• Share
  • Email
  • Embed
  • Like
  • Save
  • Private Content
W Bs In Govt
 

W Bs In Govt

on

  • 1,429 views

Whistleblowers in Gov\'t Presentation

Whistleblowers in Gov\'t Presentation

Statistics

Views

Total Views
1,429
Views on SlideShare
1,428
Embed Views
1

Actions

Likes
2
Downloads
0
Comments
0

1 Embed 1

http://www.slashdocs.com 1

Accessibility

Categories

Upload Details

Uploaded via as Microsoft PowerPoint

Usage Rights

© All Rights Reserved

Report content

Flagged as inappropriate Flag as inappropriate
Flag as inappropriate

Select your reason for flagging this presentation as inappropriate.

Cancel
  • Full Name Full Name Comment goes here.
    Are you sure you want to
    Your message goes here
    Processing…
Post Comment
Edit your comment
  • Whistleblowers in Government: Administrative Ethics As Seen Through the Constitution, Legislation, and Case Law I picked this topic because my master’s is in public administration and this topic tied this class really well into my master’s.

W Bs In Govt W Bs In Govt Presentation Transcript

  • Whistleblowers in Government: Administrative Ethics As Seen Through the Constitution, Legislation, and Case Law Susan South Jurisprudence December 4, 2008
  • Whistleblower’s Framework
    • Introduction to Whistleblowers in Government
    • Whistleblowing in Government
    • Government Ethics & Whistleblower Legislation
    • Government Ethics & Whistleblower Administration
    • Strengths and Weaknesses
    • Conclusion
    • Recommendations
  • Introduction to Whistleblowers in Government
    • Ethical decision-making
      • Employee chooses to expose illegal, unethical, or fraudulent practices within the organization
    • Range in severity
      • Leaking the information to the police, media, or appropriate authorities
    • Reasoning
      • Personal ethical code
      • Prior experiences and rationale
    • Intention – to explore the act of whistleblowing, the motivation behind it, and its effects on government as seen in theoretical concepts of discretion, whistle blowing legislation, as well as an evaluation of administrative ethics principles
    • Evaluate strengths and weaknesses
    • Make recommendations for future legislation and administrative reforms of managing whistle blowing in government
  • Famous Whistleblowers Joseph C. Wilson Valerie Plame Case Mark Felt Deep Throat Linda Tripp Clinton-Lewinsky Scandal
  • Whistleblowing in Government
    • Whistleblower definition:
    • Someone whose actions are meant to protect others not themselves, looking first towards the framework within the organization to find a means to rectify the situation, and holding the proof any person with reasonable understanding could be convinced (Alford 2001)
  • Motivation Behind Whistleblowing
    • Unethical and illegal behavior occurs at all levels and sectors.
    • Direct conflict with an inner ethical code
    • Forced to choose and reconcile this tension
    • Discretionary act – best appropriate option to resolve this friction
    • Implicit and explicit reasons of discretion
  • Government whistleblowers are not just any whistleblower…
    • Public servants
      • Regard for public good
      • Higher code of principles
      • Driven to serve a cause higher than the self
    • Corruption – “cooperative crime” (deLeon 2005)
    • Whistleblowing – self perseverance vs. “doing the right thing”
    • Motivations – public money, public opinion, and a duty to societal values
  • “ The Making of a Whistleblower and the Importance of Ethical Autonomy: James F. Alderson,” Curtis Ventriss and Shane M. Barney
    • James Alderson – Financial officer at a hospital. Whistleblower
    • Quorum Health Group - 1990
    • Promised large financial gains through the federal government’s cost reporting system
    • The Trick
    • Alderson prepare hospital’s cost report
    • Quorum request two reports
      • 1st report had largest amount possible for reimbursements
      • 2nd report was a back-up with more modest figures
    • Alderson refuses – Fired and found a new job
    • Researched Quorum and its parent company, Columbia Healthcare/HCA Healthcare
    • - Sent letter to U.S. Attorney General Marie O’Connell
    • - O’Connell subpoenaed Quorum cost reports
    • - Alderson/Medicare auditor went over the reports
    • - Alderson was correct
    • Companies instituted systematic fraud scam of the Medicare/Medicaid system
