SlideShare a Scribd company logo
1 of 14
Agenda

• Industry Overview

• Forecast

• Explanation of Variables

• Recommendations
Industry Overview

                               US CSD Industry Sales Volume and GrRate
                    11,000                                                       6.0%
                                                                                 5.0%
                    10,000                                                       4.0%
Millions of Cases




                                                                                 3.0%




                                                                                         Growth Rate
                     9,000
                                                                                 2.0%
                     8,000                                                       1.0%
                                                                                 0.0%
                     7,000                                                       -1.0%
                     6,000                                                       -2.0%
                                                                                 -3.0%
                     5,000                                                       -4.0%
                             1990    1994    1998       2002    2006      2010
                                      Total CSD Sales    Sales GrRate
                                                                    Source: Class Material
Industry Overview – cont.

              2010 CSD Players' Market Share

                         7.60%


                    16.70%
                                    42.00%



                      29.30%




       Coca-Cola   PepsiCo     Dr. Pepper Snapple    Others
                                           Source: beverage-digest.com
Actual Pepsi Sales vs. Estimated CSD Sales
CSD Sales Millions
3,350
3,150
2,950
2,750
2,550
2,350
2,150
1,950
1,750
        1985         1990        1995         2000        2005           2010
                     Actual CSD Sales     Estimated CSD Sales
                                 Source: Class Material, Estimation by Team 21
Explanation of four Variables
Real Price

• Higher price equals lower sales

• Real price removes the inflation bias

• Pepsi has little control over the price
Explanation of four Variables
Real Median Income

• Real median income vs. Purchasing Power

• Soda is a discretionary good

• Excludes inflation bias

• Removes outliers
Explanation of four Variables
Growth of Candy Consumption

•    Candy is a complement to sodas
•    Checkout line and vending machines
•    80% of candy buyers also purchase canned soda
•    At a comparable level of unhealthiness
                         Goods Purchased by Candy Buyers
    100%
    80%
    60%
    40%
    20%
     0%
           Canned Soda   Fountain Soda Bottled Water    Juice     Hot Beverages
                                                       Source: AllBusiness, 2011
Explanation of four Variables
Yogurt Daily Consumption per capita

•   A proxy of health awareness
•   Soda sales decrease with increasing health awareness
•   Covers a variety of health considerations
•   Resilient against external influences
•   High growth amongst youth
    – Teens: 59% in 2009
    – Children: 54% in 2009



                                          Source: Purcell, 2011
Forecasted Pepsi US Sales and Growth Rate
CSD Sales Millions
3,350                                                                        8.0%
3,150                                                                        6.0%
2,950
                                                                             4.0%
2,750
                                                                             2.0%
2,550
                                                                             0.0%
2,350
                                                                             -2.0%
2,150
1,950                                                                        -4.0%

1,750                                                                        -6.0%
        1985     1988   1991   1994 1997 2000 2003      2006   2009   2012
                                  PEP    Growth Rate
                                     Source: Class Material, Estimation by Team 21
Recommendations

• Short-Term
  – Modify production plan in 2011 and 2012
  – Co-opt advertising campaigns with candy manufacturers
  – Cross sales promotional activities with candy manufactures


• Long-Term
  – Moving into other product categories
  – Launch a series of CSD with vitamins and minerals
     • Like Coca-Cola’s Diet Coke Plus
     • New brand image: Healthy soda company
Q&A
Appendix A: Forecasting Regression Formula


Pepsi US CSD Sales =
3786–475xRP+0.038xRMI+1317xGCC–10117xYC

Where
RP = Real Price based on 2010
RMI = Real Median Income based on 2010
GCC = Growth Rate of Candy Consumption
YC = Yogurt Daily Consumption per capita
Appendix B: Regression Results
                           Best Forecasting Method        2010        2011         2012      MAPE
Real Price (2010)               ARIMA(0,2,1)               N/A        $5.89        $5.92     1.31%
Real Median Income                                                               $59,833.7
                                ARIMA(1,1,0)               N/A      $60,029.17               1.22%
                                                                                     9
Yogurt Consumption       Double Exponential Smoothing    0.0505      0.0529       0.0553     4.14%
Total Candy
                         Double Exponential Smoothing    6,740.44    6,772.03     6,803      1.63%
Consumption
Candy Consumption
                                      N/A                 .468%       .468%       .466%      N/A
Growth Rate
Forecasted Historical
                                ARIMA(0,2,0)               N/A        2,672       2,599      1.42%
Sales

                        Coefficient         T-Test       F-Value                      VIF
                        Signs
Regression Statistics   Correct             High: .011   538           98.9%          High: 6.64

