Pathable: Leveraging Social Software for Improved Social Networking and Community Development at Events

Loading...

Flash Player 9 (or above) is needed to view presentations.
We have detected that you do not have it on your computer. To install it, go here.

1 comments

Comments 1 - 1 of 1 previous next Post a comment

  • + gumption gumption 3 months ago
    Hey, you forgot to tag this with 'cct2009' :-)
Post a comment
Embed Video
Edit your comment Cancel

2 Favorites

Pathable: Leveraging Social Software for Improved Social Networking and Community Development at Events - Presentation Transcript

  1. Leveraging Social Software for Social Networking and Community Development at Events
    Shelly D. Farnham, Ph.D.
    Founder, Research Consultant
    Waggle Labs / Pathable
    Communities and Technologies, 2009
    Partners and coauthors: Peter T. Brown, Jordan Schwartz
  2. Core Problem
    People go to events to meet others
    Professional events are increasingly technology enabled
    How to best leverage advances in social software to improve face-to-face networking at professional events
  3. Agenda
    Background
    Pathable
    Questionnaire field study
    Lessons learned over 17 deployments at events
  4. Why Professional Networking Matters
    “networking is an important career management strategy in the era of the boundaryless careers [6, p. 283].”
    Forret and Dougherty (2001)
    • Increases access to valuable information, resources and opportunities – in other words increases social capital
    • Correlated with finding jobs, promotions, salary
  5. Professional Networking Online
    Access to people over time, over distance, all at once
    Increased access to diverse and weak social ties
    62% of employed Americans “networked” workers
    73% of managers/professional use Internet or email constantly or several times a day
    35% of “networked” workers use online networks
    Pew Internet and American Life
    150 million in online networks, 15 million on LinkedIn
  6. Social Networking at Events
    World wide over 1.2 million professional events each year, adding up to a hundred billion dollar industry
    Why?
    Learning
    Meeting people!
    Forming connections with clients and colleagues
    Face-to-face for developing trust
    face-to-face for informal idea and knowledge sharing via conversation
  7. Building Community at Events
    In early interviews with conference organizers, they listed building community as a primary goal
    Why do event attendees and event hosts at professional events care about building community?
  8. What is Community
    Cupcake Society
    "I define "community" as networks of interpersonal ties that provide sociability, support, information, a sense of belonging, and social identity.”
    • Barry Wellman (2001)
  9. Why do event attendees care about community?
    Hey, I’m a member of the Cupcake Society too!
    Can I borrow some sugar?
    Take my recipe, too!
    Sure!
    Sure!
    • Community groups enable transitive relationships
    • Powerfully increase social capital through simple act of joining community
    • Communities of practice: group of people interested in content domain, shared practices increase effectiveness of members
  10. Designing Pathable: Leveraging Social Media for Face to Face Professional Social Networking
    Whom do I most want to meet, in the limited time available to me?
    How do I meet them?
    How do we become a “social tie”?
    How do we become a community?
  11. Who is here? Who do I want to meet?
  12. Social Networks
    Social Scientist
    Media Startup
    Research
    SocialTech
    Community
    RealityAllStar
    BlogHer
    Blogger
    startup
    community
    social technology
    blogger
  13. Creating Semantic Layer to Social Space
    Our Approach: minimal profiles, based on tagging
    Add tags or keywords to self
    E.g. “research, social computing, art”
    Optimize design for converging on terms
    Across people, important terms emerge
    Tags used as search and browse pivots
    Tags used as conversation groups
    Clustering, abstraction, and match-making based on co-occurrence
    Tagging provides semantic layer to social space!
  14. Early Exploration at Seattle Mind Camp 3
    75 people provided tags for self, organization, related people, related events
  15. Pathable
    Community and social networking tools for conferences
    Community Dashboard 
    Profiles
    Attendee directory
    Match-making
    Messaging
    Feeds (blog, twitter)
    Wiki
    Schedule
  16. Attendee Directory
  17. Profile
  18. Edit Profile
  19. Host Manager -- Dashboard
  20. Host Manager -- Attendees
  21. Face to Face Integration
    Using existing technologies:
    Mobile
    Badges
    Printable calendar
    Visualization
  22. Personalized Badge
  23. Match-making
    Best matches possible, with minimal effort in profiles
    Based on predictors of successful matches:
    Common interests
    Same roles
    Job title
    Host provided categories
    Co-location
    By geography
    By events
    Existing shared groups and communities
    Weighted sum to produce ordered list
  24. Design Themes
    The event host is a connector and community moderator
    Coauthor profiles
    Communication broker, event defining access
    Social tags are used as pivots of awareness, connection, and communication
    Professional match matching based on tags for improved people finding
    Incorporate communication back channels
    Face to face integration
  25. Related Work
    • Crowdvine, Eventvue
    • Online networks for events, less emphasis on face to face integration, no recommendations
    • IntroNetworks
    • Online network for event, recommendations, extremely heavy weight
    • Ntag,Spotme
    • Mobile devices, expensive, no pre- and post- online network
    • Proactive displays, e.g. Neighborhood Window
    • Expensive equipment, required proximity to screen
    • Pathable:
    • Online directory/community, host as community moderator
    • Online and face to face integration, for pre- during and post- networking
    • Practical, inexpensive, using day-to-day technologies
  26. BarCamp Seattle Questionnaire Study
    Research questions:
    how important is social networking and community development at events
