SlideShare a Scribd company logo
1 of 18
Download to read offline
MG511 Strategic
Marketing

Case Study:
Burt’s Bees;
‘Leaving The Hive’

Lecturer:         Ms.x
Date:
14/12/2010



Group:
Seánpaul Walsh
Kenneth Kiernan
Maeve McQuillan
Contents:
1.0 Case Overview                                    2
2.0 Analyses                                         2
    2.1 External Analysis                            2
         2.1.1 Strategic Mapping                     2
         2.1.2 Competitor Analysis                   3
         2.1.3 Category Audit                        5
         2.1.4 Brand Awareness Analysis              6
    2.2 Internal Analysis                            8
         2.2.1 Revenue Growth Analysis               8
         2.2.2 CBBE Pyramid                          9
    2.3 SWOT Analysis                                9
3.0 Key Issues                                       10
4.0 Strategic Alternatives                           10
    4.1 Strategic Alternative (A); Niche Market      10
    4.2 Strategic Alternative (B);
         Joint Venture into Mass Market              11
5.0 Strategic Recommendation;
    Rebrand-Strengthen Awareness-Enter Mass Market   13
6.0 Case Lessons                                     15
7.0 Appendices/Bibliography                          16
1.0    Case Overview

Burt’s Bees had been growing by over thirty percent over the previous four years. The company
is the Brand leader in the natural personal care category, itself growing by fifteen percent over
the same period. The original vision of Burt’s Bees founder Roxanne Quimby was to ultimately
reach “everyone, everywhere”. The opportunity to grow its brand in the mass market is a
lucrative one for the company. However critics and some customers have commented that
Burt’s Bees was becoming too commercial, losing the authentic elements that has led to its
success.

Also in 2006 John Replogle became CEO of Burt’s Bees and he strongly believed that Burt’s Bees
could bring natural personal care to the forefront of mainstream personal care. Under his
leadership the product range would be changing rapidly, it would still stock the brands classics
and many of these products would continue to carry the brands early symbol; Burt’s bearded
face. However new product lines were about to appear among them a complete line of hair care
products. Replogle believed this was the way in which to break into the mass market. However
still the question remained: how could Burt’s Bees realize Roxanne Quimby’s vision of growing
the brand without distancing itself from the people, values and narratives that made it
successful thus far?

2.0    Analyses

2.1    External Analyses

       2.1.1 Strategic Mapping
It is clear from our strategic map that Burt’s Bees are a strong player in terms of brand
    awareness in their individual natural market. However as we shift to the right of the map we
    can see how brands awareness’s increases and also how the nature of the product changes. It is
    important to highlight that all the brands listed at the top and to the right, traditional, are in the
    mass market. Therefore it is evident that before any move is made Burt’s bees will need to
    strengthen their brand.

             2.1.2 Competitor Analysis

    Burt’s Bees is in an emerging market, the natural & organic personal care market has a 15%
    growth rate in the past year and the growth rate will highly likely to continue in the future. As a
    result, the industry has shown huge potential and highly competitive. In fact, NPC is still a niche
    market under the personal care industry. Key players in the mainstream personal care sector
    have shown interest and started to launch their natural personal care brands. Although some of
    them claimed to be natural, but they are widely accepted as pseudo-natural. Despite

    the natural elements of the products, Burt’s Bees and other NPC brands are also indirectly
    competing with those mass market brands.

     There are 6 main competitors in the natural & organic personal care sector:



 Brand        Distribution Channel            Price to         Product           Brand   Trial Usage Revenue
                                               Burt's         Specialty        Awareness             (million)
                                               Bees

Burt's       Speciality Stores, Health       Premium Skin & Lip                      54          26        19         101*
Bees         Stores, Drug Stores                     Care
Aveeno       Food Stores, Drug Stores,         Similar     Skin Care                 95          29        19         200
             Mass Retailers, Speciality
             Stores
Tom's        Mass Market Channels,             Lower       Oral & Body               39           7         6          50
of           Health Stores, Speciality                     Care
Maine        Stores
Kiss My      Health Food Stores,               Higher      Sun & Skin               N/A          N/A      N/A          75
Face         Speciality Stores,                            Care
             Website, CVS.com
Nature's Health Food Stores,                   Higher      Hair Care                 15           2         1         30-40
Gate     Speciality Stores,
         Website, CVS.com
JASON        CVS Stores                        Similar     No Specialty               8           3         3         20-25
Avalon                                         Higher      No Specialty              34           3         1          40
*Figure from sales in 2003 was $60 million, sales growth rate over 30%, take 60*130%*130%= $101.4 million for 2005.
Tom’s of Maine:   Owned by Colgate-Palmolive, estimated sales of $50 million in 2005.
                  Specialize in oral and body care products, price at slightly low than Burt’s
                  Bees. Tom’s is number one in the natural oral care with 60% share in US$.
                  Products sold in specialty stores, health food stores, mass-market channels
                  such as CVS, Walgreens and Target.

Kiss My Face:     Sales over $75 million in 2004, Kiss My Face covers most product categories,
                  and has two product lines. Original natural personal care products priced
                  similar to Burt’s Bees and the “certified organic” line is generally higher. Kiss
                  My Face is launching a new makeup line. It is also the sunscreen and
                  moisturizer sponsor of US Ski & Snowboard Teams 05-06. Distribution
                  channel includes health food store, specialty venues, own website, and
                  CVS.com.

Nature’s Gate:    Estimated sales of $30-40 million in 2005, Nature’s Gate was the number one
                  in natural hair care category. Three lines of products, classic priced similar to
                  Burt’s Bees and the other two higher. Products are sold through health food
                  stores, specialty venues, own website and CVS.com.

Jason:            Estimated sales of $20-25 million in 2005, JASON offers a broad range of
                  products priced in line with Burt’s Bees. Want to challenge Burt’s Bees in the
                  mainstream drug channel, started a partnership with CVS.

Avalon:           2 brands under Avalon, Avalon Organics and Alba Botanica, estimated sales of
                  $40 million. Alba Botanica is priced similar to Burt’s Bees and Avalon
                  Organics higher. Owned by the same company of JASON, will be part of the
                  challenge in the mainstream channel.

Aveeno:           Principal pseudo-natural competitor in the mass-market. Estimated sales of
                  excess $200 million, Aveeno offers a full range of products which are sold in
                  food, drug, specialty stores and mass retailers. Aveeno will launch a new line
                  of anti-aging products. Aveeno has a huge brand awareness advantage over
                  Burt’s Bees.

Other mass market competitors in the personal care industry include Johnson &Johnson’s
Neutrogena (sales $1 billion), Garnier, L’Oreal’s $400 million brand, Herbal Essences, $700
million Procter & Gamble brand. Those brands all have natural element in their products, but
they are currently still classified as pseudo-natural.

          2.1.3 Category/Product Range Audit

Burt’s Bees currently offers a large range of natural personal care products including lip, bath,
baby, skin care, and etc. There are some products (e.g. handmade candles which made up half of
their sales in the early years, their most mentioned Bay Rum after shave balm, and some
lipsticks especially the fig colour) have been discontinued due to various reasons. Ingredients
are claimed to be at least 98% natural and proven to be effective before launching. The product
also reflects the highly respect to environment and social responsibility, packaged with recycled
materials. One of the most notable features of Burt’s Bees’ products is the efficacy, which is
always tested and proven to be highly effective. This also refers to the healing effect of eczema
mentioned in customer’s                                 NPC       NPC    Current Competitor       NPC
                                    Category
       quotes in exhibit 8 of the                           Penetration Growth Offering    Offering  Feasibility
       case. Smell is also          Cosmetics                  2.2%      18.8%     No         No          No
                                    Feminine Hygiene           2.2%      12.6%     No         No          No
       another feature that
                                    Nail Care                  2.6%      7.2%      No         No          No
       Burt’s Bees valued           Fragrances/Aromatherapy    4.3%      14.3%     No         No          Yes
       highly compare to                                                        No(was
                                    Shaving                    5.3%      13.4%                No          Yes
       others. They believe that                                                offering)
       smell is one of the most     Oral Hygiene               9.9%      13.5%
                                                                                No(was
                                                                                             Yes          Yes
       attractive and appealing                                                 offering)
                                    Deodorant                 10.4%      18.3%     No         No          No
       feature of personal care
                                                                                                    Yes(ready to
       products, that also has      Haircare/Colouring        11.5%      17.1%     No        Yes
                                                                                                        launch)
       been proven to be a          Baby Care                 13.3%      14.4%    Yes        Yes          N/A
       signature feature of         Bath                      23.2%      14.0%    Yes        Yes          N/A
       Burt’s Bees products. An Bath/Toilet Soap              23.6%      13.5%    Yes        Yes          N/A
       interesting point made       Skin Care                 27.4%      13.4%    Yes        Yes          N/A

       by their Chief Marketing Officer Indursky, “we don’t ask consumers to help in creating products,
       we use them to validate, not create”. However, customer feedback in Exhibit 8 has shown huge
       desire with the discontinued products. Which we believe that the decision of discontinue those
       products was made without any research. Our table below shows the potential of each of the
       category in the personal care market including traditional, pseudo-natural and natural product
       categories, including the penetration of each natural product category in the market and its
       growth over the past year. The table below combined Burt’s Bees and competitors offerings of
       each of those product categories. Burt’s Bees’ current offering only include those have the
       highest penetration of natural personal care products (bottom 4), despite the above average
       growth rate of them. Looking at other categories, a lot of them have huge potential considering
       of the penetration and the growth rate together. That might be a good indicator for future
       research and development. However, some of them may not be feasible to the core vision of
       natural. For example, cosmetics may not be fully natural considering.

       2.1.4 Brand Awareness Analysis

          Brand Awareness June 2006                                  The graph to the left is broken into
                                                                     three parts, the bar charts in blue
120%
                                                                     represent traditional personal
                                                   Dove
100%                                                                 care products. The green charts
                                                   Olay              are both natural and Pseudo-
80%                                                Neutrogena        natural products and finally the
                                                   Herbel Essence    yellow represents Burt’s Bees. We
60%
                                                   L'Oreal
                                                                     have included both natural and
40%                                                                  traditional products into the
                                                   Chapstick
                                                                     analysis as we felt it was
20%                                                Blistex           important to consider both aspects
 0%                                                Aveeno            of the market due to the
                                                   Nivea             opportunities of expanding into
                                                                     the mass market. As we can see
                                                   Garnier
                                                                     Burt’s Bees has only 54% brand
                                                   Aveda
                                                                     awareness in comparison to Dove
and Olay who have the highest at 99% each. If we look even closer we can see that the leading
natural product brand is Aveda at 63% while in the Pseudo-natural range Aveeno is a clear
leader at 94%. A possibility for Burt’s Bees only coming in at 54% could be down to the fact that
they do not rely heavily on marketing communications and advertising to promote their brand.
Although this is not a major factor when it comes to the natural market however it is something
that will be need to be considered if entering into the mass market.

