Concept and nature of marriage
Upcoming SlideShare
Loading in...5
×
 

Concept and nature of marriage

on

  • 404 views

 

Statistics

Views

Total Views
404
Views on SlideShare
404
Embed Views
0

Actions

Likes
0
Downloads
0
Comments
0

0 Embeds 0

No embeds

Accessibility

Upload Details

Uploaded via as Microsoft PowerPoint

Usage Rights

© All Rights Reserved

Report content

Flagged as inappropriate Flag as inappropriate
Flag as inappropriate

Select your reason for flagging this presentation as inappropriate.

Cancel
  • Full Name Full Name Comment goes here.
    Are you sure you want to
    Your message goes here
    Processing…
Post Comment
Edit your comment

Concept and nature of marriage Concept and nature of marriage Presentation Transcript

  • EVOLUTION OF INSTITUTION MARRIAGE AND FAMILY OF SEX PROMISCUITY[CASUAL AND INDISCRIMINATING] WAS THE RULE .  MILCH CATTLE AND FIRE, TWO DISCOVERIES CHANGED THE LIFE OF MEN.  WITH THE EMERGENCE OF HERDS OF CATTLE , THE IDEA OF POSSESSION AND OWNERSHIP EMERGED.  MAN STARTED LEADING SOME CIVILIZED LIFE. 
  • EVOLUTION OF INSTITUTION MARRIAGE AND FAMILY OF SEX REMAINED UNREGULATED SO ONLY MATERNITY COULD BE KNOWN[PATERNITY NOT BE DETERMINED.  MAN’S QUEST TO KNOW THE PATERNITY OF CHILD LIE THE SEEDS OF INSTITUTION OF MARRIAGE. 
  • EVOLUTION OF INSTITUTION OF MARRIAGE AND FAMILY CONCEPT OF MARRIAGE SACRAMENT-HINDU .[RIG VEDA]  WIFE-ARDHANGINI[HALF OF MAN][MAN IS HALF NOT COMPLETE UNTIL HE MARRIES.  UNITY OF PERSONALITY OF HUSBAND AND WIFE, MUTUAL FIDELITY IS IMPLIED.[HIGHEST DHARMA] 
  • EVOLUTION OF INSTITUTION OF MARRIAGE AND FAMILY DHARMA MUST BE PRACTISED BY MAN TOGETHER WITH HIS WIFE.  SACRAMENT-IT IMPLIES SEVERAL THINGS  FIRST-IT IS OBLIGATORY,  FOR BEGETTING A SON,  FOR DISCHARGING HIS DEBT TO ANCESTORS AND  PERFORMING RELIGIOUS AND SPIRITUAL DUTIES.[NOW LIVE IN, ADOPTION, ETC] 
  • EVOLUTION OF INSTITUTION OF MARRIAGE AND FAMILY SACRAMENTAL-PRIMARILY SACROSANCTPRIMARILY MEANT FOR THE PERFORMANCE OF RELIGIOUS AND SPIRITUAL DUTIES.[TO AVOID EXTINCTION OF THE FAMILY LINE-NOT TO PURCHASE FLAT IN MUMBAI]  IT CAN NOT TAKE PLACE WITHOUT THE PERFORMANCE OF RITES AND CEREMONIES[LOVE MARRIAGE ?]  SACRAMENTAL ALSO DENOTES THAT IT IS PERMANENT UNION[DIVORCE ?] 
  • EVOLUTION OF INSTITUTION OF MARRIAGE AND FAMILY SACRAMENTAL ALSO DENOTES THAT IT IS AN ETERNAL [VALID NOT ONLY IN THIS LIFE BUT LIVES TO COME[I.E WIDOW MARRIAGE NOT RECOGNISED[NOW RECOGNISED ?]  WOMEN COULD ABANDON HER HUSBAND AND TAKE ANOTHER ONLY WHEN HUSBANDMISSING/DEAD/ASCETIC/IMPOTENT/OUT CASTE 
  • EVOLUTION OF INSTITUTION OF MARRIAGE AND FAMILY WITH THE ESTABLISHMENT OF MARRIAGE AS AN EXCLUSIVE UNION, THERE CAME INTO EXISTENCE SLAVE WOMEN, POLYGAMY, CONCUBINAGE AND PROSTITUTION.  MODERN CONCEPT OF MARRIAGE  CONTRACT-AGREEMENT VOLUNTARILY ENTERED INTO BY BOTH THE PARTIES.  CONSENT PLAYS IMPORTANT ROLE[EARLIER CONSENT BY FATHER OR GUARDIAN IN CHILD MARRIAGE] 
  • EVOLUTION OF INSTITUTION OF MARRIAGE AND FAMILY MARRIAGE UNDER HMA 1955  WHETHER IT HAS BECOME CONTRACT OR REMAINED A SACRAMENT?  SEC 5, 11, 12 OF ACT ANSWER THIS QUESTION..  TEST 1-CONTRACT-W/O COSENT OR CONTRACT BY MAN OF UNSOUND MINDVOID  IN MARRIAGE –{II} & {III} OF SEC 5= UNSOUND MIND-VOIDABLE AND BELOW AGE-STILL VALID. 
