SlideShare a Scribd company logo
1 of 60
Download to read offline
Expl aining intErnational it application lEadErship:



Contactless Mobile Payments
             Ste phe n E z e ll | No v e m b e r 2 0 0 9
contactless mobile payments
Explaining International IT Application Leaderhip:


Contactless Mobile Payments

                 Stephen Ezell




                  ITIF
                   The Information Technology
                   & Innovation Foundation




               November 2009
T h E I N f o r m aT I o N T E c h N o l o g y & I N N o v aT I o N f o u N d aT I o N




                           Executive Summary:
                           Contactless Mobile Payments


                             M
                                          obile payments systems (e.g., using a cell phone as an elec-
                                          tronic “wallet”) promise significantly increased economic
Mobile payments will
                                          productivity and personal convenience. But unlike many
benefit the economy and
society by increasing
                             new applications that require only an enterprising firm to develop it,
productivity through         the widespread deployment and adoption of mobile payments systems
enhancing operational        requires action from a complex ecosystem of organizations (e.g., mo-
efficiencies, enabling a     bile phone service providers, banks, retailers and others) to create a
range of innovative new      mobile payments system. Because of this, only a few nations, notably
business models, and         Japan and South Korea, have been able to coordinate the complex eco-
pushing distributed
                             system required to extensively deploy a widely used mobile payments
computing intelligence
                             system. In contrast, most other nations, including the United States,
into the physical world.
                             lag far behind. For lagging nations to take full advantage of the op-
                             portunities of mobile payments, they will need to develop and adopt
                             national mobile payments strategies.

                             This study examines which countries                          quency identification (RFID) technol-
                             lead in deploying and adopting contact-                      ogy, which enables secure wireless data
                             less mobile payments, finding Japan and                      transmission over short ranges between
                             South Korea the world leaders; surveys                       electronic devices. In combination with
                             the development of contactless mobile                        an embedded electronic wallet on a mo-
                             payments in the United States; analyzes                      bile phone or smart card, NFC makes
                             the non-policy and policy factors that                       possible a wide range of transformative
                             explain how leading countries attained                       monetary and non-monetary transac-
                             their leadership position; and offers a set                  tions. An electronic wallet is a multi-
                             of recommendations to policymakers,                          functional device possessing cash,
                             targeted to those in the United States                       information storage and transaction,
                             but applicable globally, who wish to pro-                    identification and authentication, and
                             mote contactless mobile payments.                            communication functions. Electronic
                                                                                          wallets empower mobile phones and
                             Contactless payments leverage near                           smart cards to fully replicate physical
                             field communication (NFC) technol-                           wallets, with the ability to make con-
                             ogy, a specific standard of radio-fre-                       tactless payments; to capture and trans-
mit data like transit, movie, or parking tickets; to check   players—including mobile network operators (MNOs),
in to offices, schools, or airport gates; and to store and   handset manufacturers, financial institutions including
present identification credentials. Whereas a decade         major banks and credit card issuers, merchants, pub-
ago this technology was not quite ready—the contact-         lic transit authorities, government agencies, third party
less microchips and mobile phones were not adequate,         application providers, and consumers—whose success
lacking sufficient memory and processing power—the           is dependent on joint action by all the players together
technology has matured substantially over the past           at the same time. Everyone must act collaboratively in
decade in accordance with Moore’s Law to the point           the ecosystem simultaneously, but this is not something
where electronic wallets, NFC-capable phones, and            at which markets tend to be very good. As such, there
NFC-enabled point-of-sale (POS) terminals are now            are two central challenges: a chicken-or-egg terminal/
ready for full-scale implementation and use.                 handset adoption challenge and a business model chal-
                                                             lenge.
Mobile payments are about much more than mere
credit card substitution; rather, they represent a trans-    First, for consumers to demand electronic wallet-
formative digital application that will benefit con-         enabled mobile phones—and thus, critically, for the
sumers, merchants, and the economy and society               MNOs to require this feature from handset manufac-
at large. Mobile wallets will enhance consumer con-          turers (and pay for it, since MNOs subsidize consumer
venience through the potential to replace a litany of        handsets)—consumers must know that a sufficiently
artifacts of analog life designed to convey money or         deployed infrastructure exists at merchant point-of-sale
information—credit cards, loyalty cards, transit cards,      (POS) terminals; at fare readers in metro subways and
ID cards, keys, key fobs, tickets, passes, etc.—with a       buses; at airports, parking garages, and movie theatres;
single, more powerful digital device. Moreover, mobile       in automated devices such as vending machines; and in
payments will benefit the economy by driving a range         a host of other places where the feature can be used.
of productivity improvements through: 1) bringing            However, merchants, transit operators and others hav-
operational efficiencies to merchants, retailers, transit    ing to incur the costs of deploying the NFC-enabled
authorities and others engaged in routinized monetary        reader terminals are not likely to do so until a critical
or information transactions; 2) enabling a range of in-      mass of users gives them confidence that their invest-
novative new business models and service offerings;          ments will be repaid. This “chicken-or-egg” paradox
and 3) pushing distributed computing intelligence into       exacerbates a related challenge: Each party in the eco-
the physical world.                                          system wants a clearly articulated business model for
                                                             how it can monetize mobile payments investments
To ensure digital prosperity, nations need to support        before moving forward, meaning players will not act
the development of key digital platforms such as broad-      unless the financial incentives and value propositions
band, health IT, and a smart grid. Just like these digital   are clearly understood beforehand. These system inter-
platforms, a national mobile payments infrastructure         dependency challenges must be solved in each country
is a key platform from which a proliferation of cre-         wishing to realize contactless mobile payments, and
ative applications and uses will likely develop, many of     government can play a key role in helping to resolve
which are difficult to even imagine today, but which         them.
will continue to create new business opportunities, in-
crease productivity, and drive economic growth.              Japan and South Korea have had the most success solv-
                                                             ing these challenges; they clearly lead the world in terms
Notwithstanding the enormous potential, countries            of per-capita number of contactless-enabled mobile
can’t just snap their fingers and put a mobile payments      phones and POS terminals deployed, the total number
infrastructure in place or expect that because the tech-     of contactless transactions, and market value of con-
nology is now ready the private sector will simply de-       tactless payments. In Japan, 17 million citizens make
ploy it. The reason is that mobile payments are not like     contactless mobile payments from their cell phones,
other industries where a company need only acquire           with 65 million regularly using contactless smart cards,
requisite inputs, manufacture a product or design a ser-     and 73 percent of mobile phones having electronic wal-
vice, and sell it on the market. Mobile payments entail a    let capability. In South Korea, close to 4 million citizens
complex, system-interdependent ecosystem with many           use their mobile phones to make contactless payments,


thE information tEchnology & innovation foundation | novEmbEr 20 09                                                   page 2
with 12 million phones having the capability to do          tant roles in facilitating the collaborative development
so. Thirty-three million contactless transactions are       of their countries’ mobile payments ecosystems.
made daily using either smart cards or mobile phones
in South Korea. While the United States has made            Japan’s government played a vital, if behind-the-
some progress in fielding NFC-enabled credit cards          scenes, role in furnishing overall direction and moti-
and POS machines, virtually no mobile phones are            vating the activity of key actors in Japan’s mobile pay-
equipped with NFC-enabled electronic wallets.               ments marketplace, particularly in subtly pressuring
                                                            DOCOMO to lead a collaborative ecosystem in which
What explains why Japan and South Korea are so far          it “would not abuse its market power.” The govern-
ahead of the United States (and other countries)? Cer-      ment’s conscientious strategy to facilitate develop-
tainly some non-policy factors play a role. Both South      ment of a collaborative mobile payments ecosystem
Korea and Japan are countries with gadget-loving            was made easier by the fact that it owns or had owned
mobile cultures that enjoy being first movers in in-        two crucial players in that ecosystem, DOCOMO and
novative mobile technologies. Certainly, their densely      JR East. In South Korea, the government organized
packed urban populations, heavily reliant on mass           and hosted formal meetings between carriers and
transit, provided a critical mass of captive users across   banks to facilitate standards setting and itself became
which the research and development cost of contact-         an early adopter of mobile payments systems because
less electronic wallet technology could be amortized        it recognized that, “positive government commitment
and a market brought to scale. In both countries, the       to support mobile payments is required because many
dominant mobile operator stepped forward to lead a          technical issues are closely related to government poli-
vertically integrated mobile payments ecosystem—            cy and strategy.” Singapore’s Infocomm Development
NTT DOCOMO in Japan and SK Telecom in South                 Authority (the government’s information-technology
Korea—although unlike DOCOMO’s successful in-               promotion agency) formed a roundtable group of
troduction of the osaifu-keitai (mobile wallet) in 2004,    banks, mobile network operators, and transit compa-
SK Telecom’s Moneta service met with middling suc-          nies with the intent of developing a national plan for
cess, and seems to have been supplanted by T-Money,         the introduction of NFC-enabled commerce. Recog-
launched by the public-private partnership Korea            nizing that developing a fully interoperable NFC en-
Smart Card Company.                                         vironment would generate a market size eight times
                                                            larger than a non-interoperable environment, Sin-
But while non-policy factors are important, policy          gapore has elected to create a national trusted third
factors, including a conscious role for government to       party to ensure full interoperability between the NFC
guide mobile payments ecosystems and a corporate            services of all mobile operators and service providers.
business climate oriented towards longer-term invest-       Even the United Kingdom has recognized that gov-
ment strategy and receptive to collaborative public         ernment must become explicitly involved in advocat-
private partnerships, appear to play an indispensable       ing for and helping to foster mobile payments capabil-
role in explaining countries’ mobile payments leader-       ity. The UK Department of Transport’s 2009 Smart
ship.                                                       and Integrated Ticketing Strategy envisions universal
                                                            coverage of a smart ticketing infrastructure for all UK
Perhaps the single most important reason why Japan          public transport, finding that the use of contactless
and South Korea lead the world in mobile payments           ticketing technologies such as NFC could save the
is that transit authorities, card issuers, and mobile       country up to £2 billion annually.
operators in those countries came together to collab-
oratively create a common electronic wallet capability      Each of these countries has clearly demonstrated that
for smart cards and NFC-enabled smart phones. But           governments can play critical roles in facilitating de-
private sector actors did not just decide to do this on     velopment of their mobile payments ecosystems. Gov-
their own (and, by definition, the involvement of tran-     ernments can play the following roles: addressing the
sit authorities signals the participation of government     system interdependency challenge by facilitating devel-
agencies that either oversee or directly operate transit    opment of a national mobile payments infrastructure,
administration.) Rather, governments in Japan, South        particularly by ensuring that transit agencies, airports,
Korea, and up-and-comer Singapore played impor-             and other institutions with a public or quasi-public


thE information tEchnology & innovation foundation | novEmbEr 20 09                                                 page 3
mission are adopting open, interoperable contactless        than 500,000 NFC-capable POS readers (although
payment platforms; spurring demand for mobile pay-          that number represents a fraction of all POS readers in
ments, both by driving transit agencies to adopt con-       the United States). However, only a handful of NFC-
tactless payments and by making government facilities       capable mobile phones have been deployed (mostly in
and employees early adopters of contactless technolo-       trials), and a full-fledged, phone-based mobile pay-
gies; by establishing appropriate consumer protections;     ments ecosystem in the United States continues to be
and by promoting the importance of this technology          stymied by the chicken-or-egg problem and the inabil-
system to economic growth and quality of life.              ity of mobile network operators, financial institutions,
                                                            and merchants to mutually craft viable business mod-
While Japan deserves credit for leading the world in        els palatable to all players. Fully replacing the current
innovating and adopting contactless mobile payments,        POS terminal infrastructure in the United States with
in truth it did not implement them in the most optimal      NFC-capable devices (credit cards or mobile wallets)
fashion. As with its broader mobile phone industry, Ja-     could cost upwards of $10 billion, and a key challenge
pan has to some degree fielded a proprietary, closed        is determining which parties should bear the cost of
standard mobile payments model. While Sony’s FeliCa         deploying this infrastructure. Moreover, there is a real
contactless integrated circuit (IC) chip technology un-     risk that the United States will evolve into an NFC cul-
derpins the buyer and seller devices, the different elec-   de-sac whereby the system is optimized for payments
tronic money (digital cash) systems such as Suica, Edy,     only, but not for the much more functional and eco-
and Nanaco are not interoperable, requiring merchants       nomically important mobile wallet (e.g., a device that
to deploy proprietary POS reader terminals to accept        can store information other than money and process
the different electronic money systems; some conve-         transactions other than financial).
nience stores and retail merchants have as many as
four reader terminals at check-out stations to support      The challenge the United States and many other na-
the various types of electronic money customers may         tions face is that all actors in the mobile payments
use. This is akin to the state of email before Web-based    ecosystem are each pursuing their own interests and
email, when services like CompuServe, Prodigy, and          concentrating on maximizing their own return, thus
MCI Mail dominated, when it was only possible to ex-        making it more difficult for a true infrastructure plat-
change email if both the sender and receiver both used      form to emerge. For example, merchants and transit
the same email service provider. In other words, Japan      operators focus only on assessing their potential return
does not have a fully open, interoperable system where      on investment from deploying contactless infrastruc-
any electronic money service (whether pre-paid stored       ture, but each merchant or transit agency that installs
value or post-paid credit) operating on a smart card or     an NFC-enabled POS terminal benefits not only them-
mobile phone can interact with any reader terminal. In      selves but every other participant in the ecosystem.
this regard, a better model is Singapore’s, which seeks     In other words investments in any part of the mobile
to deploy a completely open, interoperable mobile pay-      payments ecosystem can create what economists call
ments system. The United States is making some prog-        a network externality, whereby the benefits of the in-
ress in this area because the NFC standard is interoper-    vestment do not accrue fully to the party making the
able. But it will be important for the United States to     investment.
ensure that the mobile wallet standard be interoperable
with the NFC reader standard, so that individuals can       Transit operators can play a key role in ensuring the
use their mobile phones and all the applications stored     evolution of an open, interoperable, multi-function
in them just like they can use their credit cards at any    system. In Japan and South Korea, transit authorities,
NFC-enabled reader in the United States.                    card issuers, and mobile operators came together to
                                                            collaboratively create a common electronic wallet capa-
As noted, the United States has made some progress          bility for smart cards and NFC-capable smart phones.
in deploying contactless mobile payments. As of Oc-         And by creating a large number of places where con-
tober 2009, more than 100 million branded contact-          sumers can use their mobile wallets early on, transit
less credit cards have been issued by U.S. card issuers     agencies in those countries helped build a market for
and 140,000 merchant locations have deployed more           NFC-enabled phones.



thE information tEchnology & innovation foundation | novEmbEr 20 09                                                page 4
Unfortunately, in many nations, including the United         storage and transaction, identification, and communi-
States, transit agencies tend to think like private sector   cation function. But having single purpose cards would
merchants trying to maximize their own return and            be equivalent to broadband service providers building
ignoring positive network externalities. But because         broadband pipes that only allowed their content to flow
they have a public function to them, they should also        on them. The risk of going down the contactless credit
focus on the externalities generated by deploying con-       card route (where most of the progress in contactless
tactless fare readers, for doing so dramatically expands     mobile payments in the United States has been made to
the range of venues where consumers can use their            date) is that it is a single purpose device, whereas what
NFC-enabled phones, spurring consumer demand for             is needed is a multipurpose device that can do more
the technology. But each of the metropolitan transit         than just process e-cash transactions.
agencies in the United States has been confronting de-
cisions about whether to implement contactless fare          To maximize the benefits to the American economy
payment systems on their own. The risk is that in the        and to American consumers, mobile payments needs
absence of federal leadership, transit agencies will ei-     to evolve in an open, interoperable, multi-purpose
ther choose not to deploy contactless fare payment sys-      fashion. The risk in the United States is that mobile
tems or will choose to deploy closed-loop, proprietary       payments will evolve in the direction of closed- and or
fare payment systems that are not interoperable with         single-purpose platforms. Thus, the government holds
those of other transit agencies (as with Boston’s Char-      a key role to ensure the marketplace evolves in this di-
lie Card) or with NFC reader standards in general, and       rection, because if a country goes down the path of a
the opportunity to realize network externalities from        limited and non-interoperable systems, it is very dif-
contactless mobile payments in U.S. mass transit will        ficult to change course.
be lost or delayed.
                                                             In summary, mobile payments represent a critical in-
Moreover, there has been a standoff between banks,           formation technology system for the U.S. economy to
which are migrating credit cards with customer in-           realize. It is not at all clear that market forces alone will
formation stored on a magnetic stripe to the new mi-         get the United States there, or produce the completely
croprocessor-based contactless NFC standard where            open, multifunctional system that we need, certainly
customer information is encrypted, and the mass tran-        not anytime soon. Therefore, applying lessons from
sit operators, who would like access to the memory           the leading countries, there appears to be a strategic
resources on NFC smart cards but who installed an            role for the federal government to play in facilitating
earlier, proprietary version of contactless technology.      and accelerating the arrival of mobile payments in the
Thus far, banks have resisted opening up smart card          United States. Accordingly, this report makes the fol-
microprocessor resources to meet transit operators’ re-      lowing recommendations:
quirements for scratch pad memory access on which
they can calculate passenger fare and manage custom-         	 reate
                                                               C
                                                               	        an inter-government mobile payments
ers’ outstanding transit subscription balances. Even            working group and private-sector advisory
successful implementations of an open-loop outside              council that would collaborate to introduce, by
network system, such as the Utah Transit Authority’s,           mid-2010, a strategy for spurring the deploy-
which allows passengers to use their regular credit             ment of an open, interoperable mobile wallet. In
cards for contactless fare payment on UTA’s buses and           the United States, this means that the Chief Tech-
light rail, required the system to be custom-engineered         nology Officer should create: 1) a mobile payments
between the credit card-issuing banks and the transit           working group, whose members would include the
authority.                                                      Federal Communications Commission, Federal
                                                                Trade Commission, Treasury Department, Depart-
This points to a central challenge for mobile payments          ment        of        Transportation,        National
in the United States: no party, neither the banks nor           Telecommunications and Information Administra-
the transit agencies, has an interest in creating a fully       tion, National Institute of Standards and Technology,
open, interoperable multi-function smart card or mo-            the General Services Administration, and other
bile wallet device that possesses a cash, information           agencies as appropriate, along with 2) an advisory



thE information tEchnology & innovation foundation | novEmbEr 20 09                                                     page 5
council from the private sector, which together          2. Provide funding for pilot programs deploy-
  would develop, by mid-2010, a U.S. strategy for             ing NFC infrastructure in public venues.
  spurring the deployment of an open, interoperable           The mobile wallet strategy roadmap should in-
  mobile wallet platform.                                     clude funding for pilot programs to implement
                                                              NFC infrastructure in the aforementioned pub-
  The government’s role should not be to take the lead        licly or semi-publicly operated or managed envi-
  in specifying NFC standards—private markets and             ronments.
  collaborative standards-setting consortium such as
  the NFC Forum are driving this and should con-           3. Ensure senior government leaders highlight
  tinue to do so. Rather, much as the Federal Com-            the benefits of contactless mobile payments.
  munications Commission’s National Broadband                 Senior leaders at the FCC, Departments of
  Taskforce is developing a comprehensive strategy            Commerce and Transportation, and other agen-
  for how the United States can achieve ubiquitous            cies should provide vision and leadership and
  broadband deployment, a national mobile wallet/             speak openly about the transformative potential
  mobile payments strategy would craft a roadmap              of contactless mobile payments in the United
  considering issues such as: how federal, state, and         States.
  local governments will go contactless; how contact-
  less payments can be enabled in all metropolitan         4. Deploy contactless payments infrastructure,
  transit authorities; how such payments can be im-           including NFC-enabled electronic wal-
  plemented in public and quasi-public venues such            let phones and NFC-enabled POS readers
  as airports, street parking meters, parking garages,        throughout government agencies:
  toll booths, and other locations throughout the
  country; and how mobile payments can be used for                		 General Services Administration
                                                                  The
  functions such as food stamps, funds through the                 should commit to installing contactless
  Women, Infants and Children program and other                    POS terminals in all cafeterias, parking ga-
  federal benefit programs.                                        rages, and other cash facilities it directly
                                                                   operates in federal agencies and facilities,
                                                                   including Department of Defense facili-
	 overnments
  G
  	                should assume a leadership role
                                                                   ties.
  in promoting and adopting mobile payments.
  Federal, state, and local governments should be cre-             Government identification programs such
                                                                  		
                                                                  


  ative in using systems and funding to spur                       as the Department of Defense’s Common
  deployment of contactless mobile payments. The                   Access Card and the Transportation Work-
  government should:                                               er Identification Credential (TWIC) should
                                                                   allow electronic wallet applications to be
 1. Require that mass transit agencies receiv-                     housed on the card.
    ing federal funding deploy open-loop out-
                                                                  		 and local governments using POS
                                                                  State
    side network payment systems. In the current
                                                                   terminals to process payments for servic-
    reauthorization of the Surface Transportation
                                                                   es—such as for obtaining marriage licenses,
    Act, Congress should require that any transit
                                                                   parking permits, drivers licenses, etc.—
    authority receiving federal public transporta-
                                                                   should deploy NFC-enabled POS
    tion funding that has a contactless fare payment
                                                                   terminals, enabling citizens to make con-
    system move to an open-loop outside payments
                                                                   tactless payments.
    network. That is, Congress should require tran-
    sit agencies receiving federal funding to deploy     	 rticulate
                                                           A
                                                           	            clear consumer protections for mo-
    NFC-enabled contactless fare payment systems           bile payments. For mobile payments to succeed,
    interoperable with those of other transit agen-        consumers must be assured they maintain the same
    cies throughout the country.                           level of recourse in case of disputes with merchants




thE information tEchnology & innovation foundation | novEmbEr 20 09                                          page 6
or digital theft. Consumer protections should be ex-      	 esist
                                                              R
                                                              	        the urge to regulate RFID technologies,
  tended to all providers of mobile payment services.         including near field communication. Given the
  The United States should actively engage in ongoing         importance of NFC technology and its inherent se-
  OECD discussions to harmonize consumer payment              curity, it is important that policymakers not give in
  protections amongst its OECD member countries.              to pressure to regulate NFC, in particular under the
                                                              broader guise of regulating RFID technologies,
	 ddress
  A
  	          legitimate security and privacy con-             which should not be regulated either.
  cerns, but recognize mobile wallets are likely to
  be more secure than physical wallets. Policymak-          	 ncourage
                                                              E
                                                              	             competition and do not favor en-
  ers should not be swayed by the claims of some              trenched interests. The rapid evolution of mobile
  privacy advocates who are likely both to question the       devices and applications as well as network and in-
  privacy and security of mobile payments and to ac-          formation technologies has engendered an incredibly
  tively denounce proactive government efforts to             fertile period of mobile payments innovation and
  develop a national payments strategy. NFC-enabled           activity. Many new firms with innovative business
  phones offer defenses not generally available to cards,     models and service propositions have emerged to
  including enabling consumers to keep applications           provide novel platforms for remote mobile pay-
  locked with a PIN or other passcode or with a fin-          ments, such as domestic money transfers,
  gerprint or other biometric tools. Moreover mobile          international remittances, and even targeted micro-
  operators can remotely shut down all applications on        lending. Regulators should not give in to incumbent
  an NFC phone should subscribers report their de-            business interests that oppose the emergence of in-
  vice lost or stolen.                                        novative new services.

