Nyoman M Jaya School of the Built Environment, the University of Salford, Greater Manchester, M5 4WT, UK Email: n.jaya@pgr...
Wednesday, June 16, 2010 Overhead cost accounts (each individual category of expenses, e.g., quality inspection, depreciat...
2. Barriers and Benefits of ABC system <ul><li>Barriers </li></ul><ul><li>Indirect overheads are unclearly defined related...
Wednesday, June 16, 2010 Over-costed (hidden profit) Under-costed (hidden loss) Construction Project Simplistic Traditiona...
4. Conclusion Wednesday, June 16, 2010 <ul><li>Aim of the research: </li></ul><ul><li>Development of the activity-based co...
Upcoming SlideShare
Loading in …5
×

An application of activity-based costing for management of project overhead to increase profit during construction execution stage

3,186 views

Published on

Nyoman Jaya's presentation from the 2010 Salford Postgraduate Annual Research Conference (SPARC), 10-11 June, University of Salford

Published in: Education, Business, Technology
1 Comment
3 Likes
Statistics
Notes
No Downloads
Views
Total views
3,186
On SlideShare
0
From Embeds
0
Number of Embeds
12
Actions
Shares
0
Downloads
0
Comments
1
Likes
3
Embeds 0
No embeds

No notes for slide

An application of activity-based costing for management of project overhead to increase profit during construction execution stage

  1. 1. Nyoman M Jaya School of the Built Environment, the University of Salford, Greater Manchester, M5 4WT, UK Email: n.jaya@pgr.salford.ac.uk © copyright rests with the author. Please cite appropriately Wednesday, June 16, 2010 SPARC conference, 10 – 11 June
  2. 2. Wednesday, June 16, 2010 Overhead cost accounts (each individual category of expenses, e.g., quality inspection, depreciation, etc) Department cost centre 1 Cost objects (Jobs, Projects or Services) Overhead cost accounts (each individual category of expenses e.g., quality inspection, depreciation, etc) Cost objects (Jobs, Projects or Services) Activity cost centre 1 Activity cost centre 2 Activity cost centre n Traditional System: ABC System: Direct costs resource cost drivers activity cost drivers Direct costs direct labour based Figure 1: Overhead Allocation Process for Traditional versus ABC System Source: Modified from Drury (2008). Department cost centre 2 Department cost centre n Indirect costs Indirect costs
  3. 3. 2. Barriers and Benefits of ABC system <ul><li>Barriers </li></ul><ul><li>Indirect overheads are unclearly defined related to activities, jobs or projects </li></ul><ul><li>Requires expertise in construction process, cost management and accounting </li></ul><ul><li>Expensive to implement and maintain. </li></ul><ul><li>Benefits </li></ul><ul><li>Can be assigned using diverse cost drivers and technology </li></ul><ul><li>Provide system transparency enabling better management and tighter control </li></ul><ul><li>Is affordable with increased profit </li></ul>Wednesday, June 16, 2010
  4. 4. Wednesday, June 16, 2010 Over-costed (hidden profit) Under-costed (hidden loss) Construction Project Simplistic Traditional System (Overheads allocated averages) 50% - 200% 1,000% + 0% 0% Distortion Figure 2: Overheads Assigned for Construction Project. Source: Adapted from Cokins (2001). Highest Volume, Least Complex Product and Services Lowest Volume, Most Complex Product and Services Rank-ordered Products/Services Sophisticated ABC System (Overheads assigned for each activity)
  5. 5. 4. Conclusion Wednesday, June 16, 2010 <ul><li>Aim of the research: </li></ul><ul><li>Development of the activity-based cost controlling (ABCC) model for management of project overheads to increase profit during execution stage in the construction industry. </li></ul>Construction Industry Figure 3: Conceptual Framework of the Research Profit Cost Expenses Total Profit Revenue ±∆ Profit ABC system Construction Project Management of Project Overheads Cost Drivers Execution Stage Development of the ABCC model

×