Once again the colour scheme is the
same as above; Burt’s Bee’s is coming in                          Trial-June 2006
at 29% which is quite low in comparison        80%
to the brand leaders in the market. Also                                                         Dove
                                               70%
the comparison can be made with the                                                              Olay
natural products where we are the              60%
                                                                                                 Neutrogena
market leader which is great to see            50%                                               Herbal essence
because Aveda (natural product) was
above us in the brand awareness chart          40%                                               L'Oreal
however we have now jumped above               30%                                               Chapstick
them in the trial of products table.                                                             Blistex
                                               20%
                                                                                                 Aveeno
                                               10%
                                                                                                 Nivea
                                                0%
                                                                                                 Garnier
                                                                                                 Aveda
                                                                                                 Burt's Bees


Current Usage of Brands

Brand                     July 2005              June 2006                % Difference
Dove                      57                     56                       1% loss
Olay                      33                     36                       3 % increase
Neutrogena                29                     32                       3 % increase
Herbal Essence            27                     25                       2 % decrease
L’Oreal                   28                     32                       4% increase
Chapstick                 40                     50                       10% increase
Blistex                   35                     30                       5% increase
Aveeno                    14                     19                       5% increase
Nivea                     12                     9                        3% decrease
Garnier                   10                     18                       8% increase
Aveda                     7                      8                        1% increase
Burt’s Bees               13                     19                       6% increase
Tom’s of Maine            6                      6                        Stayed the same
Avalon                    1                      1                        Stayed the same
Alba                      1                      0                        1% decrease
Natures Gate              1                      1                        Stayed the same
Aubrey                    1                      1                        Stayed the same
Jason                     3                      3                        Stayed the same
Dr. Hauska                1                      0                        1% decrease
The % difference table shows us that Burt’s Bees has grown by 6% from July 2005 until June
2006 in regard to usage of its products. This is the largest growth out of the entire of the natural
product market and the third highest in the overall personal care products market.
2.2      Internal Analysis

         2.2.1 Revenue Growth Analysis

Distribution Background

Burt’s Bees currently sell directly to distributors, bypassing wholesalers in order to maintain
premium pricing and dictate trade terms. Offering generous margins, stocking Burt’s Bees was
an attractive idea for personal care retailers, despite their no-returns policy and withheld trade
terms.

Traditionally, the company have retailed through speciality stores, starting off in the gift shop
market, as there were few entry barriers. However, Roxanne Quimby knew this couldn’t carry
the business, and wanted to get Burt’s Bees to “everyone, everywhere”. The company opened six
retail stores, but were forced to close due to lack of retail competencies and resources within
the company. Quimby realized that ultimate success lay in mass-market distribution, and in
September 2004, Quimby signed a deal to distribute Burt’s Bees line in CVS and Walgreens drug
stores.

However, with the company beginning to move into mass distribution, there has been some
backlash from smaller retailers, with some leaving Burt’s Bees. Up to now they have tried to
combat this by dissuading large retailers from offering customer discounts, to help smaller
stores compete, but a few speciality stores have felt this is not enough.

Burt’s Bees tend to stock in “hives”, a standout product display, which CVS have allowed up to
now due to shelf space maintenance. However, with the growing new product range, the hives
will no longer fit the full range and they may be forced to move from the distinctive hive to the
shelf.

Revenue by Channel:

                              2002                     2005                        Growth ’02-05
      Gift/Specialty Stores   39.9%                    31.2%                       - 8.7%
      Health Stores           29%                      15.2%                       - 13.8%
      Drug Stores             9%                       29.3%                       + 20.3%
      Distributor             5.1%                     12.8%                       + 7.7%
      Grocery                 6%                       6.9%                        + 0.9%
      Other                   11.1%                    4.7%`                       - 6.4%
As we can see from the table above, patterns of revenue through distribution channels has
dramatically changed since 2002, with high growth in revenue through drugstores, considerable
growth through distributors, and slight growth through grocery stores. Revenue from gift,
speciality, health stores and other channels have all dropped significantly.

                      % of Respondents who   Annual Ad Spend as   2005 % Market        2005 % Market
                      considered brand       a % of revenue       Share, Natural       Share, Drug Store
                      natural                                     Grocery              Channel
       Burt’s Bees:   0                      0                    7.3                  0.4
We can see from Exhibit 4 that although Burt’s Bees revenue from grew by 20.3% up to 2005
(ref. Exhibit 2), they still only commanded 0.4% of the drug store channel market share. This
could be attributed to their lack of spending on marketing communications and advertising. The
leading competitor in this channel is Aveeno, who spent 90% more on advertising, resulting in a
1.1% market share.

        2.2.2   CBBE Pyramid

The CBBE model can be seen as an integrated perceived image from its customer’s point of view,
with a mind route that a person follows to become a loyal customer. (See Appendix A)

Start from the bottom is the salience stage, where an individual receives the basic information
of the brand (product category, brand name, product name, etc.), through the marketing of that
brand or can be his/her own research in today’s two way communication environment. Then
he/she may purchase that brand to become a customer, there are two different routes that
he/she may take to form a brand image. The left hand side is the rational route, and the right is
emotional, each consists of two dimensions. To become a loyal customer, he/she may have both
rational and emotional perceptions of that brand. The rational route is very objective and more
about the product rather than the brand, the two sub headings are performance and judgment.
Performance is very fact based which would be for example the performance of that product,
price, durability and even design and style. Judgment is the actual rational stage: he/she would
judge the product and the brand in terms of perceived quality, trustworthiness and superiority,
and then decide to switch or not. The emotional route is nearly the total opposite of the rational
route. It is more subjective and may not have to tie with the physical product but the brand. The
two dimensions are feelings and imagery. Imagery is what the customer see the image that
he/she would have if link it to him/her. It is highly dependent on the brand personality and
endorsement that the brand has been built over time, and also may be influenced by other
people around him/her. Feeling is the emotional touch that a brand gives this person, which
could be highly influenced by public relation management and crisis management (in bad
situations) and etc. Approaching to the top of the model is the brand resonance, which is a
combined image and/or a sum up of all the bits and pieces that make the brand differentiated
from its competitors. This model indicates how a customer views a brand and what makes
him/her loyal to the brand. It also gives us an idea of how to build a brand that is highly likely to
gain customers and their loyalty.

2.3     SWOT Analysis                                           Strengths              Weaknesses
                                                                • Effective Product    • Low Brand
                                                                • Customer Loyalty       Awareness
After compiling our external and internal analysis we           • Experienced Mgmt     • Mixed Channels
                                                                  Team                 • Varied Image
constructed a SWOT analysis.                                    • Organic


Strengths:

Burt’s Bees have a strong loyal customer base built on          Opportunities          Threats
the back of an effective product that does exactly what         • Huge Growth
                                                                  Markets, Low
                                                                                       • "Just Another Do-
                                                                                         Gooder"
it says it does. It is almost 100% organic and is backed          Penetration          • Higher Price
                                                                • Unique Competitive
by a new experienced management team. The                         Advantage

company’s owners, AEA, are also specialists in building
image and sales.

Weaknesses:
Although Burt’s Bees’, as stated above, have a loyal customer base they clearly lack a clear
unified brand image. They are using eight different logos and text on their products which is a
serious factor to reconsider before entering the mass market. As a result of this, customers were
unable to recognise the brand in surveys taken. Another weakness of the company is that they
are performing across so many distribution channels. This can prove a difficulty for a small
brand and it could be suggestive that they become more select in their channels.

Opportunities:

As Burt’s Bees are hoping to enter the mass market, this provides the company with a great
opportunity to continue rapid growth and sustain value. This can combine with the company’s
unique competitive advantage of being 99% organic.

Threats:

Burt’s Bees must also be aware of the threats facing them such as consumers perceiving them as
another “do-gooder” and questioning the truth behind their product. They also face a huge
threat of entering the mass market with their current price as consumers in mass markets may
choose the less expensive option.



3.0      Key Issues

     Product Line: Large Product Line and some popular/unpopular products. Urgent need to
      cease discontinuing habit and disappointing customers.
     Brand Strength: Very poor brand strength. At present not leader in niche market in terms
      brand awareness and a long way off of competing in mass market. Sustainability needed.
     Retailer Relationships: Working with small retailers and maintaining those relationships is
      very important to sustain value and to grow. Must weigh options of distribution up also.
     Management Change: New management team may bring different views to company and
      also different direction. Must be careful how situation is managed.
     Where Next? Stay in niche market or go straight to mass market.
     New Competitive Environment: Regardless of which direction the company goes, they are
      facing new competition from both pseudo and traditional competitors as claims to be
      natural are widespread by everyone.

4.0      Strategic Alternatives

         4.1     Strategic Alternative (A); Staying in the Niche Market

Burt’s Bees has continued to grow consistently over the last number of years, experiencing an
enormous increase in their loyal customer base. The customer comments in Exhibit 8 show that
their current product line brings high customer satisfaction, generating positive word-of-mouth.
The company has relied on this positive word-of-mouth as a promotion tool, and it has lead to
the brand’s rapid growth in the niche market.

As mentioned in the distribution background, Burt’s Bees success began by retailing through
speciality, health and gift stores. Through these channels, Burt’s Bees products get pride of
place, having their own beehive-shaped display unit in catch the customer’s eye.
It is clear from the evidence given in the case that this strategy is working for the company.
They are continuing to grow by brand-loyal customers referring friends and family, and their
100% natural core values lie at the heart of the “fan” culture than surrounds the brand.

Continuing to focus on the niche market has some real potential for the company. According to
Parrish’s 2004 study on niche market strategy, “all of the study respondents (retailers) stated
that they have seen increased sales since implementing a nice market strategy.” Parrish also
noted that in order for a niche market strategy success depends on a number of product and
market variables. The product and brand must be differentiated, which with Burt’s Bees current
quirky branding and 100% natural ethos seems to already be working in growing their
customer base. There needs to be perceived value for the customer, which is evident in the
testimonials. The merchandising mix is important, and we feel that Burt’s Bees’ current “hive”
merchandising strategy catches the eye of potential customers in specialty stores, and this will
continue to allow them to be effective in the niche market.

