Navy presentation to the Moffett Field Restoration Advisory Board on May 15, 2008, regarding the EATS/WATS groundwater clean-up.

Loading...

Flash Player 9 (or above) is needed to view presentations.
We have detected that you do not have it on your computer. To install it, go here.

0 comments

Post a comment

    Post a comment
    Embed Video
    Edit your comment Cancel

    Favorites, Groups & Events

    Navy presentation to the Moffett Field Restoration Advisory Board on May 15, 2008, regarding the EATS/WATS groundwater clean-up. - Presentation Transcript

    1. Moffett Groundwater Update May 15, 2008 Julie Crosby-Brooks Remedial Project Manager 1
    2. Presentation Overview • Base-wide Groundwater Monitoring – Water Level Measurements – Groundwater Sampling • Site 28 – WATS Overview – Coordination with MEW Companies and NASA – Path Forward • Site 26 – EATS Overview – EATS Technical Memorandum – Path Forward 2
    3. Introduction – Regional Location Map 3
    4. Introduction – Plan View of Regional Plume 4
    5. Moffett Aquifers Approximate Depths of Moffett Aquifers • Upper A-Aquifer: 0 - 35 Feet Below Ground Surface (BGS) • Lower A-Aquifer: 35 – 55 Feet BGS • B Aquifer: 55 – 160 Feet BGS • C Aquifer: 160 – 240 Feet BGS • Deep Aquifer: Greater than 240 Feet BGS 5
    6. Introduction – Aquifers 6
    7. Basewide GW Program – Groundwater Elevations Groundwater Elevation Measurements • Joint Effort with Middlefield-Ellis-Whisman (MEW) Companies and NASA • Water Levels Measured in March and November • Results are Compiled and Evaluated in Annual Groundwater Reports – 2007 Annual Groundwater Report Available in June 2008 • Upper and Lower A-Aquifer Wells and B-Aquifer Wells ________________________ One Day Event – Twice a Year 1000+ Total Water Level Measurements 400+ Water Level Measurements Collected by Navy Approximately 20 Navy Field Crews _______________________ 7
    8. Basewide GW Program – 2006 Water Levels 8
    9. Basewide GW Program – Groundwater Sampling Groundwater Sampling • Joint Effort with MEW Companies and NASA • Sampling Conducted in November / December Timeframe • Results are Compiled and Evaluated in Annual Groundwater Reports – 2007 Annual Groundwater Report Available in June 2008 • Upper and Lower A-Aquifer Wells and B-Aquifer Wells _______________________ 600+ Wells Sampled North of Highway 101 Navy Samples Approximately 125 of the Wells Volatile Organic Compounds (VOCs) Dissolved Metals & Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons (TPH) - Every 5 Years _______________________ 9
    10. Basewide GW Program – 2006 Annual Report Conclusions Site 28 - WATS • Groundwater Consistently Flows to the North • Dissolved VOCs Continue to Flow onto Moffett Site 26 - EATS • Groundwater Consistently Flows to the North • VOC Plume Stable – No Movement or Shape Change 10
    11. Site 28 – Introduction Site 28 - Introduction • Located West of the Runways • Contamination is from Navy Sources and Regional Plume • Includes West-Side Aquifers Treatment System – WATS 11
    12. Site 28 – WATS Wells N 12
    13. Site 28 – WATS Overview WATS is a Groundwater Pump and Treat System • Began Operating in 1998 • Complies with Requirements in the MEW Study Area Record of Decision (ROD) – MEW ROD Finalized in 1989 – Navy Adopted MEW ROD in 1993 • Six Upper A-aquifer and Three Lower A-aquifer Extraction Wells • Treats Groundwater Using Advanced Oxidation Process and Granular Activated Carbon • Treated Water is Discharged to the Eastern Diked Marsh and Stormwater Retention Pond (Northern Moffett Boundary) – Discharged per the Requirements of the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) Permit – All Discharge Water has been Compliant with NPDES Requirements 13
    14. Site 28 – WATS 14
    15. Site 28 – WATS Operation Data 2007 Operation Data • WATS Operational 98.9% of Time • Treated 34,532,488 Gallons of Extracted Groundwater • Removed 378 Pounds VOCs • Annual O&M cost is approx $760,644 or $2,012/pound Lifetime Operation Data • Treated 304,302,868 Gallons of Extracted Groundwater • Removed 3,997 Pounds VOCs 15
