Design Pattern Automation

@gfraiteur
a fresh view on design patterns, programming languages,
and agile methodologies
Design Pattern Automation
Gaël Fraiteur
PostSharp Technologies
Founder & Principal Engineer

@gfraiteur
Hello!
My name is GAEL.
No, I don’t think
my accent is funny.
my twitter

@gfraiteur
My commitment to you:
to seed a vision, not to sell a tool.

@gfraiteur
The vision:
Code at the right level of abstraction,
with compiler-supported design patterns

@gfraiteur
NotifyPropertyChanged,
the wrong way
LAB 1

@gfraiteur
1. A history of programming
languages and patterns
2. Defining Design Pattern Automation
3. Pattern-Oriented Software Development
4. Tools for Design Pattern Automation
5. Agile Methodologies and Patterns
6. A last example
7. Q&A
8. Summary
Section

@gfraiteur
Univac Assembly Language

@gfraiteur
FORTRAN (1955)
• 1955 - FORTRAN I
• Global Variables
• Arrays
• 1958 - FORTRAN II
• Procedural Programming
(no recursion)
• Modules

@gfraiteur
COBOL (1959)
• Data Structures
• Natural Language

@gfraiteur
LISP (1959)
• Variable Scopes (Stack)
• Garbage Collection

@gfraiteur
Simula (1967)
• Classes as
abstraction mechanism
• Virtual procedures
• Object references
• Coroutines
Begin
Class Glyph;
Virtual: Procedure print Is Procedure print;
Begin
End;
Glyph Class Char (c);
Character c;
Begin
Procedure print;
OutChar(c);
End;
Glyph Class Line (elements);
Ref (Glyph) Array elements;
Begin
Procedure print;
Begin
Integer i;
For i:= 1 Step 1 Until UpperBound (elements, 1) Do
elements (i).print;
OutImage;
End;
End;
Ref (Glyph) rg;
Ref (Glyph) Array rgs (1 : 4);
! Main program;
rgs (1):- New Char ('A');
rgs (2):- New Char ('b');
rgs (3):- New Char ('b');
rgs (4):- New Char ('a');
rg:- New Line (rgs);
rg.print;
End;

@gfraiteurCopyright © by Arild Vågen
Human Language
Cognition
Communication
Social Organization
Machine Language
Execution
Programming Languages

@gfraiteurHolašovice, Czech Republic
How is it possible that any simple farmer could make a
house, a thousand times more beautiful than all the
struggling architects of the last fifty years could do?
Christopher Alexander
in The Timeless Way of Building, 1977
Pattern Thinking (1977)

@gfraiteur
A world of
patterns
LANGUAGE
REGULARITY
RESOLUTION
OF FORCES
SELF-
SUSTAINABILITY
VARIETY UBIQUITY

@gfraiteurLanguage Enables Cognition

@gfraiteur
Copyright ©
Stijn NieuwendijkLanguage Enables Communication

@gfraiteurLanguage for the Trade

@gfraiteur
Patterns as
WISDOM
in canonical form
• Name
• Also Known As
• Problem
• Context
• Forces
• Example
• Solution
• Structure and Dynamics
• Implementation
• Example Resolved
• Known Uses
• Variants
• Consequences
• Relationships
• Name
• Also Known As
• Problem
• Context
• Forces
• Example
• Solution
• Implementation
• Known Uses
• Variants
• Consequences
• Relationships
• Name
• Also Known As
• Problem
• Context
• Forces
• Example
• Solution
• Implementation
• Known Uses
• Variants
• Consequences
• Relationships
• Name
• Also Known As
• Problem
• Context
• Forces
• Example
• Solution
• Description
• Known Uses
• Variants
• Consequences
• Relationships

@gfraiteur
Software Patterns (1995)
• Apply to OO design
• Canonic pattern description
• First catalogue of
23 patterns

@gfraiteur
In 2013, eighteen years later, design patterns still live in
their parent’s house – books.

