Lab case final ppt
Upcoming SlideShare
Loading in...5
×
 

Lab case final ppt

on

  • 249 views

law cases

law cases

Statistics

Views

Total Views
249
Views on SlideShare
249
Embed Views
0

Actions

Likes
0
Downloads
0
Comments
0

0 Embeds 0

No embeds

Accessibility

Categories

Upload Details

Uploaded via as Microsoft Word

Usage Rights

© All Rights Reserved

Report content

Flagged as inappropriate Flag as inappropriate
Flag as inappropriate

Select your reason for flagging this presentation as inappropriate.

Cancel
  • Full Name Full Name Comment goes here.
    Are you sure you want to
    Your message goes here
    Processing…
Post Comment
Edit your comment

Lab case final ppt Lab case final ppt Document Transcript

  • 1) WASHING MACHINE No B doese not have remedy against comp,b remedy has against manufacturer. 2)laptop B cannot claim refund against shopkeeper, it can claim against manufacturer It is matter of UTP. Bcz brocher mian kuch aur likha hai ,reality main kuch aur hai..2) FRUIT JUICE Good sold must correspond to the description. But this is not with this case. Good sold does not correspond to the description. So Y has remedy3) LAMP4) Yes he can have remedy.a product sold by tis general name should be fit for basic purposefor which it is used product being of merchantable quality.5) IRON LAMP ACC TO SEC 14 OF CONSUMER PROTECTION ACTCompensation & damages for injury & loss to the Consumers due to negligence of goods/service providers. YES , YES, YES6 fluorescent electric lamp bulb WAS NOT of merchantable quality. Buyer can claim Bureau of Indian Standards.Partenship 1 No 2 2 partnersip firm are separated, both firm are different. So loss of one partnersip firm cannot be covered from other firm prft… 3) Building is in d name of firm,a cannot claim d building As soon as A entered in to the partenship firm and contributed his building as his capital Building become properity of partnership firm.at tym pf dissolution of firm the property wiil be divided acc to partenship deed… 5) Acc to partnership deed, x is working as an agent,so dispute is wrong. 6 claimed was right.death of any partner dissolve d firm…
  • 7tax authorities claim is wrong.as per d law fresh contract has to be made in legal hiering afterdeath of existing partner.CASE 2person cannot get remedy from a consumer court against the sellers and manufacturers of thewatch bcz he is not consumer.CASE 3he CANNOT move a consumer forum as a consumer underthe Consumer Protection Act, BCZ HEIS NOT A CONSUMER.CASE 4NO legal remedies available to Y underthe Consumer Protection Act BUT AVAILABLE TOCOMPETITION ACT.CASE 6Initial case of reno is wrong.2nd casethe answer be different if actually 15-20 drops of Reno were needed to produce the samewhitening effect. sano correspond to reno….CASE 7NOT CASE OF UTP.CASE 9IT ISPossiblefor the State Government to use the Consumer Protection Act BCZ state govt iscomplainant so he can complain under CPA.CASE 10REMEDY AVAILABLE UNDER CPA AND COMPETION ACT.