Whats Wrong With Gay Marriage

THE QUESTION: What couldpossibly be wrong with twopeople who love each other,regardless of their sexualorientation, getting married? Andin general what‟s the problemwith being gay anyway?

Gay Marriage Uproar Erupts in GreeceWed, Jun. 04 2008 07:18 PM EDTHeated controversy erupted in Greece Tuesday after the mayor of Tilos, a small islandin the Aegean sea, stood over the nation‟s first gay “marriage” ceremony. ..Gay Marriage Bill Approval Adds to Calif. WoesMon, Sep. 10 2007 09:19 AM EDTPro-family groups are denouncing a new California bill passed by the state senateFriday that grants marriage licenses to homosexual couples…Opponents Forsee Massachusetts as Las Vegas of Gay MarriageFri, Aug. 01 2008 09:08 AM EDTBOSTON - Gov. Deval Patrick signed a bill Thursday that repealed a 1913 law thathad blocked gay couples from outside Massachusetts from marrying here…Opposition Forms Against Gay Marriage Rights in N.Y.Fri, May. 30 2008 08:12 AM EDTALBANY, N.Y. (AP) - Religious and social conservatives vowed Thursday to fight Gov.David Patersons directive requiring state agencies to recognize gay marriagesperformed legally elsewhere, saying it flouts traditional values and is a big step towardlegalizing same-sex unions in New York…Calif. Bishop Drives Gay Marriage Momentum to ChurchThu, Jun. 12, 2008 Posted: 04:27 PM EDTIn a push to strengthen support for gay and lesbian persons, the bishop of theEpiscopal Diocese of California has initiated a process to move toward equality ofmarriage rites for same-sex couples.

Is There AnythingWrong With Anything?

Without an unchanging moral standard, everything reverts to opinion and becomes emotive (i.e. “I don‟t like that…”)Options for an unchanging moral standard:• From the natural universe• From culture• From each individual• From an arbitrary deity that has revealed itself• From an unchanging Deity who has revealed Himself

Morality from the natural universe… A man said to the Universe, Sir, I exist! Nevertheless, replied the Universe, That fact has not created in me The slightest feeling of obligation. - Stephen CraneThe atheist must explain how an amoral universe accidentally created moralbeings. The very laws of causation are ignored. Further, you cannot evenarrive at the concept of “every person is [created] equal” with naturalismalone – evolution and the survival of the fittest affords no such luxury. “With me the horrid doubt always arises whether the convictions of man‟s mind, which has been developed from the mind of the lower animals, are of any value or at all trustworthy. Would any one trust in the convictions of a monkey‟s mind, if there are any convictions in such a mind?” – Charles Darwin

Morality from culture…• Is/was “Widow burning” in India morally OK?• In some cultures they love their neighbors and in others they eat them; which do you prefer?• Does a land exist where murder is a virtue and thanksgiving a vice?• Were the Nazi‟s justified in their actions given the culture/power in Germany; did culture OK their actions?• If the majority rule that rape is OK, does that make it right?• Is it OK for a culture to gratuitously torture innocent babies?• If none of the above is true, then what/who is mankind morally obligated to? Real moral obligation exists, but to whom?• Perhaps the relativist‟s view has been influenced by their culture…?• Lastly, it precludes someone from the outside‟s positive influenceThere is a difference in what a culture is doing and what it ought to do; adifference in descriptive and prescriptive.

Morality from each individual…• Is it ever OK to for a person to torture babies, abuse children, or rape someone?• Just because we have a „twilight‟ doesn‟t mean we can‟t recognize day and night. What if we did the same thing with mathematics we do with morals?• How does one gauge if the world is getting better or worse without global absolutes?• How does one settle moral disagreements without absolutes?• How many spouses desire their spouse be relatively faithful to them, rather than absolutely faithful to them?• The question is not “Must an individual believe in God in order to live moral lives?”, but “Do objective moral values exist without God?” “Why sir, if he really believes there is no distinction between virtue and vice, let us count our spoons before he leaves.” – Dr. Samuel Johnson

Morality from an arbitrary deity…•Still left in the dark as the deity could proclaim rape OK tomorrow although it is wrong today•This is the god of Islam who, through abrogation, can declare a word or revelation from him yesterday as overridden by a command issued by him today•How can one trust the goodness or feel secure and at peace with such a deity?•Different than the progressive revelation found in Christianity, where God slowly reveals His full purpose and, while the moral pronouncements do not change, the punishment may

