Your SlideShare is downloading. ×
Web 2.0 presentation by Sambit Priymabad Rout
Upcoming SlideShare
Loading in...5
×

Thanks for flagging this SlideShare!

Oops! An error has occurred.

×

Saving this for later?

Get the SlideShare app to save on your phone or tablet. Read anywhere, anytime - even offline.

Text the download link to your phone

Standard text messaging rates apply

Web 2.0 presentation by Sambit Priymabad Rout

354
views

Published on

Published in: Education, Technology, Business

0 Comments
1 Like
Statistics
Notes
  • Be the first to comment

No Downloads
Views
Total Views
354
On Slideshare
0
From Embeds
0
Number of Embeds
1
Actions
Shares
0
Downloads
4
Comments
0
Likes
1
Embeds 0
No embeds

Report content
Flagged as inappropriate Flag as inappropriate
Flag as inappropriate

Select your reason for flagging this presentation as inappropriate.

Cancel
No notes for slide

Transcript

  • 1. Presented By:SAMBIT PRIYAMBAD ROUT WEB 2.0
  • 2. What is WEB 2.0 ?
    • Basically, the term encapsulates the idea of the proliferation of interconnectivity and social interactions on the Web.
    •  
    • Tim O'Reilly regards Web 2.0 as business[3] O'Reilly considers that Eric Schmidt 's abridged slogan, don't fight the Internet, encompasses the essence of Web 2.0 — building applications and services around the unique features of the Internet , as opposed to building applications and expecting the Internet to suit as a platform (effectively "fighting the Internet").
    •  
    • The term Web 1.0 came into use after the evolution of the term Web 2.0. embracing the web as a platform and using its strengths (global audiences, for example).
  • 3. What is WEB 2.0....A video guide
  • 4.
    •   “ … an idea in people's heads rather than a reality. It’s actually an idea that the reciprocity between the user and the provider is what's emphasised. In other words, genuine interactivity, if you like, simply because people can upload as well as download."
    Stephen Fry , who writes a column about technology in the British Guardian newspaper describes web 2.0 as ....
  • 5. Problems with WEB 1.0.......
    • In the opening talk of the first Web 2.0 conference , O'Reilly and John Battelle summarized what they saw as the themes of Web 2.0. 
    • They argued that the web had become a platform , with software above the level of a single device, leveraging the power of the "Long Tail" , and with data as a driving force.
  • 6. Advantages of WEB 2.0.........
    • According to O'Reilly and Battelle,an architecture of participation where users can contribute website content creates network effects . Web 2.0 technologies tend to foster innovation in the assembly of systems and sites composed by pulling together features from distributed, independent developers.
    •  
    • This could be seen as a kind of "open source" or possible "Agile" development process, consistent with an end to the traditional software adoption cycle, typified by the so-called " perpetual beta ".
  • 7. Examples Of WEB 2.0 ....
    •  
    •  
    LEVEL 3 LEVEL 2 LEVEL 1 LEVEL 0   can operate offline,but gain advantages from going online the most "Web 2.0" operate offline but gain features online work as well offline as online eBay, Craigslist, Wikipedia, del.icio.us, Skype, dodgeball, and AdSense Flickr Google Docs , Spreadsheets & iTunes MapQuest, Yahoo! Local,Google Maps
  • 8. Characteristics of WEB 2.0 are .......
    • Web 2.0 websites allow users to do more than just retrieve information. 
    • They can build on the interactive facilities of " Web 1.0 " to provide "Network as platform" computing, allowing users to run software-applications entirely through a browser.   
    • Web 2.0 sites often feature a rich, user-friendly interface based on Ajax , Flex or similar rich media. 
    • According to Best,the characteristics of Web 2.0 are: rich user experience, user participation, dynamic content, metadata, web standards and scalability.