  Policymakers should also recognize that contact-            Likewise, policymakers should not give in to en-
  less mobile transactions effected between a mobile          trenched interests who would resist new automated
  phone with a secure integrated circuit smart chip           or self service technologies that NFC makes pos-
  and an NFC-enabled payment terminal are likely              sible, even if it means certain service jobs may be
  to be much more secure than either swiping the              automated, for these technologies introduce effi-
  credit card through a magnetic card reader, or sim-         ciencies that redound to the benefit of consumers
  ply handing the credit card to a third party. This is       and the economy as a whole.
  because in a contactless transaction (whether origi-
  nated by a smart card or mobile phone) both the IC        	 ctively
                                                              A
                                                              	         work with international NFC standards
  chip and the payment terminal authenticate one an-          setting bodies. Federal bodies involved in trade
  other and, critically, a unique identifier is generated     policy, including the National Institute of Standards
  to validate each transaction. If that unique identifier     and Technology and the United States Trade Repre-
  is somehow stolen, it cannot be used to execute a           sentative should support the development of
  subsequent or future transaction. Moreover, no pub-         interoperable international standards for mobile
  licized real-world attacks on contactless bankcards         payments, which will inure to the benefit of both
  have emerged in the United States or elsewhere since        domestic device manufacturers looking to export to
  the payments industry has introduced the technol-           global markets and consumers seeking convenient
  ogy.                                                        payment experiences alike.




thE information tEchnology & innovation foundation | novEmbEr 20 09                                              page 7
T h E I N f o r m aT I o N T E c h N o l o g y & I N N o v aT I o N f o u N d aT I o N




                           Explaining International IT Leadership:
                           Contactless Mobile Payments




                             T
                                       he ever-expanding capabilities of mobile phones have made
Mobile payments will
                                       them increasingly powerful platforms for an impressively
benefit the economy and
                                       wide range of commercial and financial transactions. Mobile
society by increasing
productivity through         phones have evolved from simple personal communication devices
enhancing operational        to become both platforms for commerce and indispensable “lifestyle
efficiencies, enabling a     infrastructure” that enhances productivity, facilitates financial trans-
range of innovative new      actions, and makes life more convenient and efficient. In the most
business models, and         advanced countries, consumers use their phones as multifunctional
pushing distributed          electronic wallets to pay public transit or taxi fares; to make purchases
computing intelligence
                             from merchants, restaurants, convenience stores, and automated de-
into the physical world.
                             vices; and to check in at airports, hotels, and schools; and for a host of
                             other functions.

                             This report examines which countries                          Understanding Mobile
                             lead the world in deploying and adopt-                        payMents
                             ing contactless mobile payments sur-                          What are Mobile payments?
                             veys, finding Japan and South Korea                           Mobile payments are perhaps the most
                             in the lead; surveys the development                          important form of mobile commerce,
                             of contactless mobile payments in the                         a term defined broadly as “commer-
                             United States; and analyzes the non-                          cial or financial transactions mediated
                             policy and policy factors that explain                        through mobile phones or other hand-
                             how the leading countries attained                            held electronic devices.”1 Mobile com-
                             their leadership position in contact-                         merce is exploding worldwide, with
                             less payments. It concludes with a set                        research firm Juniper predicting that,
                             of recommendations to policymakers,                           by 2011, the global value of all com-
                             targeted to those in the United States                        mercial or financial transactions effect-
                             but applicable globally, wishing to pro-                      ed through mobile phones will exceed
                             mote contactless mobile payments in                           $587 billion.2 By 2013, Juniper predicts
                             their country.                                                that more than 2 billion mobile sub-
scribers worldwide will have used their mobile phones     Figure 1: Contactless Mobile payment
for contactless mobile payments, mobile banking, or
over-the-air person-to-person payments.3

The following taxonomy describes the broad universe
of commercial and financial transactions that mobile
phones enable:4

I. Mobile financial services, including: contactless
   mobile payments, peer-to-peer mobile
   payments, and mobile banking.5

    1. Contactless mobile payments—also called
       “touchless” or “proximity” payments—
       leverage radio frequency identification
       technology (RFID) technology, particularly         Mobile purchases through cell phones—particularly
       through a technology standard called near          of digital content including music, games, e-books,
       field communication (NFC), to enable mobile        digital avatars, and virtual worlds—has become wide-
       subscribers to make contactless payments           spread across all developed countries, and especially
       simply by waving their mobile phone (or a          prevalent in Asian countries. Mobile sales of digital
       smart card) directly in front of NFC-enabled       goods in Japan alone constitute a $4.84 billion market,
       terminals, such as merchant’s point-of-            and well over $1 billion in South Korea. Research firm
       sale (POS) terminals, subway turnstiles, or        Ovum estimates the global value of “online shopping”
       automated devices such as vending machines         via mobile phones will come to approximately $20 bil-
       (Figure 1).
                                                          lion in 2009.7 Notwithstanding the impressive volume
        Contactless mobile payments are exploding         of digital content mobile subscribers are downloading
        globally, growing in value from $3 billion in     to their phones, this report focuses on the transforma-
        2007 to approximately $10 billion in 2009, and    tive capability of mobile phones to act as platforms
        expected to surpass $52 billion by 2012.6         for enabling remote contactless financial, commercial,
                                                          and information-based transactions.
    2. Peer-to-peer payments including funds
       transfer or domestic and international money       types of Mobile payments applications
       remittances.
                                                          Near-field communication technology enables a range
    3. Mobile      banking,     including   both          of monetary and non-monetary transactions. Embed-
       informational—alerts and account balance           ding electronic wallets on mobile phones (or smart
       inquiries—and transactional—mobile bill            cards) transforms them into multifunctional devices
       payment or equity trading—components.              that can execute contactless payment transactions,
                                                          serve as a store of information and value, house au-
II. Mobile shopping and mobile-facilitated                thentication or identification credentials, and exchange
    purchases of digital content, data, or services,      data with similarly enabled devices.
    where purchases are made via mobile phones either
    through traditional Internet website channels (e.g.   This report identifies three primary types of con-
    buying a product off the Amazon or eBay Web site      tactless transactions that electronic wallets enable: 1)
    using one’s mobile phone instead of computer) or
                                                          transactions involving only the exchange of payment
    via direct downloads of digital content, such as
    music or ringtones. Purchases can also be mobile-     information; 2) transactions involving both the ex-
    facilitated such as making a purchase from a          change of payment details and information/data per-
    computer at an online retailer or using the mobile    tinent to the transaction; and 3) storing and transmit-
    phone for authentication and the mobile operator’s    ting identification and authentication credentials. (See
    bill for invoicing and collection.                    Table 1.)



thE information tEchnology & innovation foundation | novEmbEr 20 09                                             page 9
The first category includes transactions where the mo-      to manage room access: the hotel sends an electronic
bile phone (or smart card) is simply used to transmit       code to the guest’s cell phone that permits access to a
payment details for purchases of stand-alone goods or       specific hotel room for the duration of the reservation,
services, such as buying a soda from a vending ma-          and the guest need simply touch his/her cell phone to
chine, or purchasing items from merchants such as           the door’s reader, obviating the need for physical keys
retailers, convenience stores, or fast-food restaurants.    or keys cards. Using electronic wallets for identification
There is not an information component to these trans-       purposes will further accelerate as biometric verifica-
actions required beyond the payment instructions.           tion is added to existing password authentication fea-
These types of contactless transactions will increas-       tures of mobile phones.
ingly replace cash for low-value micropayments (trans-
actions worth less than $25.)

Where electronic wallets (whether on mobile phones          Mobile payments represent a digital platform technolog y that
or smart cards) become far more powerful is their abil-     enables the creation of new and innovative applications limited
ity to store, process, and exchange transaction-related
                                                            only by the creativity of organizations seeking to use them.
information, enabling the mobile phone to replace a
litany of tickets, passes, keys, and cards. For example,
theater-goers in South Korea purchase movie tickets
via their mobile phones, receive the “tickets” elec-        And the important thing about this “platform” tech-
tronically, and swipe their phone across a reader at the    nology is that new and creative applications are only
theatre entrance, eliminating the need to hand a paper      limited by the creativity of the organizations that seek
ticket stub to a greeter. At parking garages in Japan,      to use them. For example, the Korean Salvation Army
drivers swipe their phones across readers as they enter     saw this technology platform and realized it could digi-
and exit the garage and an application in the electronic    tally transform the way it collected money at Christ-
wallet records duration of stay and transmits payment       mas. Now, next to the traditional red kettle and bell-
information at the exit gate, eliminating the need for      ringing Santa-costumed volunteers, the Korean Salva-
both paper tickets and attendants to process the trans-     tion Army has introduced digital donation screens, at
action. Likewise, airline passengers in Japan receive       which donors simply wave their mobile phone across
their reservation “tickets” electronically to the mobile    the screen and the specified amount is deducted from
phone and check in by tapping their phone to read-          one’s T-money account (a digital cash service popular in
ers at the flight gate (and at security check in). Taxi     South Korea) and paid to the Salvation Army—leaving
passengers can pay the fare and receive an electronic       donors with no excuse for not having change in their
receipt they can submit to their company’s account-         pockets, reducing the risk of money being siphoned
ing department for reimbursement. Critically, this in-      off by the volunteer, and reducing the cost of handling
formation storage and processing aspect of electronic       the cash.8 Another such application would be for the
wallets also allows transit agencies to issue contactless   government to deliver food stamps via mobile phones;
smart cards (or mobile phone applications) capable of       likely to be more convenient as many individuals who
both calculating passenger fare based on journey taken      lack bank accounts actually have mobile phones. It’s
and storing subscription account balances.                  likely that as this platform technology becomes more
                                                            widely available around the world, the number of in-
As an authentication application, electronic wallets can    novative applications will blossom.
store identification information, replacing the current
generation of key fobs and smart cards to allow indi-       Though not directly a mobile payments application, it
viduals to check in/sign in to schools, hotels, health      should be noted that NFC technology allows electronic
clubs, offices, and apartment buildings with one de-        devices to interconnect and exchange information with
vice, often a cell phone. For example, in South Ko-         one another over short distances, just as infrared or Blu-
rean, Japanese, and Swedish schools and universities,       etooth technology before it. For example, Apple is cur-
students effortlessly swipe their phones across readers     rently prototyping a next generation iPhone allowing
outside classroom doors to register their attendance.       customers to wirelessly sync their iPods and iPhones to
In New Zealand, hotels are using NFC technology             their iMac using RFID technology.9



thE information tEchnology & innovation foundation | novEmbEr 20 09                                                           page 10
table 1: Classifying Contactless Mobile payments applications

 payment transactions                     payment and information-based transactions     authentication/id
 	 obile
   M
   	         payments replace cash/       	 ransactions
                                            T
                                            	              involving exchange of both    	 uthentication/identifica-
                                                                                           A
                                                                                           	
    credit cards                             payment details and information pertain-       tion credentials are stored
                                             ing to the transaction. Data component is      in the mobile phone’s elec-
 	 o
   N
   	     information component re-
                                             stored on mobile phone’s electronic wal-       tronice wallet
    quired     beyond   exchanging
                                             let.
    payment details                                                                      	 lectronic
                                                                                           E
                                                                                           	            wallet can be
                                          	 nables
                                            E
                                            	          mobile phones to replace cards,      used as ID to check into:
 	ncludes
   I
   	       contactless payments for
                                             tickets, passes, etc.
    goods and services purchased                                                                Schools
                                                                                                		
    from:                                 	 nables
                                            E
                                            	         personalized merchandising and            Hotels
                                                                                                		
                                             advertising                                         Health Clubs
                                                                                                		
       		 Box Retailers
        Big
                                                                                               
      
                                                                                                	Office Complexes
        Quick Service Restaurants
       		                                 	 ses
                                            U
                                            	    mobile phone’s electronic wallet to
                                                                                               
      
                                                                                                 Apartment
                                                                                                		
        Convenience Stores
       		                                    manage, update, pay for, or check into:
                                                                                               
      
                                                                                                 Buildings
       	Taxis
                                                 Public Transit (Tickets)
                                                		
      
                                                
        Digital Donations
       		
                                                 A irport Check-in (Tickets)
                                                		
      
                                                
        Automated Devices
       		
                                                 Parking Garages (Tickets)
                                                		
      
                                                
              		Vending Machines
                                                	Movie Theatres (Tickets)
               
                                                
              	Parking Meters
                                                 Sporting Events (Tickets)
                                                		
               
                                                
              		Laundry Machines
                                                 Concerts/Museums/Parks
                                                		
               
                                                
       	Toll Booths
                                                 (Tickets)
      



                                                 Personalized Advertising or
                                                		
                                                


                                                 Merchandising
                                                	Loyalty cards
                                                


                                                		 cards
                                                Gift
                                                	Coupons
                                                




benefits of Contactless Mobile payments                          schools or libraries), credit cards, and cash with a sin-
Contactless mobile payments represent a transfor-                gle device capable of checking in to office complexes,
mative application that will bring a wide range of               apartment buildings, or health clubs; boarding planes
benefits to consumers, businesses, and the economy               and trains; and paying for everything from mass tran-
and society at large. Consumers will benefit from en-            sit and taxis to parking meters and vending machines.
hanced convenience and the ability to opt-in to per-             Indeed, much of daily life is consumed with the ex-
sonalized advertising or merchandising campaigns.                change of mundane information—key codes, dollars,
At a broader level, contactless payments will drive              time stamps, tickets, passes, ID credentials, etc.—all
increases in productivity, the central source of eco-            of which could be automated, streamlined, or even
nomic growth, through three channels: 1) bringing                obviated by leveraging mobile phones as a repository
operational efficiencies to merchants, retailers, and            for both information and money. Consumers will
transit authorities; 2) enabling a range of innovative           also enjoy faster transaction processing speeds in re-
new business models and service offerings; and 3)                tail and transit environments. Organizations will be
pushing distributed computing intelligence into the              able to automate these kinds of transactions, saving
physical world.                                                  significant amounts of money, which can be passed
                                                                 on to consumers. Finally, contactless transactions
Using mobile phones as electronic wallets will allow             reduce the burden—and security risk—of carrying
consumers to replace the multitude of keys, key fobs,            cash and having to fumble for loose change or bills to
loyalty cards, various types of ID cards (such as for            make small purchases.



thE information tEchnology & innovation foundation | novEmbEr 20 09                                                    page 11
For businesses, contactless payments enable increased       wallets make possible automated transactions that ei-
operational efficiency in retail and transit environ-       ther eliminate the need for personnel to manually pro-
ments, whether by accelerating transaction speeds,          cess tickets and cash or that empower employees to use
reducing the costs inherent in handling cash-based          their time more productively by automating routinized
transactions, or decreasing the need for ticketing or       activities. In fact, information technology (IT) is mov-
checkout agents at the point-of-sale (POS). Transac-        ing from a phase where many of the benefits of IT have
tions using contactless technology are as much as 40        come from “big boxes,” like servers or computers, to
percent faster than those made with credit or debit cards   a phase where the benefits come more from pushing
and 55 percent faster than those made with cash.10 In       distributed computing intelligence into the field. Pre-
mass transit environments, Japan’s JR East Railway re-      viously, most of the productivity gains from IT came
ports that moving from swiped magnetic stripe cards         from large IT implementations, such as enterprise
to contactless smart cards or mobile phones reduces         resource planning or automated order entry systems,
transaction processing time from 700 to 200 millisec-       which automated routinized activities employees had
onds. Japan’s All Nippon Airways found that using           performed in desktop or office environments.
mobile phones at check-in cuts transaction time per
passenger from 50 to 8 seconds.11 South Korea’s banks
have found that mobile transactions cost one-fifth          Electronic wallets have the potential to replace a litany of
of face-to-face transaction costs.12 And Washington,
D.C.’s transit authority found that migration to elec-      artifacts of analog life that consumers carry in their wallet to
tronic fare payments reduced staff by approximately         exchange money or information—credit cards, loyalty cards,
15 percent over a 5-year period.13
                                                            transit cards, ID cards, keys, key fobs, tickets, passes, etc.—
Contactless transactions open up entirely new chan-         with a single device.
nels for retailers to introduce opt-in personalized ad-
vertising or merchandising campaigns. For example,
customers entering a mall could swipe their mobile          But the next wave of IT will be about pushing mobile
phones across a NFC-enabled poster that would in-           computing, sensing, and intelligence out into the phys-
form them about sales or promotions at their favorite       ical world. Before, transactions in the field required
stores and even provide them with targeted coupons          people because there was little connectivity to technol-
or discounts. In Japan and South Korea, advertising         ogy platforms on the back-end (e.g., no “big box” in
posters (whether in subways or on the street) have          the field). But mobile phones bring computing into the
embedded chips allowing mobile subscribers to wave          field, acting as sensors that can connect physical infra-
their phones across the poster to learn more about—         structure to the virtual world. By enabling fully elec-
or directly purchase—the advertised good or service.        tronic transactions, contactless payments eliminate the
In those countries, one need simply walk up to a poster     need for cash or physical information exchange (e.g.,
pitching the latest Cirque de Soleil show, Harry Potter     tickets or passes) at the point-of-sale, removing the
movie, or Bruce Springsteen concert, wave the mobile        need for attendants to staff gates at parking garages,
phone across the poster, and purchase tickets imme-         movie theaters, tool booths, sporting venues, airports,
diately. In essence, NFC technology enables a world         etc. For example, if parking meters in the United
of secure end-to-end commerce and connectivity in           States were NFC-enabled, not only could drivers pay
which consumers can access and pay for physical and         electronically via their mobile phones, but because the
digital services anywhere, at any time, using any de-       meters would no longer be collecting coins, the need
vice.14 An NFC-based mobile transaction infrastruc-         for someone to physically go from parking meter to
ture will also spur the creation of more self-service       parking meter to collect them would be eliminated. If
opportunities and business models as transactions can       teachers didn’t have to spend two to three minutes of
increasingly be completed through automated devic-          class time taking attendance because students instead
es.                                                         signed in using their NFC-enabled phones, they could
                                                            save 30 hours or more a year on roll call, freeing them
The productivity story then is not simply about replac-     to focus on teaching and improving educational out-
ing credit cards with mobile phones; rather electronic      comes.15


thE information tEchnology & innovation foundation | novEmbEr 20 09                                                            page 12
box 1: Key Underlying Mobile payMents teChnologies and aCtors

Near Field Communication (NFC) Technology. Near field communication (NFC) is a short-range wireless connectivity technolo-
gy that provides intuitive, simple, and safe communication between electronic devices. NFC is a type of radio frequency identification
(RFID) technology, and the NFC standard is an extension of the ISO 14443 RFID proximity-card standard. NFC operates at 13.56
MHz and transfers data at up to 424 Kbits/second. Communication occurs when two NFC-compatible devices are brought within
four centimeters of one another. NFC communicates via magnetic field induction, where two loop antennas are located within each
other’s near field, effectively forming an air-core transformer. NFC can operate in one of two modes: passive or active.16

Mobile phones, contactless smart cards, and contactless credit (or debit) cards can communicate data via near field communication
technology to NFC-enabled payment terminals—including merchant’s point-of-sale terminals, vending machines, parking meters, rail
or subway turnstiles, airline check-in gates, etc.—to process contactless transactions. Importantly, NFC-based contactless transactions
clear (that is, they are settled financially) over existing credit card or bank payment networks, not over the wireless network on which
the phone operates.

Contactless payment technologies in Japan and South Korea also use RFID technology, but in the main, use RFID standards that are
not currently interoperable with NFC standards. Japan uses FeliCa, a proprietary standard. South Korea uses a passive, as opposed to
active, version of RFID that operates in card emulation mode only (no reader mode or peer-to-peer mode), and is not interoperable
with NFC.

FeliCa. Sony developed the FeliCa integrated circuit chip for contactless payments made via smart cards in 1988. In 2004, Sony
teamed with NTT DOCOMO (“DOCOMO”) to embed FeliCa chips into the electronic wallets of mobile phones, enabling contact-
less payments in Japan.