@gfraiteur
Latent Redundancy
Bad OO code Good OO code Ideal code
Intrinsic variability Latent redundancy Bad redundancy

@gfraiteur
Cost of low abstraction
• Boilerplate code
• More bugs
• Code review
• Changing the pattern implementation

@gfraiteur
1. A history of programming languages and patterns
2. Defining Design Pattern
Automation
6. A last example
7. Q&A
8. Summary
Section

@gfraiteur
Pattern Automation
Automation
is the use of
machines, control systems
and information technologies
to optimize productivity in
the production of goods and
delivery of services.
Wikipedia
Design Pattern Automation
is the use of tools to optimize
productivity in the
implementation of software
based on patterns.

@gfraiteur
Pattern-Aware Compilers allow for coding at the level of
abstraction of design patterns.

@gfraiteur
Design Pattern Automation is new
© hellraiser
MYTH 1

@gfraiteur
Pattern C# Keyword
Dispose using
Lock lock
Publish-Subscribe event
C# implements several patterns
TRUTH 1

@gfraiteur
But C# does not let you
implement your own patterns.

@gfraiteur
code generators were proved wrong
You can’t automate patterns because…
MYTH 2

@gfraiteur
pattern-aware programming languages
and compilers
we don’t need code generators but
TRUTH 2

@gfraiteur
there are too many skills involved
MYTH 3

@gfraiteur
industrial revolution
Skill scarcity motivated the
TRUTH 3

@gfraiteur
Our own industrial revolution:
Making it easier
to build good software

@gfraiteur
3.Pattern-Oriented Software
Development
6. A last example
7. Q&A
8. Summary
Section

@gfraiteur
they are way too complex general abstract
MYTH 4

@gfraiteur
a normal part of any engineering process
Making abstract things concrete is
TRUTH 4
ConcreteAbstract
Automatable
Non-
Automatable

@gfraiteur
Pattern-Oriented
Implementation Process
Architecture
Pattern
• Defines Subsystems
Design Pattern
• Define Components
• General problem
• Language-
independent
Implementation
Pattern
• Defines source
artefacts
• Language-specific
• Framework-specific
• Application-specific
• Implementation
guidelines
Source code
• Executable
High Abstraction Zero Abstraction

@gfraiteur
Example: Observer Pattern
1. Vanilla Design Pattern (GoF)

@gfraiteur
1
2
3 Call OnPropertyChanged whenever a property has changed.
2. Language-Specific Pattern (C#)

@gfraiteur
• Analyze property-field
dependencies
• Modify all non-const
methods
• Whenever a relevant
field has changed
• When invariants are
valid (after all changes
in the object have been
done)
When? How?
3. Application-Specific Pattern (C#)

@gfraiteur
4. Source code

@gfraiteur
NotifyPropertyChanged
with PostSharp
LAB 2

@gfraiteur
4.Tools for Design Pattern
Automation
6. A last example
7. Q&A
8. Summary
Section

@gfraiteur
Transformation
Verification

@gfraiteur
Pattern
Automation
Technologies
Pattern
Automation

@gfraiteur
Example:
Richman’s Singleton
• Static validation rules:
• A single constructor
• Constructor never called
• Code transformation:
• Introduce static field
• Introduce static method GetInstance
• Make constructor private

@gfraiteur
[Nemerle.MacroUsage (Nemerle.MacroPhase.BeforeInheritance,
Nemerle.MacroTargets.Class)]
macro Singleton (t : TypeBuilder)
{
def mems = t.GetParsedMembers();
// find constructor, which we will need to call to create instance
def ctor = mems.Filter(fun (x) {
| <[ decl: ..$_ this (..$_) $_ ]> => true
| _ => false
});
match (ctor)
{
| [ <[ decl: ..$_ this (..$parms) $_ ]> as constructor ] => {
// we must prepare expressions for invoking constructor
def invoke_parms = parms.Map(x => <[ $(x.ParsedName : name) ]>);
// first define the field, where a single instance will be stored
t.Define(<[ decl:
private static mutable instance : $(t.ParsedName : name);
]>);

