Sheila Webber Cetis 2009

Loading...

Flash Player 9 (or above) is needed to view presentations.
We have detected that you do not have it on your computer. To install it, go here.

0 comments

Post a comment

    Post a comment
    Embed Video
    Edit your comment Cancel

    Favorites, Groups & Events

    Sheila Webber Cetis 2009 - Presentation Transcript

    1. Approaching learning and teaching in Second Life Sheila Webber/ Sheila Yoshikawa Department of Information Studies University of Sheffield, January 2009 Sheila Webber, 2008
    2. “ Sheila will discuss approaches to teaching that seem best suited to the affordances of this rich and complex learning space”
    3. Affordances of SL
      • Communication/community
      • Embodied social presence
      • Building/engineering/design/sculpting
      • Animation and scripting
      • Data visualizations & simulations
      • Sound & spatial relationships
      • Language immersion
      Sheila Webber, 2009
      • Learning communities created by & for users
      • International
      • Low capital expense operations costs
      • Fundraising
      • Recruitment/administration/ management
      • Bringing distance & online learning together in the 3-D virtual world
      Taken from: (Jarmon, 2009)
    4. Teaching approaches that are:
      • Well designed
      • Appropriate for the learners
      • Appropriate for the learning outcomes
      • Scaffolding learning as appropriate
      • Aligning learning, teaching & assessment
      • Using various learning environments, tools and methods as appropriate
      • Facilitating understanding and/or conceptual change in the learner
      • (and so forth and so on ... )
      Sheila Webber, 2009 i.e. good teaching practice
    5. Sheila Webber, May 2007 Approaches to teaching
      • Revealed through "conceptions of pedagogy" research, for example as reviewed by Samuelowitz and Bain (2001)
        • Knowledge conveying categories (e.g. transferring knowledge, explaining curriculum)
        • Intermediate categories (e.g. focus on student-teacher interaction)
        • Facilitation of learning categories (e.g. facilitating conceptual change & understanding)
      People will go into SL with their approaches....
    6. “ ... She will identify how this demands active approaches to learning from students …” Liverpool University Possible to use for all 3 approaches
    7. Sheila Webber, 2009 University of Texas at Austin – self selected group projects – including fundraising Educators’ coop member Chris2 Gallagher – exploring identity with her students
    8. Sheila Webber, 2008 http://www.sconul.ac.uk One of my builds
    9. “ ... She will identify how this demands active approaches to learning from students …”
    10. Learners’ stages in meaning making
      • Absolute knowing (knowledge is certain)
      • Transitional knowing (doubts about the certainty of knowledge, learning enables understanding of these)
      • Independent knowing (developing your perspective, everyone has their own views)
      • Contextual knowing (understanding nature of context and evidence)
      Sheila Webber, 2009 Based on study of US undergraduates (King and Baxter-Magolda, 2004)
    11. Knowhow island Purple OR orange
    12. Inquiry Based Learning “ IBL is a term used to describe approaches to learning that are based on a process of self-directed inquiry or research . Students conduct small or large-scale inquiries that enable them to engage actively and creatively with the questions and problems of their discipline, often in collaboration with others. IBL approaches include case-study and problem-based learning (PBL) methods as well as research projects of different kinds. It is a key characteristic of IBL that inquiry tasks facilitate exploration and investigation of issues or scenarios that are open-ended enough for different responses and solutions to be possible (Khan and O´Rourke, 2005)” source: CILASS website (Centre for Inquiry Based Learning in the Arts and Social Sciences) http://www.shef.ac.uk/cilass/ibl.html
    13. “… and how it opens up opportunities for collaboration with other educators.” “ She will draw on examples from experience, and use models of Real Life (face to face) teaching ”
    14. Sheila Webber, 2008
    15.  
    16. “ Sheila will also identify some of the practical problems (e.g. access to technology, cultural and time differences) of working in a virtual world.” Sheila Webber, 2009 “ Me: yes, it's been really frustrating how it's been bogged down with technical issues Student 1: yeah thats been the main problem” (inworld chat transcript, 10 April 08)
    17. Sheila Webber, 2009 “ SL has been having a lot of issues over the last 2 days - they had to replace one of the inventory servers and I (like others) had to try getting in several times before succeeding. Also crashed out 5 times running just now” (my e-portfolio, Nov 2007) [2008/10/14 14:36] CC: what time is it where everyone is? [2008/10/14 14:36] ML: 5:36 [2008/10/14 14:36] GW: In the USA it is 230 PM now. [2008/10/14 14:36] CC: it's 4:30 in the afternoon here [2008/10/14 14:36] FF: 5:36 pm [2008/10/14 14:36] ZW: @CC 736 am [2008/10/14 14:36] GW: Sorry, west coast USA 230 [2008/10/14 14:36] You: 22.35 [2008/10/14 14:36] CF: 10:36 pm [2008/10/14 14:36] PP: mine, 4.30 am [2008/10/14 14:37] EB: here it's 11:36 pm (Part of discussion at SL Researchers’ Group, trying to agree a time for the next meeting)
    18. Sheila Webber, 2009
      • Sheila Webber
      • s.webber@shef.ac.uk
      • http://information-literacy.blogspot.com/
      http://adventuresofyoshikawa.blogspot.com/ Sheila Yoshikawa Powerpoint at: http://www.slideshare.net/sheilawebber/
    19. References
      • Centre for Inquiry Based Learning in the Arts and Social Sciences. (2008) Inquiry-based Learning: a conceptual framework . Sheffield: CILASS. http://www.shef.ac.uk/cilass/resources
      • Jarmon, L. (2009) “Pedagogy and Learning in the Virtual World of Second Life®” In Rogers, P et al (Eds) Encyclopedia of distance and online learning. 2 nd ed. (vol 3) IGI. (in press)
      • Khan, P. and O´Rourke, K. (2005). “Understanding Enquiry-based Learning”, In: Barrett, T., Mac Labhrainn, I., Fallon, H. (eds), Handbook of Enquiry and Problem Based Learning . Galway: CELT.
      • King, P. and Baxter-Magolda, M. (2004) Learning partnerships: theory and models of practice to educate for self-authorship . Stylus.
      • Samuelowicz, K. and Bain, J.D. (2001) Revisiting academics’ beliefs about teaching and learning. Higher education , 41 , 299-325.
    20. Other material
      • Flickr set on Infolit iSchool: http://www.flickr.com/photos/23396182@N00/collections/72157604063164433/
      • Infolit iSchool (our SL island) wiki: http://infolitischool.pbwiki.com/
      • Video of presentation on: Inquiry and Information Behaviour in Second Life (my activity with 1 st year UGs) http://stadium.open.ac.uk/stadia/preview.php?whichevent=1248

    + sheilamacsheilamac, 10 months ago

    custom

    462 views, 0 favs, 0 embeds more stats

    Sheila Webber's presentation from Eduserve/CETIS me more

    More info about this document

    © All Rights Reserved

    Go to text version

    • Total Views 462
      • 462 on SlideShare
      • 0 from embeds
    • Comments 0
    • Favorites 0
    • Downloads 3
    Most viewed embeds

    more

    All embeds

    less

    Flagged as inappropriate Flag as inappropriate
    Flag as inappropriate

    Select your reason for flagging this presentation as inappropriate. If needed, use the feedback form to let us know more details.

    Cancel
    File a copyright complaint
    Having problems? Go to our helpdesk?

    Categories

    Tags