The NFC Forum. The NFC Forum, a standards-setting consortium founded in 2004 that includes 140 members from all areas of
the NFC ecosystem, drives the development of globally-interoperable NFC standards. As of Q4 2009, the NFC Forum has finalized
11 specifications enabling a basic level of device interoperability.17

Smart Cards. Smart cards—whether public transit fare cards, credit cards, or stored value (i.e., debit) cards—use embedded micro-
chips, also known as integrated circuits (IC) chips, to electronically store data. Smart card technology can be contact-based or contact-
less. In contact-based scenarios, customers insert or swipe cards through a card reader. Contactless smart cards have an embedded
antenna and short-range radio frequency identification (RFID) computer chip, which transfers data via radio waves, enabling contact-
less, or “touchless” remote transactions.

Electronic (or “Digital”) Wallets. An electronic wallet is a mobile phone feature that can centrally and simultaneously store multiple
applications managing customer account/transaction information with financial providers, public transit agencies, or third party enti-
ties such as health clubs, schools, and office or apartment buildings. For example, the electronic wallets of mobile phones in South
Korea can simultaneously manage up to 100 different applications, ranging from electronic money to personal IDs.

Electronic Money (or “Digital Cash”). Electronic money systems, such as Japan’s Edy or South Korea’s T-money, appear in the
form of either pre-paid, or “stored value,” smart cards or as an application in the electronic wallet of a mobile phone. For example,
with Edy, customers prepay (via a credit card or by debiting a bank account) to purchase Edy digital cash that is loaded onto their smart
card or mobile phone. When customers make purchases, in lieu of using cash, funds are deducted from the stored digital cash value
on the smart card or the mobile phone.

Trusted Service Manager (TSM). A trusted service manager is a third party intermediary that manages downloads of applications
to a phone’s electronic wallet. The TSM helps service providers securely distribute and manage contactless services for their customers
using the networks of mobile operators. However, the TSM does not participate in actual contactless transactions using NFC devices.18
The key functions of the TSMs include interconnecting with mobile network operators (MNOs) and application service providers,
enrolling new users, updating user interfaces, managing customer databases, managing application lifecycles, managing value-added
services such as ticket reloading and branding, and guaranteeing end-to-end security. Examples of TSMs include FeliCa Networks in
Japan and VivoTech in the United States. In Singapore, the government’s Information Development Authority has taken on the role
of setting up a national trusted service manager (there called a trusted third party.)

Peer-to-peer (or “person-to-person”) payments. Mobile peer-to-peer payments use the SMS (simplified messaging service) feature
of mobile phones to send text messages with payment instructions to third parties, such as the bank accounts of customers, suppliers,
or family members. Peer-to-peer payments have become incredibly popular in developing countries through service providers such as
M-Pesa in Kenya and Smart Communications in the Philippines.


thE information tEchnology & innovation foundation | novEmbEr 20 09                                                                   page 13
This all has the benefit of allowing organizations to de-   erators, handset manufacturers, financial institutions
ploy resources more productively, increasing customer       including major banks and credit card issuers, com-
convenience and generating cost savings for consum-         mercial retailers and merchant stores, public transit
ers and taxpayers, while eliminating routinized, mo-        authorities, government agencies, and, of course, the
notonous tasks or jobs, freeing the individuals who         customer. Mobile payments thus represent a complex
once staffed them to pursue more-rewarding, higher-         ecosystem with many players whose success depends
skilled, and higher-paying jobs. If the United States is    on joint action at the same time by all the players to-
to continue enhancing its productivity, thus generating     gether. All parties have to figure out a way to act col-
increases in growth, wages, and standards of living, it     laboratively at the same time, and this is something
must deploy technologies like mobile payments that          markets are not very good at, especially U.S. markets.
enhance productivity throughout the economy.

A national contactless payments infrastructure sup-         Mobile payments are characterized by a chicken-or-egg problem:
ports other social objectives, including more efficient
                                                            consumers won’t demand NFC-enabled phones until they know
governance and helping the environment by eliminat-
ing paper waste. A United Kingdom study found that          a sufficient number of POS terminals exist where they can use
going contactless in mass transit ticketing could save      them; merchants won’t deploy the infrastructure until a critical
the country £2 billion annually.19 Japan has found that
the amount of paper cash in circulation in the econo-       mass of users justifies the cost of doing so.
my has appreciably decreased since 2004, when mobile
phones with electronic wallets were introduced.20 Fi-
                                                            Mobile payments are marked by a system interde-
nally, eliminating the need for paper, whether of rail,
                                                            pendency (the classic “chicken-or-egg”) conundrum,
movie, or airline tickets (or even paper currency itself)
                                                            which each country must solve: For consumers to de-
saves money and benefits the environment.
                                                            mand cell phones with embedded electronic wallets—
In summary, a system whereby mobile payments and            and thus, critically, for the mobile network operators to
transactions leverage NFC technology is a critical          require this feature from the handset manufacturers—
emerging digital infrastructure technology platform         consumers must know that a sufficiently deployed mo-
that all countries will need to have. Once a country has    bile payments infrastructure exists at merchants’ POS
an open, interoperable mobile payments infrastructure       terminals, at fare readers in metro subways and buses,
in place, it is akin to having broadband, cellular net-     in toll booths along highways, at airports, in parking
works, or a smart grid installed. And like these digi-      garages, in automated devices like vending machines
tal infrastructure platforms, mobile payments exhibit       and parking meters, and in other places where the fea-
similar network effects: as additional NFC-enabled          ture can be used. Merchants and transit operators, for
mobile phones and devices come on the market, they          their part, are not likely to deploy NFC-enabled pay-
increase the value of other similarly enabled devices.      ment terminals until a critical mass of users gives them
Over time, a proliferation of creative applications are     confidence that their investments in such technology
likely to develop from the mobile payments technology       will be repaid. And indeed, determining who should
platform, many of which are difficult to even imagine       pay to finance the widespread deployment of the NFC
today, all of which will continue to create new busi-       mobile payments infrastructure (particularly reader
ness opportunities, increase productivity, and drive        terminals at merchants and mass transit facilities) is
economic growth.                                            one of the greatest challenges to mobile payments.
                                                            One industry observer estimated it could cost upwards
                                                            of $10 billion to fully replace the current POS terminal
the Mobile payments Challenge                               infrastructure in the United States (alone) with NFC-
Mobile payments are considerably different from the         capable devices.21
classic “widget” industry in which a company need
only acquire the requisite inputs, manufacture its prod-    The system interdependency challenge makes it ex-
ucts, and sell them on the open market. For a country       tremely difficult for all parties in a multi-sided market
to successfully deploy mobile payments it must engage       to craft profitable business models. Each party needs
a wide range of actors, including: mobile network op-       to know that incoming revenues (or value, from the


thE information tEchnology & innovation foundation | novEmbEr 20 09                                                            page 14
consumer perspective) will justify the costs of their in-   tions. Year-end 2008 (or most recently available) data
vestments. Therefore, each party must have clarity as       are cited wherever possible. Historical data are cited
to its role in the mobile payments value chain and how      in most cases, though the report also makes use of
it intends to monetize it. A key sticking point is the      forward-looking, anticipatory estimates of future mar-
issue of, “Who owns the customer in mobile transac-         ket sizes for countries’ mobile payments markets. The
tions?” Wireless network operators believe they own         study relies extensively on facts and figures provided
the mobile subscriber relationship, credit card issuing     by representatives or publications of foreign govern-
banks insist they own the financial relationship with       ments and thus on the implied accuracy and validity of
customers, and retailers contend that they own the          these resources.
customer relationship at the point of purchase. Each
entity desires to have the leading place in the mobile      The assessment of country leaders was also informed
payments ecosystem and dominant role in the value           by consultations with over two dozen experts in the
chain, and as a result the market has remained still-       mobile commerce and payments field, who were asked
born. As Pragnesh Shah, former CEO of mobile pay-           to rank the world leaders in mobile payments and
ments firm Mobilians, states, “The barriers to mobile       provide both context for and a historiography of the
payments, in the United States or elsewhere, are not        evolution of mobile payments ecosystems in leading
technological nor regulatory; rather they pertain to the    countries.
business model.”22 Of course, all countries looking to
deploy mobile payments must solve these complex sys-
tem interdependency and business model ecosystem            Mobile payments exhibit classic network externalities; adding an
challenges in their own way.
                                                            additional NFC-enabled phone or POS terminal device to the
And in analyzing the countries leading the world in         network amplifies the value of previously deployed devices and
mobile payments, it becomes apparent that some forc-
                                                            makes the case more compelling for further deployment.
ing function—such as government facilitating the
development of the mobile payments ecosystemt or
ensuring that transit agencies deploy interoperable         Mobile payment technologies—and countries’ deploy-
contactless fare payment systems—has intervened to          ments of them—are dynamic and rapidly evolving. As
either circumvent or resolve the system interdependen-      of November 2009, more than 100 trials or tests of
cy paradox, catalyzing the country’s mobile payments        RF-based contactless payment systems are occurring
ecosystem and causing contactless payments to arrive        in cities and countries worldwide. This report has iden-
sooner that the marketplace alone would have other-         tified world leaders as of Fall 2009; countries’ leader-
wise delivered it.                                          ship positions may subsequently shift.

Methodology                                                 Which Countries lead in Contactless Mobile
This report focuses on which countries are best leverag-    payments?
ing mobile phones (and, to a lesser degree, smart cards)    In its 2007 report, Mobile Commerce, the OECD noted
as platforms for contactless payments and transac-          that, “The level of development of the mobile com-
tions. The analysis examines quantitative data for each     merce industry varies widely across OECD member
country, principally the number of electronic-wallet        countries. But individuals, particularly in Japan and
capable mobile phones and point of sale terminal read-      South Korea, have started to own the Internet-con-
ers underpinning the country’s mobile payments infra-       nectable mobile phones that enable the development of
structure, along with the number and overall market         mobile commerce.”23 As Shri Kumar, a senior official
value of contactless payments in each country.              with India’s Ministry of Communications and Infor-
                                                            mation Technology (MCIT), observed in a presentation
Mobile payments statistics come from a variety of           to the Mobile Forum of India in February 2009, “The
sources, principally market research firms and gov-         Asia-Pacific region is the most advanced m-commerce
ernment agencies, that may use different classification     market in the world, and the test-bed for the major-
methodologies for defining mobile payments transac-         ity of m-commerce and m-payment trials.”24 Indeed,



thE information tEchnology & innovation foundation | novEmbEr 20 09                                                          page 15
table 2: Contactless Mobile payments activity in selected Countries
 Metric/statistic                  Japan                       south Korea                  United states
 Mobile phone penetration          87% (2008)   30
                                                               93% (2008)                   88% (2008)31

 Number of mobile wallet-capable   78 million                  12 million                   Only in trials
 phones deployed

 Number of citizens using mobile   17 million phones;          3.6 million phones;          Only in trials
 wallets                           68 million smart cards      18 million T-money smart
                                                               cards
 Number of merchants deploying     608,000 merchants           +500,000 total POS readers   140,000 merchants
 RF-capable POS readers/total      deploying/total number      deployed33                   deploying/+500,000 POS
 number POS readers deployed       POS readers deployed much                                readers deployed34
                                   larger32



almost 500 million mobile transactions will occur in             Internal Affairs and Communications (MIAC) esti-
Asia in 2009, versus only 34 million in North America,           mated that the overall value of “all business carried
according to research firm Gartner.25 By 2012, Gart-             out through” cell phones in Japan was worth as much
ner expects that mobile transactions will grow to 2.4            as $106 billion in 2007, up 23 percent from 2006.28 In
billion in Asia and 221 million in North America. Re-            South Korea, 63 percent of citizens have made pay-
search firm Juniper concurs, finding that, “The Far              ments through their mobile phones, at least 12 million
East and Western Europe will be the top two regions              subscribers have RF-capable mobile phones (about
for mobile commerce by 2013, accounting for 60 per-              one-quarter of mobile phones), more than 3.5 million
cent of the [anticipated] $300 billion global transaction        citizens use their mobile phones for contactless pay-
value.” Not surprisingly then, the two countries clearly         ments, and 9.15 million mobile subscribers use mobile
leading the world in mobile payments emerge from the             banking. South Koreans purchased $1.4 billion worth
Asia-Pacific region.                                             of digital content in 2008, and the value of South Ko-
                                                                 rea’s overall mobile commerce market is expected to
Japan and South Korea lead the word in mobile pay-               grow to 6.84 billion won ($5.9 billion) in 2010.29
ments based upon the aforementioned criteria. (See
Table 2.) As Kumar argues, “Japan is two years ahead             There are currently over 100 NFC projects, trials, or
of the rest of the world in contactless adoption.”26 In-         commercial deployments occurring worldwide, 47
dustry executive Pragnesh Shah, formerly with Sprint             in Asia alone.35 Although there are many NFC trials
and recently CEO of the U.S. division of South Ko-               ongoing, most of them are still in the nascent phase,
rean mobile payments firm Mobilians, concurs that,               and none have reached the level of critical mass of de-
“Japan and South Korea clearly lead the world in the             ployment and use that has been achieved in Japan and
deployment and adoption of phone-initiated contact-              South Korea. While Hong Kong, Singapore, Taiwan,
less mobile payments.”27                                         and Malaysia each make extensive use of contactless
                                                                 payments—there are more than 10 million contactless
In Japan, 78 million mobile subscribers (73 percent)             transactions each day in Hong Kong, for example—
own FeliCa-capable mobile phones, 17 million sub-                almost all these are initiated through smart cards. As
scribers use these phones for contactless transac-               consulting firm KPMG noted in a survey of mobile
tions in railways or stores on a regular basis, and over         payments in the Asia-Pacific region, “Somewhat sur-
600,000 affiliated merchant stores (and a greater num-           prisingly, the most mobile-penetrated territories on the
ber of terminals) accept contactless payments. The               planet—Hong Kong, Singapore, and Taipei—have
market value of contactless transactions alone in Japan          shown little comparable adoption of m-payments, ex-
was $8.4 billion in 2008, and the total value of mobile          cept in the use of contactless cards for transportation
commerce activity in the country, including mobile               and some limited retail usage.”36 Malaysia has recently
content downloads, fees for text messaging and Web               completed NFC trials and is beginning to deploy its
data plans, etc., was $32.4 billion. Japan’s Ministry of         mobile payments infrastructure, but the country has


thE information tEchnology & innovation foundation | novEmbEr 20 09                                                   page 16
nowhere near the level of deployment as Japan and           Figure 2: Mobile nFC payment at a Japan railway station42
South Korea.37 In June 2009, Singapore launched a
national “Digital Concierge” initiative, “to promote e-
payment adoption, particularly interoperable payments
enabled by near field communication,” but this has just
launched. In China, China Mobile, the world’s largest
mobile operator, has announced plans for a large scale
commercial rollout of mobile contactless payments, but
the rollout is not slated to start until 2010.38 A number
of European countries—notably Austria, France, Brit-
ain, Finland, and Germany—are conducting trials of
mobile-phone based NFC payment systems in major
cities, but most are still in the test phase. Even Rus-
sia is looking to launch a contactless mobile payments
system by 2011 or 2012.39 But no European country
has yet fielded a nationally deployed, ubiquitous mobile    Japanese citizens view mobile phones as indispensible
payments infrastructure rivaling those found in Japan       “lifestyle infrastructure” that serves “as the remote
or South Korea. But even compared to these coun-            control for all the transactions in our daily lives.”41 This
tries, the United States lags those with multiple ongo-     section describes the current state of the mobile pay-
ing trials or those putting together national strategies    ments market in Japan; a subsequent section explores
to ubiquitously deploy mobile payments. Meanwhile,          the sources of the country’s mobile payments leader-
contactless payments are evolving at a dynamic pace         ship.
worldwide; countries not planning to deploy such sys-
                                                            Eighty-seven percent of Japanese own mobile phones,
tems risk falling behind globally.
                                                            90 percent of which operate on 3G networks. As of
                                                            September 2008, 78 million mobile phones in Japan
Mobile payMents in Japan                                    had FeliCa-enabled electronic wallet capability, with 17
Japan leads the world in mobile payments consumer           million mobile phone subscribers using their mobile
adoption, technology infrastructure, and market val-        phones to make contactless transactions.43 Eighteen
ue. As Card Technolog y magazine writes, “Japan has the     percent of Japan’s mobile phone subscribers report
most advanced mobile payment and ticketing market           that they have at least tried out the electronic wallet
in the world.”40 Japanese consumers use their mobile        feature of their mobile phones for contactless transac-
devices as osaifu-keitai (mobile wallets) in lieu of cash   tions.44 As of August 2009, 82.8 percent of residents in
or credit cards to pay rail or subway fares (Figure 2);     the Tokyo metropolitan area used electronic money, up
to pay for taxi rides, movie tickets, and parking me-       from 78.9 percent in August 2008. Average transaction
ters; to make purchases from kiosks and vending ma-         amounts per month increased from ¥5,600 to ¥6,000
chines; to auction used items; to manage loyalty cards      ($61 to $65) over that time period, with users averaging
and programs; and even to check in at airports with         a total of seven transactions per month.45
their mobile phones acting as a boarding pass. Japa-
nese consumers purchase hundreds of thousands of            The value of mobile contactless transactions (whether
items—from tickets to groceries—with mobile phones          initiated from a smart card or mobile phone), reached
every day in Japan. Because they spend an estimated         ¥1.7 trillion ($17 billion) in 2008, and is expected to
¥60 trillion ($514 billion) each year on low-value pur-     grow to ¥2 trillion ($20 billion) by 2012, according
chases, the market is primed for cash to be replaced        to Nikkei BP, a major Japanese business publication.46
with electronic money.                                      The following categories accounted for proximity pay-
                                                            ments volume in 2008: actual payments at a physical
Japanese consumers also use the electronic wallets on       retail location, 35 percent; online shopping, 34.5 per-
their mobile phones to store identification information     cent; transportation (trains, taxis, buses, etc.), 14.3 per-
used to check into offices, apartment buildings, and        cent; auctions, 8.3 percent; mobile music purchases, 4
health clubs, and register their attendance at school.      percent; mobile game purchases, 1.6 percent; mobile


thE information tEchnology & innovation foundation | novEmbEr 20 09                                                  page 17
e-book purchases, 1.2 percent; mobile video purchas-         3) contactless transactions that use credit on a postpaid
es, 1.1 percent.47 Considering only the value of trans-      basis, such as the DCMX credit service provided by
actions executed when Japanese mobile subscribers            DOCOMO.
actually waved their FeliCa-enabled phones or smart
cards in front of a FeliCa-enabled terminal reader, this     The four largest electronic money services in Japan are
amounted to $8.4 billion in 2008. (The remainder,            Suica, iD (DOCOMO), Edy, and Nanaco. Suica, op-
$8.6 billion, is accounted for by transactions billed to     erated by JR East Railways, serves as electronic cash
electronic money accounts but that were not actually         (available either via smart card or mobile phone) that
made in a contactless fashion. For example, one made         can be used to pay railway fare or to make purchases
a purchase on the Internet, but billed the charge to         from affiliated kiosks and merchants. Over 27 million
one’s electronic money account.)                             Japanese use Suica in lieu of cash to pay railway fare.
                                                             Suica users alone make more than 200 million con-
the Contactless Mobile payments Market in Japan              tactless transactions per month in Japan.48 Nanaco is
Contactless mobile payments in Japan began with the          a contactless smart card and e-money service provided
FeliCa smart card platform and subsequently migrated         by Seven & I Holdings (7-Eleven stores), and Waon is
into cell phones. FeliCa is an RFID-based contactless        a contactless smart card and e-money service from the
payments standard developed by Sony; it is akin to but       AEON group (one of Japan’s largest retail chains).
not yet interoperable with NFC. There are three major
types of mobile FeliCa transactions—whether initiated        As of August 2008, Japanese citizens held 84.56 mil-
via a smart card or mobile phone—in Japan today: 1)          lion mobile FeliCa accounts in Japan, including 67.7
contactless payments for rail/mass transit using a pre-      million FeliCa-enabled smart cards, and 16.9 million
paid, stored value card, such Japan Railway (JR) East’s      FeliCa-enabled mobile phones. By service provider, JR
Suica card; 2) mobile payments debited from a prepaid        East had 25.9 million customers using the Suica smart
digital cash (electronic money) account operated by          card and an additional 1.22 million mobile customers;
service providers such as Edy, Nanaco, or Waon; and          Edy had 34.4 million smart card customers and an ad-

