Cb Cetis June 2007 Final

Loading...

Flash Player 9 (or above) is needed to view presentations.
We have detected that you do not have it on your computer. To install it, go here.

0 comments

Post a comment

    Post a comment
    Embed Video
    Edit your comment Cancel

    Notes on slide 1

    Introductions: Present today are Caroline Breslin (presenting) and David Nicol from Learning Services and CAPLE (Centre for Academic Practice and Learning Enhancement) at the University of Strathclyde. Other Co-authors are Hilary Grierson from CAPLE/DMEM and Andrew Wodehouse from DMEM (Design, Manufacture and Engineering Management)

    Favorites, Groups & Events

    Cb Cetis June 2007 Final - Presentation Transcript

    1. Caroline Breslin Project Manager Learning Services University of Strathclyde Andrew Wodehouse Design Lecturer DMEM University of Strathclyde
    2. Digital Libraries in the Classroom “ digital libraries for global distributed innovative design education and teamwork”
    3. DIDET Project Vision
      • To e nhance student learning opportunities by enabling them to participate in global team-based design engineering projects that give them experience of working within multi-cultural contexts. Make this possible through a range of information and communication technologies .
    4.  
    5. Less Formal and Dynamic Storing and sharing content Group Collaboration/ Team communication Cross team activities Workfow management (process) Manipulation of information Capturing tacit information Knowledge structuring LauLima System Architecture LauLima Digital Library (LDL) longer term: reuse by staff and students Retrieval of resources Reuse of student-generated resources, design concepts and sharing processes Quality assurance Metadata and standards Granularity Browse/ search Formal and More Permanent LauLima Learning Environment (LLE) a workspace environment: point of need
    6. How LauLima is used Store Share Reuse Capture
    7. Class contexts
      • LauLima has been used in several teaching and learning contexts:
        • Team industrial projects (4 th & 5 th years)
        • Concept design modelling projects (3 rd year)
        • Global Design class (5 th year class)
    8. The design environment
      • Teams work in a sociable studio environment – challenge is for virtual space to provide a similar ‘feel’
    9. Recording design information
      • Working with LauLima for the duration of a project allows teams to build an information-rich ‘roadmap’ of their design process
      Team Site Team File Gallery
    10. Linking information
      • Linked wiki pages forced students to consider the structure of their project resource.
    11. Creating class structure
      • All class materials, announcements and deliverables through the LauLima system
      end Phase 1 Research Phase 2 Concept Development start Phase 3 Final Design Generation of Requirements Modelling and Evaluation Final Design Review
    12. Templates as shareable learning objects
      • Templates minimise work in transferring information, capturing rationale and linking resources to concepts.
    13. Communication
      • The system can be used to handle both formal and informal communication in a contained domain
      Shoutbox Messaging system ‘ Message wall’
    14. Team co-ordination
      • In the Global Design class, time differences meant that team organisation was crucial. Wiki pages provided a common forum to update team information.
      Team diary
    15. Recording team progress
      • Both formal (meeting miutes) and informal (project logs) project information can be stored in an integrated team site… particularly important for team industrial projects
      Meeting minutes page Project log page
    16. Multi-disciplinary teaching team
      • LauLima provides a forum for a multi-disciplinary teaching team to interact and give feedback
      student experience Learning technologist provided on-going information literacy support Lecturer gave tailored mini-topics highlighting key issues and tasks Coaches provided on-going process and technical support Librarian gave tailored session on information searching and sources Multi-disciplinary team Global Design coach feedback
    17. Assessment
      • LauLima site means no team report required, allows assessment of design and process management
      Design Critique & Demonstration LauLima Site
    18. Harvesting material
      • Staff harvest the best material when marking student sites – then stored in LDL for both to use.
    19. Resolving issues
      • Varying levels of ability - and enthusiasm!
      • Assessment of content Vs assessment of style
      • Ownership and control of technology
      • Ease of use/learning curve/resistance
    20. Resolving issues
      • Resolved by…
      • Adequate training and support – at all sites; focus on best practice
      • Online team monitoring and support; use of system logs
      • Monitoring and evaluation for assessment and for actively feeding into development
    21. Resolving issues
      • … and using LauLima in conjunction with other tools and technologies
    22. Resolving issues
      • Creative Vs Legal Balance
      Vs ©
    23. Legal issues
      • Copyright and IPR
      • Copyright exemptions (For LLE but not LDL)
      • Referencing (best practice)
      • Student Copyright forms
      • Data Protection – making student/staff LDL material anonymous
      • UK-USA legal and cultural differences
    24. Resolving issues
      • Resolved by…
      • Complementary teaching and learning; Information Literacy
      • Note benefits (and challenges) of cross-discipline team
      Centre for Academic Practice and Learning Enhancement Design Manufacture and Engineering Management Centre for Digital Library Research Learning Services
    25. Resolving Issues
      • Collaboration and Development Issues…
      • … not just for students but for staff !
    26. Resolving issues
      • Resolved by…
      Monitor Evaluate Feedback Develop Project EVOLUTION
    27. System trade offs
      • Balance of research and development - rapidly changing requirements - changing technological solutions - benefits and issues of open source - “next BIG thing” issue
    28. System trade offs
      • Metadata Quality Vs Speed and Usability
      Description: dsjkgdkgds
    29. System trade offs
      • Functionality Vs usability
      • Danger of functionality overload
      "Most people only use 20 percent of Microsoft Word's functionality, why buy a 100 percent solution for something you only need 20 percent of?" John Cobb, president of Automotive and Motorcycle, Emap Digital USA
    30. Still working on…
      • Workflow; changing student roles?
      • Approval; changing staff roles and/or system as project becomes embedded in department
      • Archiving; granularity of resources
    31. Achieving Aims
      • Allows true global working
      • 24/7 remote access for staff and students
    32. Q&A Further information
      • www.didet.ac.uk
      • [email_address]
      • [email_address]
      Q&A

    + sheilamacsheilamac, 3 years ago

    custom

    582 views, 0 favs, 0 embeds more stats

    Presentation by Caroline Breslin/Andrew Wodehouse, more

    More info about this document

    CC Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike LicenseCC Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike LicenseCC Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike License

    Go to text version

    • Total Views 582
      • 582 on SlideShare
      • 0 from embeds
    • Comments 0
    • Favorites 0
    • Downloads 23
    Most viewed embeds

    more

    All embeds

    less

    Flagged as inappropriate Flag as inappropriate
    Flag as inappropriate

    Select your reason for flagging this presentation as inappropriate. If needed, use the feedback form to let us know more details.

    Cancel
    File a copyright complaint
    Having problems? Go to our helpdesk?

    Categories