Morality from an unchanging Deity…• Before you can call something bad, you must know what good is• Before you can call something good, you must have a moral framework to determine what‟s good• Before you can have a moral framework, you must have a set of absolute moral laws to build the framework; they must be absolute so you have certainty• Before you can have absolute moral laws, you must have an absolute, unchanging moral law giver• This absolute moral law giver is God Moral laws imply a Moral Law Giver There is an objective Moral Law Therefore, there is a Moral Law Giver

Only morality from an unchanging Deity solves the issue“What do I care what some Bronze Age text says about homosexuality?” –Christopher Hitchens, “God Bless Me, Its a Best-Seller!”, Vanity Fair,September 2007• Logical fallacy: ad annis – “argument because of age”• Only an unchanging and all-good God who has revealed Himself gives the foundation needed to answer any and all moral issues• „Imposing morals on others‟ isn‟t the issue – someone‟s morals will be imposed, we‟re just arguing over whose morals it will be• “For all denunciation applies a moral doctrine of some kind…” – G. K. Chesterton “A man does not call a line crooked unless he has some idea of a straight line.” – C. S. Lewis

Traditional Homosexual Stance Traditional Christian StanceBorn homosexual May or may not be born homosexualIt is an identity It is a choiceIt is “who I am” It is “what I do”It is normal and natural It is abnormal and unnaturalIt is an alternative lifestyle It is a destructive lifestyleIt is a civil rights issue It is a moral issueAgain, it goes back to an absolute moral standard. In the absence of sucha standard, it all boils down to a matter of taste (“I like broccoli, but youdon‟t…”) And if there is no God, they may be right! But if this is the case,why make such absolute statements such as “It‟s wrong to discriminateagainst homosexual behavior!”“Who are you to say homosexual behavior is morally wrong?!” can easilybe returned, “Who are you to say homosexual behavior is morally right?!”

When sexologist Alfred Kensey in the 1940‟s asked homosexuals whythey practiced homosexuality, only nine percent claimed they were bornthat way. A decade or so later found that 35 percent claimed to be bornthat way, and today, virtually all make this declaration.“First, there is a difference between inherited physicalcharacteristics (like brown eyes), over which I have no control,and inherited spiritual tendencies (like lust), over which I oughtto have control. We cannot avoid the basic size, color, talents,or ethnic group from which we have come. But we do have achoice as to whether to follow spiritual impulses we may haveinherited, like impatience, anger, pride, or sexual impurity . . . .Morally speaking, “irresistible urges” are urges that have notbeen resisted. People have died for lack of water and food,but no one has ever been known to die for lack of sex,alcohol, or other drugs to fulfill his cravings! We have a freechoice in all these areas.” – Norman Geisler How many men are born monogamous? What about naturally bad tempers? Flipping the issue onto the other side: How many people are naturally born with patience, forgiveness, and discipline? Aren‟t these good traits to have?

“Yes, God created homosexuals and homosexuality.”, Troy Perry, founderof Metropolitan Community Church.“Homosexuality doesn‟t just vanish when a person decides he no longerwants it. None of my counselees have been unclear on that point. AsBible-believing Christians, they no more wanted to be gay than theywanted a third eyeball.” – Joe Dallas“All Christians, of course, don‟t wrestle with homosexuality, but theywrestle with something. That‟s part of our common human experience.” –Joe Dallas“For what I am doing, I do not understand; for I am not practicing what Iwould like to do, but I am doing the very thing I hate.” – Paul, Romans7:18“But I don‟t feel guilty…” Regardless of howyou feel, sin brings guilt before God How many parents taught their children to lie, be selfish, or get angry?

As has already been discussed, the issue of equating a “natural” feelingwith moral and righteous behavior simply cannot be done as the depravityof man doctrine makes clear that the two are not the same. It is naturalfor most men to want to have intimate relations with as many as they can,but God asks that such actions be confined to the bond of heterosexualmarriage.“For this reason God gave them over to degrading passions; for theirwomen exchanged the natural function for that which is unnatural, andin the same way also the men abandoned the natural function of thewoman and burned in their desire toward one another, men with mencommitting indecent acts and receiving in their own persons the duepenalty of their error” (Romans 1:26-27).Paul specifically states that they “exchanged” and “abandoned” thenatural function God gives everyone and instead began practicingsomething that was different than what God originally intended. This isimportant because it speaks against the claim of the pro-gay movementthat says homosexuals simply do not possess the capability for oppositesex attraction.

