Becta Research Conference Sept. 2007 - Presentation Transcript
Learning technologies: what works, what next
Mike Sharples
Learning Sciences Research Institute
University of Nottingham
[email_address]
What works 40 years of learning technology
Presentation tools
Online learning resources
Blended learning
Skills training
Simulations
Formative assessment
Classroom response systems
Engagement
Instructional/learning design
Classroom management
Software's Benefits On Tests In Doubt
Study Says Tools Don't Raise Scores
Educational software, a $2 billion-a-year industry that has become the darling of school systems across the country, has no significant impact on student performance, according to a study by the U.S. Department of Education
Washington Post, April 5, 2007
“ Effectiveness Of Reading And Mathematics Software Products: Findings From The First Student Cohort”
Mathematica Policy Research, Inc. and SRI International evaluated 16 reading and math products used by 9,424 students in 132 schools
Compared students who received the technology with those who did not, as measured by their scores on standardized tests
No significant difference for reading or math
1 year study: average intervention was 17 hours
Drill and practice packages with little to no immediate student feedback nor student assessment (with exception to the Cognitive Tutor - one of the five packages in the study)
Didn’t publish the results from individual products.
Teacher training was given by the developers in how to use the software, but not how to use the software effectively for pedagogy or content learning.
Is e-learning effective?
“ In considering the results of evaluative research in computer-assisted learning software, one has to avoid confounding the medium with the method. Generally, computer-assisted learning is under pinned by an older, neo-behaviourist theory of learning, one that has been displaced in the classroom by more social constructivist views of learning.”
A review of the Literature on Computer-Assisted Learning, particularly Integrated Learning Systems, and Outcomes with respect to Literacy and Numeracy , Parr, 2003
Innovation needs to be led by effective methods of teaching and learning, not by new technologies
Co-evolution of learning and technology
Methods for successful learning
Formative assessment (Wiliam)
Small group collaboration and peer learning (Johnson & Johnson; Dillenbourg)
Mobile Computer Supported Collaborative Learning: EduNova
MCSCL developed by Pontificia Universidad Cat ólica de Chile
Wireless handheld computers
Tested in schools, teacher training, university students
Significant differences in learning outcomes
Trials in other countries including UK (Wolverhampton)
S 2 S 1 S 3 S 2 S 1 S 3 S 2 S 1 S 3
Computer-supported collaboration
Mobile computer-supported collaboration
Face-to-face collaboration
4 . The teacher can monitor and discuss the individual and group learning activity.
¿ Qué son los ácidos nucleicos? Cadenas de ADN y ARN formadas por 4 nucleótidos Cadenas de aminoácidos unidos en distintas secuencias No sé Cadena de monosacáridos unidos por enlaces glucosídicos ¿ Qué son los ácidos nucleicos? Cadenas de ADN y ARN formadas por 4 nucleótidos Cadenas de aminoácidos unidos en distintas secuencias No sé Cadena de monosacáridos unidos por enlaces glucosídicos ¿ Qué son los ácidos nucleicos? Cadenas de ADN y ARN formadas por 4 nucleótidos Cadenas de aminoácidos unidos en distintas secuencias No sé Cadena de monosacáridos unidos por enlaces glucosídicos ¡¡Pónganse de acuerdo!! OK ¡¡Pónganse de acuerdo!! OK ¡¡Pónganse de acuerdo!! OK
¿ Qué son los ácidos nucleicos? Cadenas de ADN y ARN formadas por 4 nucleótidos Cadenas de aminoácidos unidos en distintas secuencias No sé Cadena de monosacáridos unidos por enlaces glucosídicos ¿ Qué son los ácidos nucleicos? Cadenas de ADN y ARN formadas por 4 nucleótidos Cadenas de aminoácidos unidos en distintas secuencias No sé Cadena de monosacáridos unidos por enlaces glucosídicos ¿ Qué son los ácidos nucleicos? Cadenas de ADN y ARN formadas por 4 nucleótidos Cadenas de aminoácidos unidos en distintas secuencias No sé Cadena de monosacáridos unidos por enlaces glucosídicos ¡¡CORRECTA!! OK ¡¡CORRECTA!! OK ¡¡CORRECTA!! OK
3 C’s of Effective Learning
Construction
Successful learning is constructive process (Brown & Campione, 1996) that involves seeking solutions to problems and relating new experiences to existing knowledge
Conversation
Central to learning is conversation, with teachers, with other learners, with ourselves as we question our concepts, and with the world as we carry out experiments and explorations and interpret the results (Pask, 1976)
Control
Learning is most successful when we are in control, carrying out an active and continuing cycle of experimentation and reflection (Kolb, 1984)
PI: Personal Inquiry
Support for inquiry science learning between formal and informal settings, KS3
School for introducing and framing issues, and planning inquiries
Outside, home and science centres for semi-structured investigations
Construction
Students design the methods of inquiry
Conversation
In classroom, at home, with peers, with experts
Control
‘ Scripted’ inquiry learning (dynamic lesson plans supported by mobile devices)
What next?
1960s Teaching machines
1970s Computer-assisted learning
1980s Microcomputers in education
1990s VLEs and RLOs
2000s Web 2.0
Programmed learning
Intelligent tutoring systems
Logo and constructionism
Networked learning
Web 2.0
Web 2.0
Is not
A new Virtual Learning Environment
Giving lessons on how to blog
Podcasting lectures
Students cheating in exams by sharing answers
Is
A term invented by Tim O’Reilly
The Web as a software platform
Social networked interaction
Innovation by pulling together features from distributed, independent developers (“mashups”)
The power of community
Construction , conversation , and control by web users
Web 2.0 for learning TITLE: Ralph Barthel
Creating, sharing, mixing narrative video
YouTube video content
Mojiti video annotation
Multiple paths – new scenes, new tellings
Social networked construction of multiple-path video
Issues
Tension between learning outside and within formal education
Ownership
who owns the technology, the content, the learning?
Privacy
in an always-connected world
Assessment
of learning beyond the classroom
How to separate home and school?
Home invasion of school
Disruptive devices
Mobile phones, cameras, games consoles
Disruptive activities
Texting, photoing, videoing, web browsing
School invasion of home
Parental access to the school intranet
Assessment of non-school learning
Pervasive monitoring of children’s activity
Mobiles to monitor children
Parents could soon keep a much closer eye on what children are up on their way to and from school thanks to a mobile monitoring system. Guardian Angel is a product which allows parents to map out the exact route a child takes to school. It will send text alerts to their mobile phone if the child deviates too far from that route or takes too long getting there.
BBC News website 23 rd March 2003
Ambient Mobile Assessment
utilises a new mobile services architecture to deliver interactive “smart” messaging automatically to send assessment questions and receive multiple choice responses via email or SMS which can then be auto-responded to with feedback, suggestions for further learning, or reinforcing targeted questions with full reporting capability. www.ambientperformance.com
What next?
Context
Location-aware guides, language learning, science inquiry, environmental simulations
Location-based social networks, sharing impressions and experiences in context
Wide-area educational gaming
Lifelong learning support
Technology-enabled learning spaces
E.g. buildings that teach about energy conservation
0 comments
Post a comment