 Figure 3: growth of Mobile payments acceptance in Japan51




thE information tEchnology & innovation foundation | novEmbEr 20 09                                                page 18
ditional 8.3 million more mobile customers; Nanaco         In November 2001, this collaboration led JR East to
had 6.13 million customers of its prepaid service, with    launch the Suica (Super Urban Intelligent Card) con-
900,000 using the mobile phone service; and DO-            tactless smart card, based on Sony’s FeliCa technology,
COMO had 6.44 million customers using their mobile         concurrently deploying FeliCa-enabled readers at the
phones to make mobile purchases on a credit basis.49       turnstiles of the 424 stations in its commuter railroad
(By August 2009, subscribers of DOCOMO’s DCMX              network in the Tokyo area. Critically, Suica operated as
credit service had surpassed 10 million.)50 Over           an open-loop, transit-branded card, meaning that pas-
600,000 shops now accept mobile payments in Japan,         sengers could use value stored on the Suica card not
as Figure 3 shows.                                         just for transit fare, but also to make purchases at af-
                                                           filiated merchants and kiosks in railway stations (and
history and development of Contactless Mobile              elsewhere) that accepted the Suica card. By introducing
payments in Japan                                          an interoperable smart card system, Suica launched the
Japan’s expertise in contactless smart card technology     market for electronic money in Japan.
dates back to 1988, when Sony began work on contact-
less integrated circuit (IC) chips, culminating by 1995    Sony, looking to spur demand for its Mobile FeliCa
in the development of the FeliCa contactless IC card       technology, spearheaded in 2002 the creation of the
technology.52 That same year, Hong Kong authorities        joint venture BitWallet, Inc. which launched Edy, a
adopted FeliCa IC chip technology for the Octopus          contactless smart card-based, prepaid electronic mon-
contactless card used in their public transportation       ey service using the FeliCa chip. (Ownership of the
system (akin to today’s SmarTrip cards in Washington,      BitWallet joint venture is shared 33 percent by Sony,
D.C.), and in 1999 Sony began trial use of the FeliCa      15 percent by DOCOMO, 5 percent by All Nippon
card as an employee ID and “e-wallet” in a Tokyo           Airways, with the remainder accounted for by more
office and shopping complex. But by the end of the         than 50 other companies.) Customers can use Edy as
1990s, FeliCa was struggling to find uptake and pen-       digital cash to make purchases at am/pm, Circle K,
etration in the Japanese market,53 in large part due to    and Sunkus convenience stores, taxis, bookstores, and
the system interdependency problem described previ-        other venues. By 2007, Edy had attracted 23 million
ously.                                                     smart card subscribers and 4.5 million phone subscrib-
                                                           ers who generated 15 million transactions per month at
For its part, Japan Rail (renamed JR East after its 1987   over 50,000 participating stores. However, Edy is not
privatization), the country’s largest railway line, had    interoperable with Suica.57 Nanaco, Waon, and others
begun research and development into automated fare         also emerged as competing digital card services.
collection technology as early as 1987 and had intro-
duced magnetic stripe cards in 1992.54 JR East and         Encouraged by the success of Suica and Edy, Sony,
Sony worked collaboratively throughout the 1990s           JR East, and DOCOMO discussed the possibility of
on contactless payment systems, experimenting with         embedding FeliCa technology in DOCOMO’s phones,
microwaves and battery-operated cards in trials from       and by March 2003 the trio ascertained that it was tech-
1994 to 1997, finding that the advantages of moving        nologically feasible to do so.58 The greater challenge, of
from magnetic stripe cards to contactless cards are        course, lay in identifying a sustainable business model
accelerated transaction processing time—700 milli-         for all parties. Sony would profit directly from sales of
seconds for magnet stripe cards versus 200 millisec-       the FeliCa chip, but because DOCOMO earned rev-
onds for contactless cards—and enhanced reliability.55     enues primarily through voice and data services traf-
(Payment terminals commonly found in mass transit,         fic, and because contactless transactions settle over the
which take in and return a magnetic stripe card, con-      back-end of the financial payment network, contactless
tain moving parts that convey the card through the         mobile payments would not significantly increase tele-
reader and are far more prone to mechanical failure        communications traffic, and thus would not generate
than contactless fare systems.) JR East also recognized    a revenue stream DOCOMO could tap into.59 Take-
that, by deploying contactless ticketing, it could sub-    shi Natsuno, father of DOCOMO’s popular wireless
stantially reduce the number of employees it deployed      Internet service i-Mode and head of the DOCOMO
in railway stations to handle paper-based ticketing.56     team negotiating with Sony, advanced a plan to split



thE information tEchnology & innovation foundation | novEmbEr 20 09                                               page 19
contactless mobile payments
contactless mobile payments
contactless mobile payments
contactless mobile payments
contactless mobile payments
contactless mobile payments
contactless mobile payments
contactless mobile payments
contactless mobile payments
contactless mobile payments
contactless mobile payments
contactless mobile payments
contactless mobile payments
contactless mobile payments
contactless mobile payments
contactless mobile payments
contactless mobile payments
contactless mobile payments
contactless mobile payments
contactless mobile payments
contactless mobile payments
contactless mobile payments
contactless mobile payments
contactless mobile payments
contactless mobile payments
contactless mobile payments
contactless mobile payments
contactless mobile payments
contactless mobile payments
contactless mobile payments
contactless mobile payments
contactless mobile payments
contactless mobile payments
contactless mobile payments
contactless mobile payments
contactless mobile payments
contactless mobile payments
contactless mobile payments

More Related Content

What's hot

Tecnologías emergentes y la evolución continua de los pagos electrónicos en l...
Tecnologías emergentes y la evolución continua de los pagos electrónicos en l...Tecnologías emergentes y la evolución continua de los pagos electrónicos en l...
Tecnologías emergentes y la evolución continua de los pagos electrónicos en l...Asociación de Marketing Bancario Argentino
 
Mobile Banking – A Transformation of Traditional Banking
Mobile Banking – A Transformation of Traditional BankingMobile Banking – A Transformation of Traditional Banking
Mobile Banking – A Transformation of Traditional BankingInfosys Finacle
 
Mobile payment nfc
Mobile payment nfcMobile payment nfc
Mobile payment nfcJuma Mdaki
 
M-PESA CASE STUDY
M-PESA CASE STUDY M-PESA CASE STUDY
M-PESA CASE STUDY DanielMar18
 
Mobile Payments Reloaded - Ericsson Business Review #3 2008
Mobile Payments Reloaded - Ericsson Business Review #3 2008Mobile Payments Reloaded - Ericsson Business Review #3 2008
Mobile Payments Reloaded - Ericsson Business Review #3 2008Giorgio Andreoli
 
Future of mobile payment and mobile commerce may 2013
Future of mobile payment and mobile commerce may 2013Future of mobile payment and mobile commerce may 2013
Future of mobile payment and mobile commerce may 2013Tarang Shah
 
Best Practices in Risk Management for Mobile Payments - MRC 2011
Best Practices in Risk Management for Mobile Payments - MRC 2011Best Practices in Risk Management for Mobile Payments - MRC 2011
Best Practices in Risk Management for Mobile Payments - MRC 2011Hill Ferguson
 
Swift white paper_mobile_payments
Swift white paper_mobile_paymentsSwift white paper_mobile_payments
Swift white paper_mobile_paymentsRudi Chatab
 
The mobile money movement by mpay connect dec 2010 innovations publication ...
The mobile money movement by mpay connect dec 2010   innovations publication ...The mobile money movement by mpay connect dec 2010   innovations publication ...
The mobile money movement by mpay connect dec 2010 innovations publication ...Menekse Gencer
 
Go mobile with market simplified
Go mobile with market simplifiedGo mobile with market simplified
Go mobile with market simplifiedMarket GoMobile
 
Mobile Money: Banks & Telcos, who’s the Boss?
Mobile Money: Banks & Telcos, who’s the Boss?Mobile Money: Banks & Telcos, who’s the Boss?
Mobile Money: Banks & Telcos, who’s the Boss?Isabelle Berner
 
Sample Report: Global Mobile Payment Methods: Full Year 2015
Sample Report: Global Mobile Payment Methods: Full Year 2015Sample Report: Global Mobile Payment Methods: Full Year 2015
Sample Report: Global Mobile Payment Methods: Full Year 2015yStats.com
 
Mobile Payment Trends 2014
Mobile Payment Trends 2014Mobile Payment Trends 2014
Mobile Payment Trends 2014Martin Gutberlet
 
CPP contactless and mobile payments white paper 2011
CPP contactless and mobile payments white paper 2011CPP contactless and mobile payments white paper 2011
CPP contactless and mobile payments white paper 2011CPPGroup Plc
 
Mobile Money Business Models
Mobile Money Business ModelsMobile Money Business Models
Mobile Money Business ModelsNetHopeOrg
 
Selected Macroeconomic Factors versus Bond Market Development in Nigeria
Selected Macroeconomic Factors versus Bond Market Development in NigeriaSelected Macroeconomic Factors versus Bond Market Development in Nigeria
Selected Macroeconomic Factors versus Bond Market Development in Nigeriainventionjournals
 

What's hot (19)

Tecnologías emergentes y la evolución continua de los pagos electrónicos en l...
Tecnologías emergentes y la evolución continua de los pagos electrónicos en l...Tecnologías emergentes y la evolución continua de los pagos electrónicos en l...
Tecnologías emergentes y la evolución continua de los pagos electrónicos en l...
 
Mobile Banking – A Transformation of Traditional Banking
Mobile Banking – A Transformation of Traditional BankingMobile Banking – A Transformation of Traditional Banking
Mobile Banking – A Transformation of Traditional Banking
 
Mobile payment nfc
Mobile payment nfcMobile payment nfc
Mobile payment nfc
 
M-PESA CASE STUDY
M-PESA CASE STUDY M-PESA CASE STUDY
M-PESA CASE STUDY
 
Mobile Payments Reloaded - Ericsson Business Review #3 2008
Mobile Payments Reloaded - Ericsson Business Review #3 2008Mobile Payments Reloaded - Ericsson Business Review #3 2008
Mobile Payments Reloaded - Ericsson Business Review #3 2008
 
Mobile payment technology 8.11.2014 final
Mobile payment technology 8.11.2014 finalMobile payment technology 8.11.2014 final
Mobile payment technology 8.11.2014 final
 
Future of mobile payment and mobile commerce may 2013
Future of mobile payment and mobile commerce may 2013Future of mobile payment and mobile commerce may 2013
Future of mobile payment and mobile commerce may 2013
 
Best Practices in Risk Management for Mobile Payments - MRC 2011
Best Practices in Risk Management for Mobile Payments - MRC 2011Best Practices in Risk Management for Mobile Payments - MRC 2011
Best Practices in Risk Management for Mobile Payments - MRC 2011
 
Swift white paper_mobile_payments
Swift white paper_mobile_paymentsSwift white paper_mobile_payments
Swift white paper_mobile_payments
 
Report
ReportReport
Report
 
The mobile money movement by mpay connect dec 2010 innovations publication ...
The mobile money movement by mpay connect dec 2010   innovations publication ...The mobile money movement by mpay connect dec 2010   innovations publication ...
The mobile money movement by mpay connect dec 2010 innovations publication ...
 
Go mobile with market simplified
Go mobile with market simplifiedGo mobile with market simplified
Go mobile with market simplified
 
Mobile Money: Banks & Telcos, who’s the Boss?
Mobile Money: Banks & Telcos, who’s the Boss?Mobile Money: Banks & Telcos, who’s the Boss?
Mobile Money: Banks & Telcos, who’s the Boss?
 
Sample Report: Global Mobile Payment Methods: Full Year 2015
Sample Report: Global Mobile Payment Methods: Full Year 2015Sample Report: Global Mobile Payment Methods: Full Year 2015
Sample Report: Global Mobile Payment Methods: Full Year 2015
 
Mobile Finacial Services
Mobile Finacial Services Mobile Finacial Services
Mobile Finacial Services
 
Mobile Payment Trends 2014
Mobile Payment Trends 2014Mobile Payment Trends 2014
Mobile Payment Trends 2014
 
CPP contactless and mobile payments white paper 2011
CPP contactless and mobile payments white paper 2011CPP contactless and mobile payments white paper 2011
CPP contactless and mobile payments white paper 2011
 
Mobile Money Business Models
Mobile Money Business ModelsMobile Money Business Models
Mobile Money Business Models
 
Selected Macroeconomic Factors versus Bond Market Development in Nigeria
Selected Macroeconomic Factors versus Bond Market Development in NigeriaSelected Macroeconomic Factors versus Bond Market Development in Nigeria
Selected Macroeconomic Factors versus Bond Market Development in Nigeria
 

Viewers also liked

Contactless media for urban transport services
Contactless media for urban transport servicesContactless media for urban transport services
Contactless media for urban transport servicesEd Dodds
 
MOBILE COMMERCE INNOVATIONS: NEW IDEAS & RETURNS
MOBILE COMMERCE INNOVATIONS: NEW IDEAS & RETURNSMOBILE COMMERCE INNOVATIONS: NEW IDEAS & RETURNS
MOBILE COMMERCE INNOVATIONS: NEW IDEAS & RETURNSMABSIV
 
Five business case insights on Mobile Money 2011
Five business case insights on Mobile Money 2011Five business case insights on Mobile Money 2011
Five business case insights on Mobile Money 2011CGAP
 
Next Generation Networks for Contactless and Mobile Ticketing
Next Generation Networks for Contactless and Mobile TicketingNext Generation Networks for Contactless and Mobile Ticketing
Next Generation Networks for Contactless and Mobile TicketingFujitsu Network Communications
 
MMT Roadmap for Microfinance
MMT Roadmap for MicrofinanceMMT Roadmap for Microfinance
MMT Roadmap for MicrofinanceJohn Owens
 
The Future of Public Transport Ticketing
The Future of Public Transport TicketingThe Future of Public Transport Ticketing
The Future of Public Transport TicketingMike Burden
 
Mahindra Comviva's Mobile Financial Services Product Suite
Mahindra Comviva's Mobile Financial Services Product SuiteMahindra Comviva's Mobile Financial Services Product Suite
Mahindra Comviva's Mobile Financial Services Product SuiteRuchika Tandon Jha
 
mobiquity®Wallet Social Payments
mobiquity®Wallet Social Paymentsmobiquity®Wallet Social Payments
mobiquity®Wallet Social PaymentsMahindra Comviva
 
Electronic Ticketing System for Public Transport System using NFC Technology
Electronic Ticketing System for Public Transport System using NFC TechnologyElectronic Ticketing System for Public Transport System using NFC Technology
Electronic Ticketing System for Public Transport System using NFC TechnologyPravin Dorugade
 
The State of Mobile Wallet Marketing
The State of Mobile Wallet MarketingThe State of Mobile Wallet Marketing
The State of Mobile Wallet Marketing Urban Airship
 
Smart card system for buses
Smart card system for buses  Smart card system for buses
Smart card system for buses Hashini Senaratne
 
Designing the mobile wallet - A case study
Designing the mobile wallet - A case studyDesigning the mobile wallet - A case study
Designing the mobile wallet - A case studyTim Caynes
 
Transforming the NFC Public Transport Experience from Vision to Reality -- Th...
Transforming the NFC Public Transport Experience from Vision to Reality -- Th...Transforming the NFC Public Transport Experience from Vision to Reality -- Th...
Transforming the NFC Public Transport Experience from Vision to Reality -- Th...NFC Forum
 
Comviva corp
Comviva corpComviva corp
Comviva corpNASSCOM
 

Viewers also liked (20)

Contactless media for urban transport services
Contactless media for urban transport servicesContactless media for urban transport services
Contactless media for urban transport services
 
Session 2.3 - Integrated Transport
Session 2.3 - Integrated TransportSession 2.3 - Integrated Transport
Session 2.3 - Integrated Transport
 
MOBILE COMMERCE INNOVATIONS: NEW IDEAS & RETURNS
MOBILE COMMERCE INNOVATIONS: NEW IDEAS & RETURNSMOBILE COMMERCE INNOVATIONS: NEW IDEAS & RETURNS
MOBILE COMMERCE INNOVATIONS: NEW IDEAS & RETURNS
 
Five business case insights on Mobile Money 2011
Five business case insights on Mobile Money 2011Five business case insights on Mobile Money 2011
Five business case insights on Mobile Money 2011
 
Session 2.4 - Integrated Transport
Session 2.4 - Integrated TransportSession 2.4 - Integrated Transport
Session 2.4 - Integrated Transport
 
Next Generation Networks for Contactless and Mobile Ticketing
Next Generation Networks for Contactless and Mobile TicketingNext Generation Networks for Contactless and Mobile Ticketing
Next Generation Networks for Contactless and Mobile Ticketing
 
MMT Roadmap for Microfinance
MMT Roadmap for MicrofinanceMMT Roadmap for Microfinance
MMT Roadmap for Microfinance
 
The Future of Public Transport Ticketing
The Future of Public Transport TicketingThe Future of Public Transport Ticketing
The Future of Public Transport Ticketing
 
What is Mobile money
What is Mobile moneyWhat is Mobile money
What is Mobile money
 
Mahindra Comviva's Mobile Financial Services Product Suite
Mahindra Comviva's Mobile Financial Services Product SuiteMahindra Comviva's Mobile Financial Services Product Suite
Mahindra Comviva's Mobile Financial Services Product Suite
 
mobiquity®Wallet Social Payments
mobiquity®Wallet Social Paymentsmobiquity®Wallet Social Payments
mobiquity®Wallet Social Payments
 
Electronic Ticketing System for Public Transport System using NFC Technology
Electronic Ticketing System for Public Transport System using NFC TechnologyElectronic Ticketing System for Public Transport System using NFC Technology
Electronic Ticketing System for Public Transport System using NFC Technology
 
The State of Mobile Wallet Marketing
The State of Mobile Wallet MarketingThe State of Mobile Wallet Marketing
The State of Mobile Wallet Marketing
 
The Future of Mobile Wallet Marketing
The Future of Mobile Wallet MarketingThe Future of Mobile Wallet Marketing
The Future of Mobile Wallet Marketing
 
Smart card system for buses
Smart card system for buses  Smart card system for buses
Smart card system for buses
 
Designing the mobile wallet - A case study
Designing the mobile wallet - A case studyDesigning the mobile wallet - A case study
Designing the mobile wallet - A case study
 
Mahindra Comviva 2015
Mahindra Comviva 2015Mahindra Comviva 2015
Mahindra Comviva 2015
 
Transforming the NFC Public Transport Experience from Vision to Reality -- Th...
Transforming the NFC Public Transport Experience from Vision to Reality -- Th...Transforming the NFC Public Transport Experience from Vision to Reality -- Th...
Transforming the NFC Public Transport Experience from Vision to Reality -- Th...
 
Comviva corp
Comviva corpComviva corp
Comviva corp
 
The Minimum Loveable Product
The Minimum Loveable ProductThe Minimum Loveable Product
The Minimum Loveable Product
 

Similar to contactless mobile payments

Mobile Payments: How U.S. Banks Can Deal with Disruptive Change
Mobile Payments: How U.S. Banks Can Deal with Disruptive ChangeMobile Payments: How U.S. Banks Can Deal with Disruptive Change
Mobile Payments: How U.S. Banks Can Deal with Disruptive ChangeCognizant
 
A NEED FOR PEER-TO-PEER STRONG LOCAL AUTHENTICATION PROTOCOL (P2PSLAP) IN MOB...
A NEED FOR PEER-TO-PEER STRONG LOCAL AUTHENTICATION PROTOCOL (P2PSLAP) IN MOB...A NEED FOR PEER-TO-PEER STRONG LOCAL AUTHENTICATION PROTOCOL (P2PSLAP) IN MOB...
A NEED FOR PEER-TO-PEER STRONG LOCAL AUTHENTICATION PROTOCOL (P2PSLAP) IN MOB...IJNSA Journal
 
Mobile Money Business Track: understanding the Model and Market
Mobile Money Business Track: understanding the Model and MarketMobile Money Business Track: understanding the Model and Market
Mobile Money Business Track: understanding the Model and MarketArief Gunawan
 
Mr. Ali Rashid al Mohannadi's presentation at QITCOM 2011
Mr. Ali Rashid al Mohannadi's presentation at QITCOM 2011Mr. Ali Rashid al Mohannadi's presentation at QITCOM 2011
Mr. Ali Rashid al Mohannadi's presentation at QITCOM 2011QITCOM
 
Gearing Up for the Internet of Payments
Gearing Up for the Internet of PaymentsGearing Up for the Internet of Payments
Gearing Up for the Internet of PaymentsCognizant
 
A STRATEGIC FRAMEWORK FOR MOBILE PAYMENTS
A STRATEGIC FRAMEWORK FOR MOBILE PAYMENTSA STRATEGIC FRAMEWORK FOR MOBILE PAYMENTS
A STRATEGIC FRAMEWORK FOR MOBILE PAYMENTSIJMIT JOURNAL
 
Strategic framework for mobile payments
Strategic framework for mobile paymentsStrategic framework for mobile payments
Strategic framework for mobile paymentsIJMIT JOURNAL
 
The Internet of Things: A Prime Opportunity for Merchant Acquirers
The Internet of Things: A Prime Opportunity for Merchant AcquirersThe Internet of Things: A Prime Opportunity for Merchant Acquirers
The Internet of Things: A Prime Opportunity for Merchant AcquirersCognizant
 
Sybase Mobile Commerce Guide 2011_Global Opportunities for Financial Institut...
Sybase Mobile Commerce Guide 2011_Global Opportunities for Financial Institut...Sybase Mobile Commerce Guide 2011_Global Opportunities for Financial Institut...
Sybase Mobile Commerce Guide 2011_Global Opportunities for Financial Institut...Diarmuid Mallon
 
CASHLESS SOCIETY: DRIVE’S AND CHALLENGES IN NIGERIA
CASHLESS SOCIETY: DRIVE’S AND CHALLENGES IN NIGERIACASHLESS SOCIETY: DRIVE’S AND CHALLENGES IN NIGERIA
CASHLESS SOCIETY: DRIVE’S AND CHALLENGES IN NIGERIAijistjournal
 
Emerging technology trends that could transform the way financial transaction...
Emerging technology trends that could transform the way financial transaction...Emerging technology trends that could transform the way financial transaction...
Emerging technology trends that could transform the way financial transaction...Alexander Decker
 
Payments & Infrastructure - Part II. Verifone
Payments & Infrastructure - Part II. VerifonePayments & Infrastructure - Part II. Verifone
Payments & Infrastructure - Part II. VerifoneOliver Grave
 
Payments(paa s) – the new mantra and trends
Payments(paa s) – the new mantra and trendsPayments(paa s) – the new mantra and trends
Payments(paa s) – the new mantra and trendsRamesh Kumar Nanjundaiya
 
Information Has Become An Invaluable Resource
Information Has Become An Invaluable ResourceInformation Has Become An Invaluable Resource
Information Has Become An Invaluable ResourceHeather Beninati
 
Payments 2020: Banks & Payments
Payments 2020: Banks & PaymentsPayments 2020: Banks & Payments
Payments 2020: Banks & PaymentsMohit Kant
 
FIN TECH INDUSTRY.pptx
FIN TECH INDUSTRY.pptxFIN TECH INDUSTRY.pptx
FIN TECH INDUSTRY.pptxMuhammed785214
 
The mobile banking and payment revolution1 b37fc319 e15f-46c8-b2f9-c0d4c8327285
The mobile banking and payment revolution1 b37fc319 e15f-46c8-b2f9-c0d4c8327285The mobile banking and payment revolution1 b37fc319 e15f-46c8-b2f9-c0d4c8327285
The mobile banking and payment revolution1 b37fc319 e15f-46c8-b2f9-c0d4c8327285Sumit Roy
 
HCE_and_SIM_Secure_Element
HCE_and_SIM_Secure_ElementHCE_and_SIM_Secure_Element
HCE_and_SIM_Secure_ElementNick Norman
 
Trends Transforming Cross-Border Payments
Trends Transforming Cross-Border PaymentsTrends Transforming Cross-Border Payments
Trends Transforming Cross-Border PaymentsShikha Bhatia
 

Similar to contactless mobile payments (20)

Mobile Payments: How U.S. Banks Can Deal with Disruptive Change
Mobile Payments: How U.S. Banks Can Deal with Disruptive ChangeMobile Payments: How U.S. Banks Can Deal with Disruptive Change
Mobile Payments: How U.S. Banks Can Deal with Disruptive Change
 
A NEED FOR PEER-TO-PEER STRONG LOCAL AUTHENTICATION PROTOCOL (P2PSLAP) IN MOB...
A NEED FOR PEER-TO-PEER STRONG LOCAL AUTHENTICATION PROTOCOL (P2PSLAP) IN MOB...A NEED FOR PEER-TO-PEER STRONG LOCAL AUTHENTICATION PROTOCOL (P2PSLAP) IN MOB...
A NEED FOR PEER-TO-PEER STRONG LOCAL AUTHENTICATION PROTOCOL (P2PSLAP) IN MOB...
 
