Knowledge Management A practitioner’s perspective

Agenda What is knowledge management (KM) Definition(s) History Key concepts

What is knowledge management (KM)

Definition(s)

History

Key concepts

First, what is knowledge In simplest terms, knowledge is the ability of an actor to respond to a body of facts and principles accumulated over a period of time One way to look at knowledge is as the apogee of the following continuum – data  information  knowledge Data=1 unit of fact; information=aggregation of data; knowledge=potential for action on information Data and information have intrinsic properties, the quality of knowledge depends on the properties of the agent

In simplest terms, knowledge is the ability of an actor to respond to a body of facts and principles accumulated over a period of time

One way to look at knowledge is as the apogee of the following continuum – data  information  knowledge

Data=1 unit of fact; information=aggregation of data; knowledge=potential for action on information

Data and information have intrinsic properties, the quality of knowledge depends on the properties of the agent

What is knowledge management There is no universal definition for knowledge management At its broadest, KM is the ‘process through which organizations generate value from intellectual and knowledge based assets’

There is no universal definition for knowledge management

At its broadest, KM is the ‘process through which organizations generate value from intellectual and knowledge based assets’

Knowledge assets There are two types of knowledge assets – Explicit or formal assets like copyrights, patents, templates, publications, reports, archives, etc. Tacit or informal assets that are rooted in human experience and include personal belief, perspective, and values

There are two types of knowledge assets –

Explicit or formal assets like copyrights, patents, templates, publications, reports, archives, etc.

Tacit or informal assets that are rooted in human experience and include personal belief, perspective, and values

The value of knowledge assets Knowledge assets are often described as the the intellectual capital of an organization The value of intellectual capital is often intangible A popular measure is the difference between the cost of capital assets and the cost of replacing them

Knowledge assets are often described as the the intellectual capital of an organization

The value of intellectual capital is often intangible

A popular measure is the difference between the cost of capital assets and the cost of replacing them

The value of KM It is important to manage knowledge assets because – Organizations compete increasingly on the base of knowledge (the only sustainable competitive advantage, according to some) Most of our work is information based (and often immersed in a computing environment) Our products, services, and environment are more complex than ever before Workforces are increasingly unstable leading to escalating demands for knowledge replacement/acquisition

It is important to manage knowledge assets because –

Organizations compete increasingly on the base of knowledge (the only sustainable competitive advantage, according to some)

Most of our work is information based (and often immersed in a computing environment)

Our products, services, and environment are more complex than ever before

Workforces are increasingly unstable leading to escalating demands for knowledge replacement/acquisition

The development of KM Knowledge began to be viewed as a competitive asset in the 80s, around the same time that information explosion started becoming an issue The trend was fueled by the development of IT systems which made it simple to store, display, and archive classified, indexed information The process received a fillip after Drucker (and others) stressed the role of knowledge as an organization resource, and Senge popularized ‘learning organizations’ Seeds of KM may also be found in business practices like TQM and BPR to which KM is often compared

Knowledge began to be viewed as a competitive asset in the 80s, around the same time that information explosion started becoming an issue

The trend was fueled by the development of IT systems which made it simple to store, display, and archive classified, indexed information

The process received a fillip after Drucker (and others) stressed the role of knowledge as an organization resource, and Senge popularized ‘learning organizations’

Seeds of KM may also be found in business practices like TQM and BPR to which KM is often compared

The sources of KM Today, KM draws from a wide range of disciplines/practices – Cognitive science Groupware, AI, KBMS Library and information science Document management Decision support systems Technical writing Organizational science Many more

Today, KM draws from a wide range of disciplines/practices –

Cognitive science

Groupware, AI, KBMS

Library and information science

Document management

Decision support systems

Technical writing

Organizational science

Many more

KM today (catch-all?) There is a great risk today of KM over-reaching itself Everything from organizational learning to business and competitive intelligence has become fair game for KM There are KM components to each of these but these spaces are however best left to specialized practitioners

There is a great risk today of KM over-reaching itself

Everything from organizational learning to business and competitive intelligence has become fair game for KM

There are KM components to each of these but these spaces are however best left to specialized practitioners

The scope of KM Today, most companies define the scope of KM as – KM mechanics (tools for information management) KM culture (knowledge as a social activity) KM systems (knowledge sharing as part of an organization’s DNA)

Today, most companies define the scope of KM as –

KM mechanics (tools for information management)

KM culture (knowledge as a social activity)

KM systems (knowledge sharing as part of an organization’s DNA)

KM mechanics Information management may well be considered the first wave of KM (and is still often considered synonymous with KM) Information management tries to make the right information available to the right person at the right time though a variety of database driven information applications Information management tools try to capture the human experience of knowledge through the collecting, classifying, disseminating, searching, indexing, and archival power of technology

Information management may well be considered the first wave of KM (and is still often considered synonymous with KM)

Information management tries to make the right information available to the right person at the right time though a variety of database driven information applications

Information management tools try to capture the human experience of knowledge through the collecting, classifying, disseminating, searching, indexing, and archival power of technology

