Electronic CollectionManagement:How statistics can, andcan’t, help.Surviving the recession: maximising your valueASLIB Eng...
Introduction  • Institutional, financial and strategic context  • Previous methods used to review journals collections  • ...
Cranfield University  • The UKs only wholly postgraduate university focused    on science, technology, engineering and    ...
Key Drivers  •   Financial realities  •   Demonstrating value for money  •   Strategic alignment  •   Research Excellence ...
Expenditure on Journals                         Journal Spend       2006-07     2007-08           2008-09   2009-10
Expenditure onResources                         Cranfield University                  Information Provision Expenditure   ...
How do we demonstrate that the collection  is meeting the needs of the University?
Previous TechniquesUsed:  Annual journals review using the follow data  • Circulation figures – issues and renewals  • “Sw...
New ApproachQuantitative:         Qualitative:•   Size              • Academic Liaison•   Usage             • Reading List...
Quantitative Reporting
Quantitative Reporting  •   Systematic  •   Sustainable  •   Internal benchmarking  •   Elevator pitch  •   So what?  •   ...
Brought to you by theletters…                        &
Our Approach  • What has everyone else done?     • Analysing Publisher Deals Project  • Storage centre  • Excel training  ...
Basic Metrics  • Number of titles within a package  • Total annual full-text downloads  • Cost:     • Core titles     • e-...
Value Metrics  •   Average number of requests per title  •   Average cost per title  •   Total cost as % of information pr...
The Long TailDownloads             Titles        Titles     Titles            Long Tail   Short Tail   No Tail
Subscribed Titles  •   Reviewing performance of core collection  •   REF Preferred?  •   Popular?  •   Three year trends i...
Popular Titles  •   Which titles are the most popular?  •   Top 30 titles in the package  •   Three year trends in downloa...
Considerations  • When to measure from/to?       • calendar, financial/academic, or contract year?  •   Which titles make ...
Electronic CollectionManagement:How statistics can, and can’t,help.
Qualitative Measures
Academic Liaison  • Who‟s using it?     • Why?     • How?  • How valuable is it?  • What will be the impact if we cancel? ...
Quantitative on theQualitative:  Analysis on the five REF Preferred Recommended    Journals Lists:  • Overlapping titles  ...
Reading List Review  Qualitative analysis on course reading lists:  • What are our academic recommending?  • Where is it p...
Using the results
What they can do:  • Both qualitative and quantitative measures tell the    story of the resource  • Aid decision making  ...
What they can’t do:
Conclusions
Closing thoughts  • Is it worth investing in this?  • Qualitative & Quantitative  • Danger of relying on cost-per-download
Looking Ahead  • Review of all budgets     • All Resources     • Systems     • Staff     • Services  • Demonstrating Value...
Thank YouSelena Killick                John HarringtonCranfield University          Cranfield Universitys.a.killick@cranfi...
Upcoming SlideShare
Loading in …5
×

Electronic Collection Management: How statistics can, and can't, help.

621 views
569 views

Published on

Presentation delivered at the ASLIB Engineering & Technology group and the Aerospace & Defence Librarians Group event titled: Surviving the recession: maximising your value. Held at Imperial College on the 15th of November 2011.

Published in: Education, Technology
0 Comments
0 Likes
Statistics
Notes
  • Be the first to comment

  • Be the first to like this

No Downloads
Views
Total views
621
On SlideShare
0
From Embeds
0
Number of Embeds
1
Actions
Shares
0
Downloads
7
Comments
0
Likes
0
Embeds 0
No embeds

No notes for slide

Electronic Collection Management: How statistics can, and can't, help.

