Loading...
Flash Player 9 (or above) is needed to view slideshows. We have detected that you do not have it on your computer.To install it, go here
 
Post to Twitter Post to Twitter
Myspace Hi5 Friendster Xanga LiveJournal Facebook Blogger Tagged Typepad Freewebs BlackPlanet gigya icons
SlideShare is now available on LinkedIn. Add it to your LinkedIn profile.

Using Response to Intervention with English Language Learners

From schoolpsychology, 6 months ago Add as contact

Mike Vanderwood, Ph.D. University of California, Riverside
Using Response to Intervention with English Language Learners.
Recent changes in federal legislation and California code provide educators an opportunity to implement response to intervention (RtI) approaches in general and special education. RtI decision making is particularly promising for English Language Learners (EL) because this model places a heavy emphasis on prevention strategies, and provides skill acquisition data that can be used to examine special education eligibility. The primary expected learning outcome is for participants to acquire a basic understanding how to use RtI with ELs.

2010 views | 0 comments | 0 favorites | 43 downloads | 1 embeds (Stats)

Categories

Education
Embed in your blog options close
Embed (wordpress.com) Exclude related slideshows Embed in your blog

More Info

This slideshow is Public
Total Views: 2010 on Slideshare: 2009 from embeds: 1
Most viewed embeds (Top 5): More
All Embeds: Less
Flagged as inappropriate Flag as inappropriate

Flag as inappropriate

Select your reason for flagging this slideshow as inappropriate.

If needed, use the feedback form to let us know more details.

Slideshow Transcript

  1. Slide 1:Best Practices in Assessment and Intervention for ELL Mike Vanderwood, Ph.D. University of California-Riverside Mike.vanderwood@ucr.edu 1
  2. Slide 2:ELL Growth  9.6% of students in the US public schools are ELLs  25.2% of students in California schools are ELL, and 85.3% of these students speak Spanish  ELLs’ literacy skills wane in comparison to non-ELL students (NCES, 2005)  ELLs have a higher risk of being placed into special education across elementary grades, and are 40-50% more likely than their White peers to qualify for SLD. (Artiles, et al, 2005)  Schools often delay examination for Special Ed because they want to eliminate language interference 2
  3. Slide 3:Current Practice  Very few teachers and psychologists are trained to work with students who have