Loading...
Flash Player 9 (or above) is needed to view slideshows. We have detected that you do not have it on your computer.To install it, go here
 
Post to Twitter Post to Twitter
Myspace Hi5 Friendster Xanga LiveJournal Facebook Blogger Tagged Typepad Freewebs BlackPlanet gigya icons
    SlideShare is now available on LinkedIn. Add it to your LinkedIn profile.

    SLIC, SLAINTE and Web2.0

    From scottishlibraries, 9 months ago Add as contact

    An introduction to the Scottish Library and Information Council's Web2.0 services, including flickr, del.icio.us and pageflakes. Part of the Cataloguing and Indexing Group in Scotland (CIGS) seminar "Toto, I've got a feeling we're not in Kansas anymore": metadata issues and Web2.0 services.

    395 views | 0 comments | 0 favorites | 2 downloads | 0 embeds (Stats)

    Categories

    Business & Mgmt

    Tags

    Groups/Events

    Embed in your blog options close
    Embed (wordpress.com) Exclude related slideshows Embed in your blog

    More Info

    This slideshow is Public
    CC Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs LicenseCC Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs LicenseCC Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs License
    Total Views: 395 on Slideshare: 395 from embeds: 0
    Flagged as inappropriate Flag as inappropriate

    Flag as inappropriate

    Select your reason for flagging this slideshow as inappropriate.

    If needed, use the feedback form to let us know more details.

    Slideshow Transcript

    1. Slide 1: “To confer, converse, and otherwise hobnob with my brother wizards”: SLIC, SLAINTE and Web 2.0 Celia Jenkins & Gillian Hanlon, SLIC
    2. Slide 2: Why Web 2.0? • Improving SLAINTE. Focusing on needs of community. - Different ways of delivering content - Encourages communication, participation & collaboration - Enhances our resources
    3. Slide 6: Tagging: Key features • User generated keywords • No controlled vocabulary • Non-hierarchical • Folksonomy • No limit to number of tags • Supporting fields
    4. Slide 7: The great tagging debate: part I • Enables “pseudo-faceted classification” (Speller, 2007) • Creates a bottom-up consensus view (Shirky, 2005) • Adaptable to changing vocabularies (Mathes, 2004) • Facilitates serendipitous browsing (Mathes, 2004) • Combination approach (Pattern, 2007) • Evidence of tag consensus being reached (Golder & Huberman, 2005)
    5. Slide 8: The great tagging debate: part II • Synonyms and homonyms (Mathes, 2004) • Ambiguity of uncontrolled vocabulary (Mathes, 2004) • Specificity and the level of expertise (Golder & Huberman, 2005) • Longevity of tags (Smith, 2005) • Spaces and multiple words (Mathes, 2004) • Personal versus social (Mathes, 2004)
    6. Slide 9: Tag chaos
    7. Slide 10: The source
    8. Slide 11: Tagging: flickr libraries group
    9. Slide 12: Tagging: Library of Congress approach • Flickr pilot commenced Jun 2007 – live Jan 2008 • Two LoC photo collections added • Dublin Core records included • Tags applied by users – except “Library of Congress” tag • LoC flickr record
    10. Slide 13: A delicate balance • Scalability - high cost of applying LoC approach • Cognitive issues - unlikely that users will tag to standards • Perception shift – not tagging versus cataloguing
    11. Slide 14: Scottish libraries tag guidelines
    12. Slide 15: The finished product: flickr
    13. Slide 16: The finished product: delicious
    14. Slide 17: Future developments • Continuous development of tagging guidelines • Building on existing content • Work in progress: pod/webcasting, Facebook, live chat and surveys • Overcoming legal barriers • Integration with SLAINTE
    15. Slide 18: Contact details • References on del.icio.us • Presentation on slideshare • All available through pageflakes: http://www.pageflakes.com/scottishlibraries • email: Celia Jenkins slic4@slainte.org.uk Gillian Hanlon slic1@slainte.org.uk
    © 2008 SlideShare Inc. All Rights Reserved.
    App07 is serving you