Immoral behavior is never a civil right.When Paul and John wrote against homosexuality, they werewriting in a day when it was in full bloom and practiced by the veryleaders they were living under. As educated as Paul was, he wouldhave been quite familiar with the homoerotic love that wascelebrated during this time and would certainly be familiar with the“marriage” of the emperor Nero and Sporus, who was a man thatwas altered via first century surgery to become Nero‟s “wife”.Paul‟s message against homosexuality was as counter-culturethen as it is today.The homosexual agenda pushes hard for social acceptance tolessen the sting of conscience. As Christian philosopher J.Budziszewski writes in his book The Revenge of Conscience,“those who rationalize their sins find it to be so much workthat they require other people to support them in it.”

Assertion: What two consenting adults do is their right.Response: Not true. Can two adults consent to rob a bank, kidnap a child,participate in prostitution, or commit suicide?Assertion: My right to privacy is an ultimate right.Response: Not true. Can a person privately commit a moral crime such as rape ormurder?Assertion: Morals evolve and what once was wrong is now OK.Response: Not true. Will the same be said of other moral acts such as murder,etc.?Assertion: There is homosexuality in the animal world.Response: And…? Should we behave as animals? Secondly, such observedbehavior is temporary and casual, not habitual and lifelongAssertion: A person should be able to marry who they want.Response: And where is the line drawn and how much will it be redrawn?Polygamy, marrying children, animals, etc? When posed with the question “Whydraw the line at two people?,” same-sex marriage advocate Cheryl Jacques of theHuman Rights Campaign said, ”Because I dont approve of that.” How come her“because I don‟t approve of that” objection to polygamy is more reasonable than “Idon‟t approve of that” objection to same-sex “marriage”?

• Is there an absolute moral God that exists? (already answered)• Is God‟s will expressed in the Bible?• Does the Bible state that homosexual behavior is a sin?It isn‟t the purpose of this message to validate that the will of God hasbeen expressed in the Bible, but one point to make: Jesus Christ, the Sonof God, the only one to rise from the dead and remain alive says thisabout the Scripture:1. Divinely Authoritative – Jesus said “It is written…” in Matthew 4 to rebuke the devil2. Imperishable – Jesus said not the smallest stroke in Scripture would pass away (Matthew 5:18)) 24:35)3. Unbreakable – Jesus said the Scripture cannot be broken (John 10:35)4. Ultimate Supremacy – Jesus rebuked the Pharisees for putting their tradition over Scripture (Matthew 15:3-4)5. Inerrant – Jesus said the Bible is inerrant (without error) – John 17:176. Historically Accurate – Jesus cited Adam/Eve, Jonah and others as historical figures

• This is the weakest form of argument one can have – an argument from silence• Neither did Christ speak against bestiality, child pornography, torture, etc., but it is doubtful anyone in the pro-gay movement would say Jesus approves of those things• Christ did say heterosexuality is the standard: In Mark 10:6-9, Jesus says, “But from the beginning of creation, God made them male and female. For this reason a man shall leave his father and mother, and the two shall become one flesh; so they are no longer two, but one flesh. What therefore God has joined together, let no man separate.”

"Before they lay down, the men of the city, the men of Sodom, surroundedthe house, both young and old, all the people from every quarter; and theycalled to Lot and said to him, “Where are the men who came to youtonight? Bring them out to us that we may have relations with them.” ButLot went out to them at the doorway, and shut the door behind him, andsaid, “Please, my brothers, do not act wickedly. “Now behold, I have twodaughters who have not had relations with man; please let me bring themout to you, and do to them whatever you like; only do nothing to thesemen, inasmuch as they have come under the shelter of my roof.” But theysaid, “Stand aside.” Furthermore, they said, “This one came in as an alien,and already he is acting like a judge; now we will treat you worse thanthem.” So they pressed hard against Lot and came near to break the door.But the men reached out their hands and brought Lot into the house withthem, and shut the door. They struck the men who were at the doorway ofthe house with blindness, both small and great, so that they weariedthemselves trying to find the doorway." (Genesis 19:4-11)"just as Sodom and Gomorrah and the cities around them, since they inthe same way as these indulged in gross immorality and went afterstrange flesh, are exhibited as an example in undergoing the punishmentof eternal fire." (Jude 7)

