ZOMBIES OR CYBORGS: Is Facebook eating your brain? Micah Allen PhD Student @
VS
 
OUTLINE OF THE TALK <ul><li>Neurocognitive Plasticity and Research Methods. </li></ul><ul><li>What’s a Cyborg? </li></ul><...
NEUROSCIENCE: A DISCLAIMER
POSSIBILITIES AND LIMITATIONS  Brain Plasticity in the Human Neocortex
MANY KINDS OF PLASTICITY <ul><li>Structural </li></ul><ul><ul><li>Local Connectivity </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Cellular G...
MICROSTRUCTURAL PLASTICITY
STRUCTURAL PLASTICITY AT BOTH ENDS <ul><li>“ Depending on whether the population of boutons is homogeneous or not, the amo...
STRUCTURAL PLASTICITY IN DEVELOPMENT Gogtay et al. Dynamic mapping of human cortical development during childhood through ...
BASIC METHODS IN VBM AND FMRI
RECIPE FOR VBM <ul><li>An example VBM experiment: </li></ul><ul><ul><li>Brain atrophy in Schizophrenia </li></ul></ul><ul>...
VBM AND ADULT BRAINS <ul><li>How plastic is the adult brain? VBM has been used to successfully find (+)alterations in the ...
FUNCTIONAL PLASTICITY: BLOBS AHOY! <ul><li>Similar in concept to VBM </li></ul><ul><li>Widely established method, a contra...
BLOBS
FUNCTIONAL CONNECTIVITY <ul><li>Inferences from fMRI data regarding correlations or causal relationships between activity ...
 
DEFAULT MODE NETWORK <ul><li>Distributed network of areas implicated in: </li></ul><ul><ul><li>Social Cognition, Prospecti...
SUMMARY  <ul><li>MRI can be used to measure changes in local structure and function, as well as more global patterns. </li...
ZOMBIES AND CYBORGS What are they? Micah Allen PhD Student @
MEET THE ZOMBIES <ul><li>“ [Social networking sites] are devoid of cohesive narrative and long-term significance. As a con...
BRAAAAIIINNSSS….. “ A study by the Broadcaster Audience Research Board found teenagers now spend seven-and-a-half hours a ...
ENTER THE CYBORGS
CYBORGS? <ul><li>Tool use as cognition </li></ul><ul><li>Enabled by high plasticity </li></ul><ul><li>Words as tools for t...
 
