Your SlideShare is downloading. ×
0
Ec And Ass Sig Feb 2008 Adam
Ec And Ass Sig Feb 2008 Adam
Ec And Ass Sig Feb 2008 Adam
Ec And Ass Sig Feb 2008 Adam
Ec And Ass Sig Feb 2008 Adam
Ec And Ass Sig Feb 2008 Adam
Ec And Ass Sig Feb 2008 Adam
Ec And Ass Sig Feb 2008 Adam
Ec And Ass Sig Feb 2008 Adam
Ec And Ass Sig Feb 2008 Adam
Ec And Ass Sig Feb 2008 Adam
Ec And Ass Sig Feb 2008 Adam
Ec And Ass Sig Feb 2008 Adam
Ec And Ass Sig Feb 2008 Adam
Ec And Ass Sig Feb 2008 Adam
Ec And Ass Sig Feb 2008 Adam
Ec And Ass Sig Feb 2008 Adam
Ec And Ass Sig Feb 2008 Adam
Ec And Ass Sig Feb 2008 Adam
Ec And Ass Sig Feb 2008 Adam
Ec And Ass Sig Feb 2008 Adam
Ec And Ass Sig Feb 2008 Adam
Ec And Ass Sig Feb 2008 Adam
Upcoming SlideShare
Loading in...5
×

Thanks for flagging this SlideShare!

Oops! An error has occurred.

×
Saving this for later? Get the SlideShare app to save on your phone or tablet. Read anywhere, anytime – even offline.
Text the download link to your phone
Standard text messaging rates apply

Ec And Ass Sig Feb 2008 Adam

829

Published on

Presentation by Adam Cooper @ SIG meeting 19.02.08

Presentation by Adam Cooper @ SIG meeting 19.02.08

Published in: Technology
0 Comments
0 Likes
Statistics
Notes
  • Be the first to comment

  • Be the first to like this

No Downloads
Views
Total Views
829
On Slideshare
0
From Embeds
0
Number of Embeds
1
Actions
Shares
0
Downloads
2
Comments
0
Likes
0
Embeds 0
No embeds

Report content
Flagged as inappropriate Flag as inappropriate
Flag as inappropriate

Select your reason for flagging this presentation as inappropriate.

