Neal Payton on Deferential Urbanism
Upcoming SlideShare
Loading in...5
×
 

Neal Payton on Deferential Urbanism

on

  • 1,099 views

by Neal Payton in Tel-Aviv for the Israeli Mayors Institute, founded by the Movement for Israeli Urbanism - www.miu.org.il ...

by Neal Payton in Tel-Aviv for the Israeli Mayors Institute, founded by the Movement for Israeli Urbanism - www.miu.org.il

Deferential Urbanism: The Charrette Process and its Effect on Place-making and City Design

Statistics

Views

Total Views
1,099
Views on SlideShare
1,071
Embed Views
28

Actions

Likes
1
Downloads
23
Comments
0

3 Embeds 28

http://miu.org.il 22
http://www.slashdocs.com 4
http://www.docshut.com 2

Accessibility

Categories

Upload Details

Uploaded via as Adobe PDF

Usage Rights

© All Rights Reserved

Report content

Flagged as inappropriate Flag as inappropriate
Flag as inappropriate

Select your reason for flagging this presentation as inappropriate.

Cancel
  • Full Name Full Name Comment goes here.
    Are you sure you want to
    Your message goes here
    Processing…
Post Comment
Edit your comment

Neal Payton on Deferential Urbanism Neal Payton on Deferential Urbanism Presentation Transcript