Mobile Money Business Track: understanding the Model and Market
Mobile Money Business Track: understanding the Model and MarketMobile Money Business Track: understanding the Model and Market
Mobile Money Business Track: understanding the Model and Market
 
Mr. Ali Rashid al Mohannadi's presentation at QITCOM 2011
Mr. Ali Rashid al Mohannadi's presentation at QITCOM 2011Mr. Ali Rashid al Mohannadi's presentation at QITCOM 2011
Mr. Ali Rashid al Mohannadi's presentation at QITCOM 2011
 
Gearing Up for the Internet of Payments
Gearing Up for the Internet of PaymentsGearing Up for the Internet of Payments
Gearing Up for the Internet of Payments
 
A STRATEGIC FRAMEWORK FOR MOBILE PAYMENTS
A STRATEGIC FRAMEWORK FOR MOBILE PAYMENTSA STRATEGIC FRAMEWORK FOR MOBILE PAYMENTS
A STRATEGIC FRAMEWORK FOR MOBILE PAYMENTS
 
Strategic framework for mobile payments
Strategic framework for mobile paymentsStrategic framework for mobile payments
Strategic framework for mobile payments
 
The Internet of Things: A Prime Opportunity for Merchant Acquirers
The Internet of Things: A Prime Opportunity for Merchant AcquirersThe Internet of Things: A Prime Opportunity for Merchant Acquirers
The Internet of Things: A Prime Opportunity for Merchant Acquirers
 
Sybase Mobile Commerce Guide 2011_Global Opportunities for Financial Institut...
Sybase Mobile Commerce Guide 2011_Global Opportunities for Financial Institut...Sybase Mobile Commerce Guide 2011_Global Opportunities for Financial Institut...
Sybase Mobile Commerce Guide 2011_Global Opportunities for Financial Institut...
 
CASHLESS SOCIETY: DRIVE’S AND CHALLENGES IN NIGERIA
CASHLESS SOCIETY: DRIVE’S AND CHALLENGES IN NIGERIACASHLESS SOCIETY: DRIVE’S AND CHALLENGES IN NIGERIA
CASHLESS SOCIETY: DRIVE’S AND CHALLENGES IN NIGERIA
 
Emerging technology trends that could transform the way financial transaction...
Emerging technology trends that could transform the way financial transaction...Emerging technology trends that could transform the way financial transaction...
Emerging technology trends that could transform the way financial transaction...
 
Payments & Infrastructure - Part II. Verifone
Payments & Infrastructure - Part II. VerifonePayments & Infrastructure - Part II. Verifone
Payments & Infrastructure - Part II. Verifone
 
PaymentsWhitePaper
PaymentsWhitePaperPaymentsWhitePaper
PaymentsWhitePaper
 
Payments(paa s) – the new mantra and trends
Payments(paa s) – the new mantra and trendsPayments(paa s) – the new mantra and trends
Payments(paa s) – the new mantra and trends
 
Information Has Become An Invaluable Resource
Information Has Become An Invaluable ResourceInformation Has Become An Invaluable Resource
Information Has Become An Invaluable Resource
 
Payments 2020: Banks & Payments
Payments 2020: Banks & PaymentsPayments 2020: Banks & Payments
Payments 2020: Banks & Payments
 
FIN TECH INDUSTRY.pptx
FIN TECH INDUSTRY.pptxFIN TECH INDUSTRY.pptx
FIN TECH INDUSTRY.pptx
 
The mobile banking and payment revolution1 b37fc319 e15f-46c8-b2f9-c0d4c8327285
The mobile banking and payment revolution1 b37fc319 e15f-46c8-b2f9-c0d4c8327285The mobile banking and payment revolution1 b37fc319 e15f-46c8-b2f9-c0d4c8327285
The mobile banking and payment revolution1 b37fc319 e15f-46c8-b2f9-c0d4c8327285
 
HCE_and_SIM_Secure_Element
HCE_and_SIM_Secure_ElementHCE_and_SIM_Secure_Element
HCE_and_SIM_Secure_Element
 
Trends Transforming Cross-Border Payments
Trends Transforming Cross-Border PaymentsTrends Transforming Cross-Border Payments
Trends Transforming Cross-Border Payments
 

More from Boni

beacon summit berlin, boni presentation about mall solution, merchant app, an...
beacon summit berlin, boni presentation about mall solution, merchant app, an...beacon summit berlin, boni presentation about mall solution, merchant app, an...
beacon summit berlin, boni presentation about mall solution, merchant app, an...Boni
 
Boni
BoniBoni
BoniBoni
 
Webinar presentation-for-web
Webinar presentation-for-webWebinar presentation-for-web
Webinar presentation-for-webBoni
 
Epc mobile payments whitepaper
Epc mobile payments whitepaperEpc mobile payments whitepaper
Epc mobile payments whitepaperBoni
 
Mobile learning transforming the delivery of education and training
Mobile learning transforming the delivery of education and trainingMobile learning transforming the delivery of education and training
Mobile learning transforming the delivery of education and trainingBoni
 
Mobile phone - The new way to pay
Mobile phone - The new way to payMobile phone - The new way to pay
Mobile phone - The new way to payBoni
 
Mobile Money Definitions
Mobile Money DefinitionsMobile Money Definitions
Mobile Money DefinitionsBoni
 
The unwired continent - africas mobile success story
The unwired continent - africas mobile success storyThe unwired continent - africas mobile success story
The unwired continent - africas mobile success storyBoni
 
Role of icts as enabler for agriculture and small scale farmers
Role of icts as enabler for agriculture and small scale farmersRole of icts as enabler for agriculture and small scale farmers
Role of icts as enabler for agriculture and small scale farmersBoni
 
Organic business guide developing sustainable value chains with smallholders
Organic business guide   developing sustainable value chains with smallholdersOrganic business guide   developing sustainable value chains with smallholders
Organic business guide developing sustainable value chains with smallholdersBoni
 
Livelihood changes enabled by mobile phones the case of tanzanian fishermen
Livelihood changes enabled by mobile phones   the case of tanzanian fishermenLivelihood changes enabled by mobile phones   the case of tanzanian fishermen
Livelihood changes enabled by mobile phones the case of tanzanian fishermenBoni
 
Inventory of innovative farmer advisory services using ic ts
Inventory of innovative farmer advisory services using ic tsInventory of innovative farmer advisory services using ic ts
Inventory of innovative farmer advisory services using ic tsBoni
 
E agriculture - a definition and profile of its application
E agriculture - a definition and profile of its applicationE agriculture - a definition and profile of its application
E agriculture - a definition and profile of its applicationBoni
 
Do sustainable livelihoods approaches have a positive impact of the rural poo...
Do sustainable livelihoods approaches have a positive impact of the rural poo...Do sustainable livelihoods approaches have a positive impact of the rural poo...
Do sustainable livelihoods approaches have a positive impact of the rural poo...Boni
 
smart card alliance - mobile payment business model research report on stakeh...
smart card alliance - mobile payment business model research report on stakeh...smart card alliance - mobile payment business model research report on stakeh...
smart card alliance - mobile payment business model research report on stakeh...Boni
 
near field interactions with the internet of things
near field interactions with the internet of thingsnear field interactions with the internet of things
near field interactions with the internet of thingsBoni
 
contactless commerce enables a world beyond payment cards
contactless commerce enables a world beyond payment cardscontactless commerce enables a world beyond payment cards
contactless commerce enables a world beyond payment cardsBoni
 
a manifesto for networked objects — cohabiting with pigeons, arphids and aibo...
a manifesto for networked objects — cohabiting with pigeons, arphids and aibo...a manifesto for networked objects — cohabiting with pigeons, arphids and aibo...
a manifesto for networked objects — cohabiting with pigeons, arphids and aibo...Boni
 
bell dourish-yesterdays tomorrows - notes on ubiuitous computings dominant vi...
bell dourish-yesterdays tomorrows - notes on ubiuitous computings dominant vi...bell dourish-yesterdays tomorrows - notes on ubiuitous computings dominant vi...
bell dourish-yesterdays tomorrows - notes on ubiuitous computings dominant vi...Boni
 
smart card alliance - proximity mobile payments - leveraging nfc and the cont...
smart card alliance - proximity mobile payments - leveraging nfc and the cont...smart card alliance - proximity mobile payments - leveraging nfc and the cont...
smart card alliance - proximity mobile payments - leveraging nfc and the cont...Boni
 

More from Boni (20)

beacon summit berlin, boni presentation about mall solution, merchant app, an...
beacon summit berlin, boni presentation about mall solution, merchant app, an...beacon summit berlin, boni presentation about mall solution, merchant app, an...
beacon summit berlin, boni presentation about mall solution, merchant app, an...
 
Boni
BoniBoni
Boni
 
Webinar presentation-for-web
Webinar presentation-for-webWebinar presentation-for-web
Webinar presentation-for-web
 
Epc mobile payments whitepaper
Epc mobile payments whitepaperEpc mobile payments whitepaper
Epc mobile payments whitepaper
 
Mobile learning transforming the delivery of education and training
Mobile learning transforming the delivery of education and trainingMobile learning transforming the delivery of education and training
Mobile learning transforming the delivery of education and training
 
Mobile phone - The new way to pay
Mobile phone - The new way to payMobile phone - The new way to pay
Mobile phone - The new way to pay
 
Mobile Money Definitions
Mobile Money DefinitionsMobile Money Definitions
Mobile Money Definitions
 
The unwired continent - africas mobile success story
The unwired continent - africas mobile success storyThe unwired continent - africas mobile success story
The unwired continent - africas mobile success story
 
Role of icts as enabler for agriculture and small scale farmers
Role of icts as enabler for agriculture and small scale farmersRole of icts as enabler for agriculture and small scale farmers
Role of icts as enabler for agriculture and small scale farmers
 
Organic business guide developing sustainable value chains with smallholders
Organic business guide   developing sustainable value chains with smallholdersOrganic business guide   developing sustainable value chains with smallholders
Organic business guide developing sustainable value chains with smallholders
 
Livelihood changes enabled by mobile phones the case of tanzanian fishermen
Livelihood changes enabled by mobile phones   the case of tanzanian fishermenLivelihood changes enabled by mobile phones   the case of tanzanian fishermen
Livelihood changes enabled by mobile phones the case of tanzanian fishermen
 
Inventory of innovative farmer advisory services using ic ts
Inventory of innovative farmer advisory services using ic tsInventory of innovative farmer advisory services using ic ts
Inventory of innovative farmer advisory services using ic ts
 
E agriculture - a definition and profile of its application
E agriculture - a definition and profile of its applicationE agriculture - a definition and profile of its application
E agriculture - a definition and profile of its application
 
Do sustainable livelihoods approaches have a positive impact of the rural poo...
Do sustainable livelihoods approaches have a positive impact of the rural poo...Do sustainable livelihoods approaches have a positive impact of the rural poo...
Do sustainable livelihoods approaches have a positive impact of the rural poo...
 
smart card alliance - mobile payment business model research report on stakeh...
smart card alliance - mobile payment business model research report on stakeh...smart card alliance - mobile payment business model research report on stakeh...
smart card alliance - mobile payment business model research report on stakeh...
 
near field interactions with the internet of things
near field interactions with the internet of thingsnear field interactions with the internet of things
near field interactions with the internet of things
 
contactless commerce enables a world beyond payment cards
contactless commerce enables a world beyond payment cardscontactless commerce enables a world beyond payment cards
contactless commerce enables a world beyond payment cards
 
a manifesto for networked objects — cohabiting with pigeons, arphids and aibo...
a manifesto for networked objects — cohabiting with pigeons, arphids and aibo...a manifesto for networked objects — cohabiting with pigeons, arphids and aibo...
a manifesto for networked objects — cohabiting with pigeons, arphids and aibo...
 
bell dourish-yesterdays tomorrows - notes on ubiuitous computings dominant vi...
bell dourish-yesterdays tomorrows - notes on ubiuitous computings dominant vi...bell dourish-yesterdays tomorrows - notes on ubiuitous computings dominant vi...
bell dourish-yesterdays tomorrows - notes on ubiuitous computings dominant vi...
 
smart card alliance - proximity mobile payments - leveraging nfc and the cont...
smart card alliance - proximity mobile payments - leveraging nfc and the cont...smart card alliance - proximity mobile payments - leveraging nfc and the cont...
smart card alliance - proximity mobile payments - leveraging nfc and the cont...
 

Recently uploaded

0311 National Accounts Online Giving Trends.pdf
0311 National Accounts Online Giving Trends.pdf0311 National Accounts Online Giving Trends.pdf
0311 National Accounts Online Giving Trends.pdfBloomerang
 
A Case Study On SQUARE GROUP Bangladesh.pdf
A Case Study On SQUARE GROUP Bangladesh.pdfA Case Study On SQUARE GROUP Bangladesh.pdf
A Case Study On SQUARE GROUP Bangladesh.pdfmeftaul987
 
L-1 VISA Business (Plan Sample) - Plan Writers
L-1 VISA Business (Plan Sample) - Plan WritersL-1 VISA Business (Plan Sample) - Plan Writers
L-1 VISA Business (Plan Sample) - Plan WritersPlan Writers
 
Meet Raj Shamani: A Trailblazing Entrepreneur
Meet Raj Shamani: A Trailblazing EntrepreneurMeet Raj Shamani: A Trailblazing Entrepreneur
Meet Raj Shamani: A Trailblazing Entrepreneurramya202104
 
Presented by Sabri international .......
Presented by Sabri international .......Presented by Sabri international .......
Presented by Sabri international .......SABRI INTERNATIONAL
 
3BBE: THE FUTURE OF ECOMMERCE PRESENTATION - LOUIS MALAYBALAY
3BBE: THE FUTURE OF ECOMMERCE PRESENTATION - LOUIS MALAYBALAY3BBE: THE FUTURE OF ECOMMERCE PRESENTATION - LOUIS MALAYBALAY
3BBE: THE FUTURE OF ECOMMERCE PRESENTATION - LOUIS MALAYBALAYLouis Malaybalay
 
HOW TO START EARNING WITH AFFILIATE MARKETING
HOW TO START EARNING WITH AFFILIATE MARKETINGHOW TO START EARNING WITH AFFILIATE MARKETING
HOW TO START EARNING WITH AFFILIATE MARKETINGNATHAN SPEAKS
 
AirOxi - Pioneering Aquaculture Advancements Through NFDB Empanelment.pptx
AirOxi -  Pioneering Aquaculture Advancements Through NFDB Empanelment.pptxAirOxi -  Pioneering Aquaculture Advancements Through NFDB Empanelment.pptx
AirOxi - Pioneering Aquaculture Advancements Through NFDB Empanelment.pptxAirOxi Tube
 
CORPORATE SOCIAL RESPONSIBILITY - FINAL REQUIREMENT.pdf
CORPORATE SOCIAL RESPONSIBILITY - FINAL REQUIREMENT.pdfCORPORATE SOCIAL RESPONSIBILITY - FINAL REQUIREMENT.pdf
CORPORATE SOCIAL RESPONSIBILITY - FINAL REQUIREMENT.pdfLouis Malaybalay
 
EPC Contractors aspects Presentation.pdf
EPC Contractors  aspects Presentation.pdfEPC Contractors  aspects Presentation.pdf
EPC Contractors aspects Presentation.pdfGiuseppe Tommasone
 
NewBase 14 March 2024 Energy News issue - 1707 by Khaled Al Awadi_compress...
NewBase  14 March  2024  Energy News issue - 1707 by Khaled Al Awadi_compress...NewBase  14 March  2024  Energy News issue - 1707 by Khaled Al Awadi_compress...
NewBase 14 March 2024 Energy News issue - 1707 by Khaled Al Awadi_compress...Khaled Al Awadi
 
Pitch Deck Teardown: SuperScale's $5.4M Series A deck
Pitch Deck Teardown: SuperScale's $5.4M Series A deckPitch Deck Teardown: SuperScale's $5.4M Series A deck
Pitch Deck Teardown: SuperScale's $5.4M Series A deckHajeJanKamps
 
The Vietnam Believer_Newsletter_Vol.001_Mar12 2024
The Vietnam Believer_Newsletter_Vol.001_Mar12 2024The Vietnam Believer_Newsletter_Vol.001_Mar12 2024
The Vietnam Believer_Newsletter_Vol.001_Mar12 2024believeminhh
 
NVIDIA's overall business overview Presentation.pptx
NVIDIA's overall business overview Presentation.pptxNVIDIA's overall business overview Presentation.pptx
NVIDIA's overall business overview Presentation.pptxKrutik Rakade
 
Shravan Kumaran and sanjay kumaran.pdf..
Shravan Kumaran and sanjay kumaran.pdf..Shravan Kumaran and sanjay kumaran.pdf..
Shravan Kumaran and sanjay kumaran.pdf..ranjithapriya2
 
We are inviting you on board, to move forward together in the Right Direction
We are inviting you on board, to move forward together in the Right DirectionWe are inviting you on board, to move forward together in the Right Direction
We are inviting you on board, to move forward together in the Right DirectionRight Direction Aero
 
CXO 2.0 Conference (Event Information Deck | Dec'24-Mar'25)
CXO 2.0 Conference (Event Information Deck | Dec'24-Mar'25)CXO 2.0 Conference (Event Information Deck | Dec'24-Mar'25)
CXO 2.0 Conference (Event Information Deck | Dec'24-Mar'25)CXO 2.0 Conference
 
Dashboards y paneles - CP Home - Area de Operaciones
Dashboards y paneles - CP Home - Area de OperacionesDashboards y paneles - CP Home - Area de Operaciones
Dashboards y paneles - CP Home - Area de OperacionesLPI ONG
 
Reframing Requirements: A Strategic Approach to Requirement Definition, with ...
Reframing Requirements: A Strategic Approach to Requirement Definition, with ...Reframing Requirements: A Strategic Approach to Requirement Definition, with ...
Reframing Requirements: A Strategic Approach to Requirement Definition, with ...Jake Truemper
 

Recently uploaded (20)

0311 National Accounts Online Giving Trends.pdf
0311 National Accounts Online Giving Trends.pdf0311 National Accounts Online Giving Trends.pdf
0311 National Accounts Online Giving Trends.pdf
 
A Case Study On SQUARE GROUP Bangladesh.pdf
A Case Study On SQUARE GROUP Bangladesh.pdfA Case Study On SQUARE GROUP Bangladesh.pdf
A Case Study On SQUARE GROUP Bangladesh.pdf
 
L-1 VISA Business (Plan Sample) - Plan Writers
L-1 VISA Business (Plan Sample) - Plan WritersL-1 VISA Business (Plan Sample) - Plan Writers
L-1 VISA Business (Plan Sample) - Plan Writers
 
Meet Raj Shamani: A Trailblazing Entrepreneur
Meet Raj Shamani: A Trailblazing EntrepreneurMeet Raj Shamani: A Trailblazing Entrepreneur
Meet Raj Shamani: A Trailblazing Entrepreneur
 
Presented by Sabri international .......
Presented by Sabri international .......Presented by Sabri international .......
Presented by Sabri international .......
 
3BBE: THE FUTURE OF ECOMMERCE PRESENTATION - LOUIS MALAYBALAY
3BBE: THE FUTURE OF ECOMMERCE PRESENTATION - LOUIS MALAYBALAY3BBE: THE FUTURE OF ECOMMERCE PRESENTATION - LOUIS MALAYBALAY
3BBE: THE FUTURE OF ECOMMERCE PRESENTATION - LOUIS MALAYBALAY
 
HOW TO START EARNING WITH AFFILIATE MARKETING
HOW TO START EARNING WITH AFFILIATE MARKETINGHOW TO START EARNING WITH AFFILIATE MARKETING
HOW TO START EARNING WITH AFFILIATE MARKETING
 
AirOxi - Pioneering Aquaculture Advancements Through NFDB Empanelment.pptx
AirOxi -  Pioneering Aquaculture Advancements Through NFDB Empanelment.pptxAirOxi -  Pioneering Aquaculture Advancements Through NFDB Empanelment.pptx
AirOxi - Pioneering Aquaculture Advancements Through NFDB Empanelment.pptx
 
CORPORATE SOCIAL RESPONSIBILITY - FINAL REQUIREMENT.pdf
CORPORATE SOCIAL RESPONSIBILITY - FINAL REQUIREMENT.pdfCORPORATE SOCIAL RESPONSIBILITY - FINAL REQUIREMENT.pdf
CORPORATE SOCIAL RESPONSIBILITY - FINAL REQUIREMENT.pdf
 
EPC Contractors aspects Presentation.pdf
EPC Contractors  aspects Presentation.pdfEPC Contractors  aspects Presentation.pdf
EPC Contractors aspects Presentation.pdf
 
NewBase 14 March 2024 Energy News issue - 1707 by Khaled Al Awadi_compress...
NewBase  14 March  2024  Energy News issue - 1707 by Khaled Al Awadi_compress...NewBase  14 March  2024  Energy News issue - 1707 by Khaled Al Awadi_compress...
NewBase 14 March 2024 Energy News issue - 1707 by Khaled Al Awadi_compress...
 
