Lightningtalk: Peter Parycek
Upcoming SlideShare
Loading in...5
×
 

Lightningtalk: Peter Parycek

on

  • 2,020 views

 

Statistics

Views

Total Views
2,020
Views on SlideShare
1,829
Embed Views
191

Actions

Likes
1
Downloads
16
Comments
0

2 Embeds 191

http://www.zukunftsweb.at 188
http://translate.googleusercontent.com 3

Accessibility

Categories

Upload Details

Uploaded via as Microsoft PowerPoint

Usage Rights

© All Rights Reserved

Report content

Flagged as inappropriate Flag as inappropriate
Flag as inappropriate

Select your reason for flagging this presentation as inappropriate.

Cancel
  • Full Name Full Name Comment goes here.
    Are you sure you want to
    Your message goes here
    Processing…
Post Comment
Edit your comment
  • http://www.flickr.com/photos/stilleben2001/535229671/sizes/o/
  • http://www.flickr.com/photos/stilleben2001/535229671/sizes/o/
  • Drunken Pirate ' sues school that nixed degree  MSNBC A woman denied a teaching degree on the eve of graduation because of a MySpace photo has sued the university. Here's the photo.
  • lebenslanges Einreiseverbot in die USA
  • In Sweden the legal base for accessing private data is the "Publicity Principle" dating from 1766. So for the last 2 and a half centuries, the Swedish society is used to radical openness. The idea was and still is, that in a complete see-through state – politicians and authorities are not able to hide anything. With the launch of the website "Ratsit" in 2006, things changed radically, because all the former barriers to access disappeared! Suddenly everybody could check within seconds each Swedish person's address, marital status, yearly income, (even) depts and so on. Within a very short period of time, 600.000 people registered on the website – (which is) a high score, as Sweden has only 10 Million inhabitants. After many complaints and intense discussions, the authorities – in particular the Ministry of Finance – "forced" the company to change the access. Otherwise, they threatened to reduce access to (data on a) paper base again. So now, for accessing to data of private individuals, you have to pay 10 Euro. (Information regarding companies is still for free.) Most important, the person whose data were recalled, gets informed (by mail) - a step towards balanced transparency.
  • In the past, there were many barriers to be taken before accessing this sensitive information: You had to find the right administrative office; find out the opening hours; You had to go there; pay the fee; wait for the answer; And it was not anonymous. Now all the barriers have disappeared! website for the whole USA, service is for free – financed by advertising, it's open 24 hours a day, and you get the answer within seconds; And you are anonymous  So Welcome to the Google of criminal records ;-) Visualization: Because of the easy way to visualize information with meshing-up web-tools, You can view the criminal records of your neighbors with the help of GoogleMaps - Here we go! You can also use the function "Criminal Alerts". Just subscribe to this service and you will be informed if a "criminal" is moving to your neighborhoods - Useful service, isn't it ;-)
  • http://www.flickr.com/photos/karenhorton/3265288338/sizes/l/
  • http://mathew.blogactiv.eu/2009/07/07/egovernment20-is-the-us-experience-overrated/ eRulemaking
  • STRIKE RACISM from Austria: documents racist graffiti in the streets & public transport of Vienna shows Vienna's government how many racist graffiti exist "so that authorities must react" Users are posting these graffiti (as a jpeg-file) by mobile phone via mms or e-mail
  • "MeinParlament" Austria This independent project is provided by the NonProfit Organisation "Politik Transparent", and supported by the Austrian Parliament S chirmherrschaft of the 3 Presidents of the Federal Assembly enabled by a cooperation with its German partner-site and 10 Austrian media. The site was launched (on the 22th of August 2008) during this parliamentary election campaign. In one month, till the polling day - the day before yesterday - about 2.500 user-questions reached the candidates. This project allows the citizens to: view and compare the (political) programs of 7 different parties, find (more than 2.000) profiles of candidates (also for their own constituency) ask questions, that are usually answered within a week, read all the collected answers - (which are) clearly arranged and searchable by party, regional and local constituency Also the politicians' work is faciliated, because they can give clearly laid-out answers refer to their prior answers (in case of multiple similar questions) (After the Election,) From this October on, users will also be able to: ask the (183) Members of Parliament view collected, relevant information about these persons check their track record - including work in the committees, speeches and voting in Plenum deal directly with the persons (who are) responsible/ answerable for specific matters , cause the MPs (and members of a committee) are also searchable by themes, Track the (important/decisive) committees' work
  • http://www.flickr.com/photos/humain/114290330/sizes/o/
  • http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/consumer/global-advertising-consumers-trust-real-friends-and-virtual-strangers-the-most/ http://www.scribd.com/doc/2416061/Nielsen-Trust-In-Advertising-Oct07 http://www.retailerdaily.com/entry/8707/blog-influence-on-consumer-purchases-surpasses-social-networks/ 78 vertrauen Empfehlungen 14% vertrauen auf die Werbung
  • http://epub.oeaw.ac.at/?arp=0x0022053f http://www.nzz.ch/nachrichten/kultur/literatur_und_kunst/ordnung_und_unordnung_des_wissens_1.4941730.html
  • http://www.flickr.com/photos/27241037@N02/4082528809/in/pool-unibrennt
  • Social facts tend to race ahead of institutionalized values!

