Quick & Lean Integration

  • 308 views
Uploaded on

The field of Integration is constantly evolving. …

The field of Integration is constantly evolving.

At one end comprehensive Integration/SOA suites are being released by big vendors such as IBM, Oracle, SoftwareAG.

But these Integration/SOA Suites (most of them comprising of 10 different components - each catering to a specific Integration/SOA need) are beyond the reach of many mid-sized businesses.



Thats where two new integration methodologies seem to have emerged in the past one year or so.

I have tried to capture this development in the attached presentation.

  • Full Name Full Name Comment goes here.
    Are you sure you want to
    Your message goes here
    Be the first to comment
    Be the first to like this
No Downloads

Views

Total Views
308
On Slideshare
0
From Embeds
0
Number of Embeds
1

Actions

Shares
Downloads
0
Comments
0
Likes
0

Embeds 0

No embeds

Report content

Flagged as inappropriate Flag as inappropriate
Flag as inappropriate

Select your reason for flagging this presentation as inappropriate.

Cancel
    No notes for slide

Transcript

  • 1. Oct 2010 Satish Dadha Quick & Lean Integration – For Mid-Sized Organizations
  • 2. Agenda
    • Growing Need for Integration
    • Ways to fulfill Integration Needs
    • Integration Needs of Mid-sized Organization
    • Game Changers:
      • Integration using XML Appliances
      • IaaS
    • Conclusion
  • 3. Need for Integration
    • Applications today rarely live in Isolation
    • Users expect instant access to all business functions an enterprise can offer regardless of which system the functionality may reside in
    • Enterprises today have multiple systems with their own varying data and transport protocols – All these need to interface with each other to deliver business functionality
    CRM Order Mgmt Inventory Mgmt Payroll Billing ERP I N T E G R A T I O N
  • 4. Endless Appetite for Connections
    • $10 Billion Integration Market - Gartner
    • Costs of procuring and installing integration products from leading vendors too high for mid-sized firms
    • Consequently $8 Billion in hand coded throw away integration modules are being built
    20 % - Packaged Software 80 % Hand Code
  • 5. Application Integration – Choices
    • Integration mechanisms have evolved over time
    Message Oriented Middleware Enterprise Application Integration Suite Enterprise Service Bus Websphere MQ, JMS Q – Applications connect to common messaging system and exchange data and invoke behavior via messages Middleware to enable integration of systems and applications across the enterprise. ESB = EAI Capabilities + Conformance to SOA & Web Service standards + Value adds like Business Activity Monitoring, Rules Engine Point 2 Point Connectivity File Transfer, Shared DB, Remote Procedure Invocation
  • 6. Application Integration – Choices
    • EAI & ESB Tools have wide ranging built in capabilities
    • They are designed to integrate dozens to hundreds of applications
    • They take care of requirements like:
      • Reliable Messaging
      • Centralized Policy Management
      • Business Activity Monitoring
    • Of course all these features come at a premium – Software License costs, Specialist Resources etc
  • 7. Do Mid-sized Firms need all of this?
    • According to Gartner only 10% of enterprises need all the features of an EAI Solution
    • Most mid-sized businesses need to integrate fewer than 10 applications
    • Most of all smaller firms need quicker ROI – They cannot afford the overhead and time required for EAI Solutions
    • !!!!! Using Vendor EAI solutions for Mid-sized firms may be akin to using Chainsaw to open a letter !!!!!
  • 8. So what's the solution?
    • Most of the mid-sized firms resort to custom coding to fulfill their integration needs
    • Custom coding however has 5 serious shortcomings:
      • Monopolizes specialist skills
      • Custom code may not be always reusable
      • Does not provide visibility into Integration transactions
      • Rarely scalable and flexible – Its Brittle
      • Finally custom coding turns out to be expensive in the long-run
  • 9. Game Changers ?
    • As we have seen with the evolution of integration products the needs drive the solution
    • Two major developments are taking place to potentially cater to the integration needs of smaller firms:
      • Integration as a Service
      • Hardware XML Appliances
    • These solutions cater to “on-premise”, “cloud to cloud” & “on-premise to cloud (hybrid)” Integration requirements
  • 10. Integration as a Service
    • IaaS is a concept similar to any other cloud offering
    • The vendor here will offer the integration functionality on a subscription basis and the user is relieved of most of the hassles associated with building a conventional integration setup
    • This is a concept that has just begun to be recognized as one of the solutions
    • It is capable of taking care of Transformation and simple BPM requirements
    • It brings along all the advantages of a cloud offering
  • 11. Hardware XML Appliances
    • XML Appliances primarily marketed as B2B Web Services Gateway
    • These are purpose built hardware appliances capable of processing XML at wire speed
    • Currently they are also being referred to Hardware ESB/SOA Gateway
    • Some prominent products in this space are:
      • IBM DataPower
      • Cast Iron Systems (Acquired by IBM Recently)
      • Forum Sentry
  • 12. Hardware XML Appliances
    • An illustration of IBM DataPower, being used as an SOA Gateway
    • Since these products also support – “Any to Any Transformation”, “Content Based Routing” & “Protocol Mediation (to a certain extent” they can be considered to be used for Integration requirements as well
    HTTPS
  • 13. Hardware XML Appliances
    • Pros
      • Integrate in days rather than months or years – Very limited coding required (XSL Transformation)
      • Very limited specialist programming skills reuqired
      • Reduced cost for initial procurement & maintenance as physical servers are not needed
      • Some of the vendors also provide “pre-built” integration templates
      • Console based setup for operations management
      • Very efficient in processing XML including encryption & decryption
    • Cons
      • Does not cover the entire gamut of integration requirements (Limited Protocol mediation support)
      • Limited/No BAM functionality
  • 14. Conclusion
    • If the integration requirements of a client are fairly straightforward and cost is a major factor for them then we should explore these two new approaches that have emerged
    • Cognizant can play a role in meeting customer objectives in a cost efficient manner