Pitch Deck Teardown: SuperScale's $5.4M Series A deck
Pitch Deck Teardown: SuperScale's $5.4M Series A deckPitch Deck Teardown: SuperScale's $5.4M Series A deck
Pitch Deck Teardown: SuperScale's $5.4M Series A deck
 
The Vietnam Believer_Newsletter_Vol.001_Mar12 2024
The Vietnam Believer_Newsletter_Vol.001_Mar12 2024The Vietnam Believer_Newsletter_Vol.001_Mar12 2024
The Vietnam Believer_Newsletter_Vol.001_Mar12 2024
 
NVIDIA's overall business overview Presentation.pptx
NVIDIA's overall business overview Presentation.pptxNVIDIA's overall business overview Presentation.pptx
NVIDIA's overall business overview Presentation.pptx
 
Shravan Kumaran and sanjay kumaran.pdf..
Shravan Kumaran and sanjay kumaran.pdf..Shravan Kumaran and sanjay kumaran.pdf..
Shravan Kumaran and sanjay kumaran.pdf..
 
We are inviting you on board, to move forward together in the Right Direction
We are inviting you on board, to move forward together in the Right DirectionWe are inviting you on board, to move forward together in the Right Direction
We are inviting you on board, to move forward together in the Right Direction
 
CXO 2.0 Conference (Event Information Deck | Dec'24-Mar'25)
CXO 2.0 Conference (Event Information Deck | Dec'24-Mar'25)CXO 2.0 Conference (Event Information Deck | Dec'24-Mar'25)
CXO 2.0 Conference (Event Information Deck | Dec'24-Mar'25)
 
Dashboards y paneles - CP Home - Area de Operaciones
Dashboards y paneles - CP Home - Area de OperacionesDashboards y paneles - CP Home - Area de Operaciones
Dashboards y paneles - CP Home - Area de Operaciones
 
WAM Corporate Presentation Mar 12 2024_Video.pdf
WAM Corporate Presentation Mar 12 2024_Video.pdfWAM Corporate Presentation Mar 12 2024_Video.pdf
WAM Corporate Presentation Mar 12 2024_Video.pdf
 
Reframing Requirements: A Strategic Approach to Requirement Definition, with ...
Reframing Requirements: A Strategic Approach to Requirement Definition, with ...Reframing Requirements: A Strategic Approach to Requirement Definition, with ...
Reframing Requirements: A Strategic Approach to Requirement Definition, with ...
 