Lightningtalk: Peter Parycek Lightningtalk: Peter Parycek Presentation Transcript

      • 21.01.2009 - Open Government Memorandum:
            • “ transparency, participation, and collaboration.”
    OPEN GOV
  • transparency #1
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  • too transparent? #2
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  • participation & collaboration #2
  • Economy: e.g. InnoCentive 08/04/10
    • 160.000 scientists
    • Solutions for: Boeing, Dow, DuPont, Novartis and Procter & Gamble.
  • Economy: e.g . Ideastorm (DELL) 08/04/10 Wir Users promote and vote User posts improvements and innovations View & discuss with Dell Users see & control
  •  
  • Verwaltung: z.B. PeerToPatent 08/04/10 top down
    • backlog of over 600,000 applications
    • ecosystem of scientific expertise
    • community of inventors decides on its own criteria for assessing patent applications.”
    • 44 months down to 23!
  • 08/04/10 bottom up
  • 08/04/10 bottom up
  • 08/04/10 bottom up
  • CHANGE …
  •  
    • Too many e-government initiatives are little more than electronic versions of the old fashioned system.
    • Sharing power, opening up the decision-making process, forging new relationships and partnering on service delivery are the foundations of 21st-century government.
    Don Tapscott, Anthony D. Williams, Dan Herman
  • Government 2.0 ?
    • a transition from monolithic government to Government 2.0 where pluralistic , networked forms of government called "governance webs" become the dominant organizational model for service delivery & policy-making, Don Tapscott, D. Williams
  • Government 2.0 ? Governance will become more engaging, participative , democratic and transparent , Jeremy Millard Wer will Veränderung ?
  •  Veränderung führt zu Angst
    • Spannungen zwischen der Netzwerk Dynamik & bestehenden Strukturen
    •  Organisatorischer Widerstand
      • Bestehende Institutionen werden existierende Strukturen aufrecht erhalten wollen
  • ABER
    • Veränderung ist nicht mehr zu stoppen …..
    • Digital natives (Virtual Generation) beginnen gerade zu arbeiten!
    • Tipping factor ist Demographie ….
  • „ A revolution doesn’t happen when a society adopts new tools. It happens when society adopts new behaviours “ ,  Clay Shirky . http://digitalgovernment.wordpress.com/2009/05/21/film-us-now/
  • 20 minuntes into the future
  • Dr. Peter Parycek, MSc Zentrum für E-Government, Donau-Universität Krems [email_address] +43 2732 893-2312 http://www.donau-uni.ac.at/egov http://linkedin.com/parycek http://www.slideshare.net/parycek http://twitter.com/parycek 08/04/10 DANKE für Ihre Aufmerksamkeit!
  •  Gutenberg! Internet- & Soziale-Medien-Nutzung #1 Net-Generation #2 Tools #3 Verhalten & Werte im Wandel #4 soziales Echtzeitweb #5 Transparenz #6 Zusammenarbeit #7
  • Kommunikationskonzepte im Umbruch
  • One 2 Many
  • vs 38% 78 %
  • Many 2 Many
  • Neue Organisationsmodelle & Macht verschiebt sich
  • Hierarchie vs. Netzwerk
  • vs
  • vs
  • BLOGs vs
  • vs
  • vs
  • vs
  • vs
  • vs
  • vs
  • vs
  • 1993 vs 2009
  • vs
  • vs vs
  • Gift Economy
    • The cost to you is less than you get back
    • System which allows to help each other
    • If a system Resposibilty and to allow to act in positiv way – than they will do that  compare role playing expiriences
    • They get warm feeling 
