SALSAL 2009
Peripheral Excimer Laser
Atherectomy:
Pros & Cons
October 9, 2009
Nelson Lim Bernardo, MD
Washington Hospital Center
Creager M, ed. Management of Peripheral Arterial Disease. 2000.
Creager M, ed. Management of Peripheral Arterial Disease. 2000.
PAD Prevalence: Increases with Age
Rotterdam Study (ABI <0.9) 1 San Diego Study (PAD by noninvasive tests) 2
60
50
Patients with PAD (%)
40
30
20
10
0
55-59 60-64 65-69 70-74 75-79 80-84 85-89
Age Group (years)
1 Criqui et al. Circulation. 1985;71:510-515.
2 Meijer et al. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 1998;18:185-192.
Creager M, ed. Management of Peripheral Arterial Disease. 2000.
Creager M, ed. Management of Peripheral Arterial Disease. 2000.
PAD Prevalence: Increases with Age (Both Sexes)
60
50
Patients with PAD (%)
40
30
20
10
0
55-59 60-64 65-69 70-74 75-79 80-84 85-89
Age Group (years)
1 Criqui et al. Circulation. 1985;71:510-515.
2 Meijer et al. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 1998;18:185-192.
LASER
Light
Amplification
Stimulated
Emission
Radiation
• Excimer Laser
Is a form of ultraviolet laser.
A cold laser which does not burn or cut. Vaporize
tissue by breaking bonds between molecules.
Excimer Laser: Light Spectrum
Laser light emitted from
the Turbo Elite is “cool”
(308nm)
=> Similar to laser light
employed for LASIK
(193.3nm)
• Photoablation
use of ultraviolet laser light to dissolve and remove
matter
Excimer Laser: Athermic Photoablation
• Pulsed XeCl-Laser (Spectranetics CVX-300)
Wavelength 308 nm
Pulse duration 125-200 nS
Fluence 30-50* mJ/mm2
RepetitionRate 25-80* Hz
Catheter-diameter 0.9 - 2.5 mm
• Ultraviolet energy photoablates arterial blockages
into particles most of which are smaller than a red
blood cell and are absorbed into the blood stream
Excimer Laser: Athermic Photoablation
• Pulsed XeCl-Laser (Spectranetics CVX-300)
Wavelength 308 nm
Pulse duration 125-200 nS
Fluence 30-50* mJ/mm2
RepetitionRate 25-80* Hz
Catheter-diameter 0.9 - 2.5 mm
• Ultraviolet energy photoablates arterial blockages
into particles most of which are smaller than a red
blood cell and are absorbed into the blood stream
PELA (Peripheral Excimer Laser Atherectomy)
• PRO
Debulking = NO distal embolization vs other
devices
• CON
PELA: Debulking
• Vaporizes plaque and thrombus by delivering very
high energy in extremely short pulses.
pulses.
• Mechanisms of action.
Photochemical Photothermal Photomechanical
Dissolving molecular Produces photo- Creating
bonds thermal energy kinetic energy
Excimer Laser: Photochemical
Dissolves
molecular
bonds
• Light pulse targets tissue for 125 billionths of a second
Pulsing aids in keeping the target cool – energy dissipates
between pulses
• 50 microns penetration depth
Contact laser allows for focused ablation
• Micron sized particles generated
Sub-cellular sized material is easily absorbed by the bloodstream,
minimizing risk of distal embolization.
Excimer Laser: Photothermal
Produces
photothermal
energy
• Absorption creates molecular vibration in molecules through
heating of intracellular water - water vaporizes, rupturing
cells
Plaque is dissolved
• Gaseous by-products produce a vapor bubble
• Occurs in 100 millionths of a second
Speed of vapor bubble formation and dissipation minimizes vessel
trauma
Excimer Laser: Photomechanical
Creates
kinetic
energy
• Expansion and collapse of vapor bubble breaks down tissue
and clears by-products away from tip
Tip is continually in contact with lesion material
• By-products of ablation are water, gas, and small particles
(90%<10 microns, ~ size of red blood cell)
Easily absorbed by the blood stream
Excimer Laser: Photoablation mechanism
nd on
d Timeline of a Pulse
co c
on
d
se se c
a a se
of of a
th
s
ths of
s
on li on th
lli il on
bi m il li
5 0
12 10 0
m
40
25 thousandths of a second at 25 Hz
25
Resting Period (Cooling time)
Bonds Thermal
Thermal Kinetic
dissolve
dissolve energy
energy energy
energy
Pulse rate = repetition rate per second = Hz
Excimer Laser: Why ‘debulk‘
• Excimer laser ‘‘debulking’ prior to balloon
debulking’
angioplasty transforms diffuse, multi-level
multi-level
arterial disease into more easily ballooned
stenoses.