We have some suggestions for expanding their current niche-market strategy to gain market
share in the category. We suggest building their relationships with retailers in the niche market,
in order to maximize retailers’ recommendations of our product to niche market consumers,
and increasing market share. This is already being done to an extent by their withholding trade
terms with mass retailers

We also suggest going into partnership with a major spa chain, with a similar value system to
avoid deflection from the brand. If we could get a spa chain to use Burt’s Bees products
primarily, we could ass perceived value to the product, use the health spa as a means to
emphasise the 100% natural element of the product offering, and increase brand awareness
across the market. Customers would then ideally see the benefits of Burt’s Bees product range,
and may become long-term users of the product range. Spas could also be used as an extra
specialised distribution channel within the niche market, selling Burt’s Bees products to
customers alongside Burt’s Bees Spa Treatments and to non-spa customers.

This strategy is achievable. It’s worked in the past, will continue to work, will be easy to
implement and changes will be minor. However, while there is rife opportunity to develop
market share within the niche market, our concerns about this strategy lie mainly in the reality
that staying within the niche market will limit the company’s potential for growth. While they
can continue to grow in this area, by limiting themselves from the mass market, they are
missing out on the chance to reach the majority of the market. Is it possible for Burt’s to reach
its potential for success by staying in this fixed niche market, and never expanding beyond it?

       4.2     Strategic Alternative (B); Joint Venture to enter mass market

If we look back at the analysis our low level of brand awareness is a major factor on expanding
into and competing in the mass market. In order to rectify this problem we choose to join with a
strong “pseudo natural” brand already established in the mass market such as Herbal-Essence.
Currently Herbal Essence has a $700 million brand which repositioned itself as a pseudo-
natural product line within food, drug, and mass stores. Herbal Essence is a large player in the
personal care market in comparison to Burt’s Bees. According to Sherman (2003) the reason a
smaller firm would “seek alliances with bigger more powerful companies is because of the
credibility boost, technology leveraging and access to markets which a larger player is likely to
bring to the table”. One of the possible reasons for joint ventures or strategic alliances is to
widen or integrate product lines (Sherman 2003). Therefore we suggest that for the Herbal
essence Shampoo range they would keep their brand image, however Burt’s Bees would need to
be mentioned in all aspects of the branding process. While for the rest of the Burt’s Bees product
portfolio the opposite would occur.

When considering a joint venture as a possible growth strategy give careful thought to the type
of partner you are looking for and what resources you and the partner will be contributing to
the newly formed entity (Sherman 2003). Therefore let us look at both the positive and negative
points for each company individually if the strategy was to become a reality:

Herbal Essence:

+Their current product line only includes shampoo, by joining with Burt’s Bees they have the
opportunity to utilise the full product portfolio which Burt’s Bees has to offer. This could lead to
an increase in revenue for the brand due to the expansion of the product range.

+They are currently positioned as a “pseudo natural” product line; the partnership with Burt’s
Bees can help them establish their products as fully natural. This allows Herbal Essence to
compete within the niche market of fully natural products which will further strengthen the
company’s future growth.

+They will still be the main brand image on their shampoo range; they can also use the new
shampoo which Burt’s Bees has developed and market themselves as 100% natural.

+By joining with Burt’s Bees they will acquire a percentage of the loyal and enthusiastic
customer base that Burt’s Bees currently have. The case tells us that these customers are
invaluable to the marketing of the company because they love the product so much they become
ambassadors for the product range and promote the product to anyone who will listen.

-Herbal Essence is currently only supplying shampoo to the market, by joining with Burt’s Bees
this may complicate the product line which may result in customer confusion. Also the fact that
Burt’s Bees will be the main brand image on the rest of the product range other than shampoo
this may lead to further confusion.

-If they are to enter into a niche market of “natural products” they may need to re-price their
current products to a more premium price similar to that of Burt’s Bees due to the fact that the
costs will be higher if going 100% natural. This again may cause confusion with their current
customer base and they may lose some of their existing customers.

-Herbal Essence already has high revenue and good brand awareness among consumers, why
would they need to merge with a smaller company who offer a different product line.

Burt’s Bees

+Burt’s Bees clearly state that they would like to develop a full range of shampoo, which in 2006
they finally came up with a fully natural shampoo product. If they were to merge with Herbal
Essence a specialised shampoo company, this would help them to develop and expand their
shampoo line across all channels of distribution.

+As the analysis show Herbal Essence have a massive 97% brand awareness in the personal
product care market and by Burt’s Bees merging with such an established firm this will allow
them to distribute their products to the mass market.

+The revenue and distribution channels which Herbal Essence currently has will help Burt’s
Bees expand and develop their full product range.
+The joint venture is with a company that is in the pseudo natural range already, so at least it’s
     not as traditional product range company.

     -By merging with a company such as Herbal Essence they may lose the authenticity of their
     brand and this may result in once loyal customers becoming disillusioned with the brand.

     -Burt’s Bees has just established their natural shampoo, however by joining with Herbal essence
     this may compromise their new shampoo product.

     -Herbal Essence specialise in hair care however they do not have any other products which
     means they bring limited expertise to the joint venture.

     From a Burt’s Bees point of view the joint venture with Herbal Essence will allow an easier path
     to expanding into the mass market and it will also help them to expand their product portfolio
     especially the shampoo line. The venture would give Burt’s Bees access to greater capital and
     larger distribution channels. However it seems that the benefits for Herbal Essence entering
     into the joint partnership greatly outweigh the benefits for Burt’s Bees. The disadvantage for
     Burt’s Bees entering into a joint venture with Herbal Essence would be that Burt’s Bees would
     be forced to give up a certain amount of control (Sherman 2003). If going with this strategy
     Burt’s Bees also runs the risk of losing its authenticity and original core beliefs by joining Herbal
     Essence in partnership. The risk of joining the two brands together as one is too high and will
     more than likely result in brand confusion for the consumer. Burt’s Bees should explore other
     strategies to ensure market growth.

     5.0     Chosen Strategy: Rebrand-Strengthen Awareness-Enter Mass Market

     For our chosen strategy, we have decided on a rebranding strategy to increase and strengthen
     the brand with the long term aim of expanding the brand within the mass market. As stated
     above we feel that the image of the brand is simply not sustainable to compete in the mass
     market and to an extent is the reason that the brand is not the most
     instantly recognized within the niche market. We believe that the
     number one issue for Burt’s Bees’ is to grow the brand without
     compromising the product i.e. ingredients.




                             Niche
                                                 Selected
1.     Rebrand       2.     Market
                           Campaign
                            Build Up
                                          3.       Mass
                                                  Market
                                                               4.      Entry




     We believe the strategy will follow four key steps, above.

     To begin, we feel that a large part of the weaknesses of the brand can be accounted for by the
     lack of advertising spend and multiple imagery across product lines as discussed earlier.
     Therefore we suggest one logo for the entire product portfolio, See Above. We have developed a
     logo that is similar to the ‘Innocent Smoothies’ logo as we feel that this is an appropriate way to
     position the brand and differentiate the brand from competitor’s, both niche and mass market.
     As well as a differentiator, the characteristics of the brand, such as honesty, commitment,
     organic and fair-trade can be leveraged as part of the entire offering. Brand personality can be
defined as the “embodiment of personality traits of the consumer in the brand itself” (West, Ford
& Ibrahim, 2006; P259). Through this tactic we feel we can compete with the larger traditional
competitors in the mass market as consumers will associate their own characteristics e.g.
honesty with the brand more clearly. This strategy of rebranding
should take approximately six months to one year we believe and
should create a clear unified umbrella brand for the company to
bring forward when moving into the chosen market. This
new simple logo can also improve customer’s
perception of brand, see CBBE Appendix B.             Skincare Facecare Body    Hair    Outdoor  Baby   Mens


A clear unique value proposition needs to be defined for the company along with the brand
image. We believe that the best way to this is to develop a proposition is around the healing
powers of the products. Many customers have praised the products for their healing powers so
this is a key customer insight and would be the strongest pillar to build the brand on.

Following this we suggest that a large portion of turnover is put into an advertising budget and
new packaging with the new branding as currently there is no advertising spend. This can be
done through sample days in store, coupons, television advertising, unifying the one image
online at burtsbees.com, incorporating social media into the media plan (customers as brand
ambassadors) and billboards.

After time has been spent building up the brand image within the niche market, we feel Burt’s
Bee’s should assess their consumer awareness again and relate it to their competitor’s. We
estimate that by then, the awareness figures will have raised and then the company will be
sufficiently equipped to compete within the mass market.

The next step for Burt’s Bees is to now carefully select which categories they will compete in
within the mass market and which distribution channels to use. We recommend that they aim to
compete in the Hair care, Nail Care, Shaving, Skin Care and Fragrances categories as these
represent the best opportunities for growth as all have relatively low penetration and high
growth rates. As well as this, most of these categories are aligned with existing products
available in the Burt’s Bee’s range currently, thus lowering NPD costs.

When selecting distribution channels, we feel Burt’s Bees’s priority should now be with drug
stores, distributors and grocery as they are now a mainstream product. We would aim to be still
in gift shops and health stores through working close relationships with them, but acknowledge
that we are losing some of the uniqueness which may make the brand unpopular in these
channels. However despite this we feel the reasoning is adequate as drug stores and
distributors are a growing trend in the company’s revenue streams as highlighted in analysis,
cumulative gain of 28.9% of revenue in 2005. We feel that this is also adequate as in order to
align with the long term goal of seeing the product in all mainstream stores we must be willing
to grow more.

Finally as part of this strategy, we feel that Burt’s Bees should keep measures of their progress
and understand that this is not an overnight strategy and is a long term strategy. Burt’s Bees
should not attempt to try to do too much and keep things simple. In order to grow they must
sustain current customers whilst providing the same value whilst attracting new customers
through the improved image of the brand.
Other suggestions regarding going mainstream we had were perhaps 5 years down the line,
developing food products, i.e. Honey and Lemon Healing drinks for mass market. Another
suggestion is perhaps looking into getting fair trade stamps of endorsement or 100% certified
stamps.

We believe that this chosen strategy is achievable and realistic because of recent consumer
demand trends for organic natural products and because we are not compromising the core
values of the product but simply architecting a structured brand and product portfolio whilst
sustaining existing customer value.