"„You shall not lie with a male as one lies with a female; it is anabomination." (Leviticus 18:22)"„If there is a man who lies with a male as those who lie with awoman, both of them have committed a detestable act; they shallsurely be put to death. Their bloodguiltiness is upon them."(Leviticus 20:13)"For this reason God gave them over to degrading passions; fortheir women exchanged the natural function for that which isunnatural, and in the same way also the men abandoned thenatural function of the woman and burned in their desire towardone another, men with men committing indecent acts and receivingin their own persons the due penalty of their error." (Romans 1:26-27)

"Or do you not know that the unrighteous will not inherit thekingdom of God? Do not be deceived; neither fornicators, noridolaters, nor adulterers, nor effeminate, nor homosexuals, northieves, nor the covetous, nor drunkards, nor revilers, norswindlers, will inherit the kingdom of God." (1 Corinthians 6:9-10)"realizing the fact that law is not made for a righteous person, butfor those who are lawless and rebellious, for the ungodly andsinners, for the unholy and profane, for those who kill their fathersor mothers, for murderers and immoral men and homosexuals andkidnappers and liars and perjurers, and whatever else is contraryto sound teaching," (1 Timothy 1:9-10)Bottom line: God‟s word condemns homosexual behavior.Important Point: a person with homosexual orientation is notcondemned, but the sin is.

The personal, infinite and Triune God is one God comprised ofthree distinct Persons who are of the same essence, but differentfrom one Another, with all being involved in a loving relationship. Father God Spirit Son Is not Unity in DiversityA marriage is the uniting of two individuals who are of the sameessence (human), but are distinct persons (separate from eachother), different from one another (man and woman), that cometogether to become one in a loving relationship. It is a physicalsymbolic relationship of a person choosing God forever.

“Attempting to promote monogamy among homosexual couples byrearranging marriage ignores the fact that homosexual acts arepatently obvious distortions of the human biological design. Weare born biologically male or female and as such we are sexuallydissimilar but in complimentary ways. The male/female sexualunion works, in other words. This is true of every species on earth.Every living organism has a particular way of reproducing andrearing offspring; its anatomy is biologically designed to supportthat way. If one believes we are products of an evolutionaryprocess, then homosexual acts are a deviation from theprocreative design and homosexuality is therefore a geneticdefect because it fails to propagate the species. If one holdsto the belief that we are created, then it defies the design andintent of the Creator. Either way homosexuality violates thegiven design.” – Michael Craven

“We are reluctant to say this today because our culture has beeninundated with gay-rights propaganda that carefully avoids thesexual reality of homosexual behavior. Instead the emphasis is onthe so-called emotional and romantic aspects. As a result, we feelsympathetic; we may feel like we should capitulate to their demandfor marriage in the name of equal treatment. However, equaltreatment of persons living the homosexual lifestyle is a completelydifferent issue than redefining marriage. No thinking Christianopposes the equal treatment of homosexuals, because they arefully human persons made in the image of God. Furthermore, gaymen and women are free to have sex, experience romanticrelationships, and live in whatever arrangement they choose. (Ofcourse, there are consequences to these choices.) What is nottheir choice is to redefine an institution essential to the socialwelfare and common good such that these benefits arenullified. The demand for SSM is not about equal dignity andtreatment but rather social affirmation of a particular lifestyle.”– Michael Craven

According to a thorough survey of history, any and every culture that embraces aphilosophy of sexual freedom for a period of at least three generations willinevitably experience cultural decline (Unwin, Sexual Regulations and CulturalBehavior, 1935). There is not one single example in all of human history where thiscultural pattern appears and there does not follow cultural demise consistent withthese conclusions.History is replete with examples that testify to this fact. The Greek, Roman,Babylonian, and Sumerian empires are just a few examples of cultures that beganwith a strong marriage-centered monogamy and later degenerated into liberalsexual practices (including homosexuality), which, according to the sociological andanthropological evidence, was central to their downfall.Pitirim A. Sorokin, the renowned Russian-born sociologist who founded thesociology department at Harvard, conducted his own study of history and likewisestressed that marriage is "the most decisive factor in the survival and well-being" ofsociety (Sorokin, p. 6). Based on his sociological study of historical civilizations, Dr.Sorokin warned that "any change in marriage behavior, any increase in sexualpromiscuity, and illicit sexual relations is pregnant with momentous consequences,"adding that a "sex revolution drastically affects the lives of millions, deeply disturbsthe community and decisively influences the future of society" (p.7).