    • Oher characters are  openness, freedom and collective intelligence.
  • 9. Technology that make WEB 2.0........
      • Cascading Style Sheets to aid in the separation of presentation and content
      • Folksonomies (collaborative tagging, social classification, social indexing, and social tagging)
      • Microformats extending pages with additional semantics
      • REST and/or XML - and/or JSON -based APIs
      • Rich Internet application techniques, often Ajax and/or Flex ,Flash-based
      • Semantically valid XHTML and HTML markup
      • Syndication, aggregation and notification of data in RSS or Atom feeds
      • mashups , merging content from different sources, client- and server-side
      • Weblog -publishing tools
      • wiki or forum software, etc., to support user-generated content
      • Internet privacy , the extended power of users to manage their own privacy in cloaking or deleting their own user content or profiles.
  • 10. Trademark......
    • In November 2004 , CMP Media applied to the USPTO for a service mark on the use of the term "WEB 2.0" for live events. [33] On the basis of this application, CMP Media sent a cease-and-desistIrish non-profit organization [email_address] on May 24 , 2006 , [34] but retracted it two days later. [35] The "WEB 2.0" service mark registration passed final PTO Examining Attorney review on May 10 , 2006 , but as of June 12 , 2006 the PTO had not published the mark for opposition. The European Union application (application number 004972212, which would confer unambiguous status in Ireland) remains currently pending after its filing on March 23 , 2006 . demand to the
  • 11. Criticism for WEB 2.0.....
    • >> The argument exists that "Web 2.0" does not represent a new version of the World Wide Web at all, but merely continues to use so-called "Web 1.0" technologies and concepts. 
    • >>Techniques such as AJAX do not replace underlying protocols like HTTP , but add an additional layer of abstraction on top of them (more or less the same way as C++ language is an abstract layer on top of C language.
    • >>Many of the ideas of Web 2.0 had already been featured in implementations on networked systems well before the term "Web 2.0" emerged.  
    • >> Venture capitalist Josh Kopelman noted that Web 2.0 had excited only 530,651 people (the number of subscribers at that time to TechCrunch , a Weblog covering Web 2.0 matters), too few users to make them an economically viable target for consumer applications.
  • 12. External Links for WEB 2.0...
      • Web 2.0 Summit
      • Web 2.0 - A YouTube video made by Michael Wesch explaining Web 2.0 in just under 5 minutes.
      • Deloitte & Touche LLP - Canada (2008 study) - Change your world or the world will change you: The future of collaborative government and Web 2.0
      • "Critical Perspectives on Web 2.0" , Special issue of First Monday , 13(3), 2008.
      • Graham Vickery, Sacha Wunsch-Vincent: "Participative Web and User-Created Content: Web 2.0, Wikis and Social Networking" ; OECD , 2007
  • 13. References of WEB 2.0....
      •   Markus Angermeier : Web 2.0 Mindmap Translated versions
      •   Paul Graham (November 2005). " Web 2.0 ". Retrieved on 2006 - 08-02 . “"I first heard the phrase 'Web 2.0' in the name of the Web 2.0 conference in 2004."”
      •   Tim O'Reilly ( 2005 - 09-30 ). " What Is Web 2.0 ". O'Reilly Network. Retrieved on 2006 - 08-06 . 
      •   Tim O'Reilly ( 2006 - 12-10 ). " Web 2.0 Compact Definition: Trying Again ". Retrieved on 2007 - 01-20 .
      • " developerWorks Interviews: Tim Berners-Lee " ( 2006 - 07-28 ). Retrieved on 2007 - 02-07 .
      •   Nate Anderson ( 2006 - 09-01 ). " Tim Berners-Lee on Web 2.0: "nobody even knows what it means" ". arstechnica.com. Retrieved on 2006 - 09-05 .
      • www.wikipedia.com
  • 14.            Presentation created by.....
    •  
    Sambit Priyambad Rout 3rd Year,B.Tech in CSE KIST,Bhubaneswar Mail ID:sambit.on@gmail.com