6.0      Case Lessons

     It is very important to have a product portfolio that has a consistent brand image. At the
      moment Burt’s Bees products are quite diverse and this may cause customer confusion,
      especially when entering into the mass market.
     The original vision of the Burt’s Bees brand was to have their natural and earth friendly
      products reach everyone, everywhere. Although this may cause the brand to become too
      commercial, sometimes in business it’s about making a decision and implementing it in
      order for it to work for the company.
     The loyal customers of Burt’s Bees are integral to the future success of the company. As
      stated in the case they are very passionate and truly love the brand. Therefore whatever
      future growth strategy that Burt’s Bees decide on they must not offend their current loyal
      customers by compromising the authenticity and fully natural elements of the product
      range.
7.0      Bibliography/Appendices

Books:

West, Ford & Ibrahim, (2006). ‘Strategic Marketing’, Oxford Publishing.

Doyle & Stern, (2006), ‘Marketing Management and Strategy’, 4th Ed., Prentice Hall.

Keller, (2008), ‘Strategic Brand Management’, 3rd Ed., Pearson Education.

Article:

Sherman, A. (2003), ‘Growth through Joint Ventures and Strategic Alliances’, Fast track Business
Growth. Available at Business Source Complete.

Journals:

Parrish, 2004. “Retailers use of Niche Marketing in Product Development”. Journal of Fashion
Marketing & Management; Oct2010, Vol. 14 Issue 4, p546-561.
Appendix A: CBBE Pyramid


                                   Brand Resonance
                                   Loyalty & Sense Of
                                      Community
                              Judgement
                           Feelings
                           Perceived Quality            Social
                           Creditability
                           Responsibility
                Performance for money
                        Value                        Healthy
                       Imagery
                        100% Natural
                Smell                                            Values
                Healing                                 Certified
                Endorsement
                Efficacy                                   Bees are
                natural
                                    Brand Saliance
            Category Awareness(NPC), Relatively Strong Brand Awareness
Appendix B: Declaration

                                      Declaration
We hereby certify that this material which we now submit for assessment
on the programme of study leading to the award of MBA Marketing is
entirely our own work, and has not been taken from the work of others,
save, and to the extent that, such work has been cited and acknowledged
within the text of our work.


            Signed: _______________________ ID No: ______________ Date: _________



            Signed: _______________________ ID No: ______________ Date: _________



            Signed: _______________________ ID No: ______________ Date: _________



            Signed: _______________________ ID No: ______________ Date: _________

More Related Content

What's hot

The evolution of Dove as a Brand
The evolution of Dove as a BrandThe evolution of Dove as a Brand
The evolution of Dove as a BrandRohan Bharaj
 
Unilever in Brazil - For Low Income Consumers
Unilever in Brazil - For Low Income ConsumersUnilever in Brazil - For Low Income Consumers
Unilever in Brazil - For Low Income Consumersozgur705
 
Flare Fragrances - Harvard Business Case by Priyanka Samtani, Seneca College
Flare Fragrances - Harvard Business Case by Priyanka Samtani, Seneca CollegeFlare Fragrances - Harvard Business Case by Priyanka Samtani, Seneca College
Flare Fragrances - Harvard Business Case by Priyanka Samtani, Seneca CollegePriyanka Samtani
 
Loreal in China: Strategies for the Yue Sai Brand
Loreal in China: Strategies for the Yue Sai BrandLoreal in China: Strategies for the Yue Sai Brand
Loreal in China: Strategies for the Yue Sai BrandAnkit Sen
 
Dove Evolution Of A Brand
Dove  Evolution Of A BrandDove  Evolution Of A Brand
Dove Evolution Of A Brandguest3c87b17
 
BA106 - Marketing - Burt\'s Bees Case Presentation
BA106 - Marketing - Burt\'s Bees Case PresentationBA106 - Marketing - Burt\'s Bees Case Presentation
BA106 - Marketing - Burt\'s Bees Case Presentationjiamian_niu
 
Dove: evolution of a brand
Dove: evolution of a brand Dove: evolution of a brand
Dove: evolution of a brand Sameer Mathur
 
Marketing Strategies for Low Income Consumers Unilever Brazil
Marketing Strategies for Low Income Consumers Unilever BrazilMarketing Strategies for Low Income Consumers Unilever Brazil
Marketing Strategies for Low Income Consumers Unilever BrazilSeanpaul Walsh
 
Avon Competitive Strategy
Avon Competitive StrategyAvon Competitive Strategy
Avon Competitive StrategyPutri Arinda
 
Brand Building Strategy for Nivea
Brand Building Strategy for NiveaBrand Building Strategy for Nivea
Brand Building Strategy for NiveaNikita Sanghvi
 
Marketing Analysis of NIVEA
Marketing Analysis of NIVEA Marketing Analysis of NIVEA
Marketing Analysis of NIVEA Vicky Parmar
 
Clean Edge Razor - Splitting Hairs in Product Positioning
Clean Edge Razor - Splitting Hairs in Product PositioningClean Edge Razor - Splitting Hairs in Product Positioning
Clean Edge Razor - Splitting Hairs in Product PositioningR. Purwedi Darminto
 
L'Oreal - Marketing Strategy
L'Oreal - Marketing StrategyL'Oreal - Marketing Strategy
L'Oreal - Marketing Strategyibzmir
 
Loreal HBR case analysis- Global brand local knowledge
Loreal HBR case analysis- Global brand local knowledgeLoreal HBR case analysis- Global brand local knowledge
Loreal HBR case analysis- Global brand local knowledgeJibin Joseph
 

What's hot (20)

The evolution of Dove as a Brand
The evolution of Dove as a BrandThe evolution of Dove as a Brand
The evolution of Dove as a Brand
 
Dove Brand Analysis
Dove Brand AnalysisDove Brand Analysis
Dove Brand Analysis
 
Unilever in Brazil - For Low Income Consumers
Unilever in Brazil - For Low Income ConsumersUnilever in Brazil - For Low Income Consumers
Unilever in Brazil - For Low Income Consumers
 
Dove SWOT
Dove SWOTDove SWOT
Dove SWOT
 
Flare Fragrances - Harvard Business Case by Priyanka Samtani, Seneca College
Flare Fragrances - Harvard Business Case by Priyanka Samtani, Seneca CollegeFlare Fragrances - Harvard Business Case by Priyanka Samtani, Seneca College
Flare Fragrances - Harvard Business Case by Priyanka Samtani, Seneca College
 
Loreal in China: Strategies for the Yue Sai Brand
Loreal in China: Strategies for the Yue Sai BrandLoreal in China: Strategies for the Yue Sai Brand
Loreal in China: Strategies for the Yue Sai Brand
 
Dove Evolution Of A Brand
Dove  Evolution Of A BrandDove  Evolution Of A Brand
Dove Evolution Of A Brand
 
Nivea
NiveaNivea
Nivea
 
Nivea strategy
Nivea strategyNivea strategy
Nivea strategy
 
BA106 - Marketing - Burt\'s Bees Case Presentation
BA106 - Marketing - Burt\'s Bees Case PresentationBA106 - Marketing - Burt\'s Bees Case Presentation
BA106 - Marketing - Burt\'s Bees Case Presentation
 
Dove: evolution of a brand
Dove: evolution of a brand Dove: evolution of a brand
Dove: evolution of a brand
 
Marketing Strategies for Low Income Consumers Unilever Brazil
Marketing Strategies for Low Income Consumers Unilever BrazilMarketing Strategies for Low Income Consumers Unilever Brazil
Marketing Strategies for Low Income Consumers Unilever Brazil
 
Cola wars Case Study Analysis
Cola wars Case Study AnalysisCola wars Case Study Analysis
Cola wars Case Study Analysis
 
Brand Audit on Loreal
Brand Audit on LorealBrand Audit on Loreal
Brand Audit on Loreal
 
Avon Competitive Strategy
Avon Competitive StrategyAvon Competitive Strategy
Avon Competitive Strategy
 
Brand Building Strategy for Nivea
Brand Building Strategy for NiveaBrand Building Strategy for Nivea
Brand Building Strategy for Nivea
 
Marketing Analysis of NIVEA
Marketing Analysis of NIVEA Marketing Analysis of NIVEA
Marketing Analysis of NIVEA
 
Clean Edge Razor - Splitting Hairs in Product Positioning
Clean Edge Razor - Splitting Hairs in Product PositioningClean Edge Razor - Splitting Hairs in Product Positioning
Clean Edge Razor - Splitting Hairs in Product Positioning
 
L'Oreal - Marketing Strategy
L'Oreal - Marketing StrategyL'Oreal - Marketing Strategy
L'Oreal - Marketing Strategy
 
Loreal HBR case analysis- Global brand local knowledge
Loreal HBR case analysis- Global brand local knowledgeLoreal HBR case analysis- Global brand local knowledge
Loreal HBR case analysis- Global brand local knowledge
 

Similar to STRATEGIC MARKETING PLAN AND AUDIT - BURTS BEES

Biotech Health and Life Products Company ProfileWelcome to Biote.docx
Biotech Health and Life Products Company ProfileWelcome to Biote.docxBiotech Health and Life Products Company ProfileWelcome to Biote.docx
Biotech Health and Life Products Company ProfileWelcome to Biote.docxmoirarandell
 
Biotech Health and Life Products Company Profile We.docx
Biotech Health and Life Products Company Profile  We.docxBiotech Health and Life Products Company Profile  We.docx
Biotech Health and Life Products Company Profile We.docxmoirarandell
 
Essay About The Marketing Plan Of Niften Shampoo
Essay About The Marketing Plan Of Niften ShampooEssay About The Marketing Plan Of Niften Shampoo
Essay About The Marketing Plan Of Niften ShampooKate Loge
 
BMGT 365 Organizational Leadership Biotech Company Profile .docx
BMGT 365 Organizational Leadership Biotech Company Profile    .docxBMGT 365 Organizational Leadership Biotech Company Profile    .docx
BMGT 365 Organizational Leadership Biotech Company Profile .docxjasoninnes20
 
Competitors of complan,revlon and hit
Competitors of complan,revlon and hitCompetitors of complan,revlon and hit
Competitors of complan,revlon and hitNithin Daniel
 
Procter & Gamble Strategic Analysis
Procter & Gamble Strategic AnalysisProcter & Gamble Strategic Analysis
Procter & Gamble Strategic AnalysisSteven Perdoch
 
