1. Circle every word you do not know and cannot figure out from context.2. Answer the questions following each paragraph.3...
dangerousness, labeling and participants’ sociodemographic characteristics. Twenty percent ofthe participants labeled a ta...
displayed toward mental patients. Additionally, the variables of pity and anger influence helpingbehavior. In the second m...
violence from someone displaying behaviors associated with different mentally illnesses. Otherresearch discovered that thi...
Upcoming SlideShare
Loading in...5
×

Literature Review Worksheet

396

Published on

A handout for students to practice creating a literature review from a source.

Here's the set:
http://www.slideshare.net/samlandfried/9th-grade-may-11-lit-review-activity
http://www.slideshare.net/samlandfried/9th-grade-may-11-lesson-plan
http://www.slideshare.net/samlandfried/9th-grade-april-20-literature-review
http://www.slideshare.net/samlandfried/9th-grade-april-20-lit-review-handout

Published in: Education, Health & Medicine
0 Comments
0 Likes
Statistics
Notes
  • Be the first to comment

  • Be the first to like this

No Downloads
Views
Total Views
396
On Slideshare
0
From Embeds
0
Number of Embeds
0
Actions
Shares
0
Downloads
14
Comments
0
Likes
0
Embeds 0
No embeds

No notes for slide

Literature Review Worksheet

  1. 1. 1. Circle every word you do not know and cannot figure out from context.2. Answer the questions following each paragraph.3. The material is dense, so read carefully and work together to make sense of it.Causal: How one thing causes something else.Sociodemographic: Information about someone like race, money, gender and job.Schizophrenic: A mental disease.Myths of violence and the stigma of mental illnessWriting a Short Literature ReviewWilliam Ashton, Ph.D.York College, CUNYThe mentally ill face many challenges. One of those challenges is the stigmatization they face.Stigmatization is social rejection; those stigmatized are rejected by people because of the labelthey carry or that their behaviors clearly indicate that they belong to a certain labeled group.Stigmatization of the mentally ill is caused by the public’s belief in myths about thedangerousness of the mentally ill.What is the topic of this paper?What premises does the author provide?What is the thesis?Regarding the mentally ill, it appears that people respond to the mentally ill with feelings of fearand rejection. Martin, Pescosolido & Tuch (2000)4 examined the effects of descriptions ofthesubjects’ behavior, causal attributions about the source of the behavior, the target’s perceived
  2. 2. dangerousness, labeling and participants’ sociodemographic characteristics. Twenty percent ofthe participants labeled a target described with depressed symptoms as having a mental illness(as compared with 54% for those described with schizophrenic symptoms or 1% with normaltroubles); 37% would be unwilling to interact with the depressed person (48% for theschizophrenic and 21% for normal troubles); and 33% felt that the depressed person would doviolence to others (61% for the schizophrenic and 17% for the normal troubles). Thus, a commonresponse to the mentally ill is rejection and fear of violence.What is the source being discussed?What conclusion does the author draw from the source? How do they justify their conclusion?While, based upon research, the common response to a mentally ill person is to fear violence,diagnosed mental patients commit violence at the same rates as non-diagnosed people (Martin, etal., 2000)5. Public perceptions may not match reality due to the public’s lack of contact with thementally ill.What point is the author making?Corrigan, Rowan, Green, Lundin, River, Uphoff-Wasowski, White and Kubiak (2002) conductedtwo studies examining the causal processes in contact, fear and rejection. Corrigan et al. gavetwo models to account for stigmatizing reactions. In the first model, labeled personalresponsibility, beliefs about personality responsibility influence both the level of pity and anger
  3. 3. displayed toward mental patients. Additionally, the variables of pity and anger influence helpingbehavior. In the second model, labeled dangerousness, perceived dangerousness influences fearof mental patients, which in turn influences the avoidance of the mentally ill.What is the source being discussed?What conclusion does the author draw from the source? How do they justify their conclusion?In their first study, Corrigan et al. (2002) administered a questionnaire to 216 community collegestudents. This questionnaire contained items which would allow the examination of the twomodels. The results indicated that while both models fit the data, the results for thedangerousness model seemed far more consistent with the data. Their second study was anattempt to manipulate variables in the models. Participants met with either an educational groupor with a mental patient. During the meetings, myths about the personality responsibility or thedangerousness of mental patients were discussed and disproved. While education yielded somepositive results regarding fear and rejection, contact with mental patients produced strongerresults. Thus, Corrigan et al. demonstrated that contact causes less rejection and fear.What is the point of this paragraph?Stigmatization of the mentally ill is caused by the public’s belief in myths about thedangerousness of the mentally ill and exposing those myths can reduce stigmatization. At leastone-third of the people sampled in one study said that they would both reject socially and fear
  4. 4. violence from someone displaying behaviors associated with different mentally illnesses. Otherresearch discovered that this rejection is associated to lack of contact with the mentally ill andthat as contact increased, fear of the mentally ill decreased. The direction of the relationshipbetween fear and rejection seems to be that fear (possibly based upon myths about mentalillness) causes rejection. Taken as a whole, it appears that exposing these myths as mythsincreases the acceptance of the mentally ill and that staged contact with a mentally person toexpose myths has an even more powerful effect. Caution must be advised, though; Martin et al.’s(2002) and Alexander and Link’s (2003) studies and the first study of Corrigan et al. (2002) werebased upon paper and pencil methodologies. And while Corrigan et al.’s (2002) second studyinvolved staged presentations, it was conducted in a college setting with a college sample. Futureresearch should replicate these findings in more natural settings with different populations.What title would you give this paragraph?What is the main point?What do you expect to learn from this research paper?

×