= Lesion modification
Provisional stenting
Better stenting result
• Improved ‘‘acute’ outcome ≠ ‘‘chronic’ long
acute’ chronic’
term patency.
Excimer Laser in CTO: Step-by-step technique
Step-by-step
• Left SFA total
occlusion
• Use of excimer
laser to recanalize
– “debulk” and
“debulk”
open a channel
– “pilot” channel
“pilot”
Left SFA CTO
Pre-treatment
Pre-treatment
CTO: Excimer laser assisted recanalization
• Successful
recanalization of the
totally occluded left
SFA
Left SFA Post-treatment
Post-treatment
PELA (Peripheral Excimer Laser Atherectomy)
• PRO
Debulking = NO distal embolization vs other
devices
• CON
Large vessel - Recanalized channel
≠ ??adequate luminal gain vs other devices
CELLO Trial
CLiRpath Excimer Laser System to Enlarge
Lumen Openings
• Non-randomized, prospective trial at 20 centers in
the US
• 65 patients with de novo or restenotic lesions
• Purpose: Evaluate the safety and efficacy of the
Turbo-Booster, in combination with the available
laser catheters ≤2.0 mm, to create larger lumens
for treatment within the superficial femoral and
popliteal arteries.
CELLO Trial: 1O Endpoints
Efficacy
• Laser success - defined as achieving
20% average reduction in the
percent (%) diameter stenosis, post-
laser with Turbo-Booster and prior to adjunctive therapy,
based on angiographic core laboratory analysis.
Safety
• Occurrence of major adverse events (clinical perforation,
major dissection requiring surgery, major amputation,
cerebrovascular accidents (CVA), myocardial infarction, and
death at the time of the procedure), prior to release from
the hospital, at 30 days, and at six (6) months post-
procedure.
Turbo-Booster: Proof of Concept
Turbo-Booster:
mm
3.0 mm 5.0 mm
1 pass with CLiRpath 4 passes with CLiRpath
2.5 TURBO Catheter 2.0 Booster Catheter
CELLO Trial: % Stenosis Reduction
Angiographic Core Lab Assessment Visual Assessment
80 100
77.00
60 80 89.00
60
40
42.00
40
20
21 20
15
0 0
%DS %DS
Pre TURBO Booster
Post TURBO Booster
Pre TURBO Booster Final
Final
CELLO Patient
Washington Hospital Center
Left SFA – Pre-treatment
Pre-treatment
CELLO Patient
Washington Hospital Center
IVUS: CSA = 2.2 mm2
2
CELLO Patient
Washington Hospital Center
Turbo -Booster - 8 passes
Turbo-Booster
CELLO Patient
IVUS – s/p Turbo-Booster
Turbo-Booster Washington Hospital Center
CSA increased from 2.2 to 7.3 Increased lumen but with a
s/p Booster large intimal flap
CELLO Patient
Post Turbo-Booster
Turbo-Booster Washington Hospital Center
• Tack up the flap
long 3- 5 minute
low 4 atm inflation
• Size the balloon
according to the IVUS
(media to media
dimension)
6.6 x 6.0 mm media to media
CELLO Patient
IVUS post PTA 6-mm balloon
6-mm Washington Hospital Center
CSA 15.3mm
CSA 15.3mm
Flap is tacked up & with much a
larger lumen
Final Angiogram CELLO Patient
Washington Hospital Center
Excimer Laser Debulking: Future
• Turbo-TandemTM-controlled directional laser
Turbo-Tandem -controlled
ablation
• Improved design for ease of use
• Designed to create larger lumens
• Pending 510K clearance
IA: Critical Limb Ischemia
• 77 yo AAM with PAD, s/p
PEI of left L.E. for CLI, and
resting right leg pain.