Cancel
No notes for slide

Transcript

  • 1. A Postcard from IMS Adam Cooper, 19 Feb 2008 $1.50
  • 2. <ul><li>Dear Mum, </li></ul><ul><ul><li>Weather here fine. </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Meetings interesting but I’m not sure I understand what everyone is on about; most of the words are familiar but don’t seem to make any sense. For example, I heard someone talk about punting there didn’t seem anywhere suitable. </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Hope you are keeping well, your loving son, </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Adam </li></ul></ul>
  • 3. Please interrupt with questions…
  • 4. Background – Recent Developments in IMS <ul><li>Learning Technology Advisory Council, LTAC </li></ul><ul><ul><li>… and Technology Enhanced Flexible Learning </li></ul></ul><ul><li>Process </li></ul>Implementations PUFSIG Charter Base Document CM/DN Draft Public Draft Final
  • 5. Consequences of the Process <ul><li>We need people (JISC projects) to be involved earlier </li></ul>
  • 6. Enterprise Web Services v2 – Outcomes <ul><li>Charter available on IMS website </li></ul><ul><li>Guiding Principles </li></ul><ul><ul><li>more SOA </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Specificity by application profile </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>But still rooted in MIS-VLE integration </li></ul></ul><ul><li>Currently a Base Document (final) </li></ul><ul><li>Interop demos in May: Informs, Desire2Learn, Oracle, Blackboard (?) </li></ul>
  • 7. Outcomes Service Interface <ul><li>Very CRUD-y </li></ul><ul><li>+ a selection of ReadIdsByCriterion() </li></ul><ul><li>+ possibly Discover(CQL) </li></ul><ul><li>Requirement is “final” grades from LMS to MIS </li></ul>
  • 8. What is Needed? <ul><li>Validation </li></ul><ul><li>Exploration in context </li></ul><ul><li>More business-process view of methods </li></ul><ul><li>REST formulation </li></ul>
  • 9. Learning Tools Interoperability v2 <ul><li>Loosely based on Tools Interoperability Guidelines v1 (available from IMS site, as is LTI v2 charter) </li></ul><ul><li>Recent resurgence of activity </li></ul><ul><li>A lightweight tool launch protocol, paupers’ integration </li></ul><ul><li>On-demand provisioning </li></ul><ul><li>Change of style </li></ul><ul><ul><li>Away from WS* </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Inspired by Web2.0 </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Pull </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>More soa-ish, open </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Shibboleth compatibility </li></ul></ul>
  • 10. LTI Interactions (stylised) User VLE Tool Serve page Invoke tool Handover (trust) Tool acquires data User interacts with tool (no VLE interaction) Return “outcomes” Maybe not vle
  • 11. What could LTI do? <ul><li>Return data </li></ul><ul><ul><li>Score </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Outcomes (Enterprise WS v2) </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>CMI </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>QTI Results </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>XHTML </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>CP </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>… . </li></ul></ul><ul><li>What Tools – use your imagination! </li></ul>
  • 12. What is needed? <ul><li>Validation </li></ul><ul><li>Concerted simplification </li></ul><ul><li>Pushing the concept </li></ul>
  • 13. Common Cartridge <ul><li>Charter and presentations on the IMS website (and elsewhere) </li></ul><ul><li>It’s a CM/DN Draft </li></ul><ul><li>Scope of CC </li></ul><ul><ul><li>Basic CP </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>DC metadata bound to LOM </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>QTI (for 6 question types) </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Authorisation Service </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Forum placeholders </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Weblinks (!) </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>NOT Tools Interoperability </li></ul></ul><ul><li>The Common Cartridge Alliance </li></ul><ul><li>Testing Engine Development </li></ul>
  • 14. The Authorisation Service <ul><li>Import or use level assertions </li></ul><ul><ul><li>On package (cartridge) or resource </li></ul></ul><ul><li>Honour! </li></ul><ul><li>Simple </li></ul><ul><ul><li>Send VLE URL, CC id, a PIN/key to publisher </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Get back a yay or nay </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>VLE caches per user </li></ul></ul>
  • 15. Test Engine <ul><li>Sponsored by JISC and 8 others </li></ul><ul><li>Outline </li></ul><ul><ul><li>Open source, copyrighted to the IMS Global Learning Consortium. </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Testing tool and future enhancements will be made available free-of-charge to the sponsors and the members of the CC Alliance. </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Testing tool will be made available to the public for self-administered use </li></ul></ul><ul><li>Phases </li></ul><ul><ul><li>Configured specifically for testing cartridges against the CCv1.0 as defined using the IMS SchemaProf tool. </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Testing tool can be automatically configured by importing a given set of SchemaProf files. Potentially applicable to other related Content Packaging based profiles. </li></ul></ul>
  • 16. Common Cartridge Schools (aka CCK12) <ul><li>See the IMS website but… </li></ul><ul><li>Child manifests, multiple orgs, multi-lingual </li></ul><ul><li>Question types and formatting </li></ul><ul><li>“ Learning Standards” </li></ul><ul><li>Lesson plans </li></ul><ul><li>SIF Results </li></ul><ul><li>Metadata and Vocabularies </li></ul>
  • 17. What is Needed? <ul><li>Hard-nosed spec validation </li></ul><ul><li>A transcoder? </li></ul>
  • 18. Digital Interactive Content Exchange <ul><li>Difficult to tell where this one is going… </li></ul>
  • 19. Odds and Sods <ul><li>QTI 2.1 </li></ul><ul><ul><li>CCK12 demanding the formatting capabilities </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Enthusiasm for application profiling </li></ul></ul><ul><li>LD </li></ul><ul><li>Discussion on lightweight specs </li></ul>
  • 20. I-BAT <ul><li>Developed by Colin Smythe, IMS </li></ul><ul><li>Shortly to be available for members </li></ul><ul><li>Used with poseidon (UML) and oxygen (XSLT+….) </li></ul>I-BAT Platform Independent Model Platform Specific Model XSD WSDL
  • 21.  
  • 22.  
  • 23. Thankyou for listening… <ul><li>[email_address] </li></ul>

×