 
SOCIAL CYBORGS?
SOCIAL COGNITION <ul><li>‘ Folk Psychology’  </li></ul><ul><li>Simulation and Action Observation </li></ul><ul><li>Interac...
EXTENDING THEORY-OF-MIND
EXTENDING THEORY-OF-MIND
CYBERNETIC SOCIAL COGNITION? Micah Allen:  [email_address] We now know that the brain is highly plastic, adapting to cultu...
SOCIAL COGNITION 2.0 Micah Allen:  [email_address] Social media is &quot;an umbrella term that defines the various activit...
THE NEW SOCIAL BRAIN
Micah Allen:  [email_address] The social web provides expanded opportunities to flex our cognitive muscles, through a uniq...
SOCIAL COGNITION 2.0 Micah Allen:  [email_address]
Micah Allen:  [email_address] Dense streams of multi-modal data provide opportunities to enrich our mental representations...
Micah Allen:  [email_address] Not only does social media potentially strengthen our inner social mechanisms; social media ...
SOCIAL COGNITION 2.0 Micah Allen:  [email_address] This offloading to the collective democratizes information sharing, con...
SOCIAL COGNITION 2.0 Micah Allen:  [email_address]
Micah Allen:  [email_address] This is true extended cognition- the cognitive loop is completed in digitally mediated world...
Micah Allen:  [email_address] Social media extracts the meaningful from the noise, increasing interdependency between info...
INTO THIS: <ul><li>Research 2.0 </li></ul>Micah Allen:  [email_address]
BUT WHAT ABOUT THE BRAIN? Micah Allen:  [email_address] My hypothesis: Brain  Culture Technology Mind
SOCIAL TOOLS
POTENCY AND MODE <ul><li>Density </li></ul><ul><li>Temporality </li></ul><ul><li>Control </li></ul><ul><li>Self-Relevance ...
A POTENT NEURAL AND CULTURAL STIMULANT? <ul><li>Massive adoption worldwide (about 400 million on FB alone) </li></ul><ul><...
THE SELF DISCLOSURE HYPOTHESIS <ul><li>Kraut (2002); Bessiere et al (2007); Valkenburg & Peter (2007),  </li></ul><ul><ul>...
SELF-DISCLOSURE AND COMPUTER MEDIATED COMMUNICATION <ul><li>More intimate self-disclosures when online (Tidwell  & Walther...
USING FACEBOOK TO INCREASE CONNECTIVITY <ul><li>Joinson (2008) </li></ul><ul><ul><li>Top uses of FB: Social connection, sh...
REJECTING THE ZOMBIES <ul><li>SNS and blogging may actually increase literacy (BBC, 2009) </li></ul><ul><li>SNS use does n...
SUMMARY <ul><li>Facebook is a powerful social stimulant with many opportunities to reshape social cognition. </li></ul><ul...
EXPERIMENT 1- ALTERATIONS IN TOM <ul><li>Does extensive Facebook use constitute social narrative or ToM ‘exercise’? </li><...
TRAIT-ADJECTIVE TASK
TAJT: ARE FB FRIENDS REPRESENTED LIKE REAL WORLD FRIENDS? <ul><li>Compare offline and online friends, determine if there i...
OTHER TASKS – TOM WORD PROBLEMS
MANY PARADIGMS, WHAT’S THE QUESTION? <ul><li>Short list of possible paradigms: </li></ul><ul><ul><li>Mind is in the eyes <...
KEEPING IT CLEAN <ul><li>VBM with Demographic and Cognitive Probes </li></ul>Infinite possibilities: STROOP, Wisconsin Car...
CURRENT WORK <ul><li>Analyzing data from 60 subject fMRI scan </li></ul><ul><ul><li>2 social cognitive tasks and two analy...
THANK YOU! Thanks to: Supervisors: Andreas Roepstorff, Antoine Lutz, Peter Vestergaard Supporting Institutions : Interacti...
Upcoming SlideShare
Loading in...5
×

Micah Allen: Zombies or Cyborgs: Is Facebook eating your brain?

679

Published on

Micah Allen er hjerneforsker og PhD studerende på Århus Universitet. Her fortæller han om sociale mediers indflydelse på hjernen til Headstart Morgenseminar d. 17. marts 2010.

0 Comments
0 Likes
Statistics
Notes
  • Be the first to comment

  • Be the first to like this

No Downloads
Views
Total Views
679
On Slideshare
0
From Embeds
0
Number of Embeds
0
Actions
Shares
0
Downloads
3
Comments
0
Likes
0
Embeds 0
No embeds

No notes for slide
  • Note: Task-related FC and intrinsic FC have been implicated in social cognition, memory, narrative, and other tasks.
  • What are the conditions for being a cyborg?
  • Micah Allen: Zombies or Cyborgs: Is Facebook eating your brain?