More Related Content

Similar to MBA Team Pepsi US Carbonated Soft Drink Sales Forecast

Tom Streitz - Department of Community Planning & Economic Development (CPED)
Tom Streitz - Department of Community Planning & Economic Development (CPED)Tom Streitz - Department of Community Planning & Economic Development (CPED)
Tom Streitz - Department of Community Planning & Economic Development (CPED)Minneapolis Department of Civil Rights
 
The Beacon Council
The Beacon CouncilThe Beacon Council
The Beacon Councilyaque87211
 
First Interim
First Interim First Interim
First Interim dvodicka
 
Makt strtrgy leader colgate(c 08)
Makt strtrgy leader colgate(c 08)Makt strtrgy leader colgate(c 08)
Makt strtrgy leader colgate(c 08)Sanket Deshmukh
 
Makt strtrgy leader colgate(c 08)
Makt strtrgy leader colgate(c 08)Makt strtrgy leader colgate(c 08)
Makt strtrgy leader colgate(c 08)Sanket Deshmukh
 
7 ra conference powerpoint 11.11
7 ra conference powerpoint 11.117 ra conference powerpoint 11.11
7 ra conference powerpoint 11.117 Rivers Alliance
 
Smart Menu Final NSF I-Corp Presentation
Smart Menu Final NSF I-Corp PresentationSmart Menu Final NSF I-Corp Presentation
Smart Menu Final NSF I-Corp PresentationStanford University
 
Daily Equity Newsletter
Daily Equity NewsletterDaily Equity Newsletter
Daily Equity Newslettercapital Height
 
Presentation Trends Session
Presentation Trends SessionPresentation Trends Session
Presentation Trends SessionPieter Maenhout
 
Davie County Economic Development Update
Davie County Economic Development UpdateDavie County Economic Development Update
Davie County Economic Development Updatemarkxs
 
Ideal "Bull's-Eye" Client Profile
Ideal "Bull's-Eye" Client ProfileIdeal "Bull's-Eye" Client Profile
Ideal "Bull's-Eye" Client ProfileRon Kranz
 
Digital Futures Presentation Sept 09
Digital Futures Presentation Sept 09Digital Futures Presentation Sept 09
Digital Futures Presentation Sept 09Traffika
 
Hayman capital kyle bass
Hayman capital kyle bassHayman capital kyle bass
Hayman capital kyle bassFrank Ragol
 
Dk2 XIMB - Mahindra Lifespaces Branding
Dk2 XIMB - Mahindra Lifespaces BrandingDk2 XIMB - Mahindra Lifespaces Branding
Dk2 XIMB - Mahindra Lifespaces BrandingParamdeep Saini
 

Similar to MBA Team Pepsi US Carbonated Soft Drink Sales Forecast (20)

Tom Streitz - Department of Community Planning & Economic Development (CPED)
Tom Streitz - Department of Community Planning & Economic Development (CPED)Tom Streitz - Department of Community Planning & Economic Development (CPED)
Tom Streitz - Department of Community Planning & Economic Development (CPED)
 
Marketing pres
Marketing presMarketing pres
Marketing pres
 
The Beacon Council
The Beacon CouncilThe Beacon Council
The Beacon Council
 
First Interim
First Interim First Interim
First Interim
 
This is SCA leaflet 2010 / 2011
This is SCA leaflet 2010 / 2011This is SCA leaflet 2010 / 2011
This is SCA leaflet 2010 / 2011
 
Makt strtrgy leader colgate(c 08)
Makt strtrgy leader colgate(c 08)Makt strtrgy leader colgate(c 08)
Makt strtrgy leader colgate(c 08)
 
Makt strtrgy leader colgate(c 08)
Makt strtrgy leader colgate(c 08)Makt strtrgy leader colgate(c 08)
Makt strtrgy leader colgate(c 08)
 
A2 manendra
A2 manendraA2 manendra
A2 manendra
 
7 ra conference powerpoint 11.11
7 ra conference powerpoint 11.117 ra conference powerpoint 11.11
7 ra conference powerpoint 11.11
 
Smart Menu Final NSF I-Corp Presentation
Smart Menu Final NSF I-Corp PresentationSmart Menu Final NSF I-Corp Presentation
Smart Menu Final NSF I-Corp Presentation
 
WebMd India
WebMd IndiaWebMd India
WebMd India
 
Durban presentation
Durban presentationDurban presentation
Durban presentation
 
Daily Equity Newsletter
Daily Equity NewsletterDaily Equity Newsletter
Daily Equity Newsletter
 
Presentation Trends Session
Presentation Trends SessionPresentation Trends Session
Presentation Trends Session
 
Davie County Economic Development Update
Davie County Economic Development UpdateDavie County Economic Development Update
Davie County Economic Development Update
 
Ideal "Bull's-Eye" Client Profile
Ideal "Bull's-Eye" Client ProfileIdeal "Bull's-Eye" Client Profile
Ideal "Bull's-Eye" Client Profile
 