In regards to homosexual couples, the concept of fidelity is a popularmyth. In the book The Male Couple, the author reports that in a study of156 males in homosexual relationships lasting from one to thirty-sevenyears, "Only seven couples have a totally exclusive sexual relationship,and these men all have been together for less than five years. Statedanother way, all couples with a relationship lasting more than five yearshave incorporated some provision for outside sexual activity in theirrelationships" (McWhirter, The Male Couple [Upper Saddle River, NJ:Prentice Hall] 252, 253).Furthermore, gay marriage has not strengthened the institution ofmarriage by promoting fidelity and commitment among gays inScandinavia, as some suggest it will do here. In fact, take-up rates on gaymarriage are exceedingly small. Yale law professor William Eskridge (anadvocate for gay marriage) acknowledged this when “he reported in 2000that only 2372 couples had registered after nine years of the Danish lawgoing into effect, 674 after four years in Norway, and only 749 couplesafter four years in Sweden”

Stanley Kurtz, senior fellow at Stanford University‟s Hoover Institute, reported inApril of 2004 before the House Judiciary Committee that there is ample evidenceavailable in Scandinavia demonstrating the effect of devolving marriage to includecouples of the same sex. Dr. Kurtz holds a PhD in social anthropology fromHarvard University and is regarded as both an excellent scholar and expert in thisarea. Commenting on the situation in Sweden and other European countries thathave embraced same-sex marriage, Kurtz writes:The Swedes have simply drawn the final conclusion: If we‟ve come so far withoutmarriage, why marry at all? Our love is what matters, not a piece of paper. Whyshould children change that? (Stanley Kurtz, “The End of Marriage in Scandinavia:The „conservative case‟ for same-sex marriage collapses,” The Weekly Standard, 2February 2004.)Indeed, in Sweden the out-of-wedlock birthrate is 55 percent, Norway is 50 percent,Iceland is approaching 70 percent, and in Denmark 60 percent of firstborn childrenare born out of wedlock. According to Dr. Kurtz, studies in these countriesdemonstrate that these unmarried families break up at a rate two to three times thatof married couples. Kurtz concludes by saying, “This suggests that gay marriage isboth an effect and a cause of the increasing separation between marriage andparenthood. As rising out-of-wedlock birthrates disassociate heterosexual marriagefrom parenting, gay marriage becomes conceivable”

Immanuel Kant, who was an agnostic but held to a belief in God alongwith a stance in ethical unqualified absolutism, stated that if one wanted todetermine whether a particular activity or behavior was normal and moral,they should take the behavior and apply it on a universal scale andobserve the end result. For example, in determining whether lying is amoral, normal, and acceptable behavior for people, what would be the endresult if everyone lied? Two results occur (1) rational communicationbreaks down (2) The practice is self-defeating because a lie only works ifthe target is expecting the truth (and no one would be).In this vein, what would be the final result if everyone on the planet onlypracticed “loving and monogamous” homosexuality as the pro-gaymovement advocates? The final analysis is that mankind would likelycease to exist within a generation. In effect, this is more than just aconsequential outcome view as the universal practice of homosexualitytruly does defeat itself.

Harvard professor of law Mary Ann Glendon acknowledged this real consequenceof legalizing same-sex marriage. She writes: “Religious freedom, too, is at stake..Every person and every religion that disagrees will be labeled as bigoted andopenly discriminated against. The ax must fall most heavily on religious personsand groups that dont go along. Religious institutions will be hit with lawsuits if theyrefuse to compromise their principles.” (Mary Ann Glendon, "For Better or forWorse? The federal marriage amendment would strike a blow for freedom," opinionpost to online editorial page, The Wall Street Journal, 25 February 2004).In British Columbia, Dr. Chris Kempling, a school counselor, was suspendedwithout pay for three months in 2005 for writing a letter to the editor of the localnewspaper criticizing the Liberal governments same-sex marriage legislation. In2006, Canadian professor David Mullan was fined $2,100 by Cape BretonUniversity, after he told a student homosexuality was "unnatural."In January of last year, Christian Vanneste, a member of Frances ruling party, wasfined almost $4,000 under French hate speech law for comments opposinghomosexuality. What was so egregious? Vanneste dared to suggest thathomosexuality was "inferior" to heterosexuality and said the practice would be"dangerous for humanity if it was pushed to the limit."

