Neo pi

3,667 views
2,884 views

Published on

0 Comments
2 Likes
Statistics
Notes
  • Be the first to comment

No Downloads
Views
Total views
3,667
On SlideShare
0
From Embeds
0
Number of Embeds
8
Actions
Shares
0
Downloads
98
Comments
0
Likes
2
Embeds 0
No embeds

No notes for slide

Neo pi

  1. 1. NEO-PI-R
  2. 2. The test was developed by Paul T. Costa, Jr. and Robert R. McCrae for use with adult (17+) men and women without overt psychopathology. The original version of the measurement, published in 1978, was the Neuroticism-Extroversion-Openness Inventory (NEO-I). This version only measured three of the Big Five personality traits. It was later revised in 1985 to include all five traits and renamed the NEO Personality Inventory (NEO PI). In this version, "NEO" was now considered part of the name of the test and was no longer an acronym. This naming convention continued with the third version, the NEO PI-R, published in 1990.
  3. 3. The NEO-PI-3, an update to the NEO Inventory, was published in 2005. A mnemonic device for the five primary factors is the acronym "OCEAN," or alternatively "CANOE". The short version, the NEO-Five Factor Inventory (NEOFFI), has 60 items (12 items per domain).  The NEO PI-R and NEO-FFI were updated in 2010 in a manual called the NEO Inventories for the NEO Personality Inventory-3, NEO Five-Factor Model 3, and NEO Personality Inventory-Revised. While the NEO PI-R is still being published, the NEO-PI-3 and NEO-FFI-3 feature updated normative data and new forms.
  4. 4. NEO-PI-R Based on Big Five personality dimensions Rationally and factor analytically derived Newest of the major personality inventories Very popular with researchers Composed of 5 domains, each with 6 facets Easy to administer and score
  5. 5. The Big Five  Neuroticism  Anxiety, Angry Hostility, Depression, Self-Consciousness, Impulsiveness, Vulnerability  Extraversion  Warmth, Gregariousness, Assertiveness, Activity, Excitement-Seeking, Positive Emotions  Openness  Fantasy, Aesthetics, Feelings, Actions, Ideas, Values  Agreeableness  Trust, Straightforwardness, Altruism, Compliance, Modesty, Tender-Mindedness  Conscientiousness  Competence, Order, Dutifulness, Achievement Striving, Self-Discipline, Deliberation
  6. 6. AREA OF APPLICATION The NEO PI-R has applications in occupational assessment for selection and development vocational guidance counseling research
  7. 7. Forms In the most recent publication, there are two forms for the NEO, one for self report (form S) and one for observer rating (form R). Both forms consist of 240 items (descriptions of behavior) answered on a five point scale, ranging from "strongly disagree" to "strongly agree". Finally, there is a 60-item assessment of domains only called the "NEO FFI." There are paper and computer versions of all forms available.
  8. 8. Administration  Costa and McCrae report that the assessment should not be evaluated if there are more than 40 items missing.  They also state that despite the fact that the assessment is "balanced" to control for the effects of acquiescence and nay-saying, that if more than 150 responses, or less than 50 responses, are "agree" or "strongly agree," the results should be interpreted with caution.  Scores can be reported to most test takers on "Your NEO Summary," which provides a brief explanation of the assessment, and gives the participants’ domain levels and a strengths-based description of three levels (high, medium, and low) in each domain.  For example, low N reads "Secure, hardy, and generally relaxed even under stressful conditions," whereas high N reads "Sensitive, emotional, and prone to experience feelings that are upsetting." For profile interpretation, facet and domain scores are reported in T Scores and are recorded visually as compared to the appropriate norm group, much like other measures of personality.
  9. 9. DURATION Test form- standard No. of items- 243 Time taken- 35 min
  10. 10. Psychometric properties  The psychometric properties reported below relate to the UK adaptation of the NEO PI-R.  Reliability Item analysis, (Cronbach’s Alpha) and factor analysis were carried out on a sample of 609 respondents in the UK Anglicization study. The UK results show close alignment with those from the US. The domain scales show internal reliabilities which range from .87 to .92. Facet scales show internal reliabilities ranging from .58 to .82. Test retest reliabilities are all above .75  Validity Validity data is extensive; for a full account the reader is referred to the Professional Manual (US edition), and reference lists are available from the publishers. 
  11. 11. Characteristics of NEO-PI-R N1 Anxiety N2 Angry Hostility N3 Depression N4 Self-Consciousness N5 Impulsiveness N6 Vulnerability E1 Warmth E2 Gregariousness E3 Assertiveness E4 Activity E5 Excitement Seeking E6 Positive Emotions O1 Openness to Fantasy O2 Openness to Aesthetics O3 Openness to Feelings O4 Openness to Actions O5 Openness to Ideas O6 Openness to Values A1 Trust A2 Straightforwardness A3 Altruism A4 Compliance A5 Modesty A6 Tender-Mindedness C1 Competence C2 Order C3 Dutifulness C4 Achievement Striving C5 Self-Discipline C6 Deliberation N Neuroticism      E Extraversion      O Openness to Experience      A Agreeableness      C Conscientiousness
  12. 12. Norms
  13. 13. Sample profile sheet
  14. 14. NEO-PI-R Interpretation: Some Combinations Emotional style: N & E Interpersonal style: E & A Vocational interests: E & O Attitudes: O & A Academics: O & C Character: A & C
  15. 15. NEO-PI-R and Personality Disorders N E O A C H L L L - H - L L H H - L L H L - H - Paranoid - Antisocial Borderline Dependent
  16. 16. References Lord, Wendy (2007). NEO PI-R - A Guide to Interpretation and Feedback in a Work Context. Hogrefe Ltd, Oxford. B. Bell, C. L. Rose, & A. Damon (1972). "The normative aging study: An interdisciplinary and longitudinal study of health and aging". Aging & Human Development.  McCrae, R. R., & Costa, P. T., Jr., (2010). NEO Inventories: Professional manual. Lutz, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources, Inc. Church, A. T.; Katigbak, M. S. (2002). "Indigenization of psychology in the Philippines".International Journal of Psychology 

×