    • Involving more than 200 hospitals and 37 states
    • Continued, despite initial strong opposition from government investigators/representatives
    • Quorum/Columbia – paid $745 million back to the government and $77.5 million to Alderson
  • Government and Ethics
  • Rescuer vs. Whistleblower “Whistleblowers and the Narrative of Ethics” Fred C. Alford
    • Rescuer
    • Risk their lives
    • Form decisions based on attachment to people and their surroundings
    • Forms an alliance with the person they rescue
    • Whistleblower
    • Risk livelihoods
    • Form attachment to an ideal or code of ethics
    • Acts alone
    • Attached to the actions involved, not the people
  • Ethics that will change your reality
    • Kantian Ethics
      • Universal set of moral codes that remains constant
      • “ Common human reason” – humans are innately hard-wired to distinguish between right and wrong (Thorpe 2007)
      • The idea of self is the individual guiding principles present within every one
      • “ Supererogatory acts” – actions or decisions which go beyond duty and do not encompass a set of universal moral principles to guide an individual (Jokic 2002)
    • Rescuer morality – are attached to the person not to a moral code of right and wrong
    • Whistleblower – is attached to an ideal and held to a moral obligation
          • “ Choiceless choice” theory
            • Whistleblower’s perception that they no longer own their choices
            • These choices are already decided by an inner code of ethics and one of the four narratives behind their reasoning
  • Four Narratives - one voice tells the other voice there is no choice (Alford 2001)
    • Imagined consequences – imagination foresees the consequences of the corrupt action
    • Inclination to historical moment - awareness of one’s role as a central point in the course of events
    • Victim identification – victim’s fight becomes his or her own fight
    • Inability to “double” – can no longer co-exist in two realities
  •  
  • Government Guerrillas and Whistleblowers
    • Pros
    • Ability to rationalize their actions
    • Power to expose corruption discretely
    • Capacity to justify themselves as dissenters
    • Cons
    • Government employees possess a great amount of discretion and authority in carrying out the public good – how can we be sure that their actions as whistleblowers fall within an ethical scope?
    • How do we hold government guerrillas accountable when they have cloaked actions?
  • Ethical Obligations
    • Three Main Obligations
    • Constitution
    • Legislation
    • Supreme Court
    • Other obligations:
    • Duty to serve the nation
    • Democratic process to serve people’s will
    • A sense to uphold specific professional code ethics
    • A principle that neither family nor friends should surpass one’s obligation as a public servant
  • U.S. Constitution
    • Government employees pledge an oath to uphold the principles found in the Constitution
    • Provides whistleblowers with specific protections given to all citizens, including government workers
      • First Amendment – freedom of speech
      • Fourteenth Amendment – due process of law
    • Above all other laws, policies, or agency procedures, and as such public employees have an obligation to uphold its principles before any other public policy or law is passed down to them. (Rohr 1998)
  •  
  • Legislation - CRSA
    • Civil Service Reform Act of 1979 – CRSA
    • Established the Office of the Special Counsel (OSC)
      • Charged with protecting federal whistleblowers
      • Investigates and eliminates prohibited personnel practices
      • Handles whistleblower disclosures
      • Protects the service members’ reemployment rights.
      • Authority to investigate and prosecute these complaints through its Complaints Examining Unit (United States Office of Special Counsel 2002)
    • Whistleblower protection extended to include those disclosures which proved misconduct, a major misuse of funds or authority, and a direct danger to public safety and health (Fong 1991)
  • Legislation Continued WPA, No FEAR, and WPEA
    • Whistleblower Protection Act in 1989 – WPA
      • Increased protection from retaliation for federal whistleblowers
    • Notification and Federal Employee Antidiscrimination and Retaliation Act of 2002 – No FEAR Act