    1. 1. ZOMBIES OR CYBORGS: Is Facebook eating your brain? Micah Allen PhD Student @
    2. 2. VS
    3. 4. OUTLINE OF THE TALK <ul><li>Neurocognitive Plasticity and Research Methods. </li></ul><ul><li>What’s a Cyborg? </li></ul><ul><li>What does Facebook do? </li></ul>
    4. 5. NEUROSCIENCE: A DISCLAIMER
    5. 6. POSSIBILITIES AND LIMITATIONS Brain Plasticity in the Human Neocortex
    6. 7. MANY KINDS OF PLASTICITY <ul><li>Structural </li></ul><ul><ul><li>Local Connectivity </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Cellular Growth </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Global Connectivity </li></ul></ul><ul><li>Functional </li></ul><ul><ul><li>Local activation </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Global Connectivity </li></ul></ul>
    7. 8. MICROSTRUCTURAL PLASTICITY
    8. 9. STRUCTURAL PLASTICITY AT BOTH ENDS <ul><li>“ Depending on whether the population of boutons is homogeneous or not, the amount of bouton turnover (7% per week) has different implications for the stability of the synaptic connection network. If all boutons have the same replacement probability per unit time, synaptic connectivity would become largely remodeled after about 14 weeks.” </li></ul>Stettler et al. Axons and synaptic boutons are highly dynamic in adult visual cortex. Neuron (2006) vol. 49 (6) pp. 877-87
    9. 10. STRUCTURAL PLASTICITY IN DEVELOPMENT Gogtay et al. Dynamic mapping of human cortical development during childhood through early adulthood. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA (2004) vol. 101 (21) pp. 8174-9
    10. 11. BASIC METHODS IN VBM AND FMRI
    11. 12. RECIPE FOR VBM <ul><li>An example VBM experiment: </li></ul><ul><ul><li>Brain atrophy in Schizophrenia </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><ul><li>First, get two groups with and without (at least 20 in each group). </li></ul></ul></ul><ul><ul><ul><li>Scan each for roughly 12 minutes </li></ul></ul></ul><ul><ul><ul><li>Split scans into WM and GM, then collapse each individual’s participants into an ‘average group brain’ (preprocessing). </li></ul></ul></ul><ul><ul><ul><li>Calculate significant group differences in density </li></ul></ul></ul><ul><ul><ul><li>Voilà! </li></ul></ul></ul>Bonus points: enter scores on symptom inventory or attention task. See if this explains any of your density variance.
    12. 13. VBM AND ADULT BRAINS <ul><li>How plastic is the adult brain? VBM has been used to successfully find (+)alterations in the follow situations: </li></ul><ul><ul><li>London Taxi Drivers vs Bus Drivers </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Little girls learning to play Tetris </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Tibetan Monks and Beginner Buddhists </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Medical School Students </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>CBT recipients in a variety of pathologies. </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Dental implantees </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>And many more! </li></ul></ul>
    13. 14. FUNCTIONAL PLASTICITY: BLOBS AHOY! <ul><li>Similar in concept to VBM </li></ul><ul><li>Widely established method, a contrast between a cognitive task and some baseline. </li></ul><ul><li>Ideally, a ‘factorial design’. This lets you examine the effects of two primary elements (e.g. familiarity, emotion) of your stimuli (faces) and their interaction. </li></ul>Baseline: Scrambled Images, etc Negative Emotion Positive Emotion Low Familiarity High Familiarity
    14. 15. BLOBS
    15. 16. FUNCTIONAL CONNECTIVITY <ul><li>Inferences from fMRI data regarding correlations or causal relationships between activity in different regions </li></ul><ul><li>Stress Example: </li></ul><ul><ul><li>Subjects undergo stressful face-processing stimuli for 15 minutes, followed by 15 minutes of rest. </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Correlate activity in one voxel (amygdala) to whole brain or regions-of-interest. </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Reveals areas of brain that activate whenever seed region activates </li></ul></ul>
    16. 18. DEFAULT MODE NETWORK <ul><li>Distributed network of areas implicated in: </li></ul><ul><ul><li>Social Cognition, Prospection, Narrative, Navigation, Self (Raichel et al 2009) </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Deactivated when engaged in task, a ‘daydreaming’ network, thought to underlie very basic social thinking. </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Now implicated in loads of pathologies! </li></ul></ul>
