Allied Health Professions and Licensure Efforts

Uploaded on


  • Full Name Full Name Comment goes here.
    Are you sure you want to
    Your message goes here
    Be the first to comment
    Be the first to like this
No Downloads


Total Views
On Slideshare
From Embeds
Number of Embeds



Embeds 0

No embeds

Report content

Flagged as inappropriate Flag as inappropriate
Flag as inappropriate

Select your reason for flagging this presentation as inappropriate.

    No notes for slide


  • 1. Allied Health Professions and Licensure Efforts
  • 2. Can We Go for One National License?
    • NO
    • Why Not?
    • Feds don’t want it
    • States want to keep it
    • *Decades of precedent
  • 3. Licensure is to Protect the Health and Safety of the Citizens of the State
    • Licensure regulates both the Practice of the Profession and those who render those defined services
    • Must Define Parameters within the Scope of Practice section
    • Then must set standards/requirements for those who will provide that scope of practice
  • 4. Regulating the Practice
    • Professions scope of practice can vary state to state.
    • Meet the needs of the citizens: what you can’t do in CA you could do in Alaska
    • States, not the feds, set the parameters what can and cannot be done
  • 5. Regulating the Practitioners
    • Process applications -is it filled out right?
    • Issue and renew licenses – have they met the CEs requirements, etc? Is that course really acceptable for a CE credit?
    • Disciplinary complaints: must investigate
    • Provide procedural rights for practitioner with disciplinary action taken
    • Collect the fees (States want the $$$)
  • 6. Nurse Compact
    • Comes close to national license for nurses-sort of…….
    • License issued in nurses resident state; can work “off” of license issued in one state in those states participating in Nurse Compact
    • Advocated by National Council of State Boards of Nursing
  • 7. Nurses Participating in NC Must
    • Adhere to all state laws where practicing
    • between states in relation to licensure /
    • re-registration requirements, such
    • as mandatory continuing education,
    • criminal background checks, disciplinary
    • causes of action, and evidentiary
    • standards
  • 8.
    • Since 1997 -21 states participate in Nurse Compact
    • Requires each state legislature to enact and change current laws- Not very eager
    • American Nurses Association: “agrees to disagree” with details of the complicated NC process
  • 9. State by State Effort What Do You Need to Have in Place?
    • Professional Infrastructure
    • Strong State Association
    • Strong (Central) National Association
  • 10. Professional Infrastructure
    • Are there enough practitioners to make a state by state case?
    • Is there a rationale for patient safety
    • Licensure is NOT for professional enhancement or job security
    • States want to license “professions” not occupations or disciplines
  • 11.
    • Profession= nationwide accredited education/training programs
    • Are they educated the same; curricula the same?
    • Are there enough schools across the country?
  • 12.
    • Consistent and valid competency test
    • Are they all tested on the same content?
    • States will use the professional competency test as state licensure exam
    • Cost of developing a state based test is $50K
  • 13. Strong State Society
    • Will lead the legislative effort
    • Accept the fact it may take several years
    • Does the state society have the people, time, and money?
    • Leaders in the state will be the “face” of the profession to the legislators
    • Will have to convince rank and file to support licensure efforts
  • 14.
    • Need to have the support from other key licensed professions
    • Physicians are crucial, so are nurses
    • Already a powerful, influential factor in state health policy
    • Have legislators/policy makers ears
  • 15.
    • State hospital associations traditionally oppose licensing professions
    • Argument: it will cost more money
    • No proven evidence to that, but has impact anyway
    • Therefore need other professions (docs) support to offset
  • 16.
    • Most state societies are volunteer
    • Lobbying is not their profession
    • Licensure effort takes time
    • Many states if the can afford it hire state a lobbyist to spearhead effort
    • Still need cohort of state leaders to carry it through- Gov’t/Leg Affairs Cmte.
    • What are the financial resources of the state society?
  • 17. Communication System
    • Must have a good communication system in place
    • Need to let members and supporters know what is happening and when to make contact with their legislators
    • Need to communicate with legislators
    • Internet vastly makes this easier
  • 18. Strong National Association
    • Act as ringmaster/cheerleader
    • May act as financier
    • Develop a Model Practice Act, should use as a template in every state
    • Key to that: consistent scope of practice
    • Clearinghouse for support documents
    • Advice on what worked elsewhere
  • 19. Model Licensure Language will change over time
    • Each state is unique
    • Services provided may differ to some extent in different states
    • Interested parties are different with different agendas
    • Compromises will be made
  • 20. State By State Licensure Takes Time
    • Scope of Practice will evolve
    • RTs licensed in the 1980’s no smoking cessation, telecommunications, Dx. Mgt.
    • More focus on alternate site care
    • patients leave hospital “sicker and quicker”
    • New disciplines emerge, overlap of practice
  • 21. Respiratory Therapy Experience
    • Model Practice Act developed as template
    • Licensure first began in early ’80s
    • Currently there are 48 states, DC and PR that are licensed.
    • Hawaii and Alaska not yet licensed
    • Last state to gain licensure was Alabama-2004
  • 22.
    • Similarities among states:
    • Licensure requirements: graduates of accredited schools of RT
    • Take the national credentialing exam used as state licensure exam
    • Majority (but not all) of scope of practice is the same
  • 23. Examples of Political Compromise
    • Under Medical Direction
    • Supervision: only by a Doc
    • Supervision: Doc, Nurse Practitioner, Physician Assistant (LA revised 2007)
    • Continuing ed:
    • 3 states none required (UT, CO, WI)
    • 24 biennially in Al, 12 biennially in RI
  • 24. Compromise
    • Scope of practice issues
    • ECMO: No way in NJ, absolutely in TX
    • Protocols: Can do in most states, only in an emergency in OH
  • 25. Compromise
    • 18 RC “Boards” are under Board of Medicine
    • Most fully independent RC Licensure Bds.
    • Some are Advisory Councils rarely meet, paid state staff administers and addresses issues (WA)
  • 26. Regulatory Agencies
    • Depending on the state, some state licensure boards have sweeping authority to “creatively” interpret the law
    • Others extremely restrained in what they can do
    • Just the nature of the state government psyche
  • 27. The way a state licenses
    • States like to follow similar formula
    • What did they do for other allied health professions in the state?
    • License renewal: annual/biennial?
    • Most now all follow same disciplinary criteria (liability reasons)
    • States make revisions that affect all licensure boards
  • 28.
    • Once licensure is gained must be tended to: new/revised regulations
    • Advise state societies to fight the urge to tweak the law, can be a Pandora’s box
  • 29. Licensure Like a Chess Game
    • Get all the pieces on the board before you make your first move
    • And have patience