Digital Futures Presentation Sept 09
Digital Futures Presentation Sept 09Digital Futures Presentation Sept 09
Digital Futures Presentation Sept 09
 
Hayman capital kyle bass
Hayman capital kyle bassHayman capital kyle bass
Hayman capital kyle bass
 
Dk2 XIMB - Mahindra Lifespaces Branding
Dk2 XIMB - Mahindra Lifespaces BrandingDk2 XIMB - Mahindra Lifespaces Branding
Dk2 XIMB - Mahindra Lifespaces Branding
 
Coffee - Asia
Coffee - AsiaCoffee - Asia
Coffee - Asia
 

MBA Team Pepsi US Carbonated Soft Drink Sales Forecast

  • 1.
  • 2. Agenda • Industry Overview • Forecast • Explanation of Variables • Recommendations
  • 3. Industry Overview US CSD Industry Sales Volume and GrRate 11,000 6.0% 5.0% 10,000 4.0% Millions of Cases 3.0% Growth Rate 9,000 2.0% 8,000 1.0% 0.0% 7,000 -1.0% 6,000 -2.0% -3.0% 5,000 -4.0% 1990 1994 1998 2002 2006 2010 Total CSD Sales Sales GrRate Source: Class Material
  • 4. Industry Overview – cont. 2010 CSD Players' Market Share 7.60% 16.70% 42.00% 29.30% Coca-Cola PepsiCo Dr. Pepper Snapple Others Source: beverage-digest.com
  • 5. Actual Pepsi Sales vs. Estimated CSD Sales CSD Sales Millions 3,350 3,150 2,950 2,750 2,550 2,350 2,150 1,950 1,750 1985 1990 1995 2000 2005 2010 Actual CSD Sales Estimated CSD Sales Source: Class Material, Estimation by Team 21
  • 6. Explanation of four Variables Real Price • Higher price equals lower sales • Real price removes the inflation bias • Pepsi has little control over the price
  • 7. Explanation of four Variables Real Median Income • Real median income vs. Purchasing Power • Soda is a discretionary good • Excludes inflation bias • Removes outliers
  • 8. Explanation of four Variables Growth of Candy Consumption • Candy is a complement to sodas • Checkout line and vending machines • 80% of candy buyers also purchase canned soda • At a comparable level of unhealthiness Goods Purchased by Candy Buyers 100% 80% 60% 40% 20% 0% Canned Soda Fountain Soda Bottled Water Juice Hot Beverages Source: AllBusiness, 2011
  • 9. Explanation of four Variables Yogurt Daily Consumption per capita • A proxy of health awareness • Soda sales decrease with increasing health awareness • Covers a variety of health considerations • Resilient against external influences • High growth amongst youth – Teens: 59% in 2009 – Children: 54% in 2009 Source: Purcell, 2011
  • 10. Forecasted Pepsi US Sales and Growth Rate CSD Sales Millions 3,350 8.0% 3,150 6.0% 2,950 4.0% 2,750 2.0% 2,550 0.0% 2,350 -2.0% 2,150 1,950 -4.0% 1,750 -6.0% 1985 1988 1991 1994 1997 2000 2003 2006 2009 2012 PEP Growth Rate Source: Class Material, Estimation by Team 21
  • 11. Recommendations • Short-Term – Modify production plan in 2011 and 2012 – Co-opt advertising campaigns with candy manufacturers – Cross sales promotional activities with candy manufactures • Long-Term – Moving into other product categories – Launch a series of CSD with vitamins and minerals • Like Coca-Cola’s Diet Coke Plus • New brand image: Healthy soda company
  • 12. Q&A
  • 13. Appendix A: Forecasting Regression Formula Pepsi US CSD Sales = 3786–475xRP+0.038xRMI+1317xGCC–10117xYC Where RP = Real Price based on 2010 RMI = Real Median Income based on 2010 GCC = Growth Rate of Candy Consumption YC = Yogurt Daily Consumption per capita
  • 14. Appendix B: Regression Results Best Forecasting Method 2010 2011 2012 MAPE Real Price (2010) ARIMA(0,2,1) N/A $5.89 $5.92 1.31% Real Median Income $59,833.7 ARIMA(1,1,0) N/A $60,029.17 1.22% 9 Yogurt Consumption Double Exponential Smoothing 0.0505 0.0529 0.0553 4.14% Total Candy Double Exponential Smoothing 6,740.44 6,772.03 6,803 1.63% Consumption Candy Consumption N/A .468% .468% .466% N/A Growth Rate Forecasted Historical ARIMA(0,2,0) N/A 2,672 2,599 1.42% Sales Coefficient T-Test F-Value VIF Signs Regression Statistics Correct High: .011 538 98.9% High: 6.64