    17. 19. SUMMARY <ul><li>MRI can be used to measure changes in local structure and function, as well as more global patterns. </li></ul><ul><ul><li>Interpretation of these data made much easier when used in coordination with behavioral, cognitive, demographic, or other extra-scanning parameters. </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Many possibilities, but also limitations. Experiments are difficult to control and findings can be unreliable. </li></ul></ul><ul><li>Adult and adolescent brains display remarkable plasticity at nearly every level. Short term habits, life decisions, everyday rituals, even beliefs and desires can shape our gradual neural specialization. </li></ul>
    18. 20. ZOMBIES AND CYBORGS What are they? Micah Allen PhD Student @
    19. 21. MEET THE ZOMBIES <ul><li>“ [Social networking sites] are devoid of cohesive narrative and long-term significance. As a consequence, the mid-21st century mind might almost be infantilized, characterized by short attention spans, sensationalism, inability to empathize and a shaky sense of identity”. -The Baroness Greenfield </li></ul><ul><li>“ Their thoughts and actions feel scripted, as if they’re following the steps of an algorithm. In the world of 2001 , people have become so machinelike that the most human character turns out to be a machine. That’s the essence of Kubrick’s dark prophecy: as we come to rely on computers to mediate our understanding of the world, it is our own intelligence that flattens into artificial intelligence.” </li></ul><ul><ul><li>-Nicolas Carr, Is the Internet Making us Stupid? </li></ul></ul><ul><li>“ The hive mind is for the most part stupid and boring. Why pay attention to it?” </li></ul><ul><ul><li>-Jason Lanier, DIGITAL MAOISM: The Hazards of the New Online Collectivism </li></ul></ul>
    20. 22. BRAAAAIIINNSSS….. “ A study by the Broadcaster Audience Research Board found teenagers now spend seven-and-a-half hours a day in front of a screen. Educational psychologist Jane Healy believes children should be kept away from computer games until they are seven. Most games only trigger the 'flight or fight' region of the brain, rather than the vital areas responsible for reasoning. Sue Palmer, author of Toxic Childhood, said: 'We are seeing children's brain development damaged because they don't engage in the activity they have engaged in for millennia.” -Daily Mail
    21. 23. ENTER THE CYBORGS
    22. 24. CYBORGS? <ul><li>Tool use as cognition </li></ul><ul><li>Enabled by high plasticity </li></ul><ul><li>Words as tools for thought </li></ul><ul><li>Conditions for a Cyborg </li></ul><ul><ul><ul><li>Ease of use </li></ul></ul></ul><ul><ul><ul><li>Transparency </li></ul></ul></ul><ul><ul><ul><li>Epistemic Trust </li></ul></ul></ul><ul><ul><ul><li>Parity: if it were implemented in the brain, would loss of the ‘tool’ constitute a loss of function? </li></ul></ul></ul>Bottom line: language, wrist watches, novels, printing presses and the internet have all contributed substantially to what we ‘are’ as a cognitive system. There is no going back- it’s up to us to determine value and direction.
    23. 27. SOCIAL CYBORGS?
    24. 28. SOCIAL COGNITION <ul><li>‘ Folk Psychology’ </li></ul><ul><li>Simulation and Action Observation </li></ul><ul><li>Interaction </li></ul><ul><li>False belief, mentalizing, ‘Mental state rich’ narratives </li></ul><ul><li>Self/other processing ‘is it me?’ </li></ul><ul><li>Identity </li></ul><ul><li>Are any of these extended, altered, or enhanced by social media? What is the neurological correlate of this? </li></ul>
    25. 29. EXTENDING THEORY-OF-MIND
    26. 30. EXTENDING THEORY-OF-MIND
    27. 31. CYBERNETIC SOCIAL COGNITION? Micah Allen: [email_address] We now know that the brain is highly plastic, adapting to culture and environment in a dynamic fashion. Further, we can understand the unique 2-way relationship between tool use and cognition So what about Web 2.0?
    28. 32. SOCIAL COGNITION 2.0 Micah Allen: [email_address] Social media is &quot;an umbrella term that defines the various activities that integrate technology, social interaction, and the construction of words, pictures, videos, and audio.&quot; - http://wikipedia.org Facts: 3/4 of Americans use social technology -Forrester, 2008 2/3 of the global internet population use social networks -Nielsen, 2009 Visiting SNSs is the 4th most popular online activity- more than email! -Nielsen, 2009 As of 12/2/2009 350,000,000 people use Facebook worldwide -Facebook.com Time spent on SNS is growing 3X the overall internet rate, accounting for roughly 10% of all internet time -Nielsen, 2009 “ What the F**K is social media, Kagan 2009”
