Prone Ventilation In ARDS

Loading...

Flash Player 9 (or above) is needed to view presentations.
We have detected that you do not have it on your computer. To install it, go here.

0 comments

Post a comment

    Post a comment
    Embed Video
    Edit your comment Cancel

    1 Favorite & 1 Group

    Prone Ventilation In ARDS - Presentation Transcript

    1. 8 th Pulmonary Medicine Update February 7, 2008 Prone Ventilation for ARDS: Does it Do More Than Improve Oxygenation? Richard K. Albert, M.D. Chief of Medicine Denver Health Medical Center Professor of Medicine University of Colorado Adjunct Professor of Engineering and Computer Science University of Denver Denver Health
    2. Colorado Skiing Denver Health
    3. Objectives To describe:  Hx of prone ventilation  Effects on: - O 2 - Regional lung volume and perfusion - Response to recruitment maneuvers - VILI  Clinical studies  Unpublished data Denver Health
    4. History of Prone Ventilation Douglas et al, ARRD 1977  Six pts, individual PaO 2 ’s, supine and prone, early and later in course Piehl and Brown, CCM 1976  Five case reports, mean ABG data Bryan, ARRD 1974  First suggested based on studies of sedation and paralysis on diaphragm Denver Health
    5. Collaborators U. Washington U. Colorado Lisa Embree Wayne Lamm Josh Saliman Mike Graham David Leasa Sun Jong Kim Bob Guest Takashi Mutoh Ivor Douglas Robb Glenny Tom Robertson Jae Hwa Cho Jack Hildebrandt Mary Sanderson Seok Chan Kim Mike Hlastala Charlie Wiener Wayne Kirk Mayo Clinic Rolf Hubmayr U. Barcelona Johns Hopkins U. Iowa Jordi Mancebo Blaine Easley Ken Beck Brett Simon Eric Hoffman Denver Health
    6. Effect of Prone Positioning on PaO 2
      • 34 human studies
      • ~ 70 torr 
      • 66-75% respond
      • F I O 2 /PEEP
      • 22 animal studies
      • confirming and
      • investigating
      • mechanisms
      100 200 300 400 500 PaO 2 (mm Hg) N = 20 F I O 2 = 0.9 ± 0.1 PEEP = 10 ± 1.5                Supine Prone                   67 ± 5 169 ± 35*   Denver Health
    7. Prone Position Improves V A /Q Lamm, ARRD 1994 Relative V A /Q Voxels (N) Denver Health
    8. Mechanisms for  Shunt Hypothesis: Dependent Lung: - More edema - More Q Prone positioning redistributes Q to ventral lung Shunt (Q without V) Redistribute Q to areas of V Redistribute V to areas of Q Denver Health
    9. Effect of Prone Position on Regional Lung Injury Supine 10 7.5 5.0 2.5 BF Wet/Dry Dorsal Ventral Wiener, JAP 1990 D Mid ND D Mid ND Prone Dorsal Ventral Denver Health
    10. Effect of Prone Position on Regional Perfusion Percent Flow 25 50 0 Supine Dorsal Ventral Wiener, JAP 1990 Mid D ND Prone Ventral Dorsal D Mid ND Denver Health
    11. Zonal Theory of Pulmonary Blood Flow Distribution Flow Vertical Height Ppa > Ppv > P A Zone III Ppa > Ppv > P A Zone IV P A > Ppa > Ppv Zone I Ppa > P A > Ppv Zone II Denver Health
    12. Theoretical Effect of Position on Perfusion Distribution Glenny, JAP 1991 Denver Health
    13. Measured Effect of Position on Perfusion Distribution Glenny, JAP 1991 Denver Health
    14. Zonal Theory of Pulmonary Blood Flow Distribution Flow Vertical Height Zone II Zone III Zone IV Top Bottom Denver Health
    15. Effect of Position on Perfusion Distribution Glenny, JAP 1991 Denver Health
    16. Effect of Prone Position on Gravitational Q Gradient in Humans Methods  SPECT  CT angiograms  PET Methodological issues  Assessing Q relative to what? - Gram of lung tissue ? - Alveolar volume ?  Normal vs injured lung  Effect of PEEP  Area of interest Denver Health
    17. Treatment of Hypoxemia Shunt (Q without V) Redistribute Q to areas of V Redistribute V to areas of Q Denver Health