  • EVOLUTION OF INSTITUTION MARRIAGE AND FAMILY OF THOUGH ONE PARTY PROVES IN COURT THAT HE/SHE DID NOT CONSENT- NO DECLARATION AS INVALID MARRIAGE.  SACRAMENT  PERMANENT AND INDISSOLUBLE UNIONNOW DIVORCE RECOGNIZED.  IT IS AN ETERNAL-WIDOW REMARRIAGE RECOGNIZED.  HOLY UNION-RELIGIOUS CEREMONY IS STILL NECESSARY.[TO SOME EXTENT IT CAN BE ACCEPTED] 
  • EVOLUTION OF INSTITUTION MARRIAGE AND FAMILY  OF CONCLUSION-NOT REMAINED A SACRAMENTAL MARRIAGE AND HAS ALSO NOT BECOME A CONTRACT, THOUGH IT HAS SEMBLANCE OF BOTH.
  • EVOLUTION OF INSTITUTION MARRIAGE AND FAMILY OF HMA 1955  MARRIAGE GIVES STATUS ON PARTIES AND ALSO STATUS OF LEGITIMACY ON CHILDREN.  IN ANCIENT HINDU LAW- EIGHT FORMS OF MARRIAGE PREVAILED.[APPROVED AND UNAPPROVED]  THREE WERE CONSIDERED AS VALID BEFORE 1955-BRAHMA, GANDHARVA AND ASURA  NOW ACT DOES NOT TALK ABOUT ANY KIND OF MARRIAGE RATHER IT TALKS ABOUT MARRIAGE SOLEMNIZED UNDER THE ACT 
  • EVOLUTION OF INSTITUTION MARRIAGE AND FAMILY OF SAGAI- BETROTHAL-PRE NUPTIAL AGREEMENT  ANCIENT TIME-ONE MAY BE COMPELLED TO MARRY IF HE/SHE WITHDRAWS  MODERN LAW-CONTRACT OF MARRIAGE CAN NOT BE SPECIALLY ENFORCED THOUGH AN ACTION FOR DAMAGE IS MAINTAINABLE.[SPECIAL DAMAGE OF EXPENDITURE OR RECOVERY OF GIFTS POSSIBLE.  CONTRAVENTION OF BETROTHAL AGREEMENT IS VALID. 
  • EVOLUTION OF INSTITUTION MARRIAGE AND FAMILY  OF SEC 7 OF ACT STATES THAT HINDU MARRIAGE MAY BE SOLEMNIZED IN ACCORDANCE WITH CUSTOMARY RITES AND CEREMONIES OF EITHER PARTY.
  • EVOLUTION OF INSTITUTION MARRIAGE AND FAMILY OF NECESSARY SHASTRIC CEREMONIES AND RITES ARE KANYADAN, PANIGRAHAN, VIVAHAHOMA AND SAPTPADI[LAST ONE IS NECESSARY FOR ALL HINDUS.  CUSTOMARY CEREMONIESNOT NECESSARILY SHASTRIC BUT MAY BE RELIGIOUS OR NON RELIGIOU.  E.G JATS COMMUNITY-CHADAR ANDAZI MARRIAGE IS ALLOWED.  BUDDHISTS-NO CEREMANY IS REQUIRED. 
  • EVOLUTION OF INSTITUTION MARRIAGE AND FAMILY OF LEGAL COMPLICATION-IF NOT FOLLOWED , IT IS NOT A VALID MARRIAGE.  IF PARTIES ARE ABLE TO SHOW THAT IT WAS NOT REQUIRED –IT WILL BE VALID MARRIAGE.  BIGAMY-FAILURE TO PROVE THAT NECESSARY CEREMONIES WERE PERFORMED, PROSECUTION FOR BIGAMY CAN NOT SUCCEED. 
  • EVOLUTION OF INSTITUTION MARRIAGE AND FAMILY OF RCR WILL NOT BE GRANTED IF IT IS PROVED THAT NO VALID CEREMONY WAS PERFORMED.  CAN A COMMUNITY, CAST , ORGANIZATION CREATE NEW CEREMONY ?  NO UNLESS BACKED BY STATUTORY AUTHORITY.  IS INTENTION TO LIVE AS HUSBAND & WIFE ENOUGH ?-NO[ONE HAS TO FOLLOW CEREMANY] 
  • EVOLUTION OF INSTITUTION MARRIAGE AND FAMILY  OF PRESUMPTION OF LONG COHABITATION OR CUSTOM CAN HELP IN ABOVE MATTER.[PRESUMPTION OF MARRIAGES.114 IEA ]
  • EVOLUTION OF INSTITUTION MARRIAGE AND FAMILY       OF CAPACITY TO MARRYNOW SAPINDA AND DEGREES OF PROHIBITED RELATIONSHIP IS BAR TO MARRIAGE. THIS IS BASED ON RULE OF EXOGAMY[ONE SHOULD MARRY ONLY OUTSIDE ONE’S OWN TRIBE.] ANCIENT TIME-TWO THEORIES OF SAPINDA RELATIONSHIP WERE PROPOUNDED. OBLATION THEORY-OFFERINGS ARE MADE TO DEPARTED ANCESTORS IN THE FORM OF PINDA. PINDA-BALL-MADE OF RICE
  • EVOLUTION OF INSTITUTION MARRIAGE AND FAMILY OF  ONE OFFERS ONE FULL PINDA TO HIS THREE PATERNAL ANCESTORS AND ONE PINDA TO TWO MATERNAL ANCESTORS.  WHEN TWO PERSONS OFFER PINDAS TO THE SAME ANCESTOR, THEY ARE ALSO SAPINDAS TO EACH OTHER. PARTICLES OF THE SAME BODY THEORYPROPOUNDED BY VIJNANESHWARA.-A CONNECTION WITH ONE BODY EITHER IMMEDIATELY OR BY DESCENT.[TOO WIDE DEFINITION] 
  • EVOLUTION OF INSTITUTION MARRIAGE AND FAMILY OF KEPT UPTO 7TH DEGREE ON FATHER SIDE AND 5TH ON MOTHER SIDE.  HMA-UPTO 5TH DEGREE AND 3 DEGREE RESPECTIVELY. 