• Share
  • Email
  • Embed
  • Like
  • Save
  • Private Content
Shifting Sands - New publishing models and new opportunities for African Universities
 

Shifting Sands - New publishing models and new opportunities for African Universities

on

  • 1,269 views

 

Statistics

Views

Total Views
1,269
Views on SlideShare
1,269
Embed Views
0

Actions

Likes
1
Downloads
4
Comments
0

0 Embeds 0

No embeds

Accessibility

Categories

Upload Details

Uploaded via as Microsoft PowerPoint

Usage Rights

© All Rights Reserved

Report content

Flagged as inappropriate Flag as inappropriate
Flag as inappropriate

Select your reason for flagging this presentation as inappropriate.

Cancel
  • Full Name Full Name Comment goes here.
    Are you sure you want to
    Your message goes here
    Processing…
Post Comment
Edit your comment

    Shifting Sands - New publishing models and new opportunities for African Universities Shifting Sands - New publishing models and new opportunities for African Universities Presentation Transcript

    • Shifting publishing models and Open Access, new sands new opportunities for African universitiesNew publishing models and new opportunities for African universities Open Access Day University of Botswana Eve Gray 2011 Some rights reserved by Mister-E
    • Eve GrayCentre for Educational Technology IP Law and Policy Research Unit University of Cape Town http://www.evegray.co.za http://www.scaprogramme.org.za http:/www.uctipunit.wordpress.com
    • The Budapest Open Access InitiativeAn old tradition and a new technology have converged to make possible anunprecedented public good. The old tradition is the willingness of scientists andscholars to publish the fruits of their research in scholarly journals withoutpayment, for the sake of inquiry and knowledge. The new technology is theinternet. The public good they make possible is the world-wide electronicdistribution of the peer-reviewed journal literature and completely free andunrestricted access to it by all scientists, scholars, teachers, students, and othercurious minds. Removing access barriers to this literature will accelerate research,enrich education, share the learning of the rich with the poor and the poor withthe rich, make this literature as useful as it can be, and lay the foundation foruniting humanity in a common intellectual conversation and quest for knowledge.The Budapest Open Access Initiative, December 1-2 2001.Open Society Institute http://www.soros.org/openaccess
    • OA in the mainstream
    • http://open-access.org.uk/
    • Salvatore Miele CERN OAI17 2011
    • What does the University ofBotswana seek to gain from research publication?
    • Profiling the university inthe interests of prestige as well as relevance in the local context
    • Science Research - 2001http://www.worldmapper.org2006 SASI Group (University of Sheffield) and Mark Newman (University of Michigan).
    • but will developments in OApublishing help reverse this situation?
    • Policy formulationneeds to anticipate the future
    • What will scholarlycommunications look like in 2021?
    • finding the future in the past
    • From the Royal Society and Philosophical Transactions... (1655)...
    • ...to PLoS ONE
    • Transactions - journals as... • Exchange of ideas and sharing of knowledge in a community of scholars; • Effective communication with a wider audience; • Recognition of the value of research and innovation; • Contribution to the ‘Universal good of Mankind’.
    • The trajectory of journal publishing • From 17th to 20th century, mostly society and independent journals, slow growth; • 1655 Transactions and Journal des Savans; by 1850, 100 journals; • Most journals were society journals. Alma Swan 2011; McGuigan and Russell 2008; Jean-Claude Guedon 2001.
    • 20th century rise of thecommercial journal industry • Post war, the information society provides opportunities for commercial players; • Massification of universities fuels journal growth; • Now around 25,000 journals; • Promotions and recognition driven by industry- controlled metrics
    • The ‘journals crisis’ • Monopolisation of the industry - Elsevier, Springer and Wiley control 42% of the market; • Price increases erode library budgets: ARL expenditure increased 302% between 1986 and 2005.Glenn S McGuigan and Robert D Russell, The Business of Academic Publishing: http://southernlibrarianship.icaap.org/content/v09n03/mcguigan_g01.html
    • NAGPS: A Summary of the FRPAA and Open Access Debate (2010) http://www.nagps.org/files/FRPAA%20and%20open%20access_0.pdf
    • Getting back to the roots...
    • From the Royal Society 26 October 2011
    • What else the Royal Society makes available
    • developing countrypublishing gains ground
    • self publishing by universities
    • Stellenbosch University
    • The disruptive energy of digital media
    • ‘I think of Nature as a scientific communication company rather than a journal publisher.’Timmo Hannay (Nature Publishing), Publishing Open Content (video) 2008. Produced by Belsizen3ws. http://www.youtube.com/user/belsizenw3
    • Linking to dataresources becomes important
    • http://www.nature.com/ng/journal/v43/n4/full/ng0411-281.html
    • collaboration andinterdisciplinarity
    • Jevin D West http://chronicle.com/article/Maps-of-Citations-Uncover-New/128938/?sid=wc
    • Community building
    • The growth of Open Access
    • OA journals • Non-profit open access journals - Public Library of Science; • Thousands of smaller independent, society and university-based journals; • Repositories - PubMed Central, supported by National Institutes of Health; • Commercial open access - Biomed Central; Hindawi;Laakso M, Welling P, Bukvova H, Nyman L, Björk B-C, et al. (2011); S. Miele, CERN OAI17
    • OA in the developing world• SciELO in Latin America - 800 journals, 300,000 articles;• SCiELO South Africa, supported by the DST, run by the Academy of Science of SA;• Bioline International provides a platform for developing country journals. Alma Swan 2011, http://www.wsis-community.org/mod/file/download.php?file_guid=371469
    • Salvatore Miele CERN OAI17 2011
    • Salvatore Miele CERN OAI17 2011
    • OA and impact• There is some debate on whether OA increases impact; 31 studies altogether, 27 say yes, 4 say no difference;• Impact increase up to 600%• There is little doubt that there are strong advantages for developing countries. Alma Swan 2011, http://www.wsis-community.org/mod/file/download.php?file_guid=371469
    • Open Access journals come of age
    • PLOS One - adisruptive model
    • Broad cross-disciplinary publication
    • Split peer review - technical pre-publication, impactevaluation post-publication
    • Mark Patterson, CERNOAI17 2011
    • Mark Patterson, CERN OAI17 2011
    • Linking of supplementarycontent - the article is part of a hub
    • Commercial publishers follow suit
    • The reaction againstcommercial journals goes mainstream
    • Vigorous debate about metrics - the‘altmetrics’ movement
    • Peer review under the spotlight
    • http://www.publications.parliament.uk/pa/cm201012/cmselect/cmsctech/856/85602.htm
    • potential for more flexible research publishing
    • journal platform linked to content platforms
    • social media forcollaboration and community
    • open data for regional research capacity growth
    • Plos One journal model for regional collaboration?