    29. 33. THE NEW SOCIAL BRAIN
    30. 34. Micah Allen: [email_address] The social web provides expanded opportunities to flex our cognitive muscles, through a unique medium of interaction.
    31. 35. SOCIAL COGNITION 2.0 Micah Allen: [email_address]
    32. 36. Micah Allen: [email_address] Dense streams of multi-modal data provide opportunities to enrich our mental representations, opening the window for prolonged social self-stimulation in ways that transcend traditional dogma and social normativity. The web is a social laboratory- a place rich in intersubjective data providing endlessly inter-layered surveys of the opinions, beliefs, motivations and desires that make up our collective social fabric
    33. 37. Micah Allen: [email_address] Not only does social media potentially strengthen our inner social mechanisms; social media reshapes knowledge itself, establishing a variety of collective, collaborative sense-making narratives. Further, Web 2.0 extends the traditional routines to this rich tapestry- like the notepad or calculator for arithmetic, I can now offload my sense-making of others, objects, and events to the digital intersubjective.
    34. 38. SOCIAL COGNITION 2.0 Micah Allen: [email_address] This offloading to the collective democratizes information sharing, contextualizing events in ways that defy cultural and political boundaries.
    35. 39. SOCIAL COGNITION 2.0 Micah Allen: [email_address]
    36. 40. Micah Allen: [email_address] This is true extended cognition- the cognitive loop is completed in digitally mediated worlds- social technology makes information social- lending it immediacy and accessibility
    37. 41. Micah Allen: [email_address] Social media extracts the meaningful from the noise, increasing interdependency between information Turning this:
    38. 42. INTO THIS: <ul><li>Research 2.0 </li></ul>Micah Allen: [email_address]
    39. 43. BUT WHAT ABOUT THE BRAIN? Micah Allen: [email_address] My hypothesis: Brain Culture Technology Mind
    40. 44. SOCIAL TOOLS
    41. 45. POTENCY AND MODE <ul><li>Density </li></ul><ul><li>Temporality </li></ul><ul><li>Control </li></ul><ul><li>Self-Relevance </li></ul><ul><li>Aggregation </li></ul><ul><li>Self Stimulation with Social Stimuli! </li></ul>
    42. 46. A POTENT NEURAL AND CULTURAL STIMULANT? <ul><li>Massive adoption worldwide (about 400 million on FB alone) </li></ul><ul><li>89% increase in Facebook alone this year </li></ul><ul><li>People who use the Internet for personal reasons at work are about 9 percent more productive that those who do not (Coker, 2009). </li></ul>
    43. 47. THE SELF DISCLOSURE HYPOTHESIS <ul><li>Kraut (2002); Bessiere et al (2007); Valkenburg & Peter (2007), </li></ul><ul><ul><ul><li>Longitudinal studies demonstrate Internet use improves “social connectedness and well being” when used to maintain existing friendships. </li></ul></ul></ul>
    44. 48. SELF-DISCLOSURE AND COMPUTER MEDIATED COMMUNICATION <ul><li>More intimate self-disclosures when online (Tidwell & Walther, 2002; Valkenburg & Peter, in press). </li></ul><ul><li>Real life SD leads to well being. </li></ul><ul><ul><ul><li>Berndt, 2002 – Improves closeness and quality of friendships </li></ul></ul></ul><ul><ul><ul><li>Viewed as vital in high quality friendships (Buhrmester & Pragei, 1995) </li></ul></ul></ul><ul><ul><ul><li>Why? </li></ul></ul></ul><ul><ul><ul><li>Walther’s “Hyperpersonal Communication Theory” </li></ul></ul></ul><ul><ul><ul><li>-Reduced visual, auditory, and social context (authority stimuli) leads to less concern for others perceptions, lower inhibitions, greater disclosure. </li></ul></ul></ul>
    45. 49. USING FACEBOOK TO INCREASE CONNECTIVITY <ul><li>Joinson (2008) </li></ul><ul><ul><li>Top uses of FB: Social connection, shared identities, virtual people watching </li></ul></ul><ul><li>Lampe et al (2007; 2009) </li></ul><ul><ul><li>Intensity of usage correlates with social capitol and absence of loneliness </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Facebook typically used for ‘social searching’ rather than ‘social browsing’ </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Facebook as ‘social environment’ (Stafford et al, 2004) </li></ul></ul>