      • Established guidelines for federal agencies to disseminate notice of the Act to federal employees, former employees, and applicants for employment.
      • Agencies must post certain statistical data on the agency website to show current and past actions brought against the agency based on the No FEAR Act.
    • Whistleblower Protection Enhancement Act of 2007 – WPEA
      • Amended the WPA 1989
      • Expanded whistleblower protections to “certain national security, government contractor, and science-based agency whistleblowers,” as well as augmenting current whistleblower protections for all federal civil servants (Whitaker 2007)
  • Supreme Court Case Law
    • Pickering v. Board of Education
      • Two-prong test to decide when a public employee was protected by the First Amendment’s right to freedom of speech over matters of “public concern” (Sasser 2007)
      • Is the matter up for public concern?
      • If yes, the Court would have to balance the interests of the government representative as a citizen to speak out versus the ability of the agency to effectively manage the office and ensure strong harmonious working relationships (Drachler 2008)
  • Garcetti v. Ceballos
    • Ceballos filed suit under 42 U.S. §1983 against Garcetti for violating his First Amendment right to free speech and the Fourteenth Amendment right to due process.
    • Pickering two-prong test applied
    • He was not acting as a citizen strictly out of public concern, but in his role as a deputy district attorney, and so Garcetti could not be held liable under 42 U.S. §1983 (Wenell 2007)
  •  
  • Government workers as second-class citizens
    • John Rohr - “Citizenship and the Professional Public Servant”
      • Provides a way to understand the Supreme Court decision in Garcetti
      • Public servants have a great deal of power and responsibility, which balances the limitations of rulings such as Garcetti because the public trust requires a person to answer to a higher calling.
    • Hatch Act – restricts political activity by public servants while performing in their official capacities.
  • Strengths and Weaknesses
    • Constitution
    • Strength:
      • Strongest and most uniting code of ethics
      • Public administrators pledge an oath
      • Steadfast and objective
    • Weakness:
      • Minimal, but vague language leaves conflicting viewpoints on literal meanings and intents
      • Supreme Court rulings make the law relevant and timely, while staying true to the Constitution
    • Legislation
    • Strengths:
      • The process allows for whistleblower protections to continue to evolve relevant to the times
    • Weaknesses :
      • With several reforms, building upon previous legislative acts, these negate to clean up the portions of the earlier laws
      • Contradicting legislation
    • Supreme Court
    • Strength:
      • Maintains a check on the legislative power
      • Ensures that the public administrator does not become a fourth branch of government
    • Weakness:
      • Becomes a case by case basis
  • Conclusion
    • Ethics is…
    • More than understanding the differences between right and wrong.
    • The act of doing right or wrong
    • Often difficult to identify a meaning
    • Subjective to the individual
    • Determined through discretion
    • Administrative discretion – public administrator’s capacity to employ ethical approaches relevant to the situation, in order to decide among various alternative solutions that arise while working in the organization
    • All public employees have a duty to uphold the Constitution, abide by specific legislation with regard to Supreme Court decisions
    • Whistleblowers can fulfill this obligation to the public by understanding the ethical process as it relates to him or her, using guerrilla government when necessary, and acting always in the good of the people, not for selfish gain or ignorant bliss
  • Recommendations
    • Public employees need to have a high regard for their position and recognize the power they have to meet public expectations for clean, upright, and transparent government
    • Government worker ought to strive to be constitutionally competent
    • Whistleblowing as a last resort, and in accordance with proper legislative guidelines for reporting corrupt and illegal acts
    • Whistleblowing legislation needs to restructure/condense/clean-up these reform acts, so that all players speak the same legal code