Recession Proof Opportunity Pdf
Recession Proof Opportunity PdfRecession Proof Opportunity Pdf
Recession Proof Opportunity Pdfmatrixmichael
 
Marketing.pptx
Marketing.pptxMarketing.pptx
Marketing.pptxAkkuRaveen
 
Clorox Is Very Effective On Bacteria Essay
Clorox Is Very Effective On Bacteria EssayClorox Is Very Effective On Bacteria Essay
Clorox Is Very Effective On Bacteria EssayLaura Scott
 
JBR Store - Looking for distributors, Wholesalers and Proffessionals
JBR Store - Looking for distributors, Wholesalers and ProffessionalsJBR Store - Looking for distributors, Wholesalers and Proffessionals
JBR Store - Looking for distributors, Wholesalers and ProffessionalsClaudia Nunes
 
Winona China market strategy report by daxue consulting
Winona China market strategy report by daxue consultingWinona China market strategy report by daxue consulting
Winona China market strategy report by daxue consultingDaxue Consulting
 
At-home Skin Care Devices 2011- Brochure
At-home Skin Care Devices 2011- BrochureAt-home Skin Care Devices 2011- Brochure
At-home Skin Care Devices 2011- BrochureKline and Company
 
Market Study on Australian Skincare Market | Market Research | Innovius Resea...
Market Study on Australian Skincare Market | Market Research | Innovius Resea...Market Study on Australian Skincare Market | Market Research | Innovius Resea...
Market Study on Australian Skincare Market | Market Research | Innovius Resea...Innovius Designs
 
Marketing plan for immunity booster(in health products)
Marketing plan for immunity booster(in health products)Marketing plan for immunity booster(in health products)
Marketing plan for immunity booster(in health products)Swarupa Rani Sahu
 
Boots : Hair-Care Sales Pomotion
Boots : Hair-Care Sales PomotionBoots : Hair-Care Sales Pomotion
Boots : Hair-Care Sales PomotionVibhor Kumar
 

Similar to STRATEGIC MARKETING PLAN AND AUDIT - BURTS BEES (20)

Biotech Health and Life Products Company ProfileWelcome to Biote.docx
Biotech Health and Life Products Company ProfileWelcome to Biote.docxBiotech Health and Life Products Company ProfileWelcome to Biote.docx
Biotech Health and Life Products Company ProfileWelcome to Biote.docx
 
Biotech Health and Life Products Company Profile We.docx
Biotech Health and Life Products Company Profile  We.docxBiotech Health and Life Products Company Profile  We.docx
Biotech Health and Life Products Company Profile We.docx
 
Essay About The Marketing Plan Of Niften Shampoo
Essay About The Marketing Plan Of Niften ShampooEssay About The Marketing Plan Of Niften Shampoo
Essay About The Marketing Plan Of Niften Shampoo
 
Hul by abdul gafoor...
Hul by abdul gafoor...Hul by abdul gafoor...
Hul by abdul gafoor...
 
BMGT 365 Organizational Leadership Biotech Company Profile .docx
BMGT 365 Organizational Leadership Biotech Company Profile    .docxBMGT 365 Organizational Leadership Biotech Company Profile    .docx
BMGT 365 Organizational Leadership Biotech Company Profile .docx
 
Competitors of complan,revlon and hit
Competitors of complan,revlon and hitCompetitors of complan,revlon and hit
Competitors of complan,revlon and hit
 
Fake brand in rural market
Fake brand in rural marketFake brand in rural market
Fake brand in rural market
 
Procter & Gamble Strategic Analysis
Procter & Gamble Strategic AnalysisProcter & Gamble Strategic Analysis
Procter & Gamble Strategic Analysis
 
Recession Proof Opportunity Pdf
Recession Proof Opportunity PdfRecession Proof Opportunity Pdf
Recession Proof Opportunity Pdf
 
Marketing.pptx
Marketing.pptxMarketing.pptx
Marketing.pptx
 
Clorox Is Very Effective On Bacteria Essay
Clorox Is Very Effective On Bacteria EssayClorox Is Very Effective On Bacteria Essay
Clorox Is Very Effective On Bacteria Essay
 
Boots: Hair care sales promotion
Boots: Hair care sales promotionBoots: Hair care sales promotion
Boots: Hair care sales promotion
 
JBR Store - Looking for distributors, Wholesalers and Proffessionals
JBR Store - Looking for distributors, Wholesalers and ProffessionalsJBR Store - Looking for distributors, Wholesalers and Proffessionals
JBR Store - Looking for distributors, Wholesalers and Proffessionals
 
Hul template
Hul templateHul template
Hul template
 
Winona China market strategy report by daxue consulting
Winona China market strategy report by daxue consultingWinona China market strategy report by daxue consulting
Winona China market strategy report by daxue consulting
 
Market Research On DOVE.
Market Research On DOVE.Market Research On DOVE.
Market Research On DOVE.
 
At-home Skin Care Devices 2011- Brochure
At-home Skin Care Devices 2011- BrochureAt-home Skin Care Devices 2011- Brochure
At-home Skin Care Devices 2011- Brochure
 
Market Study on Australian Skincare Market | Market Research | Innovius Resea...
Market Study on Australian Skincare Market | Market Research | Innovius Resea...Market Study on Australian Skincare Market | Market Research | Innovius Resea...
Market Study on Australian Skincare Market | Market Research | Innovius Resea...
 
Marketing plan for immunity booster(in health products)
Marketing plan for immunity booster(in health products)Marketing plan for immunity booster(in health products)
Marketing plan for immunity booster(in health products)
 
Boots : Hair-Care Sales Pomotion
Boots : Hair-Care Sales PomotionBoots : Hair-Care Sales Pomotion
Boots : Hair-Care Sales Pomotion
 

More from Seanpaul Walsh

DESIGN WORK FOR MGMT PORTFOLIO 4
DESIGN WORK FOR MGMT PORTFOLIO 4DESIGN WORK FOR MGMT PORTFOLIO 4
DESIGN WORK FOR MGMT PORTFOLIO 4Seanpaul Walsh
 
DESIGN WORK FOR MGMT PORTFOLIO 1
DESIGN WORK FOR MGMT PORTFOLIO 1DESIGN WORK FOR MGMT PORTFOLIO 1
DESIGN WORK FOR MGMT PORTFOLIO 1Seanpaul Walsh
 
DESIGN WORK FOR MGMT PORTFOLIO 2
DESIGN WORK FOR MGMT PORTFOLIO 2DESIGN WORK FOR MGMT PORTFOLIO 2
DESIGN WORK FOR MGMT PORTFOLIO 2Seanpaul Walsh
 
DESIGN WORK FOR MGMT PORTFOLIO 3
DESIGN WORK FOR MGMT PORTFOLIO 3DESIGN WORK FOR MGMT PORTFOLIO 3
DESIGN WORK FOR MGMT PORTFOLIO 3Seanpaul Walsh
 
SUSTAINABILITY MARKETING - GREENSTAR LTD. AUDIT
SUSTAINABILITY MARKETING - GREENSTAR LTD. AUDITSUSTAINABILITY MARKETING - GREENSTAR LTD. AUDIT
SUSTAINABILITY MARKETING - GREENSTAR LTD. AUDITSeanpaul Walsh
 
NEXT GENERATION MARKETING PORTFOLIO 2011
NEXT GENERATION MARKETING PORTFOLIO 2011NEXT GENERATION MARKETING PORTFOLIO 2011
NEXT GENERATION MARKETING PORTFOLIO 2011Seanpaul Walsh
 
STRATEGIC MARKETING PLAN - JUST US COFFEE
STRATEGIC MARKETING PLAN - JUST US COFFEESTRATEGIC MARKETING PLAN - JUST US COFFEE
STRATEGIC MARKETING PLAN - JUST US COFFEESeanpaul Walsh
 
UNICEF PROMO FRONT COVER
UNICEF PROMO FRONT COVERUNICEF PROMO FRONT COVER
UNICEF PROMO FRONT COVERSeanpaul Walsh
 
UNICEF PROMO BACK COVER
UNICEF PROMO BACK COVERUNICEF PROMO BACK COVER
UNICEF PROMO BACK COVERSeanpaul Walsh
 

More from Seanpaul Walsh (12)

DESIGN WORK FOR MGMT PORTFOLIO 4
DESIGN WORK FOR MGMT PORTFOLIO 4DESIGN WORK FOR MGMT PORTFOLIO 4
DESIGN WORK FOR MGMT PORTFOLIO 4
 
DESIGN WORK FOR MGMT PORTFOLIO 1
DESIGN WORK FOR MGMT PORTFOLIO 1DESIGN WORK FOR MGMT PORTFOLIO 1
DESIGN WORK FOR MGMT PORTFOLIO 1
 
DESIGN WORK FOR MGMT PORTFOLIO 2
DESIGN WORK FOR MGMT PORTFOLIO 2DESIGN WORK FOR MGMT PORTFOLIO 2
DESIGN WORK FOR MGMT PORTFOLIO 2
 
DESIGN WORK FOR MGMT PORTFOLIO 3
DESIGN WORK FOR MGMT PORTFOLIO 3DESIGN WORK FOR MGMT PORTFOLIO 3
DESIGN WORK FOR MGMT PORTFOLIO 3
 
SUSTAINABILITY MARKETING - GREENSTAR LTD. AUDIT
SUSTAINABILITY MARKETING - GREENSTAR LTD. AUDITSUSTAINABILITY MARKETING - GREENSTAR LTD. AUDIT
SUSTAINABILITY MARKETING - GREENSTAR LTD. AUDIT
 
NEXT GENERATION MARKETING PORTFOLIO 2011
NEXT GENERATION MARKETING PORTFOLIO 2011NEXT GENERATION MARKETING PORTFOLIO 2011
NEXT GENERATION MARKETING PORTFOLIO 2011
 
STRATEGIC MARKETING PLAN - JUST US COFFEE
STRATEGIC MARKETING PLAN - JUST US COFFEESTRATEGIC MARKETING PLAN - JUST US COFFEE
STRATEGIC MARKETING PLAN - JUST US COFFEE
 