    16. Site 28 – Coordination with MEW Companies Currently Partnering with MEW Companies to Prepare Site-wide Focused Feasibility Study (FFS) and Technical Impracticability (TI) Evaluation • Evaluates Effectiveness of the Current Remedy • Evaluates and Compares Alternatives for Site-Wide Groundwater Cleanup Submitted Volume I (Sections 1 through 5) to EPA on April 14, 2008 16
    17. Site 26 – Introduction Site 26 - Introduction • Located East of the Runways • Contamination is from Navy Sources Only (Not Part of Regional Plume) • Includes East-Side Aquifer Treatment System – EATS 17
    18. Site 26 – EATS Overview & Operation Data East-Side Aquifer Treatment System - EATS • Operated from January 1999 Through July 2003 • Five Upper A-Aquifer Extraction Wells • Treats Groundwater Using an Air Stripper and Granular Activated Carbon EATS Lifetime Operation Data • Removed 67 Million Gallons of Groundwater • Approximately 23.6 Pounds VOCs EATS Taken Off-Line in 2003 to Evaluate: • Plume Stability • Chemical of Concern Rebound • Natural Attenuation • Application of Hydrogen Release Compound® (HRC) 18
    19. Site 26 – EATS 19
    20. Site 26 Draft Technical Memorandum • Reviewed Site Hydrogeology • In Depth Evaluation of Contamination • Evaluation of Remedial Alternatives Sand Thickness Evaluation 20
    21. Site 26 Draft Tech Memo – Hydrogeology Evaluation In Depth Evaluation of Contamination • Low Concentration • Plume Contracts with Depth • Residual Limited Contamination Remains in Fine- Grained Soils 21
    22. Site 26 Draft Tech Memo – Remedial Alternatives Evaluated for Implementabilty and Effectiveness Optimized Pump and Treat System Combination of Biotic and Abiotic Treatment Air Sparging / Soil Vapor Extraction Phytoremediation Dual Phase Extraction Monitored Natural Attenuation Substrate Enhanced Biostimulation In-Situ Chemical Oxidation Bioaugmentation In-Situ Thermal Treatment Micro-Scale Zero Valent Iron – Nanoscale Zero Valent Iron 22
    23. Site 26 Draft Tech Memo – Remedial Alternatives Remedial Alternatives that are Effective and Implementable Screened Out Based on Cost Micro-Scale Zero Valent Iron – $40 Million Nanoscale Zero Valent Iron - $46 Million Combination of Biotic and Abiotic Treatment - $13 to $14 Million 23
    24. Site 26 Draft Tech Memo Site 26 Technical Memorandum Conclusions • No Remedial Alternative can be Implemented Without Inordinate Costs – Complex Site Hydrogeology • Recommend Evaluating Technical Impracticability Waiver Navy Will Coordinate with Regulatory Agencies to Develop Path Forward 24
    25. Summary – Moffett Groundwater Program Moffett Groundwater Program Path Forward • Continue Groundwater Sampling and Water Level Measurements – Next Groundwater Sampling Occurs in November / December 2008 • Continue to Operate Pump and Treat System at WATS • Continue Working with MEW Companies to Finalize FFS • Work with Regulatory Agencies to Determine Path Forward at EATS 25
    26. Questions 26

    + Steve WilliamsSteve Williams, 2 years ago

    custom

    995 views, 0 favs, 1 embeds more stats

    Navy presentation to the Moffett Field Restoration more

    More info about this document

    © All Rights Reserved

    Go to text version

    • Total Views 995
      • 985 on SlideShare
      • 10 from embeds
    • Comments 0
    • Favorites 0
    • Downloads 9
    Most viewed embeds
    • 10 views on http://www.nuqu.org

    more

    All embeds
    • 10 views on http://www.nuqu.org

    less

    Flagged as inappropriate Flag as inappropriate
    Flag as inappropriate

    Select your reason for flagging this presentation as inappropriate. If needed, use the feedback form to let us know more details.

    Cancel
    File a copyright complaint
    Having problems? Go to our helpdesk?

    Categories