. 23 Checks on Judicial Power ■ Congress and the Courts • Confirmations • Impeachment • Number of judges • Jurisdiction ■ Public Opinion and the Courts Copyright © 2013 Cengage Thurgood Marshall became the first black Supreme Court justice. As chief counsel for the NAACP, Marshall argued the 1954 Brown v. Board of Education case in front of the Supreme Court. He was appointed to the Court in 1967 and served until 1991, p. 463. Bettmann/Corbis

×