The Giving Consumer
The Giving ConsumerThe Giving Consumer
The Giving Consumer
 
UNICEF PROMO FRONT COVER
UNICEF PROMO FRONT COVERUNICEF PROMO FRONT COVER
UNICEF PROMO FRONT COVER
 
UNICEF PROMO BACK COVER
UNICEF PROMO BACK COVERUNICEF PROMO BACK COVER
UNICEF PROMO BACK COVER
 
A1 POSTER
A1 POSTERA1 POSTER
A1 POSTER
 
RSA Ad Deconstruction
RSA Ad DeconstructionRSA Ad Deconstruction
RSA Ad Deconstruction
 

STRATEGIC MARKETING PLAN AND AUDIT - BURTS BEES

  • 1. MG511 Strategic Marketing Case Study: Burt’s Bees; ‘Leaving The Hive’ Lecturer: Ms.x Date: 14/12/2010 Group: Seánpaul Walsh Kenneth Kiernan Maeve McQuillan
  • 2. Contents: 1.0 Case Overview 2 2.0 Analyses 2 2.1 External Analysis 2 2.1.1 Strategic Mapping 2 2.1.2 Competitor Analysis 3 2.1.3 Category Audit 5 2.1.4 Brand Awareness Analysis 6 2.2 Internal Analysis 8 2.2.1 Revenue Growth Analysis 8 2.2.2 CBBE Pyramid 9 2.3 SWOT Analysis 9 3.0 Key Issues 10 4.0 Strategic Alternatives 10 4.1 Strategic Alternative (A); Niche Market 10 4.2 Strategic Alternative (B); Joint Venture into Mass Market 11 5.0 Strategic Recommendation; Rebrand-Strengthen Awareness-Enter Mass Market 13 6.0 Case Lessons 15 7.0 Appendices/Bibliography 16
  • 3. 1.0 Case Overview Burt’s Bees had been growing by over thirty percent over the previous four years. The company is the Brand leader in the natural personal care category, itself growing by fifteen percent over the same period. The original vision of Burt’s Bees founder Roxanne Quimby was to ultimately reach “everyone, everywhere”. The opportunity to grow its brand in the mass market is a lucrative one for the company. However critics and some customers have commented that Burt’s Bees was becoming too commercial, losing the authentic elements that has led to its success. Also in 2006 John Replogle became CEO of Burt’s Bees and he strongly believed that Burt’s Bees could bring natural personal care to the forefront of mainstream personal care. Under his leadership the product range would be changing rapidly, it would still stock the brands classics and many of these products would continue to carry the brands early symbol; Burt’s bearded face. However new product lines were about to appear among them a complete line of hair care products. Replogle believed this was the way in which to break into the mass market. However still the question remained: how could Burt’s Bees realize Roxanne Quimby’s vision of growing the brand without distancing itself from the people, values and narratives that made it successful thus far? 2.0 Analyses 2.1 External Analyses 2.1.1 Strategic Mapping
  • 4. It is clear from our strategic map that Burt’s Bees are a strong player in terms of brand awareness in their individual natural market. However as we shift to the right of the map we can see how brands awareness’s increases and also how the nature of the product changes. It is important to highlight that all the brands listed at the top and to the right, traditional, are in the mass market. Therefore it is evident that before any move is made Burt’s bees will need to strengthen their brand. 2.1.2 Competitor Analysis Burt’s Bees is in an emerging market, the natural & organic personal care market has a 15% growth rate in the past year and the growth rate will highly likely to continue in the future. As a result, the industry has shown huge potential and highly competitive. In fact, NPC is still a niche market under the personal care industry. Key players in the mainstream personal care sector have shown interest and started to launch their natural personal care brands. Although some of them claimed to be natural, but they are widely accepted as pseudo-natural. Despite the natural elements of the products, Burt’s Bees and other NPC brands are also indirectly competing with those mass market brands. There are 6 main competitors in the natural & organic personal care sector: Brand Distribution Channel Price to Product Brand Trial Usage Revenue Burt's Specialty Awareness (million) Bees Burt's Speciality Stores, Health Premium Skin & Lip 54 26 19 101* Bees Stores, Drug Stores Care Aveeno Food Stores, Drug Stores, Similar Skin Care 95 29 19 200 Mass Retailers, Speciality Stores Tom's Mass Market Channels, Lower Oral & Body 39 7 6 50 of Health Stores, Speciality Care Maine Stores Kiss My Health Food Stores, Higher Sun & Skin N/A N/A N/A 75 Face Speciality Stores, Care Website, CVS.com Nature's Health Food Stores, Higher Hair Care 15 2 1 30-40 Gate Speciality Stores, Website, CVS.com JASON CVS Stores Similar No Specialty 8 3 3 20-25 Avalon Higher No Specialty 34 3 1 40 *Figure from sales in 2003 was $60 million, sales growth rate over 30%, take 60*130%*130%= $101.4 million for 2005.
  • 5. Tom’s of Maine: Owned by Colgate-Palmolive, estimated sales of $50 million in 2005. Specialize in oral and body care products, price at slightly low than Burt’s Bees. Tom’s is number one in the natural oral care with 60% share in US$. Products sold in specialty stores, health food stores, mass-market channels such as CVS, Walgreens and Target. Kiss My Face: Sales over $75 million in 2004, Kiss My Face covers most product categories, and has two product lines. Original natural personal care products priced similar to Burt’s Bees and the “certified organic” line is generally higher. Kiss My Face is launching a new makeup line. It is also the sunscreen and moisturizer sponsor of US Ski & Snowboard Teams 05-06. Distribution channel includes health food store, specialty venues, own website, and CVS.com. Nature’s Gate: Estimated sales of $30-40 million in 2005, Nature’s Gate was the number one in natural hair care category. Three lines of products, classic priced similar to Burt’s Bees and the other two higher. Products are sold through health food stores, specialty venues, own website and CVS.com. Jason: Estimated sales of $20-25 million in 2005, JASON offers a broad range of products priced in line with Burt’s Bees. Want to challenge Burt’s Bees in the mainstream drug channel, started a partnership with CVS. Avalon: 2 brands under Avalon, Avalon Organics and Alba Botanica, estimated sales of $40 million. Alba Botanica is priced similar to Burt’s Bees and Avalon Organics higher. Owned by the same company of JASON, will be part of the challenge in the mainstream channel. Aveeno: Principal pseudo-natural competitor in the mass-market. Estimated sales of excess $200 million, Aveeno offers a full range of products which are sold in food, drug, specialty stores and mass retailers. Aveeno will launch a new line of anti-aging products. Aveeno has a huge brand awareness advantage over Burt’s Bees. Other mass market competitors in the personal care industry include Johnson &Johnson’s Neutrogena (sales $1 billion), Garnier, L’Oreal’s $400 million brand, Herbal Essences, $700 million Procter & Gamble brand. Those brands all have natural element in their products, but they are currently still classified as pseudo-natural. 2.1.3 Category/Product Range Audit Burt’s Bees currently offers a large range of natural personal care products including lip, bath, baby, skin care, and etc. There are some products (e.g. handmade candles which made up half of their sales in the early years, their most mentioned Bay Rum after shave balm, and some lipsticks especially the fig colour) have been discontinued due to various reasons. Ingredients are claimed to be at least 98% natural and proven to be effective before launching. The product also reflects the highly respect to environment and social responsibility, packaged with recycled materials. One of the most notable features of Burt’s Bees’ products is the efficacy, which is always tested and proven to be highly effective. This also refers to the healing effect of eczema
  • 6. mentioned in customer’s NPC NPC Current Competitor NPC Category quotes in exhibit 8 of the Penetration Growth Offering Offering Feasibility case. Smell is also Cosmetics 2.2% 18.8% No No No Feminine Hygiene 2.2% 12.6% No No No another feature that Nail Care 2.6% 7.2% No No No Burt’s Bees valued Fragrances/Aromatherapy 4.3% 14.3% No No Yes highly compare to No(was Shaving 5.3% 13.4% No Yes others. They believe that offering) smell is one of the most Oral Hygiene 9.9% 13.5% No(was Yes Yes attractive and appealing offering) Deodorant 10.4% 18.3% No No No feature of personal care Yes(ready to products, that also has Haircare/Colouring 11.5% 17.1% No Yes launch) been proven to be a Baby Care 13.3% 14.4% Yes Yes N/A signature feature of Bath 23.2% 14.0% Yes Yes N/A Burt’s Bees products. An Bath/Toilet Soap 23.6% 13.5% Yes Yes N/A interesting point made Skin Care 27.4% 13.4% Yes Yes N/A by their Chief Marketing Officer Indursky, “we don’t ask consumers to help in creating products, we use them to validate, not create”. However, customer feedback in Exhibit 8 has shown huge desire with the discontinued products. Which we believe that the decision of discontinue those products was made without any research. Our table below shows the potential of each of the category in the personal care market including traditional, pseudo-natural and natural product categories, including the penetration of each natural product category in the market and its growth over the past year. The table below combined Burt’s Bees and competitors offerings of each of those product categories. Burt’s Bees’ current offering only include those have the highest penetration of natural personal care products (bottom 4), despite the above average growth rate of them. Looking at other categories, a lot of them have huge potential considering of the penetration and the growth rate together. That might be a good indicator for future research and development. However, some of them may not be feasible to the core vision of natural. For example, cosmetics may not be fully natural considering. 2.1.4 Brand Awareness Analysis Brand Awareness June 2006 The graph to the left is broken into three parts, the bar charts in blue 120% represent traditional personal Dove 100% care products. The green charts Olay are both natural and Pseudo- 80% Neutrogena natural products and finally the Herbel Essence yellow represents Burt’s Bees. We 60% L'Oreal have included both natural and 40% traditional products into the Chapstick analysis as we felt it was 20% Blistex important to consider both aspects 0% Aveeno of the market due to the Nivea opportunities of expanding into the mass market. As we can see Garnier Burt’s Bees has only 54% brand Aveda awareness in comparison to Dove
  • 7. and Olay who have the highest at 99% each. If we look even closer we can see that the leading natural product brand is Aveda at 63% while in the Pseudo-natural range Aveeno is a clear leader at 94%. A possibility for Burt’s Bees only coming in at 54% could be down to the fact that they do not rely heavily on marketing communications and advertising to promote their brand. Although this is not a major factor when it comes to the natural market however it is something that will be need to be considered if entering into the mass market. Once again the colour scheme is the same as above; Burt’s Bee’s is coming in Trial-June 2006 at 29% which is quite low in comparison 80% to the brand leaders in the market. Also Dove 70% the comparison can be made with the Olay natural products where we are the 60% Neutrogena market leader which is great to see 50% Herbal essence because Aveda (natural product) was above us in the brand awareness chart 40% L'Oreal however we have now jumped above 30% Chapstick them in the trial of products table. Blistex 20% Aveeno 10% Nivea 0% Garnier Aveda Burt's Bees Current Usage of Brands Brand July 2005 June 2006 % Difference Dove 57 56 1% loss Olay 33 36 3 % increase Neutrogena 29 32 3 % increase Herbal Essence 27 25 2 % decrease L’Oreal 28 32 4% increase Chapstick 40 50 10% increase Blistex 35 30 5% increase Aveeno 14 19 5% increase Nivea 12 9 3% decrease Garnier 10 18 8% increase Aveda 7 8 1% increase Burt’s Bees 13 19 6% increase Tom’s of Maine 6 6 Stayed the same Avalon 1 1 Stayed the same Alba 1 0 1% decrease Natures Gate 1 1 Stayed the same Aubrey 1 1 Stayed the same Jason 3 3 Stayed the same Dr. Hauska 1 0 1% decrease The % difference table shows us that Burt’s Bees has grown by 6% from July 2005 until June 2006 in regard to usage of its products. This is the largest growth out of the entire of the natural product market and the third highest in the overall personal care products market.