• (+) CAD, s/p CABG.
(+) HTN. (+) lipids. (-) DM.
• (+) PAD
5/19/06 - PEI of left SFA &
left popliteal artery.
3/23/07 - PEI of left PT &
left peroneal artery.
• (-) smoker, 1 ppd.
• ABI: Right = 0.3
Left = 0.9
Right BTK - Baseline
IA: Critical Limb Ischemia
Distal run-off - Post Tibial A.
run-off Right BTK - Baseline
IA: Debulking BTK
Distal run-off - Post Tibial A.
run-off Right BTK - Baseline
IA: Debulking BTK
1.4- mm Turbo Elite
45 mJ/mm2 at 25 Hz
PT – 2,074 pulses
Peroneal – 4,769
Adjunct POBA
Post-PELA
Post-PELA Right BTK - Baseline
IA: Debulking BTK
Right BTK - Baseline Right BTK - Post
IA: Debulking BTK
Right Foot - Post Right BTK - Post
Laird, J. et al. Journal of Endovascular Therapy. 2006. 13:1-11.
Laird, J. et al. Journal of Endovascular Therapy. 2006. 13:1-
13:1-11.
LACI (Laser Angioplasty for Critical Limb Ischemia)
(Laser
• Prospective, multi-center study (14: 11 - US, 3 --OUS).
multi-center OUS).
April 2001 to April 2002.
• Patients with CLI
Rutherford Category 4-6
4-6
Poor surgical candidates (No outflow/conduit, +cardiac)
(No outflow/conduit, +cardiac)
• Treatment: PELA of SFA, popliteal and/or
infrapopliteal arteries, with adjunctive PTA and
provisional stenting
• Primary Endpoint: Limb salvage at 6 months
Freedom from amputation at or above the ankle
Laird, J. et al. Journal of Endovascular Therapy. 2006. 13:1-11.
Laird, J. et al. Journal of Endovascular Therapy. 2006. 13:1-
13:1-11.
LACI: Vascular Lesions Treated
45%
40%
% of Identified Lesions
35%
30%
25%
20%
15%
10%
5%
0%
SFA popliteal infrapopliteal other
Laird, J. et al. Journal of Endovascular Therapy. 2006. 13:1-11.
Laird, J. et al. Journal of Endovascular Therapy. 2006. 13:1-
13:1-11.
LACI: 6-Month Results
6-Month
Total enrollment 155 limbs
Death 17
Lost to follow-up
follow-up 11_
Reached 6-month follow-up
6-month follow-up 127
Major amputation among
survivors 9
Survival with limb
salvage 118/127 = 93%
PELA (Peripheral Excimer Laser Atherectomy)
• PRO
Debulking = NO distal embolization vs other
devices
BTK ‘ adequate debulking’ = Provisional stenting
‘adequate debulking’
• CON
Large vessel - Recanalized channel
≠ ??adequate luminal gain vs other devices
$$Cost = Improved long term outcome
PELA & other ‘debulking’ devices
‘debulking’
• Debulking devices - ‘‘niche’ role; improves acute
niche’
success.
• There is ‘‘paucity’ of good data to favor any
paucity’
particular treatment modality
– “Tailor to lesion”. Outcome data needed.
“Tailor lesion”.
We have more “toys” in the Peripheral lab vs.
“toys”
Coronary lab.
• Improved ‘‘acute’ outcome ≠ ‘‘chronic’ long term
acute’ chronic’
patency.
Peripheral Excimer Laser Atherectomy
• Peripheral Excimer Laser Atherectomy is an
important armamentarium in our percutaneous
management of PAD.
• As with other debulking devices – “Tailor to
“Tailor
lesion”
lesion”
• To optimize outcomes & minimize complications
– Device training and case selection
• USE:
ISR > BTK > SFA
0 comments
Post a comment