ED-6620
Stefan Moores
 What is the future of e-learning going to
encompass??
 Does there need to be new pedagogical
approaches to effectively ...
 Defined by Harley, Lawrence and the
University of California (2007) as being mostly
facilitated through the use of the i...
 According to Scott Niper (1989), as cited in
Guri-Rosenblit (2005, p. 467), the three are:
 Correspondence teaching.
 ...
 Wiki’s
 Blog’s
 Podcast’s
(Conrad, 2008)
WebCT Window Blackboard Window
 Integrated Learning System’s, web content and
digital text (McFarlane, 2001).
 According to Tsai (2009) there are a number of
benefits for e-learners, which include…
 Flexible time and space.
 Allo...
 Hughes (2007) believes that future e-learning
environments must include…
 Freedom to challenge ideas.
 Must not become...
 ‘Disruptive’ technologies need ‘Disruptive’
Pedagogies (Remtulla, 2006).
 Teaching strategies must exploit underused
as...
 Combines many pedagogical styles (Breen,
2007).
 There are many positive benefits to using a
blended learning approach ...
 Connectivism-the learning process is cyclical,
in that learners will connect to a network to
share and find new informat...
 E-learner’s must be passionate and considerate
in the use of technologies for e-learning
(Conrad, 2008).
 New technolog...
 Abbad, M., Morris, D., & de Nahlik, C. (2009). Looking under the Bonnet: Factors
Affecting Student Adoption of E-Learnin...
 Hedberg, J. (2006). E-Learning Futures? Speculations for a Time Yet to Come. Studies in
Continuing Education, 28(2), 171...
The Evolution of E-Learning...ED-6620
The Evolution of E-Learning...ED-6620
The Evolution of E-Learning...ED-6620
The Evolution of E-Learning...ED-6620
The Evolution of E-Learning...ED-6620
The Evolution of E-Learning...ED-6620
The Evolution of E-Learning...ED-6620
The Evolution of E-Learning...ED-6620
The Evolution of E-Learning...ED-6620
The Evolution of E-Learning...ED-6620
Upcoming SlideShare
Loading in...5
×

The Evolution of E-Learning...ED-6620

2,567

Published on

This is a critical slidecast of the future of e-learning and the new pedagogies which it encompasses.

Published in: Education, Technology
0 Comments
3 Likes
Statistics
Notes
  • Be the first to comment

No Downloads
Views
Total Views
2,567
On Slideshare
0
From Embeds
0
Number of Embeds
1
Actions
Shares
0
Downloads
113
Comments
0
Likes
3
Embeds 0
No embeds

No notes for slide

The Evolution of E-Learning...ED-6620

  1. 1. ED-6620 Stefan Moores
  2. 2.  What is the future of e-learning going to encompass??  Does there need to be new pedagogical approaches to effectively address e-learning??
  3. 3.  Defined by Harley, Lawrence and the University of California (2007) as being mostly facilitated through the use of the internet and may be assisted by other technologies such as interactive communication technologies or ICT’s.  According to Remtulla (2007) it is a ‘Grand Solution’ for the future of education.
  4. 4.  According to Scott Niper (1989), as cited in Guri-Rosenblit (2005, p. 467), the three are:  Correspondence teaching.  Print with broadcast media.  Use of ICT’s and the internet.
  5. 5.  Wiki’s  Blog’s  Podcast’s (Conrad, 2008)
  6. 6. WebCT Window Blackboard Window
  7. 7.  Integrated Learning System’s, web content and digital text (McFarlane, 2001).
  8. 8.  According to Tsai (2009) there are a number of benefits for e-learners, which include…  Flexible time and space.  Allows for indirect social interaction.  Abundance of learning resources  Dynamic learning interfaces.
  9. 9.  Hughes (2007) believes that future e-learning environments must include…  Freedom to challenge ideas.  Must not become static, insular or exclusive.  Build a sense of community.  Interactions provide greater opportunity to engage the learner.
  10. 10.  ‘Disruptive’ technologies need ‘Disruptive’ Pedagogies (Remtulla, 2006).  Teaching strategies must exploit underused aspects of E-Learning technologies (Remtulla, 2006).
  11. 11.  Combines many pedagogical styles (Breen, 2007).  There are many positive benefits to using a blended learning approach (Clarke, 2007).  Couples face-to-face learning with e-learning (Breen, 2007)
  12. 12.  Connectivism-the learning process is cyclical, in that learners will connect to a network to share and find new information, will modify their beliefs on the basis of new learning, and will then connect to a network to share these realizations and find new information once more (Hill & Kop, 2008, p. 2).
  13. 13.  E-learner’s must be passionate and considerate in the use of technologies for e-learning (Conrad, 2008).  New technologies and pedagogical approaches are necessary (Christen, 2009).
  14. 14.  Abbad, M., Morris, D., & de Nahlik, C. (2009). Looking under the Bonnet: Factors Affecting Student Adoption of E-Learning Systems in Jordan. International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 10(2).  Breen, P. (2007). Lessons from an International e-Learning Project. International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 8(3), 1-10.  Christen, A. (2009, January 1). Transforming the Classroom for Collaborative Learning in the 21st Century. Techniques: Connecting Education and Careers, 84(1), 28-31.  Clarke, A. (2007). The Future of E-Learning. Adults Learning, 18(7), 14-15.  Conrad, D. (2008). Reflecting on Strategies for a New Learning Culture: Can we do it? Journal of Distance Education, 22(3), 157-161.  Davies, J., & Pigott, N. (2004). E-Learning across the Atlantic. Commentary. Perspectives London policy and practice in higher education, 8(2), 37-40.  Guri-Rosenblit, S. (2005). Distance Education and E-Learning: Not the Same Thing. Higher Education: The International Journal of Higher Education and Educational Planning, 49(4), 467-493.  Harley, D., Lawrence, S., & University of California, B. (2007). The Regulation of E- Learning: New National and International Policy Perspectives. Research & Occasional Paper Series: A Report. Revised. Online Submission. Retrieved August 3, 2009, from ERIC.
  15. 15.  Hedberg, J. (2006). E-Learning Futures? Speculations for a Time Yet to Come. Studies in Continuing Education, 28(2), 171-183.  Hill, A., & Kop, R. (2008). Connectivism: Learning Theory of the Future or Vestige of the Past?. International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 9(3), 1-13.  Hughes, G. (2007). Diversity, Identity and Belonging in E-Learning Communities: Some Theories and Paradoxes. Teaching in Higher Education, 12, 709-720.  Kanuka, H., & Kelland, J. (2008). Has e-Learning Delivered on its Promises? Expert Opinion on the Impact of e-Learning in Higher Education. The Canadian Journal of Higher Education, 38(1), 45-65.  McFarlane, Kathryn. (2001). Just another electric circus? Meeting standards for K to 12 e- learning classroom resources. Education Canada, 41(3), 26.  Remtulla, K. (2007). The Knowledge-Based Economy and E-Learning: Critical Considerations for Workplace Democracy. Convergence, 40, 9-24.  Tsai, M. (2009). The Model of Strategic e-Learning: Understanding and Evaluating Student e-Learning from Metacognitive Perspectives. Educational Technology & Society, 12(1), 34-48.  Watson, L. (2007). Building the Future of Learning. European Journal of Education, 42(2), 255-263.
  1. A particular slide catching your eye?

    Clipping is a handy way to collect important slides you want to go back to later.

×