Your SlideShare is downloading. ×
0
Logic
Logic
Logic
Logic
Logic
Logic
Logic
Upcoming SlideShare
Loading in...5
×

Thanks for flagging this SlideShare!

Oops! An error has occurred.

×
Saving this for later? Get the SlideShare app to save on your phone or tablet. Read anywhere, anytime – even offline.
Text the download link to your phone
Standard text messaging rates apply

Logic

205

Published on

A very simple introduction to logic designed for my high school senior writing students who were failing to make logical connections.

A very simple introduction to logic designed for my high school senior writing students who were failing to make logical connections.

Published in: Education, Technology, Spiritual
0 Comments
0 Likes
Statistics
Notes
  • Be the first to comment

  • Be the first to like this

No Downloads
Views
Total Views
205
On Slideshare
0
From Embeds
0
Number of Embeds
0
Actions
Shares
0
Downloads
9
Comments
0
Likes
0
Embeds 0
No embeds

Report content
Flagged as inappropriate Flag as inappropriate
Flag as inappropriate

Select your reason for flagging this presentation as inappropriate.

Cancel
No notes for slide

Transcript

  • 1. LogicThis Web site provides, through a range of materials and tools, an introduction to thestudy of elementary logic covering propositional and predicate calculus. It is aimedespecially at first year undergraduates studying Philosophy at the University ofOxford, but it is hoped that the site may be useful more widely, for anyone whowould like to investigate the subject."Elementary, my dearWatson."Unless otherwise noted all content comes from: http://logic.philosophy.ox.ac.uk/
  • 2. ConsistentInconsistent(Not contradictoryContradictory) Peter believes that Mary is a woman and that she hasthree hundred children. Peter believes that David has three daughters and foursons, and Davidhas six children in all. Peter believes that David has exactly four children, thatDavidssister is Mary and that Marys only brother hasthree children. Men have children. Peter is a man. Peter has children. Men have children. Peter is a man. Peter does not havechildren.
  • 3. LexicalAmbiguityStructuralAmbiguityLexical "You know, somebodyactually complimented meon my driving today. Theyleft a little note on thewindscreen; it said, ParkingFine." So that was nice." "Outside of a dog, a book isa mans best friend; insideits too hard to read." The Rabbi married my sister. She is looking for a match.Structural The professor said onMonday he would give anexam. The chicken is ready to eat. Visiting relatives can beboring. The burglar threatened thestudent with a knifehttp://grammar.about.com/od/il/g/lexicalambiguityterm.htm http://grammar.about.com/od/rs/g/syntacticambiguityterm.htm
  • 4. ArgumentsAn argument consists of a conclusion (which is what is being argued for) anda premise or premises which are the considerations which are being offered infavour of the conclusion.For example:Socrates is a man. All men are mortal. So, Socrates is mortal.The premises of this argument are, of course, "Socrates is a man" and "All men aremortal" and the conclusion is "Socrates is mortal".Note: the conclusion of an argument need not come at the end. It might come at thebeginning, as in:Socrates is mortal. For all men are mortal, and he is a man.Or in the middle, as in:Socrates is a man. So, he is mortal. For all men are mortal.
  • 5. Arguments1. John will come to the party, because he has been invited, and he likes parties.2. John doesnt like parties. So he will come to the party because he has beeninvited. For he always accepts invitations.3. Mary says that Manchester United will beat Derby County. So , since she isalways right about such things, they will.4. Mary says that Manchester United will beat Derby County. So, if she is rightabout such things, they will.Identify the premises (2)and conclusion (1).
  • 6. Validity An argument is valid just if it would be impossible for itspremises all to be true and its conclusion false simultaneously. In a valid argument, there is no need for the premises to betrue. (One may want the premises of ones argument to be true;but their not being true does not affect itsvalidity. All dogs go to Heaven. Dingo is a dog. Dingo will go to Heaven. All people are dumb. Sam is a person. Sam is smart.
  • 7. Validity Either The Patriots or the Philadelphia Eagles will win the Superbowl.The Patriots lost.Therefore The Eagles won. Michael J Fox has Parkinsons disease.Michael J Fox is a vegetarian.To be healthy one should eat meat.http://kslinker.com/VALID-AND-INVALID-ARGUMENTS.html

×