contactless mobile payments

  • 1. Expl aining intErnational it application lEadErship: Contactless Mobile Payments Ste phe n E z e ll | No v e m b e r 2 0 0 9
  • 3. Explaining International IT Application Leaderhip: Contactless Mobile Payments Stephen Ezell ITIF The Information Technology & Innovation Foundation November 2009
  • 4. T h E I N f o r m aT I o N T E c h N o l o g y & I N N o v aT I o N f o u N d aT I o N Executive Summary: Contactless Mobile Payments M obile payments systems (e.g., using a cell phone as an elec- tronic “wallet”) promise significantly increased economic Mobile payments will productivity and personal convenience. But unlike many benefit the economy and society by increasing new applications that require only an enterprising firm to develop it, productivity through the widespread deployment and adoption of mobile payments systems enhancing operational requires action from a complex ecosystem of organizations (e.g., mo- efficiencies, enabling a bile phone service providers, banks, retailers and others) to create a range of innovative new mobile payments system. Because of this, only a few nations, notably business models, and Japan and South Korea, have been able to coordinate the complex eco- pushing distributed system required to extensively deploy a widely used mobile payments computing intelligence system. In contrast, most other nations, including the United States, into the physical world. lag far behind. For lagging nations to take full advantage of the op- portunities of mobile payments, they will need to develop and adopt national mobile payments strategies. This study examines which countries quency identification (RFID) technol- lead in deploying and adopting contact- ogy, which enables secure wireless data less mobile payments, finding Japan and transmission over short ranges between South Korea the world leaders; surveys electronic devices. In combination with the development of contactless mobile an embedded electronic wallet on a mo- payments in the United States; analyzes bile phone or smart card, NFC makes the non-policy and policy factors that possible a wide range of transformative explain how leading countries attained monetary and non-monetary transac- their leadership position; and offers a set tions. An electronic wallet is a multi- of recommendations to policymakers, functional device possessing cash, targeted to those in the United States information storage and transaction, but applicable globally, who wish to pro- identification and authentication, and mote contactless mobile payments. communication functions. Electronic wallets empower mobile phones and Contactless payments leverage near smart cards to fully replicate physical field communication (NFC) technol- wallets, with the ability to make con- ogy, a specific standard of radio-fre- tactless payments; to capture and trans-
  • 5. mit data like transit, movie, or parking tickets; to check players—including mobile network operators (MNOs), in to offices, schools, or airport gates; and to store and handset manufacturers, financial institutions including present identification credentials. Whereas a decade major banks and credit card issuers, merchants, pub- ago this technology was not quite ready—the contact- lic transit authorities, government agencies, third party less microchips and mobile phones were not adequate, application providers, and consumers—whose success lacking sufficient memory and processing power—the is dependent on joint action by all the players together technology has matured substantially over the past at the same time. Everyone must act collaboratively in decade in accordance with Moore’s Law to the point the ecosystem simultaneously, but this is not something where electronic wallets, NFC-capable phones, and at which markets tend to be very good. As such, there NFC-enabled point-of-sale (POS) terminals are now are two central challenges: a chicken-or-egg terminal/ ready for full-scale implementation and use. handset adoption challenge and a business model chal- lenge. Mobile payments are about much more than mere credit card substitution; rather, they represent a trans- First, for consumers to demand electronic wallet- formative digital application that will benefit con- enabled mobile phones—and thus, critically, for the sumers, merchants, and the economy and society MNOs to require this feature from handset manufac- at large. Mobile wallets will enhance consumer con- turers (and pay for it, since MNOs subsidize consumer venience through the potential to replace a litany of handsets)—consumers must know that a sufficiently artifacts of analog life designed to convey money or deployed infrastructure exists at merchant point-of-sale information—credit cards, loyalty cards, transit cards, (POS) terminals; at fare readers in metro subways and ID cards, keys, key fobs, tickets, passes, etc.—with a buses; at airports, parking garages, and movie theatres; single, more powerful digital device. Moreover, mobile in automated devices such as vending machines; and in payments will benefit the economy by driving a range a host of other places where the feature can be used. of productivity improvements through: 1) bringing However, merchants, transit operators and others hav- operational efficiencies to merchants, retailers, transit ing to incur the costs of deploying the NFC-enabled authorities and others engaged in routinized monetary reader terminals are not likely to do so until a critical or information transactions; 2) enabling a range of in- mass of users gives them confidence that their invest- novative new business models and service offerings; ments will be repaid. This “chicken-or-egg” paradox and 3) pushing distributed computing intelligence into exacerbates a related challenge: Each party in the eco- the physical world. system wants a clearly articulated business model for how it can monetize mobile payments investments To ensure digital prosperity, nations need to support before moving forward, meaning players will not act the development of key digital platforms such as broad- unless the financial incentives and value propositions band, health IT, and a smart grid. Just like these digital are clearly understood beforehand. These system inter- platforms, a national mobile payments infrastructure dependency challenges must be solved in each country is a key platform from which a proliferation of cre- wishing to realize contactless mobile payments, and ative applications and uses will likely develop, many of government can play a key role in helping to resolve which are difficult to even imagine today, but which them. will continue to create new business opportunities, in- crease productivity, and drive economic growth. Japan and South Korea have had the most success solv- ing these challenges; they clearly lead the world in terms Notwithstanding the enormous potential, countries of per-capita number of contactless-enabled mobile can’t just snap their fingers and put a mobile payments phones and POS terminals deployed, the total number infrastructure in place or expect that because the tech- of contactless transactions, and market value of con- nology is now ready the private sector will simply de- tactless payments. In Japan, 17 million citizens make ploy it. The reason is that mobile payments are not like contactless mobile payments from their cell phones, other industries where a company need only acquire with 65 million regularly using contactless smart cards, requisite inputs, manufacture a product or design a ser- and 73 percent of mobile phones having electronic wal- vice, and sell it on the market. Mobile payments entail a let capability. In South Korea, close to 4 million citizens complex, system-interdependent ecosystem with many use their mobile phones to make contactless payments, thE information tEchnology & innovation foundation | novEmbEr 20 09 page 2
  • 6. with 12 million phones having the capability to do tant roles in facilitating the collaborative development so. Thirty-three million contactless transactions are of their countries’ mobile payments ecosystems. made daily using either smart cards or mobile phones in South Korea. While the United States has made Japan’s government played a vital, if behind-the- some progress in fielding NFC-enabled credit cards scenes, role in furnishing overall direction and moti- and POS machines, virtually no mobile phones are vating the activity of key actors in Japan’s mobile pay- equipped with NFC-enabled electronic wallets. ments marketplace, particularly in subtly pressuring DOCOMO to lead a collaborative ecosystem in which What explains why Japan and South Korea are so far it “would not abuse its market power.” The govern- ahead of the United States (and other countries)? Cer- ment’s conscientious strategy to facilitate develop- tainly some non-policy factors play a role. Both South ment of a collaborative mobile payments ecosystem Korea and Japan are countries with gadget-loving was made easier by the fact that it owns or had owned mobile cultures that enjoy being first movers in in- two crucial players in that ecosystem, DOCOMO and novative mobile technologies. Certainly, their densely JR East. In South Korea, the government organized packed urban populations, heavily reliant on mass and hosted formal meetings between carriers and transit, provided a critical mass of captive users across banks to facilitate standards setting and itself became which the research and development cost of contact- an early adopter of mobile payments systems because less electronic wallet technology could be amortized it recognized that, “positive government commitment and a market brought to scale. In both countries, the to support mobile payments is required because many dominant mobile operator stepped forward to lead a technical issues are closely related to government poli- vertically integrated mobile payments ecosystem— cy and strategy.” Singapore’s Infocomm Development NTT DOCOMO in Japan and SK Telecom in South Authority (the government’s information-technology Korea—although unlike DOCOMO’s successful in- promotion agency) formed a roundtable group of troduction of the osaifu-keitai (mobile wallet) in 2004, banks, mobile network operators, and transit compa- SK Telecom’s Moneta service met with middling suc- nies with the intent of developing a national plan for cess, and seems to have been supplanted by T-Money, the introduction of NFC-enabled commerce. Recog- launched by the public-private partnership Korea nizing that developing a fully interoperable NFC en- Smart Card Company. vironment would generate a market size eight times larger than a non-interoperable environment, Sin- But while non-policy factors are important, policy gapore has elected to create a national trusted third factors, including a conscious role for government to party to ensure full interoperability between the NFC guide mobile payments ecosystems and a corporate services of all mobile operators and service providers. business climate oriented towards longer-term invest- Even the United Kingdom has recognized that gov- ment strategy and receptive to collaborative public ernment must become explicitly involved in advocat- private partnerships, appear to play an indispensable ing for and helping to foster mobile payments capabil- role in explaining countries’ mobile payments leader- ity. The UK Department of Transport’s 2009 Smart ship. and Integrated Ticketing Strategy envisions universal coverage of a smart ticketing infrastructure for all UK Perhaps the single most important reason why Japan public transport, finding that the use of contactless and South Korea lead the world in mobile payments ticketing technologies such as NFC could save the is that transit authorities, card issuers, and mobile country up to £2 billion annually. operators in those countries came together to collab- oratively create a common electronic wallet capability Each of these countries has clearly demonstrated that for smart cards and NFC-enabled smart phones. But governments can play critical roles in facilitating de- private sector actors did not just decide to do this on velopment of their mobile payments ecosystems. Gov- their own (and, by definition, the involvement of tran- ernments can play the following roles: addressing the sit authorities signals the participation of government system interdependency challenge by facilitating devel- agencies that either oversee or directly operate transit opment of a national mobile payments infrastructure, administration.) Rather, governments in Japan, South particularly by ensuring that transit agencies, airports, Korea, and up-and-comer Singapore played impor- and other institutions with a public or quasi-public thE information tEchnology & innovation foundation | novEmbEr 20 09 page 3
  • 7. mission are adopting open, interoperable contactless than 500,000 NFC-capable POS readers (although payment platforms; spurring demand for mobile pay- that number represents a fraction of all POS readers in ments, both by driving transit agencies to adopt con- the United States). However, only a handful of NFC- tactless payments and by making government facilities capable mobile phones have been deployed (mostly in and employees early adopters of contactless technolo- trials), and a full-fledged, phone-based mobile pay- gies; by establishing appropriate consumer protections; ments ecosystem in the United States continues to be and by promoting the importance of this technology stymied by the chicken-or-egg problem and the inabil- system to economic growth and quality of life. ity of mobile network operators, financial institutions, and merchants to mutually craft viable business mod- While Japan deserves credit for leading the world in els palatable to all players. Fully replacing the current innovating and adopting contactless mobile payments, POS terminal infrastructure in the United States with in truth it did not implement them in the most optimal NFC-capable devices (credit cards or mobile wallets) fashion. As with its broader mobile phone industry, Ja- could cost upwards of $10 billion, and a key challenge pan has to some degree fielded a proprietary, closed is determining which parties should bear the cost of standard mobile payments model. While Sony’s FeliCa deploying this infrastructure. Moreover, there is a real contactless integrated circuit (IC) chip technology un- risk that the United States will evolve into an NFC cul- derpins the buyer and seller devices, the different elec- de-sac whereby the system is optimized for payments tronic money (digital cash) systems such as Suica, Edy, only, but not for the much more functional and eco- and Nanaco are not interoperable, requiring merchants nomically important mobile wallet (e.g., a device that to deploy proprietary POS reader terminals to accept can store information other than money and process the different electronic money systems; some conve- transactions other than financial). nience stores and retail merchants have as many as four reader terminals at check-out stations to support The challenge the United States and many other na- the various types of electronic money customers may tions face is that all actors in the mobile payments use. This is akin to the state of email before Web-based ecosystem are each pursuing their own interests and email, when services like CompuServe, Prodigy, and concentrating on maximizing their own return, thus MCI Mail dominated, when it was only possible to ex- making it more difficult for a true infrastructure plat- change email if both the sender and receiver both used form to emerge. For example, merchants and transit the same email service provider. In other words, Japan operators focus only on assessing their potential return does not have a fully open, interoperable system where on investment from deploying contactless infrastruc- any electronic money service (whether pre-paid stored ture, but each merchant or transit agency that installs value or post-paid credit) operating on a smart card or an NFC-enabled POS terminal benefits not only them- mobile phone can interact with any reader terminal. In selves but every other participant in the ecosystem. this regard, a better model is Singapore’s, which seeks In other words investments in any part of the mobile to deploy a completely open, interoperable mobile pay- payments ecosystem can create what economists call ments system. The United States is making some prog- a network externality, whereby the benefits of the in- ress in this area because the NFC standard is interoper- vestment do not accrue fully to the party making the able. But it will be important for the United States to investment. ensure that the mobile wallet standard be interoperable with the NFC reader standard, so that individuals can Transit operators can play a key role in ensuring the use their mobile phones and all the applications stored evolution of an open, interoperable, multi-function in them just like they can use their credit cards at any system. In Japan and South Korea, transit authorities, NFC-enabled reader in the United States. card issuers, and mobile operators came together to collaboratively create a common electronic wallet capa- As noted, the United States has made some progress bility for smart cards and NFC-capable smart phones. in deploying contactless mobile payments. As of Oc- And by creating a large number of places where con- tober 2009, more than 100 million branded contact- sumers can use their mobile wallets early on, transit less credit cards have been issued by U.S. card issuers agencies in those countries helped build a market for and 140,000 merchant locations have deployed more NFC-enabled phones. thE information tEchnology & innovation foundation | novEmbEr 20 09 page 4
  • 8. Unfortunately, in many nations, including the United storage and transaction, identification, and communi- States, transit agencies tend to think like private sector cation function. But having single purpose cards would merchants trying to maximize their own return and be equivalent to broadband service providers building ignoring positive network externalities. But because broadband pipes that only allowed their content to flow they have a public function to them, they should also on them. The risk of going down the contactless credit focus on the externalities generated by deploying con- card route (where most of the progress in contactless tactless fare readers, for doing so dramatically expands mobile payments in the United States has been made to the range of venues where consumers can use their date) is that it is a single purpose device, whereas what NFC-enabled phones, spurring consumer demand for is needed is a multipurpose device that can do more the technology. But each of the metropolitan transit than just process e-cash transactions. agencies in the United States has been confronting de- cisions about whether to implement contactless fare To maximize the benefits to the American economy payment systems on their own. The risk is that in the and to American consumers, mobile payments needs absence of federal leadership, transit agencies will ei- to evolve in an open, interoperable, multi-purpose ther choose not to deploy contactless fare payment sys- fashion. The risk in the United States is that mobile tems or will choose to deploy closed-loop, proprietary payments will evolve in the direction of closed- and or fare payment systems that are not interoperable with single-purpose platforms. Thus, the government holds those of other transit agencies (as with Boston’s Char- a key role to ensure the marketplace evolves in this di- lie Card) or with NFC reader standards in general, and rection, because if a country goes down the path of a the opportunity to realize network externalities from limited and non-interoperable systems, it is very dif- contactless mobile payments in U.S. mass transit will ficult to change course. be lost or delayed. In summary, mobile payments represent a critical in- Moreover, there has been a standoff between banks, formation technology system for the U.S. economy to which are migrating credit cards with customer in- realize. It is not at all clear that market forces alone will formation stored on a magnetic stripe to the new mi- get the United States there, or produce the completely croprocessor-based contactless NFC standard where open, multifunctional system that we need, certainly customer information is encrypted, and the mass tran- not anytime soon. Therefore, applying lessons from sit operators, who would like access to the memory the leading countries, there appears to be a strategic resources on NFC smart cards but who installed an role for the federal government to play in facilitating earlier, proprietary version of contactless technology. and accelerating the arrival of mobile payments in the Thus far, banks have resisted opening up smart card United States. Accordingly, this report makes the fol- microprocessor resources to meet transit operators’ re- lowing recommendations: quirements for scratch pad memory access on which they can calculate passenger fare and manage custom-  reate C an inter-government mobile payments ers’ outstanding transit subscription balances. Even working group and private-sector advisory successful implementations of an open-loop outside council that would collaborate to introduce, by network system, such as the Utah Transit Authority’s, mid-2010, a strategy for spurring the deploy- which allows passengers to use their regular credit ment of an open, interoperable mobile wallet. In cards for contactless fare payment on UTA’s buses and the United States, this means that the Chief Tech- light rail, required the system to be custom-engineered nology Officer should create: 1) a mobile payments between the credit card-issuing banks and the transit working group, whose members would include the authority. Federal Communications Commission, Federal Trade Commission, Treasury Department, Depart- This points to a central challenge for mobile payments ment of Transportation, National in the United States: no party, neither the banks nor Telecommunications and Information Administra- the transit agencies, has an interest in creating a fully tion, National Institute of Standards and Technology, open, interoperable multi-function smart card or mo- the General Services Administration, and other bile wallet device that possesses a cash, information agencies as appropriate, along with 2) an advisory thE information tEchnology & innovation foundation | novEmbEr 20 09 page 5
  • 9. council from the private sector, which together 2. Provide funding for pilot programs deploy- would develop, by mid-2010, a U.S. strategy for ing NFC infrastructure in public venues. spurring the deployment of an open, interoperable The mobile wallet strategy roadmap should in- mobile wallet platform. clude funding for pilot programs to implement NFC infrastructure in the aforementioned pub- The government’s role should not be to take the lead licly or semi-publicly operated or managed envi- in specifying NFC standards—private markets and ronments. collaborative standards-setting consortium such as the NFC Forum are driving this and should con- 3. Ensure senior government leaders highlight tinue to do so. Rather, much as the Federal Com- the benefits of contactless mobile payments. munications Commission’s National Broadband Senior leaders at the FCC, Departments of Taskforce is developing a comprehensive strategy Commerce and Transportation, and other agen- for how the United States can achieve ubiquitous cies should provide vision and leadership and broadband deployment, a national mobile wallet/ speak openly about the transformative potential mobile payments strategy would craft a roadmap of contactless mobile payments in the United considering issues such as: how federal, state, and States. local governments will go contactless; how contact- less payments can be enabled in all metropolitan 4. Deploy contactless payments infrastructure, transit authorities; how such payments can be im- including NFC-enabled electronic wal- plemented in public and quasi-public venues such let phones and NFC-enabled POS readers as airports, street parking meters, parking garages, throughout government agencies: toll booths, and other locations throughout the country; and how mobile payments can be used for General Services Administration The functions such as food stamps, funds through the should commit to installing contactless Women, Infants and Children program and other POS terminals in all cafeterias, parking ga- federal benefit programs. rages, and other cash facilities it directly operates in federal agencies and facilities, including Department of Defense facili-  overnments G should assume a leadership role ties. in promoting and adopting mobile payments. Federal, state, and local governments should be cre- Government identification programs such  ative in using systems and funding to spur as the Department of Defense’s Common deployment of contactless mobile payments. The Access Card and the Transportation Work- government should: er Identification Credential (TWIC) should allow electronic wallet applications to be 1. Require that mass transit agencies receiv- housed on the card. ing federal funding deploy open-loop out- and local governments using POS State side network payment systems. In the current terminals to process payments for servic- reauthorization of the Surface Transportation es—such as for obtaining marriage licenses, Act, Congress should require that any transit parking permits, drivers licenses, etc.— authority receiving federal public transporta- should deploy NFC-enabled POS tion funding that has a contactless fare payment terminals, enabling citizens to make con- system move to an open-loop outside payments tactless payments. network. That is, Congress should require tran- sit agencies receiving federal funding to deploy  rticulate A clear consumer protections for mo- NFC-enabled contactless fare payment systems bile payments. For mobile payments to succeed, interoperable with those of other transit agen- consumers must be assured they maintain the same cies throughout the country. level of recourse in case of disputes with merchants thE information tEchnology & innovation foundation | novEmbEr 20 09 page 6
  • 10. or digital theft. Consumer protections should be ex-  esist R the urge to regulate RFID technologies, tended to all providers of mobile payment services. including near field communication. Given the The United States should actively engage in ongoing importance of NFC technology and its inherent se- OECD discussions to harmonize consumer payment curity, it is important that policymakers not give in protections amongst its OECD member countries. to pressure to regulate NFC, in particular under the broader guise of regulating RFID technologies,  ddress A legitimate security and privacy con- which should not be regulated either. cerns, but recognize mobile wallets are likely to be more secure than physical wallets. Policymak-  ncourage E competition and do not favor en- ers should not be swayed by the claims of some trenched interests. The rapid evolution of mobile privacy advocates who are likely both to question the devices and applications as well as network and in- privacy and security of mobile payments and to ac- formation technologies has engendered an incredibly tively denounce proactive government efforts to fertile period of mobile payments innovation and develop a national payments strategy. NFC-enabled activity. Many new firms with innovative business phones offer defenses not generally available to cards, models and service propositions have emerged to including enabling consumers to keep applications provide novel platforms for remote mobile pay- locked with a PIN or other passcode or with a fin- ments, such as domestic money transfers, gerprint or other biometric tools. Moreover mobile international remittances, and even targeted micro- operators can remotely shut down all applications on lending. Regulators should not give in to incumbent an NFC phone should subscribers report their de- business interests that oppose the emergence of in- vice lost or stolen. novative new services. Policymakers should also recognize that contact- Likewise, policymakers should not give in to en- less mobile transactions effected between a mobile trenched interests who would resist new automated phone with a secure integrated circuit smart chip or self service technologies that NFC makes pos- and an NFC-enabled payment terminal are likely sible, even if it means certain service jobs may be to be much more secure than either swiping the automated, for these technologies introduce effi- credit card through a magnetic card reader, or sim- ciencies that redound to the benefit of consumers ply handing the credit card to a third party. This is and the economy as a whole. because in a contactless transaction (whether origi- nated by a smart card or mobile phone) both the IC  ctively A work with international NFC standards chip and the payment terminal authenticate one an- setting bodies. Federal bodies involved in trade other and, critically, a unique identifier is generated policy, including the National Institute of Standards to validate each transaction. If that unique identifier and Technology and the United States Trade Repre- is somehow stolen, it cannot be used to execute a sentative should support the development of subsequent or future transaction. Moreover, no pub- interoperable international standards for mobile licized real-world attacks on contactless bankcards payments, which will inure to the benefit of both have emerged in the United States or elsewhere since domestic device manufacturers looking to export to the payments industry has introduced the technol- global markets and consumers seeking convenient ogy. payment experiences alike. thE information tEchnology & innovation foundation | novEmbEr 20 09 page 7
  • 11. T h E I N f o r m aT I o N T E c h N o l o g y & I N N o v aT I o N f o u N d aT I o N Explaining International IT Leadership: Contactless Mobile Payments T he ever-expanding capabilities of mobile phones have made Mobile payments will them increasingly powerful platforms for an impressively benefit the economy and wide range of commercial and financial transactions. Mobile society by increasing productivity through phones have evolved from simple personal communication devices enhancing operational to become both platforms for commerce and indispensable “lifestyle efficiencies, enabling a infrastructure” that enhances productivity, facilitates financial trans- range of innovative new actions, and makes life more convenient and efficient. In the most business models, and advanced countries, consumers use their phones as multifunctional pushing distributed electronic wallets to pay public transit or taxi fares; to make purchases computing intelligence from merchants, restaurants, convenience stores, and automated de- into the physical world. vices; and to check in at airports, hotels, and schools; and for a host of other functions. This report examines which countries Understanding Mobile lead the world in deploying and adopt- payMents ing contactless mobile payments sur- What are Mobile payments? veys, finding Japan and South Korea Mobile payments are perhaps the most in the lead; surveys the development important form of mobile commerce, of contactless mobile payments in the a term defined broadly as “commer- United States; and analyzes the non- cial or financial transactions mediated policy and policy factors that explain through mobile phones or other hand- how the leading countries attained held electronic devices.”1 Mobile com- their leadership position in contact- merce is exploding worldwide, with less payments. It concludes with a set research firm Juniper predicting that, of recommendations to policymakers, by 2011, the global value of all com- targeted to those in the United States mercial or financial transactions effect- but applicable globally, wishing to pro- ed through mobile phones will exceed mote contactless mobile payments in $587 billion.2 By 2013, Juniper predicts their country. that more than 2 billion mobile sub-
  • 12. scribers worldwide will have used their mobile phones Figure 1: Contactless Mobile payment for contactless mobile payments, mobile banking, or over-the-air person-to-person payments.3 The following taxonomy describes the broad universe of commercial and financial transactions that mobile phones enable:4 I. Mobile financial services, including: contactless mobile payments, peer-to-peer mobile payments, and mobile banking.5 1. Contactless mobile payments—also called “touchless” or “proximity” payments— leverage radio frequency identification technology (RFID) technology, particularly Mobile purchases through cell phones—particularly through a technology standard called near of digital content including music, games, e-books, field communication (NFC), to enable mobile digital avatars, and virtual worlds—has become wide- subscribers to make contactless payments spread across all developed countries, and especially simply by waving their mobile phone (or a prevalent in Asian countries. Mobile sales of digital smart card) directly in front of NFC-enabled goods in Japan alone constitute a $4.84 billion market, terminals, such as merchant’s point-of- and well over $1 billion in South Korea. Research firm sale (POS) terminals, subway turnstiles, or Ovum estimates the global value of “online shopping” automated devices such as vending machines via mobile phones will come to approximately $20 bil- (Figure 1). lion in 2009.7 Notwithstanding the impressive volume Contactless mobile payments are exploding of digital content mobile subscribers are downloading globally, growing in value from $3 billion in to their phones, this report focuses on the transforma- 2007 to approximately $10 billion in 2009, and tive capability of mobile phones to act as platforms expected to surpass $52 billion by 2012.6 for enabling remote contactless financial, commercial, and information-based transactions. 2. Peer-to-peer payments including funds transfer or domestic and international money types of Mobile payments applications remittances. Near-field communication technology enables a range 3. Mobile banking, including both of monetary and non-monetary transactions. Embed- informational—alerts and account balance ding electronic wallets on mobile phones (or smart inquiries—and transactional—mobile bill cards) transforms them into multifunctional devices payment or equity trading—components. that can execute contactless payment transactions, serve as a store of information and value, house au- II. Mobile shopping and mobile-facilitated thentication or identification credentials, and exchange purchases of digital content, data, or services, data with similarly enabled devices. where purchases are made via mobile phones either through traditional Internet website channels (e.g. This report identifies three primary types of con- buying a product off the Amazon or eBay Web site tactless transactions that electronic wallets enable: 1) using one’s mobile phone instead of computer) or transactions involving only the exchange of payment via direct downloads of digital content, such as music or ringtones. Purchases can also be mobile- information; 2) transactions involving both the ex- facilitated such as making a purchase from a change of payment details and information/data per- computer at an online retailer or using the mobile tinent to the transaction; and 3) storing and transmit- phone for authentication and the mobile operator’s ting identification and authentication credentials. (See bill for invoicing and collection. Table 1.) thE information tEchnology & innovation foundation | novEmbEr 20 09 page 9
  • 13. The first category includes transactions where the mo- to manage room access: the hotel sends an electronic bile phone (or smart card) is simply used to transmit code to the guest’s cell phone that permits access to a payment details for purchases of stand-alone goods or specific hotel room for the duration of the reservation, services, such as buying a soda from a vending ma- and the guest need simply touch his/her cell phone to chine, or purchasing items from merchants such as the door’s reader, obviating the need for physical keys retailers, convenience stores, or fast-food restaurants. or keys cards. Using electronic wallets for identification There is not an information component to these trans- purposes will further accelerate as biometric verifica- actions required beyond the payment instructions. tion is added to existing password authentication fea- These types of contactless transactions will increas- tures of mobile phones. ingly replace cash for low-value micropayments (trans- actions worth less than $25.) Where electronic wallets (whether on mobile phones Mobile payments represent a digital platform technolog y that or smart cards) become far more powerful is their abil- enables the creation of new and innovative applications limited ity to store, process, and exchange transaction-related only by the creativity of organizations seeking to use them. information, enabling the mobile phone to replace a litany of tickets, passes, keys, and cards. For example, theater-goers in South Korea purchase movie tickets via their mobile phones, receive the “tickets” elec- And the important thing about this “platform” tech- tronically, and swipe their phone across a reader at the nology is that new and creative applications are only theatre entrance, eliminating the need to hand a paper limited by the creativity of the organizations that seek ticket stub to a greeter. At parking garages in Japan, to use them. For example, the Korean Salvation Army drivers swipe their phones across readers as they enter saw this technology platform and realized it could digi- and exit the garage and an application in the electronic tally transform the way it collected money at Christ- wallet records duration of stay and transmits payment mas. Now, next to the traditional red kettle and bell- information at the exit gate, eliminating the need for ringing Santa-costumed volunteers, the Korean Salva- both paper tickets and attendants to process the trans- tion Army has introduced digital donation screens, at action. Likewise, airline passengers in Japan receive which donors simply wave their mobile phone across their reservation “tickets” electronically to the mobile the screen and the specified amount is deducted from phone and check in by tapping their phone to read- one’s T-money account (a digital cash service popular in ers at the flight gate (and at security check in). Taxi South Korea) and paid to the Salvation Army—leaving passengers can pay the fare and receive an electronic donors with no excuse for not having change in their receipt they can submit to their company’s account- pockets, reducing the risk of money being siphoned ing department for reimbursement. Critically, this in- off by the volunteer, and reducing the cost of handling formation storage and processing aspect of electronic the cash.8 Another such application would be for the wallets also allows transit agencies to issue contactless government to deliver food stamps via mobile phones; smart cards (or mobile phone applications) capable of likely to be more convenient as many individuals who both calculating passenger fare based on journey taken lack bank accounts actually have mobile phones. It’s and storing subscription account balances. likely that as this platform technology becomes more widely available around the world, the number of in- As an authentication application, electronic wallets can novative applications will blossom. store identification information, replacing the current generation of key fobs and smart cards to allow indi- Though not directly a mobile payments application, it viduals to check in/sign in to schools, hotels, health should be noted that NFC technology allows electronic clubs, offices, and apartment buildings with one de- devices to interconnect and exchange information with vice, often a cell phone. For example, in South Ko- one another over short distances, just as infrared or Blu- rean, Japanese, and Swedish schools and universities, etooth technology before it. For example, Apple is cur- students effortlessly swipe their phones across readers rently prototyping a next generation iPhone allowing outside classroom doors to register their attendance. customers to wirelessly sync their iPods and iPhones to In New Zealand, hotels are using NFC technology their iMac using RFID technology.9 thE information tEchnology & innovation foundation | novEmbEr 20 09 page 10