    • Legislative reform needs to account for Supreme Court rulings such as Pickering and Garcetti
  • Questions?
    • Have any of you experienced corrupt behavior at a job? What did you do?
    • If faced with an ethical dilemma or came upon a form of corruption in your agency, department, or organization that caused the public at large a severe disservice, health risk, etc. what would you do?
    • Any other questions?
  • Resources:
    • Alford, C. Fred. (2001). Whistleblowers: Broken Lives and Organizational Power . Ithaca: Cornell.
    • Alford, C. Fred. (2001). Whistleblowers and the Narrative of Ethics. Journal of Social Philosophy , 32(3), 402-418. Retrieved October 2, 2008 from Blackwell-Synergy
    • Drachsler, David A. (2008). Public Employee Whistleblowers After Garcetti v. Ceballos.  Labor Law Journal, 59(2 ), 201-208.  Retrieved September 15, 2008, from ABI/INFORM Global database.
    • deLeon, Peter. (2005). Cowboys and the New Public Management. In Ethics in Public Management , ed. H. George Frederickson and Richard K. Ghere, 206. Armonk, NY: M.E. Sharpe.
    • Ventriss, Curtis and Shane M. Barney. (2003). The Making of a Whistleblower and the Importance of Ethical Autonomy: James F. Alderson. Public Integrity , (5) 4, 355-368. Retrieved on October 2, 2008, from ABI/INFORM Global database. Thorpe 2007, 461
    • Fisher, Louis. (2005). “National Security Whistleblowers.” CRS Report for Congress by Federation of American Scientists. (December 30, 2005). Congressional Research Service publications. Retrieved on November 2, 2008, from http://www.fas.org/sgp/crs/natsec/RL33215.pdf
    • Fong, Bruce D. (1991). Whistleblower Protection and the Office of Special Counsel: The Development of Reprisal Law in the 1980s. American University Law Review, 20 . Retrieved on September 15, 2008, from LexisNexis Academic.
    • Jokic, Aleksandar. (2002). Supererogation and Moral Luck: Two Problems for Kant, One Solution.  Journal of Value Inquiry , 36(2-3), 221-33. Retrieved November 2, 2008 from ABI/INFORM Global database.
    • Kennedy, Caroline. (2005) United States Constitution: What It Says, What It Means: A Hip Pocket Guide . New York: Oxford Press.
    • O’Leary, Rosemary. 2006. The Ethics of Dissent: Managing Guerrilla Government . Washington, D.C.: CQ Press.
  • Resources Continued…
    • Rohr, John. (1998). Public Service, Ethics, and Constitutional Practice . Lawrence, KS: University of Kansas Press.
    • Rohr, John, Chandler, Ralph Clark. (1984). Civil Servants and Second-Class Citizens/Response/Discussion.  Public Administration Review: Special Issue  44(135) Retrieved on November 2, 2008 from ABI/INFORM Global database.
    • Sasser, Jamie. (2007). The Silenced Citizens: The Post-Garcetti Landscape for Public Sector Employees Working in National Security. University of Richmond Law Review, 41 . Retrieved on September 15, 2008, from LexisNexis Academic.
    • Thorpe, Lucas. (2006). The Point of Studying Ethics According to Kant.  Journal of Value Inquiry ,  40(4), 461. Retrieved November 2, 2008 from ABI/INFORM Global database.
    • United States Department of State: Office of Attorney recruitment and Management. (2006)
    • No Fear Act . Retrieved on November 2, 2008, from http://www.state.gov/s/ocr/rls/76101.htm
    • United States Department of Treasury. (2008). No FEAR Act . Retrieved on November 2, 2008,
    • From http:// www.ustreas.gov/nofearact /
    • United States Government Printing Office. (2002) Notification and Federal Employee
    • Antidiscrimination and Retaliation Act of 2002 . Retrieved on November 2, 2008, from http://frwebgate.access.gpo.gov/cgi-bin/getdoc.cgi?dbname =107_cong_public_laws&docid=f:publ174.pdf
    • United States Office of Special Counsel. (2002). The Role of the U.S. Office of Special Council .
    • Retrieved on September 13, 2008, from http:// www.osc.gov/documents/pubs/oscrole.pdf
    • Whitaker, L. Paige. (2007). CRS Report for Congress by Federation of American Scientists.
    • (March 12, 2007). The Whistleblower Protection Act: An Overview . Congressional Research Service publications. Retrieved on September 13, 2008, from http://www.fas.org/sgp/crs/natsec/RL33918.pdf Waxman 2007
    • Wenell, Julie A. (2007). Garcetti v. Ceballos: Stifling the First Amendment in the Public Workplace. William & Mary Bill of Rights Journal, 16 . Retrieved on September 15, 2008, from LexisNexis Academic.
  • Thank you!