Film Industry Presentation
Scott Harrison
Hollywood and the German Industry
• In this presentation I will compare the
mainstream film industry of Hollywood, with
the German film industry.
The differences between Hollywood
and the German Film Industry
• Funding
• Ownership
• Technology
• National identity
• Genre
• Representation
Examples
The Lives of Others (Germany,
2006)
• Directed by Florian Henckel von
Donnersmarck
• Grossed $77,356,942 worldwide
• Winner of 2006 Academy Award
for Best Foreign Language Film
Avatar (USA, 2009)
• Directed by James Cameron
• Grossed $2,782,275,172
worldwide
• Nominated for nine Academy
Awards
In order to compare these two industries, I will refer in my analysis to two specific film
examples, which are two of the highest-grossing films of modern times in their
respective industries:
Funding
Hollywood
• The Hollywood film industry is
dominated by a number of big
film financiers called film
studios
• These studios actively seek out
projects that will be the next
big money maker for them
• Some studios supply the
funding for both the
production and distribution of
the film
German
• In contrast, the German
industry relies more heavily on
publicly-funded national
institutions, such as the
Filmförderungsanstalt FFA
(German Federal Film Board)
• Germany also provides tax
incentives for investors to put
money into the making of
films, meaning many private
investors and companies have
involvement.
Funding – The Lives of Others
• Funded by a number of organisations (Wiedemann & Berg,
Bayerischer Rundfunk, ARTE & Creado Film), a mixture of studios
and TV companies
• Budget of $2,000,000
• Written and Directed by von Donnersmarck
• Director’s parents were from East Germany, and he grew up there
• The film has a very strict sense of German identity, and is about a
period of German history in which the country was split between
East and West
• Due to this, and because of the relatively small budget, the film
aims to portray realistic German events, meaning many locations
are domestic (in houses), there is almost no CGI, and some of the
themes are much more mature and complex in nature than those
of Avatar.
Funding – Avatar
• Funded by 20th
Century Fox (studio)
• Budget of $237,000,000
• Written and Directed by Cameron
• Studio encouraged by the success of Cameron’s previous film, Titanic
• Studio even gave $10,000,000 for Cameron to produce a short clip
demonstrating his vision!
• This meant that the film, as a Sci-Fi action epic, was extremely reliant on
visuals, including a number of CGI characters, sweeping alien landscapes
and large-scale battles.
• One could argue that the success of Avatar could be attributed to the
money spent on it, as people were eager to see what the film looked like.
It was also one of the major breakthroughs in the current trend for 3D
films.
Technology
Hollywood
• Consistently at the ‘cutting
edge’ of new cinema
technology
• American films, particularly big
budget blockbusters, are
always the films which try to
introduce new technologies to
the cinema world (3D, Colour,
sound, etc.)
• This is due to the huge
amounts of money that are
available to directors and
producers in Hollywood
Germany
• German films tend to be lower
budget than Hollywood films
• This usually means that
German films are more
focussed on character and
story rather than action and
effects
• These types of stories do not
necessarily require expensive
new technology, however
much like other industries the
German industry tends to
follow the lead of Hollywood
Technology - Avatar
• Avatar is perceived as being the catalyst for the new revolution in 3D cinema
• Some people attribute the extra cost of seeing the film in 3D as being the reason its
box office gross was so high
• Revolutionary new motion-capture techniques were used to create the alien
characters (pioneered in other big budget films such as The Lord of the Rings and
Pirates of the Caribbean)
• James Cameron deliberately waited until the Technology was available for him to
create an alien world that felt realistic
• The film, and its success, was ultimately the product of a time in Hollywood where
producers were looking for new ideas (in terms of new and original stories) and new
technologies in order to maximise revenue. They saw James Cameron, with his
previous successes, as being able to provide this. Many criticised that the all of the
big Hollywood films leading up to Avatar were unoriginal ideas such as sequels
remakes, and comic book adaptations.
Technology – The Lives of Others
• The Lives of Others is a drama about society in East
Germany in the 1970s
• Due to its realistic nature, the use of CGI, or 3D
technology, was probably not perceived by distributors
to be important
• This could be perhaps explained because the target
audience of the film are more interested in the
performances of the actors, and the portrayal of the
country at the time.
• One could also argue that because it is aiming to portray
a time in the past, the use of this technology would be
detrimental to the illusion that we are looking back in
time. The film as it stands has an aged look, due to the
use of film technology which would have been available
at the time the film was set.
National Identity
Hollywood
• Hollywood films tend to
portray the Americans as
“the good guys”
• Protecting the rest of the
world from danger
• Foreign accents = baddies!
• Films which display anti-
American sentiments have
difficulty finding funding in
Hollywood
Germany
• The German film industry
produces a wide variety of
material
• Perhaps due to the countries
difficult recent history, the most
successful focus on political and
social issues, as well as the
Second World War
• Some of the most successful
German language films – Das
Boot (War film), The Lives of
Others (set during The Cold War),
Europa Europa (Holocaust-based
film), and Downfall (Last days of
Hitler)

Film industry presentation example

  • 1.