  • 8. 2.2 Internal Analysis 2.2.1 Revenue Growth Analysis Distribution Background Burt’s Bees currently sell directly to distributors, bypassing wholesalers in order to maintain premium pricing and dictate trade terms. Offering generous margins, stocking Burt’s Bees was an attractive idea for personal care retailers, despite their no-returns policy and withheld trade terms. Traditionally, the company have retailed through speciality stores, starting off in the gift shop market, as there were few entry barriers. However, Roxanne Quimby knew this couldn’t carry the business, and wanted to get Burt’s Bees to “everyone, everywhere”. The company opened six retail stores, but were forced to close due to lack of retail competencies and resources within the company. Quimby realized that ultimate success lay in mass-market distribution, and in September 2004, Quimby signed a deal to distribute Burt’s Bees line in CVS and Walgreens drug stores. However, with the company beginning to move into mass distribution, there has been some backlash from smaller retailers, with some leaving Burt’s Bees. Up to now they have tried to combat this by dissuading large retailers from offering customer discounts, to help smaller stores compete, but a few speciality stores have felt this is not enough. Burt’s Bees tend to stock in “hives”, a standout product display, which CVS have allowed up to now due to shelf space maintenance. However, with the growing new product range, the hives will no longer fit the full range and they may be forced to move from the distinctive hive to the shelf. Revenue by Channel: 2002 2005 Growth ’02-05 Gift/Specialty Stores 39.9% 31.2% - 8.7% Health Stores 29% 15.2% - 13.8% Drug Stores 9% 29.3% + 20.3% Distributor 5.1% 12.8% + 7.7% Grocery 6% 6.9% + 0.9% Other 11.1% 4.7%` - 6.4% As we can see from the table above, patterns of revenue through distribution channels has dramatically changed since 2002, with high growth in revenue through drugstores, considerable growth through distributors, and slight growth through grocery stores. Revenue from gift, speciality, health stores and other channels have all dropped significantly. % of Respondents who Annual Ad Spend as 2005 % Market 2005 % Market considered brand a % of revenue Share, Natural Share, Drug Store natural Grocery Channel Burt’s Bees: 0 0 7.3 0.4 We can see from Exhibit 4 that although Burt’s Bees revenue from grew by 20.3% up to 2005 (ref. Exhibit 2), they still only commanded 0.4% of the drug store channel market share. This could be attributed to their lack of spending on marketing communications and advertising. The
  • 9. leading competitor in this channel is Aveeno, who spent 90% more on advertising, resulting in a 1.1% market share. 2.2.2 CBBE Pyramid The CBBE model can be seen as an integrated perceived image from its customer’s point of view, with a mind route that a person follows to become a loyal customer. (See Appendix A) Start from the bottom is the salience stage, where an individual receives the basic information of the brand (product category, brand name, product name, etc.), through the marketing of that brand or can be his/her own research in today’s two way communication environment. Then he/she may purchase that brand to become a customer, there are two different routes that he/she may take to form a brand image. The left hand side is the rational route, and the right is emotional, each consists of two dimensions. To become a loyal customer, he/she may have both rational and emotional perceptions of that brand. The rational route is very objective and more about the product rather than the brand, the two sub headings are performance and judgment. Performance is very fact based which would be for example the performance of that product, price, durability and even design and style. Judgment is the actual rational stage: he/she would judge the product and the brand in terms of perceived quality, trustworthiness and superiority, and then decide to switch or not. The emotional route is nearly the total opposite of the rational route. It is more subjective and may not have to tie with the physical product but the brand. The two dimensions are feelings and imagery. Imagery is what the customer see the image that he/she would have if link it to him/her. It is highly dependent on the brand personality and endorsement that the brand has been built over time, and also may be influenced by other people around him/her. Feeling is the emotional touch that a brand gives this person, which could be highly influenced by public relation management and crisis management (in bad situations) and etc. Approaching to the top of the model is the brand resonance, which is a combined image and/or a sum up of all the bits and pieces that make the brand differentiated from its competitors. This model indicates how a customer views a brand and what makes him/her loyal to the brand. It also gives us an idea of how to build a brand that is highly likely to gain customers and their loyalty. 2.3 SWOT Analysis Strengths Weaknesses • Effective Product • Low Brand • Customer Loyalty Awareness After compiling our external and internal analysis we • Experienced Mgmt • Mixed Channels Team • Varied Image constructed a SWOT analysis. • Organic Strengths: Burt’s Bees have a strong loyal customer base built on Opportunities Threats the back of an effective product that does exactly what • Huge Growth Markets, Low • "Just Another Do- Gooder" it says it does. It is almost 100% organic and is backed Penetration • Higher Price • Unique Competitive by a new experienced management team. The Advantage company’s owners, AEA, are also specialists in building image and sales. Weaknesses:
  • 10. Although Burt’s Bees’, as stated above, have a loyal customer base they clearly lack a clear unified brand image. They are using eight different logos and text on their products which is a serious factor to reconsider before entering the mass market. As a result of this, customers were unable to recognise the brand in surveys taken. Another weakness of the company is that they are performing across so many distribution channels. This can prove a difficulty for a small brand and it could be suggestive that they become more select in their channels. Opportunities: As Burt’s Bees are hoping to enter the mass market, this provides the company with a great opportunity to continue rapid growth and sustain value. This can combine with the company’s unique competitive advantage of being 99% organic. Threats: Burt’s Bees must also be aware of the threats facing them such as consumers perceiving them as another “do-gooder” and questioning the truth behind their product. They also face a huge threat of entering the mass market with their current price as consumers in mass markets may choose the less expensive option. 3.0 Key Issues  Product Line: Large Product Line and some popular/unpopular products. Urgent need to cease discontinuing habit and disappointing customers.  Brand Strength: Very poor brand strength. At present not leader in niche market in terms brand awareness and a long way off of competing in mass market. Sustainability needed.  Retailer Relationships: Working with small retailers and maintaining those relationships is very important to sustain value and to grow. Must weigh options of distribution up also.  Management Change: New management team may bring different views to company and also different direction. Must be careful how situation is managed.  Where Next? Stay in niche market or go straight to mass market.  New Competitive Environment: Regardless of which direction the company goes, they are facing new competition from both pseudo and traditional competitors as claims to be natural are widespread by everyone. 4.0 Strategic Alternatives 4.1 Strategic Alternative (A); Staying in the Niche Market Burt’s Bees has continued to grow consistently over the last number of years, experiencing an enormous increase in their loyal customer base. The customer comments in Exhibit 8 show that their current product line brings high customer satisfaction, generating positive word-of-mouth. The company has relied on this positive word-of-mouth as a promotion tool, and it has lead to the brand’s rapid growth in the niche market. As mentioned in the distribution background, Burt’s Bees success began by retailing through speciality, health and gift stores. Through these channels, Burt’s Bees products get pride of place, having their own beehive-shaped display unit in catch the customer’s eye.
  • 11. It is clear from the evidence given in the case that this strategy is working for the company. They are continuing to grow by brand-loyal customers referring friends and family, and their 100% natural core values lie at the heart of the “fan” culture than surrounds the brand. Continuing to focus on the niche market has some real potential for the company. According to Parrish’s 2004 study on niche market strategy, “all of the study respondents (retailers) stated that they have seen increased sales since implementing a nice market strategy.” Parrish also noted that in order for a niche market strategy success depends on a number of product and market variables. The product and brand must be differentiated, which with Burt’s Bees current quirky branding and 100% natural ethos seems to already be working in growing their customer base. There needs to be perceived value for the customer, which is evident in the testimonials. The merchandising mix is important, and we feel that Burt’s Bees’ current “hive” merchandising strategy catches the eye of potential customers in specialty stores, and this will continue to allow them to be effective in the niche market. We have some suggestions for expanding their current niche-market strategy to gain market share in the category. We suggest building their relationships with retailers in the niche market, in order to maximize retailers’ recommendations of our product to niche market consumers, and increasing market share. This is already being done to an extent by their withholding trade terms with mass retailers We also suggest going into partnership with a major spa chain, with a similar value system to avoid deflection from the brand. If we could get a spa chain to use Burt’s Bees products primarily, we could ass perceived value to the product, use the health spa as a means to emphasise the 100% natural element of the product offering, and increase brand awareness across the market. Customers would then ideally see the benefits of Burt’s Bees product range, and may become long-term users of the product range. Spas could also be used as an extra specialised distribution channel within the niche market, selling Burt’s Bees products to customers alongside Burt’s Bees Spa Treatments and to non-spa customers. This strategy is achievable. It’s worked in the past, will continue to work, will be easy to implement and changes will be minor. However, while there is rife opportunity to develop market share within the niche market, our concerns about this strategy lie mainly in the reality that staying within the niche market will limit the company’s potential for growth. While they can continue to grow in this area, by limiting themselves from the mass market, they are missing out on the chance to reach the majority of the market. Is it possible for Burt’s to reach its potential for success by staying in this fixed niche market, and never expanding beyond it? 4.2 Strategic Alternative (B); Joint Venture to enter mass market If we look back at the analysis our low level of brand awareness is a major factor on expanding into and competing in the mass market. In order to rectify this problem we choose to join with a strong “pseudo natural” brand already established in the mass market such as Herbal-Essence. Currently Herbal Essence has a $700 million brand which repositioned itself as a pseudo- natural product line within food, drug, and mass stores. Herbal Essence is a large player in the personal care market in comparison to Burt’s Bees. According to Sherman (2003) the reason a smaller firm would “seek alliances with bigger more powerful companies is because of the credibility boost, technology leveraging and access to markets which a larger player is likely to bring to the table”. One of the possible reasons for joint ventures or strategic alliances is to