    can Pathable help?
    Procedure:
    BarCamp Seattle is a free, two-day conference held for people in Web 2.0
    280 people registered for the event using Pathable
    78 people total (76% male and 24% female) completed the questionnaire, 18 at the event and 60 afterwards online
  27. Self-report Measurements
    Networking behaviors
    Goal in coming to event
    How many new people met
    Number of friends and colleagues
    Perceived professional social support received from people at event
    Pathable usage
    Psychological sense of community [Wilkinson, 2007] adapted for events
    “A feeling of fellowship runs deep between me and others at BarCamp”
    “I feel loyal to the people at BarCamp”
    “My friendships and associations with others at BarCamp mean a lot”
    Event attachment
    Satisfaction with event
  28. Measurement Cont’d
    Event attachment
    Adapted from Rosenbaum et al. study of a suburban diner
    People who experienced social support and community through diner, developed place attachment – bond between person and place
    Expected similar transfer of affect for events:
    Three factors: dependency, commitment, identification
    Sense of Community
    Place Attachment
    Sense of Community
    Event Attachment
  29. Primary Goal in Coming to Event
  30. Correlations between Event Features and Intention to Return
    Sense of community and event attachment highly correlation r = .81
    Bolded items are statistically significant at p < .05.
  31. Pathable Usage
    Everyone registered through Pathable, about half actively used the system
    60% actively browsed directory
    47% actively browsed messages
    19% actively sent messages
    43% intended to use directory after event
    55% intended to use communication features after event
    If they said they came to event only to learn, less likely to use Pathable(t = 2.6, p < .02)
    The higher the usage, the more they said it helped them meet people (r = .65, p < .001)
    No correlation between usage and count of people met
    Usage correlated with count of professional friends at event (r = .36, p < .01)
    **percentages for those who indicated at least somewhat or quite a bit
  32. Impact on Professional Network
  33. Impact on Attachment and Sense of Community
  34. Impact of Usage by Feature
    Pathablehelped attendees meet others
    the more they browsed the attendee directory
    (r = .37, p < .005)
    the more they browsed attendee messages
    (r = .43, p < .005)
    the more they sent messages
    (r =.54, p < .005)
    the more they used the match-making feature
    (r = .66, p < .005)
  35. Lessons Learned Across Events
    Seventeen deployments over five months
    Evening mixers
    One to three day conferences
    Review of what worked, what did not
  36. Figure 9. Life cycle of Pathable activity before, during and after event
    Life Cycle of a Pathable-enabled Event
    • Gnomedex
    • Can create an active community with minimal effort
    • Two emails
    • Seeded initial profiles
    • Seeded conversations
  37. Adoption Rates
    Higher for conferences vs. mixers
    Higher for smaller events (200-600 vs. 2000)
    Higher if seamless with registration
  38. Pathable Group Messages
  39. Searching Attendee Directory
    Average total number of directory searches per event: 6882
  40. Seeding the Community
    Ensure the community feels full from the start
    Model the desired behavior
    Invite the organizers, speakers, volunteers to complete a profile first
    Author the speaker/high status profiles
    Seed representative tags
    Seed type of conversation hoped for
    Send personal invitations
  41. Leveraging Match-making Features
    Nurturing tags
    Use badges
    Use color coded categories
    Provides overview
    Easy point of conversation
    Examples
    Job types: developer, designer, marketer
    Interests: blogging, podcasting, and mobile
    Person types: creative vs. geek
    Personality: introvert, extrovert
    Integrate with face to face
    Introductions
    Birds of a feather meetings
  42. People Loved Badges
    and blogged about them!
  43. Conclusions
    Networking and community development primary goal
    Professional networking and sense of community strong predictors of event satisfaction, event attachment, and intention to return
    Pathable helped
    Features helped attendees meet others, especially use of match-making feature
    Usage had positive impact on sense of community, event attachment
    It is quality, not quantity, that matters
    counts of people met had little impact on satisfaction
    quality of conversation, usage of matching-making tool, and count of professional connections had an impact
  44. Issues
    Requirements for success of Pathable
    Event organizers must actively adopt role of community organizers
    Important to seed community profiles and conversation
    Important to have seamless integration with registration system
    Event duration must be long enough, and desire to meet others strong enough to motivate people to complete profiles
    Study issues
    Correlation is not causation
    Perhaps people with stronger sense of community more likely to use Pathable
    Did find usage is correlated with desire to meet new people, and users reportedit helped them meet new people
    Generalizability to other types of events
    Features
    Tagging still a new idea for many people
    Profile fatigue
  45. Next Steps
    Personalized scheduling
    Twitter integration
    Matching based on complementary interests
    Custom profile questions
  46. Twitter

+ Shelly FarnhamShelly Farnham, 4 months ago

custom

522 views, 2 favs, 0 embeds more stats

Presentation given at the Communities Technologies more

More info about this document

© All Rights Reserved

Go to text version

  • Total Views 522
    • 522 on SlideShare
    • 0 from embeds
  • Comments 1
  • Favorites 2
  • Downloads 9
Most viewed embeds

more

All embeds

less

Flagged as inappropriate Flag as inappropriate
Flag as inappropriate

Select your reason for flagging this presentation as inappropriate. If needed, use the feedback form to let us know more details.

Cancel
File a copyright complaint
Having problems? Go to our helpdesk?

Categories