@gfraiteur
// finally, define getter
t.Define (<[ decl:
public static Instance : $(t.ParsedName : name)
{
get
{
// lazy initialization in generated code
when (instance == null)
instance = $(t.ParsedName : name) (..$invoke_parms);
instance;
}
}
]>);
// make sure constructor is protected
constructor.Attributes |= NemerleAttributes.Protected;
| _ => Message.Error ("Singleton design pattern requires exactly one constru
}
}

@gfraiteur
[Singleton]
class LoadBalancer
{
// Details omitted
}
public class SingletonApp
{
public static Main() : void
{
def b1 = LoadBalancer.Instance;
def b2 = LoadBalancer.Instance;
// Same instance?
when ((b1 : object == b2) && (b2 : object == b3) && (b3 : object == b4))
Console.WriteLine( "Same instance" );
// Do the load balancing
Console.WriteLine( b1.Server );
Console.WriteLine( b2.Server );
}
}

@gfraiteur
Macro-enabled .NET languages
• Nemerle
• Scala
• Boo

@gfraiteur
Poorman’s Pattern Automation:
Static Analysis
Pattern
Automation

@gfraiteur
Example:
Poorman’s Singleton
• Static validation rules:
• Static private readonly field named
‘singleton’, whose type is the current type.
• Static public method GetInstance() whose return
type is the current type, returns field ‘singleton’.
• Class constructors are private.

@gfraiteur
Singleton
with Architecture Unit Tests
LAB 3

@gfraiteur
• Limitations
• Inadequate UI and
error reporting
• Limited reflection
API
• Alternatives
• FxCop
• PostSharp
Architecture
Framework
Architecture Unit Tests

@gfraiteur
5. Agile Methodologies
and Patterns
6. A last example
7. Q&A
8. Summary
Section

@gfraiteur
All design patterns are found in books
MYTH 5

@gfraiteur
spinning into
Emergent
Design

@gfraiteur
Quality
Eroding Design
Quality
Distance from design

@gfraiteur
Quality
Emergent Design
Quality
Knowledge

@gfraiteur
Iterative Design
• Unit Tests
• Load Tests
• Integration Tests
• Project
• Team
• Design
• Abstract
• Design
• Refactor
• Implement
• Time
• User Stories
Planning Development
TestingReview

@gfraiteur
Agile & Continuous Improvement
Design
Refactor
Implement
new stuff
Learn
Knowledge
Patterns
Language
Requirements
Code

@gfraiteur
We’re a part of a whole
Software
Engineering
Discipline
Company /
Personal
Know-How
Project
Engineering
Discipline

@gfraiteurHolašovice, Czech Republic
Patterns emerge naturally from iterative
design processes.
TRUTH 5

@gfraiteur
Example of application-specific pattern:
Business Rule Pattern
• For any class derived from BusinessRule:
• Name ends with “BusinessRule”
• No public constructor
• Has nested class named “Factory”
• Has parameterless public constructor
• Annotated with
[Export(typeof(IBusinessRuleFactory))]

@gfraiteur
6. A last example
7. Q&A
8. Summary
Section

@gfraiteur
Example:
Reader-Writer Synchronized Object
• Code Generation
• Introduce interface IReaderWriterSynchronized
• [ReaderLock], [WriterLock] executes the method with
the right locking level
• Code Verification
• All fields must be private
• Cannot access field without proper lock

@gfraiteur
ReaderWriterSynchronized
with PostSharp
LAB 4

@gfraiteur
Q&A
Gael Fraiteur
gael@postsharp.net
@gfraiteur

@gfraiteurCopyright © by Arild Vågen
Summary
• Compilers must do more to raise abstraction level
• Patterns stem from continuous improvement
BETTER SOFTWARE THROUGH SIMPLER CODE

Design Pattern Automation

Recommended

Recommended

More Related Content

What's hot

What's hot (11)

Viewers also liked

Viewers also liked (7)

Similar to Design Pattern Automation

Similar to Design Pattern Automation (20)

More from PostSharp Technologies

More from PostSharp Technologies (9)

Recently uploaded

Recently uploaded (20)

Design Pattern Automation

Editor's Notes