Pulling No Punches: Change Management at Oakhill College
Upcoming SlideShare
Loading in...5
×
 

Pulling No Punches: Change Management at Oakhill College

on

  • 288 views

This is the slideshow presented at the Twenty-First International Conference on Learning at Lander College for Women, Touro College, New York City, USA, July 2014

This is the slideshow presented at the Twenty-First International Conference on Learning at Lander College for Women, Touro College, New York City, USA, July 2014

Statistics

Views

Total Views
288
Views on SlideShare
284
Embed Views
4

Actions

Likes
0
Downloads
0
Comments
0

1 Embed 4

https://twitter.com 4

Accessibility

Categories

Upload Details

Uploaded via as Microsoft PowerPoint

Usage Rights

CC Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs LicenseCC Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs LicenseCC Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs License

Report content

Flagged as inappropriate Flag as inappropriate
Flag as inappropriate

Select your reason for flagging this presentation as inappropriate.

Cancel
  • Full Name Full Name Comment goes here.
    Are you sure you want to
    Your message goes here
    Processing…
Post Comment
Edit your comment

Pulling No Punches: Change Management at Oakhill College Pulling No Punches: Change Management at Oakhill College Presentation Transcript

  • Pulling No Punches: Change Management at Oakhill College Shani Hartley Melissa Carson
  • Who are we? The Innovative Learning Team Image source:Oakhill ILT
  • Background – Oakhill College Image source:Oakhill Website http://oakhill.nsw.edu.au/pages/default.aspx?pid=5
  • The Report - ICT and Active Learning Image source:Oakhill ILT (Glen Waverley Secondary College)
  • Interviewing ex-students Video source:Oakhill ILT
  • Report findings For learning to occur in a deep and meaningful way there needed to be a pedagogical shift by teachers to incorporate: •the demands of a technology rich world •a reduction of the delivery of content and an increase in concept based, skill driven student activity •authentic learning embedded in real-world connections •integration of subjects •assessment tasks less about knowledge/content and more about active learning Image source:Oakhill ILT
  • The origin of REAL One of the main aims of REAL was to disrupt the majority of teachers out of their comfort zone of maintaining control from the front of the room so they could learn to have the courage to relinquish some of that control, thereby allowing students to take more responsibility for their own learning. Image source:http://winehouse.com.au/categories.asp?cID=1371&cN=Rockford%20Basket%20Press&c=165329
  • The aims ● Promote critical thinking by incorporating student centred learning ● Support student engagement with relevant resources, tools, learning outcomes and a positive, appealing working environment that offers variety in learning opportunities in flexible learning spaces ● Showcase and support teacher development by facilitating a concentrated approach to best-practice in the classroom, allowing for collaborative teaching, transparent processes and communication, reflective professional dialogue and personalised professional development
  • The aims continued ● Design, a cohesive, strategic Year 7 Curriculum underpinned by UbD, centred around transference of skills and concepts linked to the Australian Curriculum General Capabilities using a matrix ● Facilitate open communication between all stakeholders in the educational process, students, staff, parents via a virtual environment offering continuous online access to curriculum documents and student work ● Track student development in a longitudinal study
  • The aims continued • Truly differentiate the curriculum by supporting students with special needs directly, as well as extending the gifted and talented through access to project based learning opportunities and connections to tertiary institutions and global partners
  • “If you build it…” Field Of Dreams (1989) Image source:http://www.into-the-dark.com/film-review-field-of-dreams-1989/
  • The birth of REAL • Leadership clearly articulate and model pedagogical goals • Grassroots implementation of pedagogical change • Transparency for all stakeholders through technology • Professional development for teachers Image source:Oakhill REAL Website http://real.oakhill.nsw.edu.au/ GOALS
  • The Technology Image source:Oakhill ILT
  • Disruption One of the main aims of REAL was to disrupt the majority of teachers out of their comfort zone of maintaining control from the front of the room so they could learn to have the courage to relinquish some of that control, thereby allowing students to take more responsibility for their own learning. Image source: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vujraZVYrzU
  • DIY Research Image source:http://www.incrowdnow.com/2013/07/3-benefits-of-do-it-yourself-research/ ● GOAL: Longitudinal Study ● Discussions with universities for help with research failed ● DIY ‘Active Research’ ● Lacks rigour and in-depth statistical analysis ● Nevertheless, provides useful feedback
  • Observations 1. Timing of direct instruction versus student-centred activity. 2. Students each lesson asked three questions:  What are you learning about this lesson (what is the big idea?)  What do you understand about this task/topic/activity OR tell me what you understand about this  What task are you doing now? 3. Teacher feedback (instruction coach role) Image source:http://www.psychology4a.com/science%208.htm
  • Survey of teachers ● I have never seen so much authentic collaboration in the classroom ● It has forced more reflective practice and a re-think of pedagogy ● I am more conscious of the amount of "teacher talk" and teacher centred activities in the classroom and make more of an effort to minimise these in favour of a student centred approach ● The opportunity to see how others are working in my own and other [faculties] provides chances to reflect on my professional practice ● I like the fact that as a department head, we as a group have had to have some real discussion and forethought about our programs, assessment and teaching practice.