  • 2.
    Hollywood and theGerman Industry • In this presentation I will compare the mainstream film industry of Hollywood, with the German film industry.
  • 3.
    The differences betweenHollywood and the German Film Industry • Funding • Ownership • Technology • National identity • Genre • Representation
  • 4.
    Examples The Lives ofOthers (Germany, 2006) • Directed by Florian Henckel von Donnersmarck • Grossed $77,356,942 worldwide • Winner of 2006 Academy Award for Best Foreign Language Film Avatar (USA, 2009) • Directed by James Cameron • Grossed $2,782,275,172 worldwide • Nominated for nine Academy Awards In order to compare these two industries, I will refer in my analysis to two specific film examples, which are two of the highest-grossing films of modern times in their respective industries:
  • 5.
    Funding Hollywood • The Hollywoodfilm industry is dominated by a number of big film financiers called film studios • These studios actively seek out projects that will be the next big money maker for them • Some studios supply the funding for both the production and distribution of the film German • In contrast, the German industry relies more heavily on publicly-funded national institutions, such as the Filmförderungsanstalt FFA (German Federal Film Board) • Germany also provides tax incentives for investors to put money into the making of films, meaning many private investors and companies have involvement.
  • 6.
    Funding – TheLives of Others • Funded by a number of organisations (Wiedemann & Berg, Bayerischer Rundfunk, ARTE & Creado Film), a mixture of studios and TV companies • Budget of $2,000,000 • Written and Directed by von Donnersmarck • Director’s parents were from East Germany, and he grew up there • The film has a very strict sense of German identity, and is about a period of German history in which the country was split between East and West • Due to this, and because of the relatively small budget, the film aims to portray realistic German events, meaning many locations are domestic (in houses), there is almost no CGI, and some of the themes are much more mature and complex in nature than those of Avatar.
  • 7.
    Funding – Avatar •Funded by 20th Century Fox (studio) • Budget of $237,000,000 • Written and Directed by Cameron • Studio encouraged by the success of Cameron’s previous film, Titanic • Studio even gave $10,000,000 for Cameron to produce a short clip demonstrating his vision! • This meant that the film, as a Sci-Fi action epic, was extremely reliant on visuals, including a number of CGI characters, sweeping alien landscapes and large-scale battles. • One could argue that the success of Avatar could be attributed to the money spent on it, as people were eager to see what the film looked like. It was also one of the major breakthroughs in the current trend for 3D films.
  • 8.
    Technology Hollywood • Consistently atthe ‘cutting edge’ of new cinema technology • American films, particularly big budget blockbusters, are always the films which try to introduce new technologies to the cinema world (3D, Colour, sound, etc.) • This is due to the huge amounts of money that are available to directors and producers in Hollywood Germany • German films tend to be lower budget than Hollywood films • This usually means that German films are more focussed on character and story rather than action and effects • These types of stories do not necessarily require expensive new technology, however much like other industries the German industry tends to follow the lead of Hollywood
  • 9.
    Technology - Avatar •Avatar is perceived as being the catalyst for the new revolution in 3D cinema • Some people attribute the extra cost of seeing the film in 3D as being the reason its box office gross was so high • Revolutionary new motion-capture techniques were used to create the alien characters (pioneered in other big budget films such as The Lord of the Rings and Pirates of the Caribbean) • James Cameron deliberately waited until the Technology was available for him to create an alien world that felt realistic • The film, and its success, was ultimately the product of a time in Hollywood where producers were looking for new ideas (in terms of new and original stories) and new technologies in order to maximise revenue. They saw James Cameron, with his previous successes, as being able to provide this. Many criticised that the all of the big Hollywood films leading up to Avatar were unoriginal ideas such as sequels remakes, and comic book adaptations.
  • 10.
    Technology – TheLives of Others • The Lives of Others is a drama about society in East Germany in the 1970s • Due to its realistic nature, the use of CGI, or 3D technology, was probably not perceived by distributors to be important • This could be perhaps explained because the target audience of the film are more interested in the performances of the actors, and the portrayal of the country at the time. • One could also argue that because it is aiming to portray a time in the past, the use of this technology would be detrimental to the illusion that we are looking back in time. The film as it stands has an aged look, due to the use of film technology which would have been available at the time the film was set.
  • 11.
    National Identity Hollywood • Hollywoodfilms tend to portray the Americans as “the good guys” • Protecting the rest of the world from danger • Foreign accents = baddies! • Films which display anti- American sentiments have difficulty finding funding in Hollywood Germany • The German film industry produces a wide variety of material • Perhaps due to the countries difficult recent history, the most successful focus on political and social issues, as well as the Second World War • Some of the most successful German language films – Das Boot (War film), The Lives of Others (set during The Cold War), Europa Europa (Holocaust-based film), and Downfall (Last days of Hitler)