Limitations of mechanical KM Reliance on technology produces consensual knowledge (over-reliance on best practices for instance) and may stifle innovation The notion that ‘right information’ is predictable and flows from historical data may be flawed Making information available in not enough; getting people to use it is more critical

Reliance on technology produces consensual knowledge (over-reliance on best practices for instance) and may stifle innovation

The notion that ‘right information’ is predictable and flows from historical data may be flawed

Making information available in not enough; getting people to use it is more critical

KM culture All knowledge has a social and evolutionary facet There is a crying need to continuously subject knowledge to re-examination and modification It is important to keep the human and social elements of organization involved in all stored knowledge

All knowledge has a social and evolutionary facet

There is a crying need to continuously subject knowledge to re-examination and modification

It is important to keep the human and social elements of organization involved in all stored knowledge

KM culture through CoP Communities of practice (or thematic groups) are a popular way of injecting KM culture in an organization CoPs are fora where members share information and experiences, develop new insights, assimilate and transform knowledge CoPs emphasize shared interests and work across locations and time zones (often using technology developed during KM’s first wave)

Communities of practice (or thematic groups) are a popular way of injecting KM culture in an organization

CoPs are fora where members share information and experiences, develop new insights, assimilate and transform knowledge

CoPs emphasize shared interests and work across locations and time zones (often using technology developed during KM’s first wave)

KM systems KM succeeds fully when it is woven into the fabric of an organization and becomes intrinsic to an organization’s processes Common practices include – Formal KM leadership Formal rewards and recognition for KM oriented work Tools and mechanisms that encourage knowledge sharing Development of knowledge bases Intellectual asset management Metrics to evaluate KM initiatives

KM succeeds fully when it is woven into the fabric of an organization and becomes intrinsic to an organization’s processes

Common practices include –

Formal KM leadership

Formal rewards and recognition for KM oriented work

Tools and mechanisms that encourage knowledge sharing

Development of knowledge bases

Intellectual asset management

Metrics to evaluate KM initiatives

KM systems today In many ways, the systemic approach is the logical culmination of KM mechanics and KM culture Many KM systems are however not yet robust enough – KM metrics (surveys, benchmarking, cost/benefit studies, service evaluation) are still an inexact science Knowledge workers are often KM resistant (KM is frequently considered an oxymoron)

In many ways, the systemic approach is the logical culmination of KM mechanics and KM culture

Many KM systems are however not yet robust enough –

KM metrics (surveys, benchmarking, cost/benefit studies, service evaluation) are still an inexact science

Knowledge workers are often KM resistant (KM is frequently considered an oxymoron)

KM – the report card Clearly, the jury is still out on KM though there is increased acceptance that KM can be central to organizational success The key achievements of KM have been in emphasizing that – There is a tacit dimension of knowledge creation which must be recognized and valued Knowledge is subjective and interpretative and distinct from raw data or information Meaning is central to knowledge creation Knowledge is social and interactive in nature Technology is an inalienable aspect of KM

Clearly, the jury is still out on KM though there is increased acceptance that KM can be central to organizational success

The key achievements of KM have been in emphasizing that –

There is a tacit dimension of knowledge creation which must be recognized and valued

Knowledge is subjective and interpretative and distinct from raw data or information

Meaning is central to knowledge creation

Knowledge is social and interactive in nature

Technology is an inalienable aspect of KM

KM readings/references Good sources on the internet include The KM forum ( http://www.km-forum.org/ ) The CIO magazine’s knowledge management research center ( http://www.cio.com/research/knowledge/ ) The KMNetwork ( http://www.brint.com/km/ ) The KM resource center ( http://www.kmresource.com/exp. htm )

Good sources on the internet include

The KM forum ( http://www.km-forum.org/ )

The CIO magazine’s knowledge management research center ( http://www.cio.com/research/knowledge/ )

The KMNetwork ( http://www.brint.com/km/ )

The KM resource center ( http://www.kmresource.com/exp. htm )

KM readings/references – contd. The KM literature is vast, but good starting points include – Nonaka, Ikujiro, and Hirotaka Takeuchi. The Knowledge-Creating Company. Senge, Peter M. The Fifth Discipline: The Art and Practice of the Learning Organization Wiig, Karl, M. Knowledge Management Foundations: Thinking About Thinking - How People and Organizations Represent, Create and Use Knowledge Menou, Michel J. (Ed.). Measuring the Impact of Information on Development Harris, Michael H. History of Libraries in the Western World

The KM literature is vast, but good starting points include –

Nonaka, Ikujiro, and Hirotaka Takeuchi. The Knowledge-Creating Company.

Senge, Peter M. The Fifth Discipline: The Art and Practice of the Learning Organization

Wiig, Karl, M. Knowledge Management Foundations: Thinking About Thinking - How People and Organizations Represent, Create and Use Knowledge

Menou, Michel J. (Ed.). Measuring the Impact of Information on Development

Harris, Michael H. History of Libraries in the Western World

Feedback/Questions