Theorizing Sustainable Design through Human Geographies - Presentation Transcript
Theorizing Sustainable Design through Human Geographies Key Note Paper 12 th August 2009 Dr Tasleem Shakur Email: [email_address] e-journals: www.edgehill.ac.uk/gber www.edgehill.ac.uk/icdes/sacs
NORTH (industrial) SOUTH (non-industrial) industrial commodities ‘ consumer’ society raw materials ‘ basic needs’ society trade/international division of labour Source: Redclift, 1984, p.56 The on going North/South Dialogue
Living Standard Environmental Stock Minimum Level Adapted from: Pearce, 1990 Mismatches between potential (environmental resource base) and aspirations (standards)
Dichotomies in Sustainable Development Theories
CONCEPT OF ‘NEEDS’ : Conditions for maintaining an acceptable life standard for all people (Brandt, 1984)
CONCEPT OF ‘LIMITS’: Capacity of the environment to fulfil the needs of the present and future, determined by the state of technology and social organisations (Brundtland Report, 1987)
Contradictions in Concepts
ECONOMIC DIMENSION: Creation of new market/cost reduction through efficiency
ENVIRONMENTAL DIMENSION: Reduction of waste/ reduced impact on human health and use of renewable raw materials
SOCIAL DIMENSION: Worker health and safety, impacts on local community and benefits to disadvantaged groups
Contemporary Emerging Principles
Understanding Place
Connecting with Nature
Understanding Natural Processes
Understanding Environmental Impact
Embracing co-creative design: importance to listen to every voice, voices of the community
Understanding People
THIS IS WHERE HUMAN GEOGRAPHIES COMES INTO ACTION!
Sustainable Architecture Concept would nowadays include a Combination of Values
Sustainability
Durability
Longevity
Appropriate materials
Sense of place
The challenge is to find the balance between environmental considerations and economic constraints. Many suggest consideration must be given to the need of our communities and the eco-system.
Ideal Context to Sustainable Design
CULTURAL CONTEXT IN: Architecture history, theory
SUSTAINABLE TECHNOLOGY: Building design is responsible for consuming more than half the energy consumed in the US
Social and Environmental Aims
Locally and environmentally sensitive
Re-thinking design methodology for sustainable social development
Climate as design generation
To sustain cultural identity in the face of rapid global technological change
Short term gains versus long term failures
End of 1980s and the beginning of the 1990s began the era of sustainability with economy and environmental care
Environmental Design and Cultural Identity: A Challenge to ‘modernity’?
Le Corbusier’s ‘Only one house for all cultures’ or ‘global common place’ (failure of Bijlmermeer design of the 1960s in Amsterdam) (Shakur, 2005)
Louis Kahn in defence of poor rain protection in his massive national assembly building in Bangladesh ‘why the hell does it rain so much in Bangladesh?’ (Shakur, 2008)
Nehru while commissioning Le Corbusier for the planning and design of Chandigarh ‘let a city be born free from the past prejudices of India?’ (Shakur, 2003)
Some Concluding Thoughts
Shifting roles, performance and limitations of the designers, builders and constructors (Shakur, et al , 2001) (preoccupation with micro scale interactions)
What are the implications for design education in the future?
Not to treat design and design professions as independent variables
Relationships between individuals, built environment, design professions and society (Knox, 2004, p.94)
Some Concluding Thoughts
Sustainable design education versus postmodern societies
Challenge for the future – design professionals are becoming more and more irrelevant, a passenger on a rudderless postmodern ship (Newman and Kenworthy, 2003)
Theorizing Sustainable Design through Human Geograp more
Theorizing Sustainable Design through Human Geographies, Key Note Paper, by Dr Tasleem Shakur Email: shakurt@edgehill.ac.uk e-journals: www.edgehill.ac.uk/gber www.edgehill.ac.uk/icdes/sacs less
0 comments
Post a comment