TeleLearning in Practice: What is the Business Case?

Loading...

Flash Player 9 (or above) is needed to view presentations.
We have detected that you do not have it on your computer. To install it, go here.

0 comments

Post a comment

    Post a comment
    Embed Video
    Edit your comment Cancel

    Favorites, Groups & Events

    TeleLearning in Practice: What is the Business Case? - Presentation Transcript

    1. TeleLearning in Practice What is the Business Case? Sylvia Currie, scurrie@sfu.ca Research Associate TeleLearning•NCE Simon Fraser University
    2. Why me? Work life
      • Post Secondary Administration
          • curriculum development
          • educational advising
          • admissions and transfer (residency requirements, prior learning assessment)
      • Educational Technology
          • technician
          • instructional support
          • research and development
      • changed jobs 7 times in past 10 years
    3. Why me? Student life
      • TeleLearning reason I returned to SFU to pursue graduate work
      • First hand experience using as a student using online technologies
        • enrolled in first SFU FirstClass course
        • enrolled in first SFU Virtual-U course (1995)
      • Research Associate - Virtual-U Project
    4. Virtual-U Project
      • Field trials began in 1996 across Canada
        • Data collected from 14 sites, 229 courses
      • Virtual-U web-based software
        • Tools and resources to design, manage, and evaluate online courses
        • Supports active, collaborative learning
        • Designed by educators
    5. What is unique about Virtual-U?
      • Flexible framework to support varied content and instructional approaches
      • Emphasis on user involvement in designing learning environments
      • Focus on understanding new roles, techniques, and teaching models
      • Environment for design, management, and evaluation
    6. Consequences of not involving educators
      • Technology designed to teach specific skills or content
      • Cookie-cutter approach to online course design
      • All resources devoted to software
      • Educators not involved in research and design
      • Teacher replacement
      • No flexibility of use
      • No pedagogical support
      • No advancement of use
    7. My observations
      • Focus on consumer model of telelearning (quantity, convenience, access, cost)
      • Focus on specialized training for job-related skills
      • Not enough focus on telelearning as a new environment to improve quality of learning
    8. “ Current” Problems with Universities
        • “ ...relentlessly inelastic packing-case”
        • “ We seem to have multiplied [universities] greatly in the past hundred years, but we seem to have multiplied them altogether too much upon the old pattern”
      • H.G. Wells (1938) World Brain
    9. Levels of Intellectual Development of Adult Learners
      • 1. Keeping up-to-date
      • 2. Learning with initiative and from new experiences
      • 3. Accumulate, rectify, and change human experience
      • H.G. Wells (1938) World Brain
    10. Socialization (tacit to tacit) Internalization (explicit to tacit) Externalization (tacit to explicit) Combination (explicit to explicit) Nonaka’s Spiral of Knowledge The Knowledge Creating Company
    11. Downfalls: Traditional Models
      • People deluged with highly specific information
      • Individuals discouraged or inhibited to share knowledge
      • Measurement of success is quantitative
      • Equate information flow with solution for a knowledge society
      • Focus on “know what” instead of “know how”
      • Private nature of work
      • Inequality among participants
    12. What works? Socialization
      • “ Combination” is not sufficient
      • Many new technologies attend to individuals and explicit information that passes between them
      • Ease of creating and sharing knowledge is a reflection of its social context
      • Online environment contributes to more reflective and in-depth discourse
      • For organizational knowledge to be created, tacit individual knowledge must be shared
      • Equity in participation / freedom to articulate ideas
    13. What works? Externalization
      • Multimedia representations
      • Portfolios of work
      • Documentation of experiences (writing as a heuristic)
      • Translating knowledge in understandable formats
      • “ Repurposing” (I repurposed this word from Curtis Bonk’s presentation)
    14. What works? Strategic rotation
      • Exposure to multiple perspectives
      • Understanding contributions of others to achieving goals
      • Rely on individual expertise in new situation
      • Logic of redundancy
    15. What works? Team Approach
      • Develop different approaches to same problem
      • Synthesize
      • Participation not limited to project members
      • Participants take on more responsibility
    16. What works? Changing Roles
      • Instructor (manager) as facilitator
      • Participant rather than provider
      • Ask questions rather than give answers
      • Provide conceptual framework
      • Equity in participation
      • Increased expectations of participants
    17. What works? Add Value to Information
      • Enhance “combination” typical of traditional models
      • Store and reconfigure information
      • Sort and categorize
      • Annotate
      • Information distributed in a purposeful way
      • No discrimination in access of information
      • Leads to new knowledge (e.g. CSILE)
    18. “ Current” Solutions
        • “ I imagine…something added to the world network of universities, linking and coordinating them with one another and with the general intelligence of the world”
        • H.G. Wells (1938) World Brain
    19. Summary: Learning Networks
      • Challenge existing organization boundaries and hierarchies
      • Make knowledge accessible within and outside of organizations
      • Provide equity of access to all participants
      • Support sustained engagement for knowledge creation to occur
      • Enable external input to propel knowledge creation
      • Prepare learners with a different set of skills
        • to communicate, work collaboratively, solve problems, think critically, and cope with change
      • Provide unique opportunities for lifelong learning
    20. References
      • Brown, J.S. & Duguid,P. (1998) Organizing Knowledge, California Management Review 40 (3)
      • Keating, D. (1996) Habits of mind for a learning society: Educating for human development. In D.R. Olson & N. Torrance, The handbook of education and human development: New models of learning, teaching, and schooling, Cambridge, MA: Blackwell Publishers
      • Nonaka, I. (1991) The knowledge-creating company, Harvard Business Review, Nov.
      • Wells, H.G. (1938) World Brain, Freeport: Books for Libraries Press

    + Webbed FeatWebbed Feat, 2 years ago

    custom

    649 views, 0 favs, 0 embeds more stats

    A presentation from 1998 on the business case for T more

    More info about this document

    CC Attribution-ShareAlike LicenseCC Attribution-ShareAlike License

    Go to text version

    • Total Views 649
      • 649 on SlideShare
      • 0 from embeds
    • Comments 0
    • Favorites 0
    • Downloads 12
    Most viewed embeds

    more

    All embeds

    less

    Flagged as inappropriate Flag as inappropriate
    Flag as inappropriate

    Select your reason for flagging this presentation as inappropriate. If needed, use the feedback form to let us know more details.

    Cancel
    File a copyright complaint
    Having problems? Go to our helpdesk?

    Categories