From Participation to Power

Different set of skills required  r-stage – Pioneers – Decision Maker – Opportunists  K-stage – Bureaucrats – Specialists  Ω-stage – Activists – Visionaries – Dreamer  α-stage – Catalysts – Investors – Incubators (c) 2009 FAS.research 21

Different focus required  R-stage – starting – implementing  K-stage – scaling – downloading  Ω-stage – grieving – dreaming – crystallizing  α-stage – prototyping – debating (c) 2009 FAS.research 22

Participator Impact Analysis (PIA)  Bottom up process facilitated by FAS for better understanding drivers and levers how to overcome water problem  Strengthen by-in and sense of ownership through participation  1.5 days workshop on 6/22-23 in Amman, members from JWA, different Ministries, NGOs, Universities, GTZ etc. (c) 2009 FAS.research 35

Action Domains identified by PIA process  Change crop pattern  Illegal wells and land  Land management pattern  Efficient irrigation  Waste water reuse  Exchange experience among farmers  Diversification of income sources (c) 2009 FAS.research 38

Main policy factors identified by PIA process  Awareness on problems and potential benefits for farmers  Financial incentives (tax system, loans, compensations, prizes)  Farmer's organizations and networks (unions, cooperatives, water use org.)  Role alignment and sectoral integration among governmental institutions  Stakeholder participation (project planning, law enforcement)  Effectiveness of law enforcement  Equity of law enforcement  Availability of improved technologies  Availability of alternatives outside agriculture (alternative income sources)  Availability of alternatives inside agriculture (new product markets)  Diversify income sources  Change the crop pattern (towards crops that need less water)  Use of efficient irrigation (and waste water treatment) technologies (c) 2009 FAS.research 40

Stakeholder that have an Impact on Factors Practices Practices Factor Factor Practices Practices Practices Practices akeholder Factor Factor Stakeholder Factor Factor Stakeholder Stakeholder Stakeholder (c) 2009 FAS.research 41

Average Active Values Stakeholder Participation 4.2 Role Alignment 4.1 Farmer's Organizations and Networks 3 Awareness 2.5 Equity of Law Enforcement 2.2 Financial Incentives 1.9 Availability of improved technologies 1.7 New Product Markets 1.5 Alternatives to Agriculture 0.8 Effectiveness of Law Enforcement 0.8 0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3 3.5 4 4.5 (c) 2009 FAS.research 44

Policy Levers Role Alignment and Sectoral Integration … 5.9 Stakeholder Participation (Project… 1.6 Farmer's Organizations and Networks… 1.1 Equity of Law Enforcement 1.0 Availability of improved technologies 1.0 Active/Passive Awareness on Problems and Potential… 0.9 Financial Incentives (Tax System, Loans,… 0.8 Availability of Alternatives inside… 0.6 Availability of Alternatives outside… 0.5 Effectiveness of Law Enforcement 0.2 0.0 1.0 2.0 3.0 4.0 5.0 6.0 7.0 (c) 2009 FAS.research 45

Role of success factors in the system 6 Policy Indicators 5 Stakeholder Participation Average active values 4 Role Alignment Awareness Financial Incentives 3 Farmer's Organizations and Networks Availability of improved technologies 2 New Product Markets Equity of Law Enforcement Crop Pattern Change Alternatives to Agriculture Income Diversification 1 Use of Efficient Technologies Effectiveness of Law Enforcement Performance Indicators 0 0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3 3.5 4 Average passive values (c) 2009 FAS.research 46

Main Stakeholder idenfied  MWI / WAJ  MOPIC  MoA  Royal Court  Land Owners (not farmers)  Land owners who are also farmers  Sharecroppers  Managers  Farmer's Association  NGOs  Private Sector  Research Centers (c) 2009 FAS.research 47

7 Dialog Domains 1. Change the Crop Pattern 2. Improve the Land Management Pattern 3. Improve Use of Efficient Irrigation 4. Increase Use of Treated Waste Water 5. Improve Exchange of Experience among Farmers 6. Diversify Income Sources or Leave Agriculture 7. Resolve Use of Illegal Wells and Land (c) 2009 FAS.research 49

Questions and challenges for the future  How can we allocate resources and synchronize understanding that we not remain scattered or stay stuck into the α-phase of re-organization without getting things going (dark side of Web 2.0)  How can we create resilient communities being capable to go through those cycles of re-invention without ultimately getting smashed and destroyed (depression, social stigma, isolation, poverty, resignation etc.) (institutionalized ways of new social security)  How can we transform the dangers of individual creative destruction into a collective creative de-construction (Meetup groups helping each other to transform) (c) 2009 FAS.research 51

http://shareable.net	92
http://www.shareable.net	16
http://librarymine.wordpress.com	7
http://mindingyourhead.blogspot.com	3
http://www.slideshare.net	1

From Participation to Power

by Shareable on Nov 20, 2009

Accessibility

Categories

Tags

Upload Details

Usage Rights

5 Embeds 119

Statistics

From Participation to Power — Presentation Transcript