Edu Tourism

Loading...

Flash Player 9 (or above) is needed to view presentations.
We have detected that you do not have it on your computer. To install it, go here.

0 comments

Post a comment

    Post a comment
    Embed Video
    Edit your comment Cancel

    Favorites, Groups & Events

    Edu Tourism - Presentation Transcript

    1. L E I S u R E L earning via E dutourism: I n- S it u R ecreation-based E ducation Fenny Setiawan, Prof. Dr. Raja Maznah, Firuz H.Hussin, Lim Boon Yann Faculty of Education, University of Malaya L E I S u R E
    2. Edu Tourism ? Training Program
    3. Edu Tourism Sight-seeing and leisure program To gain new knowledge In different culture and context
    4. Edu Tourism program = Event Based Training
    5. start end schedule training event-based event pre post critical
      • compact short duration
      • minimal analysis/impact
      • unreliable evaluation
      • convenient implementation
      Characteristics of Event based programs ?
    6. Limitation of Time
      • condense training content within a short and compact duration
      • establish quick and close rapport between facilitator and participants
      • 3. respond to in-situ changes during site visits
      • 4. incorporate recreational activities
      INSTRUCTIONAL DESIGN L E I S u R E
    7. THEORITICAL GROUNDING First Principles M odel (Merrill, 2002) First Principles Model (Merrill, 2002) INTEGRATION Group presentation PROBLEM Training - Education Site Visit - Tourism APPLICATION Hands on activity – designing presentation DEMONSTRATION Field visit – to show the real situation ACTIVATION Gaining attention/rapport during training, fun element
    8. covert immersion Understanding the Learner Learn i ng Env i ronment Participant-observation methodology: The researcher immerses in complete participation of all experiment activities and goes on to actively influence the direction of the group (O’Conner,2002)
    9. Create Rapport
    10. edu tourism program was designed to incorporate instruction hidden behind rapport-building activities in order to maximize impact Methodology
    11. Model learners become motivated because they know that their learning outcome benefits themselves personally. Persona l
    12. Finding – key finding
      • Problems faced in gaining participant – facilitator rapport
      • Strategies that promote participant-facilitator rapport
      • Strategies that gain learner attention
      •  
    13. 1 Problems faced in gaining participant – facilitator rapport Problems faced Description of possible causes Cultural differences
      • The differences in philosophies and beliefs,
      Language barrier
      • The difference in language and jargon caused difficulty in communication
      • Longer time was need to solicit information or entice proactive dialogue from the learners
      Seniority/status
      • The seniority or job-rank positions of the participants caused a barrier in the solicitation of rapport and attention
    14. 2 Strategies that promote participant-facilitator rapport Environment (context) Instructional strategies used Distance communication via email, fax, or SMS
      • Obtained as much info as possible on participant profiles
      • Pre-arranged all logistics
      • Pre- arranged the necessary protocols and correspondence to site visit
      • Designed & produced intro-packet (info handouts on venue/housekeeping, goodie-bag souvenirs, etc)
      Venue at first point of contact (airport)
      • Prepared hand-held signboard
      • Ensured facilitator personality is proactive/chatty
      Informal Situation (Welcome dinner, lunch break, on the bus )
      • Ensured facilitator provokes a proactive and reactive conversation
      • Ensured facilitator always willing to assist and welcomes participants’ questions and inquiries
      Formal Situation (official site visit)
      • Played leadership role on behalf of the delegation and introduce the participants to the government representatives during the official visits
      • Ensured the facilitator played the role of mediator in dialogue sessions and conversations
      • also played the role of translator whenever needed)
      Feedback and closing ceremony
      • Created in-depth intense conversations to solicit information from participants in order to establish long term rapport
    15. 3 Strategies that gain learner attention Types of learner attention Instructional strategies Proactive dialogue
      • Initiate a conversation to the participant in any occasion – during welcome pick up and dinner
      Reactive dialogue
      • Giving and information about program outline and tourism info and seeking participants interest to gain participant reaction – during informal function
      Continuos dialogue
      • Intellectual discussion among participant and facilitator – during official site visit
      Solicit info
      • Initiate a conversation to trigger participant feedback and opinion – after official site visit
      Solicit long term rapport
      • In-depth communication in informal/ formal context to build long term rapport – during the event and closing ceremony
    16. Hidden Curricula into their instruction (Snyder, 1970) As this case study was one in a series of many edu tourism programmes, the findings are inconclusive as a stand-alone study It is hoped that the findings from this series will contribute towards building a foundation of applicable knowledge in the field of L earning via E dutourism, or I n- S it u R ecreation-based E ducation ( L.E.I.S.u.R.E ) Conclusion
    17. References Bruner, J. S. (1961). The act of discovery . Harvard Educational Review 31 (1): 21–32.   Bruner, J. (1966). Toward a Theory of Instruction . Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.   Fowlkes, J. E et al., (1998). Event based approach to training (EBAT). The International Journal of Aviation Psychology, 8 (3), 209-221   Hall, E. & Hall, M. (1990). Understanding Cultural Differences: Germans, French, and Americans . Maine, Intercultural Press, Inc.   Hussin, F (2004) Project Paper submitted in partial fulfillment for the requirements of Masters in Instructional Technology, University of Malaya: KL   Hussin, F (2005 ) The Osmosis Project a.k.a. Instructional Architecture: Case Studies Exploring an Alternative Framework for ICT-Based In-Situ Learning, Seminar in Instructional Technology Research, University of Malaya.   Hussin,F. & Salleh,U.K. (2006). Using Technology to Deliver Hidden Curricula: Reflections from Action – Researchers on Nurturing Learner Readiness. Proceedings of the Malaysia Education Technology Association Convention, on 9-11 September 2006 at Awana Langkawi.   Joyce, B., Weil, M. with Calhoun, E. (2000). Models of teaching (6th ed.). Boston: Allyn and Bacon.   Knowles, M. (1984). The Adult Learner: A Neglected Species (3rd Ed.). Houston, TX: Gulf Publishing   Merrill, M. D. (2002). First principles of instruction . Educational Technology Research and Development , 50(3), 43-59.   Snyder, B.R. (1970) The Hidden Curriculum . New York: Alfred A. Knopf.   Wolcott, H.F (2005). The arts of fieldwork . Rowman, Altamira
    18. Thank you Faculty of Education, University of Malaya Fenny Setiawan, Prof. Dr. Raja Maznah, Firuz H.Hussin, Lim Boon Yann

    + Fenny SetiawanFenny Setiawan, 2 years ago

    custom

    238 views, 0 favs, 0 embeds more stats

    Presentation for PTPM Conference

    More info about this document

    © All Rights Reserved

    Go to text version

    • Total Views 238
      • 238 on SlideShare
      • 0 from embeds
    • Comments 0
    • Favorites 0
    • Downloads 7
    Most viewed embeds

    more

    All embeds

    less

    Flagged as inappropriate Flag as inappropriate
    Flag as inappropriate

    Select your reason for flagging this presentation as inappropriate. If needed, use the feedback form to let us know more details.

    Cancel
    File a copyright complaint
    Having problems? Go to our helpdesk?

    Categories

    Tags