Your SlideShare is downloading. ×
Debate Digital & Private life
Upcoming SlideShare
Loading in...5
×

Thanks for flagging this SlideShare!

Oops! An error has occurred.

×
Saving this for later? Get the SlideShare app to save on your phone or tablet. Read anywhere, anytime – even offline.
Text the download link to your phone
Standard text messaging rates apply

Debate Digital & Private life

155
views

Published on

Published in: Technology, Spiritual

0 Comments
0 Likes
Statistics
Notes
  • Be the first to comment

  • Be the first to like this

No Downloads
Views
Total Views
155
On Slideshare
0
From Embeds
0
Number of Embeds
2
Actions
Shares
0
Downloads
5
Comments
0
Likes
0
Embeds 0
No embeds

Report content
Flagged as inappropriate Flag as inappropriate
Flag as inappropriate

Select your reason for flagging this presentation as inappropriate.

Cancel
No notes for slide

Transcript

  • 1. DEBATE SESSIONBRAND, DIGITAL AND CREATIONPRIVATE LIFE IN A DIGITAL LIFEFEBRUARY 2013
  • 2. VINAY, José SergioJO, JunhyonYANG, ChunjiayiVOINEA, AndraSAVOCA, GabrieleLAUK, AndreasWANG, Hsing-YiVIJAYKAR, Sneha#1THE DIGITALREVIEWPress / digital review: digitalcommunication / facts newsIndividual review of digital related topicsto be presented in a short talk (5 mnmax)The article / document / photograph isto be accessible for the entire group(through a link or a photocopy or anyother copy)
  • 3. #2THE DEBATEVINAY, José SergioMORITZ, PalomaHU, FeiningSAVOCA, GabrieleLU, LanyaoLEJARD, JulieJO, JunhyonVOINEA, AndraMASMEJEAN, LouiseLAUK, AndreasLI, MengyingACHART, IsabelleGroup 1 Group 2Is Internet the end ofour private life ?Is Internettransparency acondition to security,honesty andtranquillity.
  • 4. RESPECT THERULES
  • 5. THE DEBATEKEYPARADOXES TOREMEMBER
  • 6. 1. OIKOS VS POLISINTIMACY AS APOLITICAL QUESTION
  • 7. THE PARADOX OF ACONSTANTLYCHANGING NOTION• TRADITIONAL OPPOSITION BETWEENOIKOS (THE INDIVIDUALLY RULEDPERSONAL SPACE) AND THE POLIS (CITY)• BEFORE THE 18TH CENTURY, NOLEGITIMACY OF PRIVATE LIFE HABERMAS « REPRESENTATIONALCULTURE »• AFTER THE FRENCH REVOLUTION, THEBOURGEOIS SOCIETY INVENTS PRIVATE LIFE(EG. THE DIARY) SEPARATED FROM THEPUBLIC SPHERE (OFFENTLICHKEIT).• MASS MEDIA ARE SUPPOSED TO HAVEWEAKENED THE PUBLIC SPHERE DURINGTHE 20TH CENTURY.• INTERNET – THAT IS SUPPOSED TO BE THEPUBLIC SPHERE OF THE 21ST CENTURY – ISINVADED BY PRIVATE LIVES AND A HIGHCONFUSION BETWEEN PRIVATE ANDPUBLIC LIFE.
  • 8. https://www.google.com/settings/ads/onweb2. DIGITAL INTIMACYIS NOT ABOUT WHOYOU ARE, BUTABOUT WHAT YOUDO
  • 9. 3. SOME USERS ARETRYING TO TAKEPROFIT OUT OFPRIVATE LIFE LOSS
  • 10. http://www.intel.com/museumofme/r/index.htm…LOOSING SOMEINTIMACY MAY BE ASOURCE OF UTILITY
  • 11. 4. RADICALTRANSPARENCY ISSEEN AS ACONDITION OFPROGRESS
  • 12. OPEN SOURCE,TRANSPARENCY ANDULTRA-FREEDOM ASCONDITIONS FORDEMOCRACY
  • 13. 5. TRANSPARENCYAS A FRONTIER INOURCONTEMPORARYWORLD
  • 14. BUT DEFINITELYCREATING AMONITORED WORLD ANTIDOTES:BANALITY/TRIVIALITYPERSONAABUNDANCE
  • 15. BIBLIOGRAPHY
  • 16. WEBOGRAPHYhttp://www.zephoria.org/thoughts/archives/2008/03/09/how_youth_find.htmlhttp://www.nytimes.com/2008/03/09/business/09cell.html?_r=2&http://www.zephoria.org/thoughts/archives/2006/05/20/erosion_of_yout.htmlhttp://www.artisopensource.nethttp://wikileaks.org

×