  • 08/04/10 Power Shift?
  • Change … Governance & Business will become more engaging, participative , democratic and transparent , Jeremy Miller / Peter P. But who wants to lose Power?
  •  FEAR!
    • Tension between network dynamics and institutional structures
    • Organizational resistance!!!
      • Institutions will try to protect existing organizational arrangements
  • BUT
    • you can‘t stop it! because …..
    • Digital natives (Virtual Generation) are starting to work!
    • Tipping factor is demographic ….
  • References:
    • Books & Articles:
      • The Long Tail: Why the Future of Business Is Selling Less of More, Chris Anderson, Harper Collins, 2008
      • Wikinomics, Don Tapscott, D. Williams, 2007
      • The Tipping Point: How Little Things Can Make A Big Difference, Malcolm Gladwell, Little, Brown, 2001
      • Linked: The New Science of Networks, Albert-Laszlo Barabasi, 2001
      • The Wealth of Networks: How Social Production Transforms Markets and Freedom, Yochai Benkler, 2007
      • Here Comes Everybody: The Power of Organizing Without Organizations, Clay Shirky, 2008
      • Which Kind of Collaboration Is Right for You? by Gary P. Pisano, Roberto Verganti, HBR 12/08
      • Swarm Creativity: Competitive Advantage Through Collaborative Innovation Networks, Peter A. Gloor, 2006
      • Crowdsourcing: Why the Power of the Crowd Is Driving the Future of Business, Jeff Howe, 2008
      • Throwing Sheep in the Boardroom, How Online Social Networking Will Transform Your Life, Work and World, Matthew Fraser, Soumitra Dutta, 2008
    • Blogs:
      • Dion Hinchcliffe‘s Web 2.0 Blog: http://web2.socialcomputingmagazine.com/
      • Longtail Blog: http://www.thelongtail.com/
      • Wikinomics Blog: http://www.wikinomics.com/blog/
    • Examples:
      • http://www.innocentive.com/
      • http://www.gfbn.com/
      • http://www.ideastorm.com /
      • http://www.mysociety.org/
      • http://www.fixmystreet.com /
      • http://www.rassismusstreichen.at /
      • http://www.peertopatent.org /
      • http://www.jugend2help.gv.at/
      • http://askyourlawmaker.org /
      • http://www.meinparlament.at /
  • http://digitalgovernment.wordpress.com/
  • If you are interested in eParticipation … If you are interested in further contact …
    • http://www.slideshare.net/parycek
    • http://linkedin.com/parycek
    • http://twitter.com/parpet
    Join! Follow me!
  •  
    • Revolution 
      • Fundamental Change!
      • Gesellschaft kann Dinge die bis vor kurzem großen Organisationen vorbehalten wurde.
      • re-write society
    • Open Government
      • Start 21.01.209
      • Open Government Memorandum:
        • transparency, public participation, and collaboration.” The
      • Angloameerikanische Raum
      • "Publicity Principle" dating from 1766.
    • Was spricht für Open Data
      • Daten sind die Basis für Innovation in der Gesellschaft
        • Gesellschaft erstellt die Anwendungen und analysiert die Daten
      • Transparenz sichert Demokratie
    • Was spricht gegen Open Data:
      • Die erwähnten Daten werden leider alle finanziell verwertet
      • In Zentraleuropa steht der Datenschutz gegen die Nutzung
      • Mehr Transparenz der Verwaltung und der Politik
      • Machtverlust
      • Mehr Transparenz: auch zwischen den Ministerien
      • Viele Inhalte sind Urheberrechtlich geschützt
  •