Last year, the Brazilian Association of Gays, Lesbians, Bisexuals, Transvestites,and Transsexuals (ABGLT) filed a criminal complaint against Christian activist JulioSevero and the National Vision for Christian Awareness for inciting "hatred" againsthomosexuals, and "homophobia." The complaint was made because Severoregularly denounces homosexual behavior as immoral on his Web site, andopposes the goals of the homosexual movement. Severo and his ministry weresuccessfully prosecuted simply for denouncing homosexual behavior as sinfulduring a campaign to promote family values. As a result, the ministry was orderedto cancel its campaign and all related events.In America-the land of the free-a Christian photographer who declined tophotograph a same-sex "commitment ceremony" was hauled before the NewMexico Human Rights Division (NMHRD) in January of this year. ElanePhotography turned down the job because their beliefs were in conflict with themessage communicated by the ceremony. The same-sex couple filed a complaintwith the NMHRD, which is now trying Elane Photography under stateantidiscrimination laws for sexual orientation discrimination.Last year, June Sheldon, an adjunct professor teaching a human heredity course atSan Jose City College, was fired for answering a students in-class question aboutheredity and homosexual behavior. Apparently professor Sheldon did not offer thestudent the "right" answer.

Marcia Walden, a licensed counselor at Computer Sciences Corporation in Atlanta,was fired after she chose to refer a person seeking counsel in a same-sexrelationship to another colleague.The New Jersey Division on Civil Rights threatened to prosecute the Ocean GroveCamp Meeting Association of the United Methodist Church after it refused to allowa same-sex civil union ceremony at one of its worship facilities.Students in Boyd County, Kentucky, were threatened with "suspension" and the"possibility of court referral" if they publicly voiced moral objections to the schoolsdiversity training, which normalized homosexual behavior.A Christian high school student in Michigan was suspended for refusing to removean "Im Straight" sticker from his t-shirt when other students were wearing duct tapeover their mouths to show support for the pro-homosexual National Day of Silence.And in a most ludicrous act, Christian publishers Zondervan and Thomas Nelsonare facing a $60 million federal lawsuit for publishing "homophobic and prejudicial"translations of the Bible, from a man who claims he and other homosexuals havesuffered based on what the suit claims is a misinterpretation of the Bible.

First, Those tempted to judge homosexuals more harshly thanothers should remember Christ‟s words about it being moretolerable for Sodom in the day of judgment than for cities that hadcome face-to-face with the truth of Christ and turned away(Matthew 10:15).It must also be remembered that homosexual orientation is not theissue, but the practice of homosexual behavior, and even then,understanding must be given to those who fall into sin but turnback in repentance to Christ.Jesus acted only with compassion and understanding with theadulterous woman whose story is told in John 8. Do Christiansreally believe the outcome would have been different if ahomosexual caught in the act was thrown before Christ instead ofa woman charged with having immoral heterosexual relations?

But those in the pro-gay movement must be careful not to pull outtheir eraser and remove Christ‟s final words in the John 8passage, which are: “now go your way and leave your life of sin.”The Bible clearly does not condone homosexual behavior. TheChurch should make every effort to spiritually educate strugglinghomosexuals on God‟s truth and provide counseling and supportgroups that supply help to those struggling with the temptation.Most importantly, the Church should relay the fact thathomosexuality can be overcome just as every other temptationthat is common to man. After Paul speaks about those whocontinue to practice sin (including homosexuality) being deniedentry into the kingdom of God in 1 Corinthians 6, he providesmuch needed hope for those who believe that escape fromhomosexual behavior is not possible: “Such were some of you; butyou were washed, but you were sanctified, but you were justified inthe name of the Lord Jesus Christ and in the Spirit of our God.”(1 Corinthians 6:11, emphasis added).

http://www.confidentchristians.org	632
http://www.powerpointapologist.org	506
http://www.slideshare.net	23
http://calebspath.blogspot.com	17
http://www.calebspath.blogspot.com	2
http://calebspath.blogspot.co.uk	1
http://calebspath.blogspot.ca	1
http://calebspath.blogspot.hk	1
http://calebspath.blogspot.sg	1
http://webcache.googleusercontent.com	1
http://calebspath.blogspot.dk	1

Whats Wrong With Gay Marriage

by Robin Schumacher on Sep 10, 2008

Accessibility

Categories

Upload Details

Usage Rights

11 Embeds 1,186

Statistics

Whats Wrong With Gay Marriage Presentation Transcript