Your SlideShare is downloading. ×
Evaluating Websites Revised
Upcoming SlideShare
Loading in...5
×

Thanks for flagging this SlideShare!

Oops! An error has occurred.

×

Saving this for later?

Get the SlideShare app to save on your phone or tablet. Read anywhere, anytime - even offline.

Text the download link to your phone

Standard text messaging rates apply

Evaluating Websites Revised

595
views

Published on

For teaching students the criteria for evaluating websites and other free web information.

For teaching students the criteria for evaluating websites and other free web information.

Published in: Education, Technology

1 Comment
0 Likes
Statistics
Notes
  • I had this posted multiple times here and realized I had a typo/grammar error. Sorry! This the corrected, error-free version.
       Reply 
    Are you sure you want to  Yes  No
    Your message goes here
  • Be the first to like this

No Downloads
Views
Total Views
595
On Slideshare
0
From Embeds
0
Number of Embeds
3
Actions
Shares
0
Downloads
1
Comments
1
Likes
0
Embeds 0
No embeds

Report content
Flagged as inappropriate Flag as inappropriate
Flag as inappropriate

Select your reason for flagging this presentation as inappropriate.

Cancel
No notes for slide

Transcript

  • 1. Stephanie Herfel Librarian Newburgh Campus Library
  • 2. Be an investigator!
  • 3. Purpose  Why was the website created?  .edu and .gov sites are reliable  .com generally exist to sell you something  .org sites are okay as long as the purpose is not to convince that an opinion is fact  Who is the intended audience?  Is there a lot of advertising on the page = Be critical!
  • 4. Authority       Is the author’s name easy to find? Is the author an expert on the topic? Is an About Us page included? Does the website have a contact page? .gov, .edu, or .org site? Are sources cited?
  • 5. ABOUT US http://www.cancer.org/
  • 6. Let’s Look at an Example… http://www.heart.org/HEARTORG/
  • 7. Objectivity  Why was the webpage created?  Fact or an opinion?  Look out for bias  Bias = an opinion formed without evidence, facts, or knowledge.
  • 8. Currency (When?)  When was the webpage written?  When was the page last updated?  Medical and technology- dates are important  Literature and history topics- dates are less important
  • 9. Coverage  Is there enough information for your purpose?  Is the information provided appropriate for college research?  Can the same information be found from a more credible source? (book, encyclopedia, or journal article)
  • 10. Design  How is the information arranged?  Is it well organized?  Is the webpage free of spelling/grammar errors?
  • 11. A reliable website has:  Purpose. If your page was created to educate or help others and…  Authority. If your page lists the author credentials and its domain is preferred (.edu, .gov, .org, or .net) and…  Objectivity. If your page provides accurate information with limited advertising and it is objective in presenting the information, and . . .  Currency. If your page is current and updated regularly (as stated on the page) and the links (if any) are also up-to-date, and . . .  Coverage. If your page has enough information to suit your purpose, and …  Design If the information is well organized and free of errors then . . . IT HAS CREDIBILITY = A RELIABLE SOURCE OF INFORMATION!
  • 12. Searching Tip To search within a specific top-level website domain like .org, .edu, .gov, type your topic/search term and then add “site:.gov” or “site:.edu” after your topic. Examples: global warming site:.gov dietary supplements site:.edu
  • 13. Work Cited Kapoun, Jim. "Teaching undergrads WEB evaluation: A guide for library instruction." C&RL News (July/August 1998): 522-523.