  • 14. table 1: Classifying Contactless Mobile payments applications payment transactions payment and information-based transactions authentication/id  obile M payments replace cash/  ransactions T involving exchange of both  uthentication/identifica- A credit cards payment details and information pertain- tion credentials are stored ing to the transaction. Data component is in the mobile phone’s elec-  o N information component re- stored on mobile phone’s electronic wal- tronice wallet quired beyond exchanging let. payment details  lectronic E wallet can be  nables E mobile phones to replace cards, used as ID to check into:  ncludes I contactless payments for tickets, passes, etc. goods and services purchased  Schools from:  nables E personalized merchandising and  Hotels advertising Health Clubs Box Retailers Big   Office Complexes Quick Service Restaurants  ses U mobile phone’s electronic wallet to   Apartment Convenience Stores manage, update, pay for, or check into:   Buildings Taxis Public Transit (Tickets)   Digital Donations A irport Check-in (Tickets)   Automated Devices Parking Garages (Tickets)   Vending Machines Movie Theatres (Tickets)   Parking Meters Sporting Events (Tickets)   Laundry Machines Concerts/Museums/Parks   Toll Booths (Tickets)  Personalized Advertising or  Merchandising Loyalty cards  cards Gift Coupons  benefits of Contactless Mobile payments schools or libraries), credit cards, and cash with a sin- Contactless mobile payments represent a transfor- gle device capable of checking in to office complexes, mative application that will bring a wide range of apartment buildings, or health clubs; boarding planes benefits to consumers, businesses, and the economy and trains; and paying for everything from mass tran- and society at large. Consumers will benefit from en- sit and taxis to parking meters and vending machines. hanced convenience and the ability to opt-in to per- Indeed, much of daily life is consumed with the ex- sonalized advertising or merchandising campaigns. change of mundane information—key codes, dollars, At a broader level, contactless payments will drive time stamps, tickets, passes, ID credentials, etc.—all increases in productivity, the central source of eco- of which could be automated, streamlined, or even nomic growth, through three channels: 1) bringing obviated by leveraging mobile phones as a repository operational efficiencies to merchants, retailers, and for both information and money. Consumers will transit authorities; 2) enabling a range of innovative also enjoy faster transaction processing speeds in re- new business models and service offerings; and 3) tail and transit environments. Organizations will be pushing distributed computing intelligence into the able to automate these kinds of transactions, saving physical world. significant amounts of money, which can be passed on to consumers. Finally, contactless transactions Using mobile phones as electronic wallets will allow reduce the burden—and security risk—of carrying consumers to replace the multitude of keys, key fobs, cash and having to fumble for loose change or bills to loyalty cards, various types of ID cards (such as for make small purchases. thE information tEchnology & innovation foundation | novEmbEr 20 09 page 11
  • 15. For businesses, contactless payments enable increased wallets make possible automated transactions that ei- operational efficiency in retail and transit environ- ther eliminate the need for personnel to manually pro- ments, whether by accelerating transaction speeds, cess tickets and cash or that empower employees to use reducing the costs inherent in handling cash-based their time more productively by automating routinized transactions, or decreasing the need for ticketing or activities. In fact, information technology (IT) is mov- checkout agents at the point-of-sale (POS). Transac- ing from a phase where many of the benefits of IT have tions using contactless technology are as much as 40 come from “big boxes,” like servers or computers, to percent faster than those made with credit or debit cards a phase where the benefits come more from pushing and 55 percent faster than those made with cash.10 In distributed computing intelligence into the field. Pre- mass transit environments, Japan’s JR East Railway re- viously, most of the productivity gains from IT came ports that moving from swiped magnetic stripe cards from large IT implementations, such as enterprise to contactless smart cards or mobile phones reduces resource planning or automated order entry systems, transaction processing time from 700 to 200 millisec- which automated routinized activities employees had onds. Japan’s All Nippon Airways found that using performed in desktop or office environments. mobile phones at check-in cuts transaction time per passenger from 50 to 8 seconds.11 South Korea’s banks have found that mobile transactions cost one-fifth Electronic wallets have the potential to replace a litany of of face-to-face transaction costs.12 And Washington, D.C.’s transit authority found that migration to elec- artifacts of analog life that consumers carry in their wallet to tronic fare payments reduced staff by approximately exchange money or information—credit cards, loyalty cards, 15 percent over a 5-year period.13 transit cards, ID cards, keys, key fobs, tickets, passes, etc.— Contactless transactions open up entirely new chan- with a single device. nels for retailers to introduce opt-in personalized ad- vertising or merchandising campaigns. For example, customers entering a mall could swipe their mobile But the next wave of IT will be about pushing mobile phones across a NFC-enabled poster that would in- computing, sensing, and intelligence out into the phys- form them about sales or promotions at their favorite ical world. Before, transactions in the field required stores and even provide them with targeted coupons people because there was little connectivity to technol- or discounts. In Japan and South Korea, advertising ogy platforms on the back-end (e.g., no “big box” in posters (whether in subways or on the street) have the field). But mobile phones bring computing into the embedded chips allowing mobile subscribers to wave field, acting as sensors that can connect physical infra- their phones across the poster to learn more about— structure to the virtual world. By enabling fully elec- or directly purchase—the advertised good or service. tronic transactions, contactless payments eliminate the In those countries, one need simply walk up to a poster need for cash or physical information exchange (e.g., pitching the latest Cirque de Soleil show, Harry Potter tickets or passes) at the point-of-sale, removing the movie, or Bruce Springsteen concert, wave the mobile need for attendants to staff gates at parking garages, phone across the poster, and purchase tickets imme- movie theaters, tool booths, sporting venues, airports, diately. In essence, NFC technology enables a world etc. For example, if parking meters in the United of secure end-to-end commerce and connectivity in States were NFC-enabled, not only could drivers pay which consumers can access and pay for physical and electronically via their mobile phones, but because the digital services anywhere, at any time, using any de- meters would no longer be collecting coins, the need vice.14 An NFC-based mobile transaction infrastruc- for someone to physically go from parking meter to ture will also spur the creation of more self-service parking meter to collect them would be eliminated. If opportunities and business models as transactions can teachers didn’t have to spend two to three minutes of increasingly be completed through automated devic- class time taking attendance because students instead es. signed in using their NFC-enabled phones, they could save 30 hours or more a year on roll call, freeing them The productivity story then is not simply about replac- to focus on teaching and improving educational out- ing credit cards with mobile phones; rather electronic comes.15 thE information tEchnology & innovation foundation | novEmbEr 20 09 page 12
  • 16. box 1: Key Underlying Mobile payMents teChnologies and aCtors Near Field Communication (NFC) Technology. Near field communication (NFC) is a short-range wireless connectivity technolo- gy that provides intuitive, simple, and safe communication between electronic devices. NFC is a type of radio frequency identification (RFID) technology, and the NFC standard is an extension of the ISO 14443 RFID proximity-card standard. NFC operates at 13.56 MHz and transfers data at up to 424 Kbits/second. Communication occurs when two NFC-compatible devices are brought within four centimeters of one another. NFC communicates via magnetic field induction, where two loop antennas are located within each other’s near field, effectively forming an air-core transformer. NFC can operate in one of two modes: passive or active.16 Mobile phones, contactless smart cards, and contactless credit (or debit) cards can communicate data via near field communication technology to NFC-enabled payment terminals—including merchant’s point-of-sale terminals, vending machines, parking meters, rail or subway turnstiles, airline check-in gates, etc.—to process contactless transactions. Importantly, NFC-based contactless transactions clear (that is, they are settled financially) over existing credit card or bank payment networks, not over the wireless network on which the phone operates. Contactless payment technologies in Japan and South Korea also use RFID technology, but in the main, use RFID standards that are not currently interoperable with NFC standards. Japan uses FeliCa, a proprietary standard. South Korea uses a passive, as opposed to active, version of RFID that operates in card emulation mode only (no reader mode or peer-to-peer mode), and is not interoperable with NFC. FeliCa. Sony developed the FeliCa integrated circuit chip for contactless payments made via smart cards in 1988. In 2004, Sony teamed with NTT DOCOMO (“DOCOMO”) to embed FeliCa chips into the electronic wallets of mobile phones, enabling contact- less payments in Japan. The NFC Forum. The NFC Forum, a standards-setting consortium founded in 2004 that includes 140 members from all areas of the NFC ecosystem, drives the development of globally-interoperable NFC standards. As of Q4 2009, the NFC Forum has finalized 11 specifications enabling a basic level of device interoperability.17 Smart Cards. Smart cards—whether public transit fare cards, credit cards, or stored value (i.e., debit) cards—use embedded micro- chips, also known as integrated circuits (IC) chips, to electronically store data. Smart card technology can be contact-based or contact- less. In contact-based scenarios, customers insert or swipe cards through a card reader. Contactless smart cards have an embedded antenna and short-range radio frequency identification (RFID) computer chip, which transfers data via radio waves, enabling contact- less, or “touchless” remote transactions. Electronic (or “Digital”) Wallets. An electronic wallet is a mobile phone feature that can centrally and simultaneously store multiple applications managing customer account/transaction information with financial providers, public transit agencies, or third party enti- ties such as health clubs, schools, and office or apartment buildings. For example, the electronic wallets of mobile phones in South Korea can simultaneously manage up to 100 different applications, ranging from electronic money to personal IDs. Electronic Money (or “Digital Cash”). Electronic money systems, such as Japan’s Edy or South Korea’s T-money, appear in the form of either pre-paid, or “stored value,” smart cards or as an application in the electronic wallet of a mobile phone. For example, with Edy, customers prepay (via a credit card or by debiting a bank account) to purchase Edy digital cash that is loaded onto their smart card or mobile phone. When customers make purchases, in lieu of using cash, funds are deducted from the stored digital cash value on the smart card or the mobile phone. Trusted Service Manager (TSM). A trusted service manager is a third party intermediary that manages downloads of applications to a phone’s electronic wallet. The TSM helps service providers securely distribute and manage contactless services for their customers using the networks of mobile operators. However, the TSM does not participate in actual contactless transactions using NFC devices.18 The key functions of the TSMs include interconnecting with mobile network operators (MNOs) and application service providers, enrolling new users, updating user interfaces, managing customer databases, managing application lifecycles, managing value-added services such as ticket reloading and branding, and guaranteeing end-to-end security. Examples of TSMs include FeliCa Networks in Japan and VivoTech in the United States. In Singapore, the government’s Information Development Authority has taken on the role of setting up a national trusted service manager (there called a trusted third party.) Peer-to-peer (or “person-to-person”) payments. Mobile peer-to-peer payments use the SMS (simplified messaging service) feature of mobile phones to send text messages with payment instructions to third parties, such as the bank accounts of customers, suppliers, or family members. Peer-to-peer payments have become incredibly popular in developing countries through service providers such as M-Pesa in Kenya and Smart Communications in the Philippines. thE information tEchnology & innovation foundation | novEmbEr 20 09 page 13
  • 17. This all has the benefit of allowing organizations to de- erators, handset manufacturers, financial institutions ploy resources more productively, increasing customer including major banks and credit card issuers, com- convenience and generating cost savings for consum- mercial retailers and merchant stores, public transit ers and taxpayers, while eliminating routinized, mo- authorities, government agencies, and, of course, the notonous tasks or jobs, freeing the individuals who customer. Mobile payments thus represent a complex once staffed them to pursue more-rewarding, higher- ecosystem with many players whose success depends skilled, and higher-paying jobs. If the United States is on joint action at the same time by all the players to- to continue enhancing its productivity, thus generating gether. All parties have to figure out a way to act col- increases in growth, wages, and standards of living, it laboratively at the same time, and this is something must deploy technologies like mobile payments that markets are not very good at, especially U.S. markets. enhance productivity throughout the economy. A national contactless payments infrastructure sup- Mobile payments are characterized by a chicken-or-egg problem: ports other social objectives, including more efficient consumers won’t demand NFC-enabled phones until they know governance and helping the environment by eliminat- ing paper waste. A United Kingdom study found that a sufficient number of POS terminals exist where they can use going contactless in mass transit ticketing could save them; merchants won’t deploy the infrastructure until a critical the country £2 billion annually.19 Japan has found that the amount of paper cash in circulation in the econo- mass of users justifies the cost of doing so. my has appreciably decreased since 2004, when mobile phones with electronic wallets were introduced.20 Fi- Mobile payments are marked by a system interde- nally, eliminating the need for paper, whether of rail, pendency (the classic “chicken-or-egg”) conundrum, movie, or airline tickets (or even paper currency itself) which each country must solve: For consumers to de- saves money and benefits the environment. mand cell phones with embedded electronic wallets— In summary, a system whereby mobile payments and and thus, critically, for the mobile network operators to transactions leverage NFC technology is a critical require this feature from the handset manufacturers— emerging digital infrastructure technology platform consumers must know that a sufficiently deployed mo- that all countries will need to have. Once a country has bile payments infrastructure exists at merchants’ POS an open, interoperable mobile payments infrastructure terminals, at fare readers in metro subways and buses, in place, it is akin to having broadband, cellular net- in toll booths along highways, at airports, in parking works, or a smart grid installed. And like these digi- garages, in automated devices like vending machines tal infrastructure platforms, mobile payments exhibit and parking meters, and in other places where the fea- similar network effects: as additional NFC-enabled ture can be used. Merchants and transit operators, for mobile phones and devices come on the market, they their part, are not likely to deploy NFC-enabled pay- increase the value of other similarly enabled devices. ment terminals until a critical mass of users gives them Over time, a proliferation of creative applications are confidence that their investments in such technology likely to develop from the mobile payments technology will be repaid. And indeed, determining who should platform, many of which are difficult to even imagine pay to finance the widespread deployment of the NFC today, all of which will continue to create new busi- mobile payments infrastructure (particularly reader ness opportunities, increase productivity, and drive terminals at merchants and mass transit facilities) is economic growth. one of the greatest challenges to mobile payments. One industry observer estimated it could cost upwards of $10 billion to fully replace the current POS terminal the Mobile payments Challenge infrastructure in the United States (alone) with NFC- Mobile payments are considerably different from the capable devices.21 classic “widget” industry in which a company need only acquire the requisite inputs, manufacture its prod- The system interdependency challenge makes it ex- ucts, and sell them on the open market. For a country tremely difficult for all parties in a multi-sided market to successfully deploy mobile payments it must engage to craft profitable business models. Each party needs a wide range of actors, including: mobile network op- to know that incoming revenues (or value, from the thE information tEchnology & innovation foundation | novEmbEr 20 09 page 14
  • 18. consumer perspective) will justify the costs of their in- tions. Year-end 2008 (or most recently available) data vestments. Therefore, each party must have clarity as are cited wherever possible. Historical data are cited to its role in the mobile payments value chain and how in most cases, though the report also makes use of it intends to monetize it. A key sticking point is the forward-looking, anticipatory estimates of future mar- issue of, “Who owns the customer in mobile transac- ket sizes for countries’ mobile payments markets. The tions?” Wireless network operators believe they own study relies extensively on facts and figures provided the mobile subscriber relationship, credit card issuing by representatives or publications of foreign govern- banks insist they own the financial relationship with ments and thus on the implied accuracy and validity of customers, and retailers contend that they own the these resources. customer relationship at the point of purchase. Each entity desires to have the leading place in the mobile The assessment of country leaders was also informed payments ecosystem and dominant role in the value by consultations with over two dozen experts in the chain, and as a result the market has remained still- mobile commerce and payments field, who were asked born. As Pragnesh Shah, former CEO of mobile pay- to rank the world leaders in mobile payments and ments firm Mobilians, states, “The barriers to mobile provide both context for and a historiography of the payments, in the United States or elsewhere, are not evolution of mobile payments ecosystems in leading technological nor regulatory; rather they pertain to the countries. business model.”22 Of course, all countries looking to deploy mobile payments must solve these complex sys- tem interdependency and business model ecosystem Mobile payments exhibit classic network externalities; adding an challenges in their own way. additional NFC-enabled phone or POS terminal device to the And in analyzing the countries leading the world in network amplifies the value of previously deployed devices and mobile payments, it becomes apparent that some forc- makes the case more compelling for further deployment. ing function—such as government facilitating the development of the mobile payments ecosystemt or ensuring that transit agencies deploy interoperable Mobile payment technologies—and countries’ deploy- contactless fare payment systems—has intervened to ments of them—are dynamic and rapidly evolving. As either circumvent or resolve the system interdependen- of November 2009, more than 100 trials or tests of cy paradox, catalyzing the country’s mobile payments RF-based contactless payment systems are occurring ecosystem and causing contactless payments to arrive in cities and countries worldwide. This report has iden- sooner that the marketplace alone would have other- tified world leaders as of Fall 2009; countries’ leader- wise delivered it. ship positions may subsequently shift. Methodology Which Countries lead in Contactless Mobile This report focuses on which countries are best leverag- payments? ing mobile phones (and, to a lesser degree, smart cards) In its 2007 report, Mobile Commerce, the OECD noted as platforms for contactless payments and transac- that, “The level of development of the mobile com- tions. The analysis examines quantitative data for each merce industry varies widely across OECD member country, principally the number of electronic-wallet countries. But individuals, particularly in Japan and capable mobile phones and point of sale terminal read- South Korea, have started to own the Internet-con- ers underpinning the country’s mobile payments infra- nectable mobile phones that enable the development of structure, along with the number and overall market mobile commerce.”23 As Shri Kumar, a senior official value of contactless payments in each country. with India’s Ministry of Communications and Infor- mation Technology (MCIT), observed in a presentation Mobile payments statistics come from a variety of to the Mobile Forum of India in February 2009, “The sources, principally market research firms and gov- Asia-Pacific region is the most advanced m-commerce ernment agencies, that may use different classification market in the world, and the test-bed for the major- methodologies for defining mobile payments transac- ity of m-commerce and m-payment trials.”24 Indeed, thE information tEchnology & innovation foundation | novEmbEr 20 09 page 15
  • 19. table 2: Contactless Mobile payments activity in selected Countries Metric/statistic Japan south Korea United states Mobile phone penetration 87% (2008) 30 93% (2008) 88% (2008)31 Number of mobile wallet-capable 78 million 12 million Only in trials phones deployed Number of citizens using mobile 17 million phones; 3.6 million phones; Only in trials wallets 68 million smart cards 18 million T-money smart cards Number of merchants deploying 608,000 merchants +500,000 total POS readers 140,000 merchants RF-capable POS readers/total deploying/total number deployed33 deploying/+500,000 POS number POS readers deployed POS readers deployed much readers deployed34 larger32 almost 500 million mobile transactions will occur in Internal Affairs and Communications (MIAC) esti- Asia in 2009, versus only 34 million in North America, mated that the overall value of “all business carried according to research firm Gartner.25 By 2012, Gart- out through” cell phones in Japan was worth as much ner expects that mobile transactions will grow to 2.4 as $106 billion in 2007, up 23 percent from 2006.28 In billion in Asia and 221 million in North America. Re- South Korea, 63 percent of citizens have made pay- search firm Juniper concurs, finding that, “The Far ments through their mobile phones, at least 12 million East and Western Europe will be the top two regions subscribers have RF-capable mobile phones (about for mobile commerce by 2013, accounting for 60 per- one-quarter of mobile phones), more than 3.5 million cent of the [anticipated] $300 billion global transaction citizens use their mobile phones for contactless pay- value.” Not surprisingly then, the two countries clearly ments, and 9.15 million mobile subscribers use mobile leading the world in mobile payments emerge from the banking. South Koreans purchased $1.4 billion worth Asia-Pacific region. of digital content in 2008, and the value of South Ko- rea’s overall mobile commerce market is expected to Japan and South Korea lead the word in mobile pay- grow to 6.84 billion won ($5.9 billion) in 2010.29 ments based upon the aforementioned criteria. (See Table 2.) As Kumar argues, “Japan is two years ahead There are currently over 100 NFC projects, trials, or of the rest of the world in contactless adoption.”26 In- commercial deployments occurring worldwide, 47 dustry executive Pragnesh Shah, formerly with Sprint in Asia alone.35 Although there are many NFC trials and recently CEO of the U.S. division of South Ko- ongoing, most of them are still in the nascent phase, rean mobile payments firm Mobilians, concurs that, and none have reached the level of critical mass of de- “Japan and South Korea clearly lead the world in the ployment and use that has been achieved in Japan and deployment and adoption of phone-initiated contact- South Korea. While Hong Kong, Singapore, Taiwan, less mobile payments.”27 and Malaysia each make extensive use of contactless payments—there are more than 10 million contactless In Japan, 78 million mobile subscribers (73 percent) transactions each day in Hong Kong, for example— own FeliCa-capable mobile phones, 17 million sub- almost all these are initiated through smart cards. As scribers use these phones for contactless transac- consulting firm KPMG noted in a survey of mobile tions in railways or stores on a regular basis, and over payments in the Asia-Pacific region, “Somewhat sur- 600,000 affiliated merchant stores (and a greater num- prisingly, the most mobile-penetrated territories on the ber of terminals) accept contactless payments. The planet—Hong Kong, Singapore, and Taipei—have market value of contactless transactions alone in Japan shown little comparable adoption of m-payments, ex- was $8.4 billion in 2008, and the total value of mobile cept in the use of contactless cards for transportation commerce activity in the country, including mobile and some limited retail usage.”36 Malaysia has recently content downloads, fees for text messaging and Web completed NFC trials and is beginning to deploy its data plans, etc., was $32.4 billion. Japan’s Ministry of mobile payments infrastructure, but the country has thE information tEchnology & innovation foundation | novEmbEr 20 09 page 16
  • 20. nowhere near the level of deployment as Japan and Figure 2: Mobile nFC payment at a Japan railway station42 South Korea.37 In June 2009, Singapore launched a national “Digital Concierge” initiative, “to promote e- payment adoption, particularly interoperable payments enabled by near field communication,” but this has just launched. In China, China Mobile, the world’s largest mobile operator, has announced plans for a large scale commercial rollout of mobile contactless payments, but the rollout is not slated to start until 2010.38 A number of European countries—notably Austria, France, Brit- ain, Finland, and Germany—are conducting trials of mobile-phone based NFC payment systems in major cities, but most are still in the test phase. Even Rus- sia is looking to launch a contactless mobile payments system by 2011 or 2012.39 But no European country has yet fielded a nationally deployed, ubiquitous mobile Japanese citizens view mobile phones as indispensible payments infrastructure rivaling those found in Japan “lifestyle infrastructure” that serves “as the remote or South Korea. But even compared to these coun- control for all the transactions in our daily lives.”41 This tries, the United States lags those with multiple ongo- section describes the current state of the mobile pay- ing trials or those putting together national strategies ments market in Japan; a subsequent section explores to ubiquitously deploy mobile payments. Meanwhile, the sources of the country’s mobile payments leader- contactless payments are evolving at a dynamic pace ship. worldwide; countries not planning to deploy such sys- Eighty-seven percent of Japanese own mobile phones, tems risk falling behind globally. 90 percent of which operate on 3G networks. As of September 2008, 78 million mobile phones in Japan Mobile payMents in Japan had FeliCa-enabled electronic wallet capability, with 17 Japan leads the world in mobile payments consumer million mobile phone subscribers using their mobile adoption, technology infrastructure, and market val- phones to make contactless transactions.43 Eighteen ue. As Card Technolog y magazine writes, “Japan has the percent of Japan’s mobile phone subscribers report most advanced mobile payment and ticketing market that they have at least tried out the electronic wallet in the world.”40 Japanese consumers use their mobile feature of their mobile phones for contactless transac- devices as osaifu-keitai (mobile wallets) in lieu of cash tions.44 As of August 2009, 82.8 percent of residents in or credit cards to pay rail or subway fares (Figure 2); the Tokyo metropolitan area used electronic money, up to pay for taxi rides, movie tickets, and parking me- from 78.9 percent in August 2008. Average transaction ters; to make purchases from kiosks and vending ma- amounts per month increased from ¥5,600 to ¥6,000 chines; to auction used items; to manage loyalty cards ($61 to $65) over that time period, with users averaging and programs; and even to check in at airports with a total of seven transactions per month.45 their mobile phones acting as a boarding pass. Japa- nese consumers purchase hundreds of thousands of The value of mobile contactless transactions (whether items—from tickets to groceries—with mobile phones initiated from a smart card or mobile phone), reached every day in Japan. Because they spend an estimated ¥1.7 trillion ($17 billion) in 2008, and is expected to ¥60 trillion ($514 billion) each year on low-value pur- grow to ¥2 trillion ($20 billion) by 2012, according chases, the market is primed for cash to be replaced to Nikkei BP, a major Japanese business publication.46 with electronic money. The following categories accounted for proximity pay- ments volume in 2008: actual payments at a physical Japanese consumers also use the electronic wallets on retail location, 35 percent; online shopping, 34.5 per- their mobile phones to store identification information cent; transportation (trains, taxis, buses, etc.), 14.3 per- used to check into offices, apartment buildings, and cent; auctions, 8.3 percent; mobile music purchases, 4 health clubs, and register their attendance at school. percent; mobile game purchases, 1.6 percent; mobile thE information tEchnology & innovation foundation | novEmbEr 20 09 page 17
  • 21. e-book purchases, 1.2 percent; mobile video purchas- 3) contactless transactions that use credit on a postpaid es, 1.1 percent.47 Considering only the value of trans- basis, such as the DCMX credit service provided by actions executed when Japanese mobile subscribers DOCOMO. actually waved their FeliCa-enabled phones or smart cards in front of a FeliCa-enabled terminal reader, this The four largest electronic money services in Japan are amounted to $8.4 billion in 2008. (The remainder, Suica, iD (DOCOMO), Edy, and Nanaco. Suica, op- $8.6 billion, is accounted for by transactions billed to erated by JR East Railways, serves as electronic cash electronic money accounts but that were not actually (available either via smart card or mobile phone) that made in a contactless fashion. For example, one made can be used to pay railway fare or to make purchases a purchase on the Internet, but billed the charge to from affiliated kiosks and merchants. Over 27 million one’s electronic money account.) Japanese use Suica in lieu of cash to pay railway fare. Suica users alone make more than 200 million con- the Contactless Mobile payments Market in Japan tactless transactions per month in Japan.48 Nanaco is Contactless mobile payments in Japan began with the a contactless smart card and e-money service provided FeliCa smart card platform and subsequently migrated by Seven & I Holdings (7-Eleven stores), and Waon is into cell phones. FeliCa is an RFID-based contactless a contactless smart card and e-money service from the payments standard developed by Sony; it is akin to but AEON group (one of Japan’s largest retail chains). not yet interoperable with NFC. There are three major types of mobile FeliCa transactions—whether initiated As of August 2008, Japanese citizens held 84.56 mil- via a smart card or mobile phone—in Japan today: 1) lion mobile FeliCa accounts in Japan, including 67.7 contactless payments for rail/mass transit using a pre- million FeliCa-enabled smart cards, and 16.9 million paid, stored value card, such Japan Railway (JR) East’s FeliCa-enabled mobile phones. By service provider, JR Suica card; 2) mobile payments debited from a prepaid East had 25.9 million customers using the Suica smart digital cash (electronic money) account operated by card and an additional 1.22 million mobile customers; service providers such as Edy, Nanaco, or Waon; and Edy had 34.4 million smart card customers and an ad- Figure 3: growth of Mobile payments acceptance in Japan51 thE information tEchnology & innovation foundation | novEmbEr 20 09 page 18
  • 22. ditional 8.3 million more mobile customers; Nanaco In November 2001, this collaboration led JR East to had 6.13 million customers of its prepaid service, with launch the Suica (Super Urban Intelligent Card) con- 900,000 using the mobile phone service; and DO- tactless smart card, based on Sony’s FeliCa technology, COMO had 6.44 million customers using their mobile concurrently deploying FeliCa-enabled readers at the phones to make mobile purchases on a credit basis.49 turnstiles of the 424 stations in its commuter railroad (By August 2009, subscribers of DOCOMO’s DCMX network in the Tokyo area. Critically, Suica operated as credit service had surpassed 10 million.)50 Over an open-loop, transit-branded card, meaning that pas- 600,000 shops now accept mobile payments in Japan, sengers could use value stored on the Suica card not as Figure 3 shows. just for transit fare, but also to make purchases at af- filiated merchants and kiosks in railway stations (and history and development of Contactless Mobile elsewhere) that accepted the Suica card. By introducing payments in Japan an interoperable smart card system, Suica launched the Japan’s expertise in contactless smart card technology market for electronic money in Japan. dates back to 1988, when Sony began work on contact- less integrated circuit (IC) chips, culminating by 1995 Sony, looking to spur demand for its Mobile FeliCa in the development of the FeliCa contactless IC card technology, spearheaded in 2002 the creation of the technology.52 That same year, Hong Kong authorities joint venture BitWallet, Inc. which launched Edy, a adopted FeliCa IC chip technology for the Octopus contactless smart card-based, prepaid electronic mon- contactless card used in their public transportation ey service using the FeliCa chip. (Ownership of the system (akin to today’s SmarTrip cards in Washington, BitWallet joint venture is shared 33 percent by Sony, D.C.), and in 1999 Sony began trial use of the FeliCa 15 percent by DOCOMO, 5 percent by All Nippon card as an employee ID and “e-wallet” in a Tokyo Airways, with the remainder accounted for by more office and shopping complex. But by the end of the than 50 other companies.) Customers can use Edy as 1990s, FeliCa was struggling to find uptake and pen- digital cash to make purchases at am/pm, Circle K, etration in the Japanese market,53 in large part due to and Sunkus convenience stores, taxis, bookstores, and the system interdependency problem described previ- other venues. By 2007, Edy had attracted 23 million ously. smart card subscribers and 4.5 million phone subscrib- ers who generated 15 million transactions per month at For its part, Japan Rail (renamed JR East after its 1987 over 50,000 participating stores. However, Edy is not privatization), the country’s largest railway line, had interoperable with Suica.57 Nanaco, Waon, and others begun research and development into automated fare also emerged as competing digital card services. collection technology as early as 1987 and had intro- duced magnetic stripe cards in 1992.54 JR East and Encouraged by the success of Suica and Edy, Sony, Sony worked collaboratively throughout the 1990s JR East, and DOCOMO discussed the possibility of on contactless payment systems, experimenting with embedding FeliCa technology in DOCOMO’s phones, microwaves and battery-operated cards in trials from and by March 2003 the trio ascertained that it was tech- 1994 to 1997, finding that the advantages of moving nologically feasible to do so.58 The greater challenge, of from magnetic stripe cards to contactless cards are course, lay in identifying a sustainable business model accelerated transaction processing time—700 milli- for all parties. Sony would profit directly from sales of seconds for magnet stripe cards versus 200 millisec- the FeliCa chip, but because DOCOMO earned rev- onds for contactless cards—and enhanced reliability.55 enues primarily through voice and data services traf- (Payment terminals commonly found in mass transit, fic, and because contactless transactions settle over the which take in and return a magnetic stripe card, con- back-end of the financial payment network, contactless tain moving parts that convey the card through the mobile payments would not significantly increase tele- reader and are far more prone to mechanical failure communications traffic, and thus would not generate than contactless fare systems.) JR East also recognized a revenue stream DOCOMO could tap into.59 Take- that, by deploying contactless ticketing, it could sub- shi Natsuno, father of DOCOMO’s popular wireless stantially reduce the number of employees it deployed Internet service i-Mode and head of the DOCOMO in railway stations to handle paper-based ticketing.56 team negotiating with Sony, advanced a plan to split thE information tEchnology & innovation foundation | novEmbEr 20 09 page 19