  1. 1. Electronic CollectionManagement:How statistics can, andcan’t, help.Surviving the recession: maximising your valueASLIB Engineering & Technology GroupAerospace & Defence Librarians GroupJohn Harrington Selena KillickHead of Information Services Library Quality Officer
  2. 2. Introduction • Institutional, financial and strategic context • Previous methods used to review journals collections • Role of qualitative and quantitative measures • What these measures can and cannot tell us
  3. 3. Cranfield University • The UKs only wholly postgraduate university focused on science, technology, engineering and management • One of the UKs top five research intensive universities • Annual turnover £150m • 40% of our students study whilst in employment • We deliver the UK Ministry of Defences largest educational contract
  4. 4. Key Drivers • Financial realities • Demonstrating value for money • Strategic alignment • Research Excellence Framework (REF) • Income Mission critical • Reputation
  5. 5. Expenditure on Journals Journal Spend 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10
  6. 6. Expenditure onResources Cranfield University Information Provision Expenditure by Format 2009-10 0% 8% 29% Books inc. special collections Total Journals e-Books 58% Other databases Other digital documents 4%
  7. 7. How do we demonstrate that the collection is meeting the needs of the University?
  8. 8. Previous TechniquesUsed: Annual journals review using the follow data • Circulation figures – issues and renewals • “Sweep survey” to capture in-house use • Journal contents page requests • Download figures • Journal prices v the cost of ILL requests More recent focus on “cost per download”
  9. 9. New ApproachQuantitative: Qualitative:• Size • Academic Liaison• Usage • Reading Lists Review• Coverage • REF Preferred• Value for Money
  10. 10. Quantitative Reporting
  11. 11. Quantitative Reporting • Systematic • Sustainable • Internal benchmarking • Elevator pitch • So what? • Enable informed decision making • Demonstrate smart procurement
  12. 12. Brought to you by theletters… &
  13. 13. Our Approach • What has everyone else done? • Analysing Publisher Deals Project • Storage centre • Excel training • Template design
  14. 14. Basic Metrics • Number of titles within a package • Total annual full-text downloads • Cost: • Core titles • e-Access Fee • Total costs
  15. 15. Value Metrics • Average number of requests per title • Average cost per title • Total cost as % of information provision expenditure • Cost per full-text download • Average download per FTE student/staff/total • Average cost per FTE student/staff/total
  16. 16. The Long TailDownloads Titles Titles Titles Long Tail Short Tail No Tail
  17. 17. Subscribed Titles • Reviewing performance of core collection • REF Preferred? • Popular? • Three year trends in cost / downloads / CPD • Cost / Downloads / CPD categorised: • Zero • Low • Medium • High • Cancel?
  18. 18. Popular Titles • Which titles are the most popular? • Top 30 titles in the package • Three year trends in downloads • REF Preferred? • Subscribed title?
  19. 19. Considerations • When to measure from/to? • calendar, financial/academic, or contract year? • Which titles make up our core collection? • Do we have access to all of the „zero use‟ titles? • What constitutes Low/Medium/High? • What about the aggregator usage statistics? • Do we trust the usage statistics? • What is the size of the target population?
  20. 20. Electronic CollectionManagement:How statistics can, and can’t,help.
  21. 21. Qualitative Measures
  22. 22. Academic Liaison • Who‟s using it? • Why? • How? • How valuable is it? • What will be the impact if we cancel? • Teaching? • Research?
  23. 23. Quantitative on theQualitative: Analysis on the five REF Preferred Recommended Journals Lists: • Overlapping titles • Unsubscribed titles • Financial shortfall • Current recommended subscribed titles • Usage data
  24. 24. Reading List Review Qualitative analysis on course reading lists: • What are our academic recommending? • Where is it published? • How often is it recommended? • Are there alternatives?
  25. 25. Using the results
  26. 26. What they can do: • Both qualitative and quantitative measures tell the story of the resource • Aid decision making • Justify procurement • Safeguard budgets
  27. 27. What they can’t do:
  28. 28. Conclusions
  29. 29. Closing thoughts • Is it worth investing in this? • Qualitative & Quantitative • Danger of relying on cost-per-download
  30. 30. Looking Ahead • Review of all budgets • All Resources • Systems • Staff • Services • Demonstrating Value and Impact • Resources • Services
  31. 31. Thank YouSelena Killick John HarringtonCranfield University Cranfield Universitys.a.killick@cranfield.ac.uk j.harrington@cranfield.ac.ukTel: 01793 785561 Tel: 01234 754477

×