    18. Ventilation Distribution Milic-Emili, 1960s  Gravitational distribution of Ppl - More negative in nondependent region  Upright, supine, decubitus positions Denver Health
    19. Effect of Prone Position on Ppl Gradient 0 3 -3 Ppl (cm H 2 O) Supine Prone Control Mutoh, JAP 1992 0.53 ± 0.1 D 0.17 ± 0.1 D ND ND Denver Health
    20. Effect of PEEP on Regional Air Density Control Supine Prone Dep Non-Dep Dep Non-Dep 32 24 16 8 0 32 24 16 8 0 Denver Health
    21. Prone Position Improves Dorsal Lung V/Q Lamm, ARRD 1994 Control Denver Health
    22. Dual Effect of Prone Position on Ppl Gradient in ALI 0 3 -3 Ppl (cm H 2 O) Supine Supine Prone Prone Control Edema Mutoh, JAP 1992 0.53 ± 0.1 D 0.17 ± 0.1 D 0.71 ± 0.1 D 0.27 ± 0.1 D ND ND ND ND Denver Health
    23. Prone Position  Overinflation and Regional V L Heterogeneity Supine Prone Injured Dep Non-Dep Dep Non-Dep 0 0 5 5 10 10 15 15 20 20 Denver Health
    24. Prone Position Improves Dorsal Lung Ventilation Lamm, ARRD 1994 Oleic Acid Denver Health
    25. Effect of Body Position on Ppl Gradient How lungs fit into the thorax   Lung distensibility   Thorax distensibility - Lung volume - Chest wall mass - Air- or liquid-filled - Chest wall compliance - Abdominal mass - Abdominal compliance - Heart mass - Mediastinal mass - Diaphragm curvature Denver Health
    26. Weight of the Lung Denver Health
    27. Triangular Shaped Lung Denver Health
    28. Weight of the Lung Denver Health
    29. Weight of the Lung Denver Health
    30. Effect of Heart Weight (Supine) Albert, AJRCCM 2000 41% of left lung under the heart Malbouisson, ’00 - 64% of LLL - ARDS patients -  heart size Denver Health
    31. Effect of Heart Weight (Prone) Albert, AJRCCM 2000 Denver Health
    32. Prone Position  Lung Compression by Abdominal Contents Supine Prone Denver Health
    33. ARDS Net Low-Stretch Ventilation Study ARDS Net Low-Stretch Ventilation Study  Test of low-vs. “standard”-stretch  -  6 vs 12 mL/kg (IBW) -  PEEP and FIO 2 controlled by protocol  -  Mean PEEP ~ 8-9 cm H 2 O - 861 patients  mortality  40% to 31%  9% absolute, 23% relative VILI/Biotrauma contributes to mortality NEJM 2000 Denver Health
    34. Most ARDS Develops During Hospitalization Hudson et al, AJRCCM 1995 Denver Health
    35. VILI/Biotrauma Pathophysiology Overdistension  Endothelial/epithelial stretch  Capillary stress failure  Surfactant alteration Cyclical airspace opening and closing  Shear stress  Surfactant alteration   by PEEP Something else Denver Health
    36. Effect of Prone Position on Response to Recruitment Maneuver Pelosi, AJRCCM 2002 N = 10 ARDS 3 x 45 cmH 2 0/min EELV measured with helium Denver Health
    37. Effect of Prone Position on Response to Recruitment Maneuver % Total Volume Right Lung Left Lung 100 75 50 25 0 Supine Supine Prone Prone OI PA WA NA Galiatsou, AJRCCM 2006 N = 21 Lobar ALI 40/20 x 30 sec PEEP  to  C L No ventral derecruitment Denver Health
    38. Cyclical Airspace Opening and Closing End-Exhalation Mid-Inhalation End-Inhalation Lavage-Induced ALI, PEEP 10 cm H 2 O Denver Health
    39. Italian Prone Ventilation Trial (Gattinoni et al, NEJM 2001)
      • ARDS patients (N = 308)
      •  F I O 2 : 0.72
      •  PEEP: 9.6
      •  SAPS: 40
      • O 2
      • No survival benefit
      • Post-hoc analysis:
      •   survival in highest SAPS
      Denver Health
    40. Italian Prone Ventilation Trial (Gattinoni et al, NEJM 2001) Problems:  Proning protocol - Application: 7 hrs/day (  17 hrs/day supine) - Institution: late (decubiti) - Duration: 10 day maximum  Protocol breaks: 134 in 53 pts  Underpowered (N = 308) - Trend toward  mortality (25% vs 21.1%, 16%  ) - Stopped because of investigator bias  No ventilation protocol  No weaning protocol Denver Health