  • Survey of teachers ● Finding new ways of connecting with and engaging with students - lessons have become more interactive and dynamic. Finding myself taking this into other grades (with varying degrees of success) ● Programmes are substantially more coherent and purposeful ● A more thoughtful process in designing and delivering lessons ● a) Planning the lessons pretty much one by one, and preparing resources, knowing students and their parents will be accessing this material and plan, has made me think more specifically than abstractly. b) I have learned more ways to use Google Docs. c) I have had to 'let go' to some extent of controlling and 'drip feeding' every step of student progress as students have access to material to keep going. Of course this is good because students can set their pace accordingly.
  • e-Portfolios REAL program in action at its best Today 18/6/14 we had a great practical example of the REAL program is action. In their PDHPE workbook p67-70 students have to do a group activity. We asked them to move into groups of 6 at their tables and before we could explain the activity, they were already assigning topics and starting the activity. We were trying to get them to stop and listen to an explanation….but they didn’t need it, so we shut up. Not one student asked a question or hesitated starting, they just worked it out. Halleluah!! Added bonus ….they are doing it correctly and collaboratively. We even have some mixed tables from the 2 classes. Image source:http://powerlisting.wikia.com/wiki/File:FAIL-Word-art-300x187.png Except for Nickie:
  • In summary - leadership Diagram created using Lucidchart. Image source:http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:3D_Team_Leadership_Arrow_Concept.jpg ● GOAL: Clear message and modelling good practice by leadership ● REAL has the support of leadership ● Perception by teachers that REAL is not endorsed by the leaders ● Advantage: ownership ● Disadvantage: some teachers don’t see REAL as whole school philosophy and thus justify their resistance
  • In summary - grassroots Image source:http://www.grassrootslawnandlandscaping.com/images/grassroots4.jpg ● GOAL: Tapping into grassroots innovative pedagogy ● REAL has created conversations about pedagogy ● Observable changes in teaching have occurred ● Survey results reveal teachers are changing their pedagogy
  • In summary - technology Image source:Oakhill ILT ● GOAL: Transparency ● Successful driver of change through being held accountable by other stakeholders ● Successful driver of change through forcing teachers into an online environment ● Has made cross-curricular opportunities obvious
  • The future Image source:http://www.annholm.net/wp-content/uploads/2013/03/road-sign_future.jpg ● 2015: Years 7 and 8 will be REAL ● 2016: Hope for whole school approach without REAL branding ● Improve our research methods ● Apply for a grant to fund further research ● Connect with other schools to be more collaborative
  • To finish... REAL website: http://real.oakhill.nsw.edu.au/ Contact us Melissa: mcarson@oakhill.nsw.edu.au @kookykevinc Shani: shartley@oakhill.nsw.edu.au @shhartley
  • References •ACARA. (2011). NAPLAN. http://www.nap.edu.au/naplan/naplan.html •AITSL. (2012). Australian Charter for the Professional Learning of Teachers and School Leaders: A shared responsibility and commitment. http://www.aitsl.edu.au/professional-growth/australian-charter-for- the-professional-learning-of-teachers-and-school-leaders •Armenakis, A. & Harris, S. (2009). Reflections: Our journey in organizational change research and practice. Journal of Change Management, 9 (2), pp.127-142 •Authentic Education. (2012). What is Understanding by Design? Retrieved from http://www.authenticeducation.org/ubd/ubd.lasso •Baum, H. (2002). Why School Systems Resist Reform: A Psychoanalytic Perspective. Human Relations, 55(2), pp.173-198. DOI: 10.1177/0018726702055002182 •Bernhard, H. (1990). Managing for Change or Stability? Journal of Organizational Change Management, 3(3), pp.25-28. DOI: 10.1108/09534819010135344 •Burnes, B. (2010). Call for Papers: Why Does Change Fail and What Can We Do About It?, Journal of Change Management, 10(2), pp.241-242 .
  • References •Gurr, D. and Drysdale, L. (2012). Tensions and dilemmas in leading Australia's schools, School Leadership & Management: Formerly School Organisation, 32(5), pp.403-420, DOI: 10.1080/13632434.2012.723619 •Hartley, S., Carson, M., Cook, N. (2013). Dragging the Digital Chain: Planning the Pedagogical and Digital Direction of Oakhill College. ICERI2013 Proceedings, pp.6271-6279. Accessed from Proceedings CD: http://library.iated.org/publications/ICERI2013 •Holmes K., Clement J. and Albright J. (2013). The complex task of leading educational change in schools, School Leadership & Management, 33(3), 270-283 DOI: 10.1080/13632434.2013.800477 •Ministerial Council for Education, Employment, Training and Youth Affairs. 2008. Melbourne Declaration on Educational Goals for Young Australians. http://www.mceecdya.edu.au/mceecdya/melbourne_declaration,25979.html •NSW Department of Education and Training. (2010). Action Research in Education Guidelines, 2nd Edition. https://www.det.nsw.edu.au/proflearn/research/actres.htm
  • References •Priestley, M., Edwards, R., Priestley, A, and Miller, K. (2012). Teacher Agency in Curriculum Making: Agents of Change and Spaces for Manoeuvre. Curriculum Inquiry 42(2), pp.191-213. •Saka, A. (2003). Internal change agents’ view of the management of change problem. Journal of Organizational Change Management, 16(5), pp.480-496. DOI 10.1108/09534810310494892 •Saunders, R. (2013). The role of teacher emotions in change: Experiences, patterns and implications for professional development. Journal of Educational Change, 14(3), pp.303-333. DOI 10.1007/s10833-012- 9195-0 •Thursfield, D. (2008). Managers' learning in a UK local authority: The political context of an in-house MBA. Management Learning 39(3), pp.295-309. DOI:10.1177/1350507608090878