    46. 50. REJECTING THE ZOMBIES <ul><li>SNS and blogging may actually increase literacy (BBC, 2009) </li></ul><ul><li>SNS use does not correlate with decreases in grades (Hargittai, 2009) </li></ul><ul><li>Users do not typically use SNTs as a replacement for social interaction. </li></ul><ul><li>We’re already cyborgs! The printing press may have made the soliloquy less popular, but it didn’t reduce our ability to quote or understand Shakespeare! </li></ul><ul><li>Many uses of SNS. Probably unique neural correlates for each profile. </li></ul><ul><li>What theory cannot answer: what’s actually going on in there! </li></ul>
    47. 51. SUMMARY <ul><li>Facebook is a powerful social stimulant with many opportunities to reshape social cognition. </li></ul><ul><li>Social Networking Sites only one small aspect of our cyborg hybridization. </li></ul><ul><li>Potency of SNS usage and ubiquitous nature of distributed social cognition raise empirical questions for culture, consciousness, and cognition </li></ul><ul><li>Let’s do some experiments! </li></ul>
    48. 52. EXPERIMENT 1- ALTERATIONS IN TOM <ul><li>Does extensive Facebook use constitute social narrative or ToM ‘exercise’? </li></ul><ul><li>Measure with two tasks: </li></ul><ul><ul><li>Trait-Adjective Judgment Task </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Perspective Taking/Narrative Mentalizing Task </li></ul></ul>
    49. 53. TRAIT-ADJECTIVE TASK
    50. 54. TAJT: ARE FB FRIENDS REPRESENTED LIKE REAL WORLD FRIENDS? <ul><li>Compare offline and online friends, determine if there is neural equity. Two groups, low and high intensity. </li></ul><ul><li>Issues: Task may not be sensitive enough to discover differences best friends and strangers. </li></ul><ul><li>Possible Solution: Use a standard TAJT to determine alterations in self-related processing (i.e. more or less self-related activity) in conjunction with more precise ‘other’ task. </li></ul>Familiarity -FB +FB -IRL Bill Clinton Penpal +IRL Supervisor Girlfriend
    51. 55. OTHER TASKS – TOM WORD PROBLEMS
    52. 56. MANY PARADIGMS, WHAT’S THE QUESTION? <ul><li>Short list of possible paradigms: </li></ul><ul><ul><li>Mind is in the eyes </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Intentional stories </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Spontaneous mentalizing </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Short comics depicting intentional happenings </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>TAJTs </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Moral reasoning </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>‘ Like me’ </li></ul></ul><ul><li>Does SNS use: </li></ul><ul><ul><li>Alter in/group out/group phenomenon </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Alter self/other representation </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Increases ToM sensitivity </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Generalize to ToM for strangers, or alter non-specific social cognitive abilities </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Influence totally distinct tasks- mirror neuron system and motor simulation </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Enhance perspective taking or empathy </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Any of these- general vs specific? </li></ul></ul>
    53. 57. KEEPING IT CLEAN <ul><li>VBM with Demographic and Cognitive Probes </li></ul>Infinite possibilities: STROOP, Wisconsin Card Sort, etc
    54. 58. CURRENT WORK <ul><li>Analyzing data from 60 subject fMRI scan </li></ul><ul><ul><li>2 social cognitive tasks and two analytic reasoning tasks </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Extensive Default Mode Network data </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Internet Usage and Social Capitol Questionnaires. </li></ul></ul><ul><li>Clarifying ‘extended social cognition’ </li></ul><ul><li>Identifying future studies </li></ul>
    55. 59. THANK YOU! Thanks to: Supervisors: Andreas Roepstorff, Antoine Lutz, Peter Vestergaard Supporting Institutions : Interacting Minds and the Danish Center for Functionally Integrative Neuroscience, London Knowledge Lab, ÅU Collaborators and Contributors: Yishay Mor, Shaun Gallagher Contact: [email_address] Twitter: @neuroconscience URL: neuroconscience.com Slides: http://bit.ly/b7uiA7
    1. A particular slide catching your eye?

      Clipping is a handy way to collect important slides you want to go back to later.

    ×