  • Deferential Urbanism
  • Shirlington • Library • 400,000 sf of Retail (Old + New) Arlington, VA • Theater • 250 Rental Apartments • Plaza Fountain • 325 Condos • Harris Teeter • 750,000 sf of Office
  • Shirlington • Library • 400,000 sf of Retail (Old + New) Arlington, VA • Theater • 250 Rental Apartments • Plaza Fountain • 325 Condos • Harris Teeter • 750,000 sf of Office
  • City West Cincinnati, OH
  • College Park Memphis, TN
  • MLK, Jr. Philadelphia, PA Before
  • College Park Memphis, TN
  • Placeholder – MLK MLK
  • Salishan Tacoma, WA
  • The Charrette Process: Consensus Based An effective Charrette: • Seeks citizen input • Is community– specific and builds upon a community’s strengths and opportunities • Defines and characterizes the neighborhood development • Establishes a coordinated plan of action for shorter and longer term physical improvements
  • Interactive design process - Charrettes Definition: An intensive design process on site - open to all for real time critiques usually lasting 3-6 days Pros: Cons: Immediate feedback Requires big upfront effort Gets all stakeholders talking to Small projects may not be each other appropriate candidates. Invests stakeholders in design Somewhat open ended Sometimes improves the design May not get enough participation Great PR and marketing Sometimes insults the design - may attract initial buyers Short term design costs are higher Identifies supporters May fatigue the community Efficient and quick Stakeholders wary
  • Pattern of Streets. Can you find the Public Housing Site?.
  • Pattern of Streets - transformed
  • Pattern of Civic Spaces
  • The Charrette Process: Consensus Based Monday Tuesday Wednesday Thursday Open House (open) Stakeholder Stakeholder AM Work Session Presentation Meetings Meetings (open) Who We Are Work Session Work Session PM Work Session •Great Neighborhoods Public Mid-Point (closed) •Site Analysis Presentation Presentation • Community Input •Feedback/Commu •Feedback/Commun
  • Open Process: Community Dialogue begins early Acknowledgement of community’s loss All relevant stakeholders identified Community’s hot buttons identified Interactive design process Accept feedback Supporters aid in approvals
  • Main Goals of Master Plan • Create a “Sense of Place” • Form a new “Town Center” • Build series of “Village Squares” • Expand street network throughout area • Reduce retail / Increase residential
  • Interactive design process - Charrettes Tips: 1. Begin with visual discussion and examples of the concepts. 2. Allow for both formal and informal critiques. 3. Include public and elected officials where possible. 4. Let everyone know that all will be heard, but not all ideas are doable. 5. Conclude with big presentation, and wonderful drawings as well as timetable for action. 6. After charrette, act fast while feelings are good and before opposition can mobilize. 7. Enlist support of attendees.
  • 1. Begin with visual discussion and examples of the concepts. Pedestrian Zone • Make Great Sidewalks
  • Coast Highway and Washington looking South
  • Coast Highway and Washington looking South
  • Coast Highway and Washington looking South
  • Coast Highway and Washington looking South
  • 2. Allow for both formal and informal critiques.
  • Macarthur Park, Los Angeles, California
  • 5 5 4 7 10 8 6 5 5 5 10 9 4 2 1 3 1. METRO PLAZA 6. PLAY YARD 2. METRO ENTRANCE 7. ENTRY COURTYARD 3. MACARTHUR PARK 8. MONUMENTAL 4. PASEO STAIR 5. COURTYARD 9. GRAPHIC BOARD 10. TERRACE Macarthur Park, Los Angeles, California
  • Macarthur Park, Los Angeles, California
  • Macarthur Park, Los Angeles, California
  • THE ELLINGTON
  • Ground Floor Georgia ave./petworth
  • 3. Include public and elected officials where possible.
  • 4. Let everyone know that all will be heard, but not all ideas are doable.
  • Road Diet Phase 1: Apply road diet to W. San Antonio Area has “good bones” Proximate to Town Square Consistent street front and historic building fabric Proximate to large parking lots Concentration of Entertainment/Cultural Destinations
  • Road Diet Phase 1: Apply road diet to W. San Antonio. Narrow road from 4 to 2 lanes with center left-hand turning lane Increased reverse angled parking Added street trees Curb extensions shorten pedestrian crossing distances Traffic calming pavement designs at intersections
  • The Coast Highway Master Plan Process: Vision for the Coast Highway Overarching concept includes: Transportation Land use Design Phasing Market Assessments
  • Strategy • Infill Development – Pedestrian Friendly • Catalytic Sites - Destinations • Traffic calming – Road Diet • Roundabouts • Re-integrate the street grid • Rationalize Parking • Building Type Selection • Mix of building heights
  • The Coast Highway Master Plan Process: Vision for the Coast Highway Master Plans for Districts North Coast (July charrette) Mid Coast / South Coast (August Charrette)
  • The Coast Highway Master Plan Process: Vision for the Coast Highway Master Plans for Districts North Coast (July charrette) Mid Coast / South Coast (August Charrette)
  • North Coast Highway Plan Rubrics 1) Signature Gateways 2) Neighborhoods/ Destinations 3) Linkages 4) Views Downtown Cinema
  • North County Vision Plan
  • Arts Bridge Existing Proposed
  • The Nodes Arts District Gateway South O. Village Mid-Coast Center Sprinter Station Oceanside Blvd. Wisconsin. Vista Way Cassidy Transit Center Loma Alta Creek Arts & Technology District
  • The Nodes The Avenue • Urbane – Village or Town Like • Center Median • Wide Sidewalks • Green Edges • Buildings to Back of Sidewalk • Wide Front Yards • No Auto-Oriented Uses • Auto-Oriented Uses Okay • No Industrial Uses • No Industrial Uses • Mixed-Use • Multi-Family Residential Okay
  • The Nodes Arts District Gateway South O. Village Mid-Coast Center Sprinter Station Oceanside Blvd. Wisconsin. Vista Way Cassidy Transit Center Loma Alta Creek Arts & Technology District
  • The Nodes The Avenue • Urbane – Village or Town Like • Center Median • Wide Sidewalks • Green Edges • Buildings to Back of Sidewalk • Wide Front Yards • No Auto-Oriented Uses • Auto-Oriented Uses Okay • No Industrial Uses • No Industrial Uses • Mixed-Use • Multi-Family Residential Okay
  • Transit Center Mid-Coast Center Arts District Gateway Arts & Technology District Sprinter Station Loma Alta Creek South O. Village
  • Infill Buildings Transit Station New Surface Parking Renovated Building Park-Once Garage
  • Coast Highway at Washington looking West
  • Coast Highway at Washington looking West
  • Arts & Technology District Ditmar School Oceanside Blvd. Sprinter Station Loma Alta Creek
  • Sprinter Station Vision Plan Retail Residential Live/Work Sprinter Station Hotel/Retail Neighborhood Green Hotel/Retail Retail Enhanced SWM / Loma Alta Pedestrian Trails
  • Cassidy Buena Vista Lagoon South O. Village Vista Way
  • South O Village Vision Plan
  • Coast Highway and Cassidy looking South
  • Coast Highway and Cassidy looking South
  • Coast Highway and Cassidy looking South
  • Coast Highway and Cassidy looking South
  • Coast Highway and Cassidy looking South
  • South O. Village Buena Vista Lagoon Cassidy Vista Way
  • Uniform Development
  • Development at Midblock
  • Development at Corners
  • Average Height Requirement
  • 50’
  • Ch 2, pg 19
  • Mays Street –Looking North Existing
  • Figure ground
  • CIRCULATION
  • Main Street
  • Downtown Streets Main Street and Mays Street N S E W
  • The Plan First Ideas
  • The Plan Concepts Roundabout Roundabout Roundabout Park Park Park Redevelopment Area Mays Street Round Park Rock Ave Town Museu Green m TOD Main Street Site Extension City Hall Green
  • The Plan Roundabout Roundabout Park Park Park Redevelopment Area Park Town Museum Green TOD Site City Hall Green
  • The Plan Park Pedestrian Bridge Roundabout Social Roundabout Services Park Center Town Woodbine Green Museumc Train Station City Hall Green Commercial Development
  • The Plan West Downtown Entry Retail/Offic e New Retail/ Hotel Office Main Street New Theater Garage/ Retail
  • The Plan Site of Main Street Entry - Existing
  • The Vision Main Street Gateway Ch 2, pg 7
  • Town Square City Hall Square
  • The Plan Site of New Town Green - Existing Conditions
  • The Plan Site of New Town Green – Transformed!
  • Mays Street –Looking North Existing
  • Mays Street –Looking North After Streetscaping and Restriping
  • Mays Street –Looking North After Some Infill Development
  • Mays Street –Looking North After ReDevelopment
  • The Vision New Town Square Ch 2, pg 40
  • The Vision New Town Square Ch 2, pg 25
  • Fort Belvoir
  • Fort Belvoir
  • Fort Belvoir
  • Fort Belvoir
  • 5. Conclude with big presentation, and wonderful drawings as well as timetable for action.
  • PLACEHOLDER