It is not surprising that the new Bayesian network paradigm prompts comparisons to more conventional methods. In the field of market research, for instance, long-established methods, such as factor ...

It is not surprising that the new Bayesian network paradigm prompts comparisons to more conventional methods. In the field of market research, for instance, long-established methods, such as factor analysis remain in daily use today. Given that there exists a direct counterpart to factor analysis in the Bayesian network framework, we want to highlight similarities as well as fundamental differences. The objective of this paper is to present both methods side-by-side and thus help researchers to correctly compare and interpret the respective results. More specifically, we want to establish the semantic equivalents between the traditional statistical factor analysis approach and BayesiaLab’s method based on Bayesian networks, which we refer to as Probabilistic Latent Factor Induction.

### Statistics

### Views

- Total Views
- 691
- Views on SlideShare
- 688
- Embed Views

### Actions

- Likes
- 1
- Downloads
- 53
- Comments
- 0

### Accessibility

### Categories

### Upload Details

Uploaded via SlideShare as Adobe PDF

### Usage Rights

© All Rights Reserved

Full NameComment goes here.donghwa893 weeks ago