Legal Guidelines regarding the Use of Electronic Patient Data. Do we need new Rules of the Game?

920 views
794 views

Published on

Legal Guidelines regarding the Use of Electronic Patient Data. Do we need new Rules of the Game?. Van Overstraeten T. eHealth week 2010 (Barcelona: CCIB Convention Centre; 2010)

Published in: Health & Medicine
0 Comments
0 Likes
Statistics
Notes
  • Be the first to comment

  • Be the first to like this

No Downloads
Views
Total views
920
On SlideShare
0
From Embeds
0
Number of Embeds
5
Actions
Shares
0
Downloads
20
Comments
0
Likes
0
Embeds 0
No embeds

No notes for slide

Legal Guidelines regarding the Use of Electronic Patient Data. Do we need new Rules of the Game?

  1. 1. Legal Guidelines on the Use of Electronic Patient Data Do we need new rules of the game?
  2. 2. Introduction • Health informatics increase ability to collect and process patient data • Positive effects on patient care • Help reduce medical errors • Promote evidence-based medicine by increasing clinical data for research and enhancing scientific knowledge (secondary use) • Limitation: privacy and secrecy of patient data
  3. 3. EU Legal Framework • EU Directive 95/46 of 24 October 1995 • Privacy and personal data protection recognised as fundamental rights (Article 16 Lisbon TFEU 2009) • Other Directives re. electronic data • Directive 2002/58/EC of 12 July 2002 • Modified by Directive 2009/136/EC of 25 November 2009
  4. 4. EU Directive 95/46 • Main purposes • Freedom of circulation of personal data within the EU • Protection of personal data • Personal data = data related to an identified or identifiable individual • Processing broadly defined as any type of use • Specific category for electronic patient data • Health-related data (“sensitive”, additional protection)
  5. 5. EU Directive 95/46 • Main principles • Fair and lawful processing • For limited purposes (no further incompatible processing) • Adequate, relevant and not excessive • Accurate and up to date • Not kept for longer than is necessary • Data subjects’ rights (information and access) • Secured processing (technically and organisationally) • No transfer to third countries without adequate protection • Notification to relevant regulator
  6. 6. Health-related data • Relevant legal ground for processing (Article 8) • Explicit consent of the data subject • Protection of data subject’s vital interests • For preventive medicine, medical diagnosis, treatment or healthcare services, with supervision by a health professional bound by professional secrecy
  7. 7. Secondary use • Hierarchy for the further processing of personal data for scientific purposes (WP 29 No. 136 of 2007): • Anonymous data • If impossible to achieve the scientific purpose with the latter: pseudonymised data (key-coded data) • If impossible to achieve the scientific purpose: non pseudonymised data (= personal data) • Issue of (ir)reversibility of data
  8. 8. Secondary use • Directive flexible for scientific research and public health interest (with local implementation issues): • Further data processing not incompatible with initial purpose (Article 6.1 b and Recital 29) • Data may be stored for longer period (Article 6.1, e) • Member States may derogate from the prohibition to process sensitive data (Recital 34) • No obligation of information when impossible or disproportionate (Article 11.2 and Recital 40)
  9. 9. Guidelines re. secondary processing 1. Prepare inventory of candidate sources (e.g. database of clinical trials, routine healthcare) 2. Review extent of anonymisation/codification and perform risk assessment re. identifiability of data subjects 3. Pay particular attention to potential identifiers, including presence of rare disorders, key coded data Source: Association of the British Pharmaceutical Industry (ABPI) - 2007
  10. 10. Guidelines re. secondary processing 4. Review information provided to data subjects and their consents upon data collection for primary purpose • Statement re. potential future uses or planned duration or storage of data? • Compatibility of proposed processing with original consent (i.e. not truly a secondary use)? 5. Generate a risk statement with • Evaluation of likelihood of data subject’s identification • Compatibility with original stated purpose • Justification for proposed secondary use of the data
  11. 11. Guidelines re. secondary processing 6. Determine if • Tracking down and re-consenting of data subject is needed OR • The data should be anonymised OR • Other legal grounds enabling processing for secondary use
  12. 12. New Rules? • Existing legal framework in the EU under review • Two main developments since 1995 • Digital technology (telemedicine, electronic health records, eHealth platform, etc.) • Globalisation of medical research
  13. 13. New Rules? • Need for a single legal framework to respond to globalisation • Need for harmonisation and standardisation of approach (e.g. template consent forms) • Same protection to all health-related data irrespective of geographic location of data subjects • ⇒ International Convention (WHO)
  14. 14. Questions? Tanguy Van Overstraeten Linklaters LLP Rue Brederode 13 1000 Brussels Belgium Tel: +32 2 501 94 05 tvanover@linklaters.com

×