    41. French Prone Ventilation Trial (Guerin et al, JAMA 2004)
      • Consecutive hypoxemic patients (N = 802)
      •  F I O 2 : 0.66
      •  PEEP: 7.5-7.9
      •  SAPS: 46
      • O 2
      • No survival benefit
      • Post-hoc analysis:
      •   survival in highest SAPS
      •  VAP in prone group
      Denver Health
    42. French Prone Ventilation Trial (Guerin et al, JAMA 2004) Problems:  Only 413 with ARDS or ALI (51%) - No condition-specific data  Underpowered  81 (21%) crossovers (supine to prone)  Proning protocol: - Application: 8 hrs/day (16 hrs/day supine) > 25% < 8 hrs/day - Duration: 4 days  No ventilation protocol Denver Health
    43. Spanish Prone Ventilation Trial (Mancebo et al, AJRCCM 2006)
      • ARDS patients
      •  F I O 2 : 0.85  Enrolled < 48 hrs
      •  PEEP: 12  Prone 20 hrs/day
      •  SAPS: 38-43
      •  Diffuse infiltrates
      • O 2
      • Trend for survival benefit
      • Post-hoc analysis:
      •   survival in pts with lowest SAPS
      Denver Health
    44. Spanish Prone Ventilation Trial (Mancebo et al, AJRCCM 2006) Mortality (%) 20 40 60 80 Hospital 37/58 64% 39/75 52% ICU 34/58 59% 33/75 44% 25%  P < 0.12 P < 0.02 (adjusted by SAPS) 19%  P < 0.20 Denver Health Prone Supine
    45. Prone Ventilation in ARDS Summary   PaO 2 in 66-75% of patients -  F I O 2 (  O 2 toxicity),  PEEP (  overdistension)  No substantive side-effects  More homogeneous EELV -  Overinflation -  Airspace opening and closing -  Recruitment   Ventilator-induced lung injury (?)   Biotrauma (?)   Mortality (?) Denver Health
    46. Some New Stuff Pre-B Cell Colony Enhancing Factor-1  First found in endometrial tissue  Lung endothelium/epithelium   in PMNs of septic pts   IL-6 and IL-8  Induced by - Mechanical stress - LPS, IL-1  , TNF  , IL-6 - VILI Denver Health
    47. Prone Position  High V T -Induced Regional PBEF-1 Expression 40 80 60 20 Relative PBEF-1 Expression (/  -Actin) Control Low V T (Spine) High V T (Supine) High V T (Prone) Cephalad Caudal Cephalad Caudal Non-Dependent Dependent Denver Health
    48. PBEF Expression (IHC) Endothelial and Epithelial Expression Denver Health 20x
    49. Objectives Summarize:  Hx of prone ventilation  Effects on: - O 2 - Regional lung volume and perfusion - Response to recruitment maneuvers - VILI  Clinical studies  Unpublished data Denver Health
    50. Prone Ventilation in ARDS Conclusion: Don’t do anything on your back – You might get ARDS Denver Health

    + scribeofegyptscribeofegypt, 2 years ago

    custom

    2980 views, 1 favs, 5 embeds more stats

    More info about this document

    © All Rights Reserved

    Go to text version

    • Total Views 2980
      • 2955 on SlideShare
      • 25 from embeds
    • Comments 0
    • Favorites 1
    • Downloads 223
    Most viewed embeds
    • 16 views on http://www.esict.blogspot.com
    • 4 views on http://esict.blogspot.com
    • 3 views on http://www.banhachest.blogspot.com
    • 1 views on http://banhachest.blogspot.com
    • 1 views on http://rtcorner.net

    more

    All embeds
    • 16 views on http://www.esict.blogspot.com
    • 4 views on http://esict.blogspot.com
    • 3 views on http://www.banhachest.blogspot.com
    • 1 views on http://banhachest.blogspot.com
    • 1 views on http://rtcorner.net

    less

    Flagged as inappropriate Flag as inappropriate
    Flag as inappropriate

    Select your reason for flagging this presentation as inappropriate. If needed, use the feedback form to let us know more details.

    Cancel
    File a copyright complaint
    Having problems? Go to our helpdesk?

    Categories

    Tags

    Groups / Events