  • 12. widen or integrate product lines (Sherman 2003). Therefore we suggest that for the Herbal essence Shampoo range they would keep their brand image, however Burt’s Bees would need to be mentioned in all aspects of the branding process. While for the rest of the Burt’s Bees product portfolio the opposite would occur. When considering a joint venture as a possible growth strategy give careful thought to the type of partner you are looking for and what resources you and the partner will be contributing to the newly formed entity (Sherman 2003). Therefore let us look at both the positive and negative points for each company individually if the strategy was to become a reality: Herbal Essence: +Their current product line only includes shampoo, by joining with Burt’s Bees they have the opportunity to utilise the full product portfolio which Burt’s Bees has to offer. This could lead to an increase in revenue for the brand due to the expansion of the product range. +They are currently positioned as a “pseudo natural” product line; the partnership with Burt’s Bees can help them establish their products as fully natural. This allows Herbal Essence to compete within the niche market of fully natural products which will further strengthen the company’s future growth. +They will still be the main brand image on their shampoo range; they can also use the new shampoo which Burt’s Bees has developed and market themselves as 100% natural. +By joining with Burt’s Bees they will acquire a percentage of the loyal and enthusiastic customer base that Burt’s Bees currently have. The case tells us that these customers are invaluable to the marketing of the company because they love the product so much they become ambassadors for the product range and promote the product to anyone who will listen. -Herbal Essence is currently only supplying shampoo to the market, by joining with Burt’s Bees this may complicate the product line which may result in customer confusion. Also the fact that Burt’s Bees will be the main brand image on the rest of the product range other than shampoo this may lead to further confusion. -If they are to enter into a niche market of “natural products” they may need to re-price their current products to a more premium price similar to that of Burt’s Bees due to the fact that the costs will be higher if going 100% natural. This again may cause confusion with their current customer base and they may lose some of their existing customers. -Herbal Essence already has high revenue and good brand awareness among consumers, why would they need to merge with a smaller company who offer a different product line. Burt’s Bees +Burt’s Bees clearly state that they would like to develop a full range of shampoo, which in 2006 they finally came up with a fully natural shampoo product. If they were to merge with Herbal Essence a specialised shampoo company, this would help them to develop and expand their shampoo line across all channels of distribution. +As the analysis show Herbal Essence have a massive 97% brand awareness in the personal product care market and by Burt’s Bees merging with such an established firm this will allow them to distribute their products to the mass market. +The revenue and distribution channels which Herbal Essence currently has will help Burt’s Bees expand and develop their full product range.
  • 13. +The joint venture is with a company that is in the pseudo natural range already, so at least it’s not as traditional product range company. -By merging with a company such as Herbal Essence they may lose the authenticity of their brand and this may result in once loyal customers becoming disillusioned with the brand. -Burt’s Bees has just established their natural shampoo, however by joining with Herbal essence this may compromise their new shampoo product. -Herbal Essence specialise in hair care however they do not have any other products which means they bring limited expertise to the joint venture. From a Burt’s Bees point of view the joint venture with Herbal Essence will allow an easier path to expanding into the mass market and it will also help them to expand their product portfolio especially the shampoo line. The venture would give Burt’s Bees access to greater capital and larger distribution channels. However it seems that the benefits for Herbal Essence entering into the joint partnership greatly outweigh the benefits for Burt’s Bees. The disadvantage for Burt’s Bees entering into a joint venture with Herbal Essence would be that Burt’s Bees would be forced to give up a certain amount of control (Sherman 2003). If going with this strategy Burt’s Bees also runs the risk of losing its authenticity and original core beliefs by joining Herbal Essence in partnership. The risk of joining the two brands together as one is too high and will more than likely result in brand confusion for the consumer. Burt’s Bees should explore other strategies to ensure market growth. 5.0 Chosen Strategy: Rebrand-Strengthen Awareness-Enter Mass Market For our chosen strategy, we have decided on a rebranding strategy to increase and strengthen the brand with the long term aim of expanding the brand within the mass market. As stated above we feel that the image of the brand is simply not sustainable to compete in the mass market and to an extent is the reason that the brand is not the most instantly recognized within the niche market. We believe that the number one issue for Burt’s Bees’ is to grow the brand without compromising the product i.e. ingredients. Niche Selected 1. Rebrand 2. Market Campaign Build Up 3. Mass Market 4. Entry We believe the strategy will follow four key steps, above. To begin, we feel that a large part of the weaknesses of the brand can be accounted for by the lack of advertising spend and multiple imagery across product lines as discussed earlier. Therefore we suggest one logo for the entire product portfolio, See Above. We have developed a logo that is similar to the ‘Innocent Smoothies’ logo as we feel that this is an appropriate way to position the brand and differentiate the brand from competitor’s, both niche and mass market. As well as a differentiator, the characteristics of the brand, such as honesty, commitment, organic and fair-trade can be leveraged as part of the entire offering. Brand personality can be
  • 14. defined as the “embodiment of personality traits of the consumer in the brand itself” (West, Ford & Ibrahim, 2006; P259). Through this tactic we feel we can compete with the larger traditional competitors in the mass market as consumers will associate their own characteristics e.g. honesty with the brand more clearly. This strategy of rebranding should take approximately six months to one year we believe and should create a clear unified umbrella brand for the company to bring forward when moving into the chosen market. This new simple logo can also improve customer’s perception of brand, see CBBE Appendix B. Skincare Facecare Body Hair Outdoor Baby Mens A clear unique value proposition needs to be defined for the company along with the brand image. We believe that the best way to this is to develop a proposition is around the healing powers of the products. Many customers have praised the products for their healing powers so this is a key customer insight and would be the strongest pillar to build the brand on. Following this we suggest that a large portion of turnover is put into an advertising budget and new packaging with the new branding as currently there is no advertising spend. This can be done through sample days in store, coupons, television advertising, unifying the one image online at burtsbees.com, incorporating social media into the media plan (customers as brand ambassadors) and billboards. After time has been spent building up the brand image within the niche market, we feel Burt’s Bee’s should assess their consumer awareness again and relate it to their competitor’s. We estimate that by then, the awareness figures will have raised and then the company will be sufficiently equipped to compete within the mass market. The next step for Burt’s Bees is to now carefully select which categories they will compete in within the mass market and which distribution channels to use. We recommend that they aim to compete in the Hair care, Nail Care, Shaving, Skin Care and Fragrances categories as these represent the best opportunities for growth as all have relatively low penetration and high growth rates. As well as this, most of these categories are aligned with existing products available in the Burt’s Bee’s range currently, thus lowering NPD costs. When selecting distribution channels, we feel Burt’s Bees’s priority should now be with drug stores, distributors and grocery as they are now a mainstream product. We would aim to be still in gift shops and health stores through working close relationships with them, but acknowledge that we are losing some of the uniqueness which may make the brand unpopular in these channels. However despite this we feel the reasoning is adequate as drug stores and distributors are a growing trend in the company’s revenue streams as highlighted in analysis, cumulative gain of 28.9% of revenue in 2005. We feel that this is also adequate as in order to align with the long term goal of seeing the product in all mainstream stores we must be willing to grow more. Finally as part of this strategy, we feel that Burt’s Bees should keep measures of their progress and understand that this is not an overnight strategy and is a long term strategy. Burt’s Bees should not attempt to try to do too much and keep things simple. In order to grow they must sustain current customers whilst providing the same value whilst attracting new customers through the improved image of the brand.
  • 15. Other suggestions regarding going mainstream we had were perhaps 5 years down the line, developing food products, i.e. Honey and Lemon Healing drinks for mass market. Another suggestion is perhaps looking into getting fair trade stamps of endorsement or 100% certified stamps. We believe that this chosen strategy is achievable and realistic because of recent consumer demand trends for organic natural products and because we are not compromising the core values of the product but simply architecting a structured brand and product portfolio whilst sustaining existing customer value. 6.0 Case Lessons  It is very important to have a product portfolio that has a consistent brand image. At the moment Burt’s Bees products are quite diverse and this may cause customer confusion, especially when entering into the mass market.  The original vision of the Burt’s Bees brand was to have their natural and earth friendly products reach everyone, everywhere. Although this may cause the brand to become too commercial, sometimes in business it’s about making a decision and implementing it in order for it to work for the company.  The loyal customers of Burt’s Bees are integral to the future success of the company. As stated in the case they are very passionate and truly love the brand. Therefore whatever future growth strategy that Burt’s Bees decide on they must not offend their current loyal customers by compromising the authenticity and fully natural elements of the product range.
  • 16. 7.0 Bibliography/Appendices Books: West, Ford & Ibrahim, (2006). ‘Strategic Marketing’, Oxford Publishing. Doyle & Stern, (2006), ‘Marketing Management and Strategy’, 4th Ed., Prentice Hall. Keller, (2008), ‘Strategic Brand Management’, 3rd Ed., Pearson Education. Article: Sherman, A. (2003), ‘Growth through Joint Ventures and Strategic Alliances’, Fast track Business Growth. Available at Business Source Complete. Journals: Parrish, 2004. “Retailers use of Niche Marketing in Product Development”. Journal of Fashion Marketing & Management; Oct2010, Vol. 14 Issue 4, p546-561.
  • 17. Appendix A: CBBE Pyramid Brand Resonance Loyalty & Sense Of Community Judgement Feelings Perceived Quality Social Creditability Responsibility Performance for money Value Healthy Imagery 100% Natural Smell Values Healing Certified Endorsement Efficacy Bees are natural Brand Saliance Category Awareness(NPC), Relatively Strong Brand Awareness
  • 18. Appendix B: Declaration Declaration We hereby certify that this material which we now submit for assessment on the programme of study leading to the award of MBA Marketing is entirely our own work, and has not been taken from the work of others, save, and to the extent that, such work has been cited and acknowledged within the text of our work. Signed: _______________________ ID No: ______________ Date: _________ Signed: _______________________ ID No: ______________ Date: _________ Signed: _______________________ ID No: ______________ Date: _________ Signed: _______________________ ID No: ______________ Date: _________