Digitizing the Social Contract - Presentation Transcript
Digitizing the Social Contract: Producing American Political Culture in the Age of New Media By Philip N. Howard Department of Communication University of Washington
Social Contract
“Renewed” by voting, political activities
Affected by imperfect information
Both citizens and government misread each other due to poor information
This is why consulting and software companies design technologies the author calls “Political Hypermedia”
Campaigns: Evolving with Technology
Campaigns: Evolving with Technology
Pre modern: Mid 1800s-1950s:
local party volunteers gather data
Modern: 1960s-1980s:
Long, nationally coordinated campaigns run by professional consultants with a centralized headquarters
Occasional opinion polls
Television commercials were increasingly important-and therefore costly
Post modern (Hypermedia)1990s-Today:
Presidential campaigns increasingly use PR
More consultants, more opinion polls, more internet based
Age of Cyberpolitics
Political elites have less control over spin and facts
More democratic, substantive, less biased political discussion
(race, gender, etc. are hidden)
Activism is easier to coordinate across geographic/time zones
Fast, fast, fast!
New Media Effects on Democracy
Are they positive or negative influences?
Possible Positive Effects:
New media might be able to overcome the inadequate, one way political message status quo
Virtual communities add to the public debate, draw in new political participants
Less distance between the government and governed
Possible Negative Effects
Political content online is “political pornography”-grossly simplified, exaggerated, distorted
Tools like email can overwhelm political offices with work, server crashes
EX: In 2000, Capital Hill received over 6 million emails a month: 8K per Representative, 55K per Senator
Ease of anonymity, hacking makes the internet a breeding ground for “mudslinging”
NO Political Effects
Author argues that there is no distinct impact on democracy, it just amplifies existing politics
No “direct democracy” in the near future
C-Span effect: despite live broadcasting of congress, low viewership/understanding of politics
Production of Modern Political Culture
“ By 2050 a piece of software will be a candidate”
Tracey Westin Grassroots.com
Producing political culture involves:
Defining a problem creates an “issue”
Finding the audience-those who are plagued by the issue or are sympathetic
Mass media can only broadcast, but internet can target specific audiences
This helps lobbyists, activists and politicians spread knowledge and desire for action
Political Hypermedia Communities
Subsets of political community
Not necessarily Democrat or Republican
More selective issues, seeded by lobbyists, special interest groups
Designed to focus on issues, not candidates
Political Hypermedia Tools
Narrowcasting, mass customization:
yields more in depth political preferences; this “tailors” the production of political culture by:
Improving campaign efficiency
Organizing public into activist/interest groups. (233)
How Digital Information Helps Lobbyists and Politicians Find YOU
example: Astroturf Compiler Software
Helps lobbyists build a network of supporters for a specific cause
Manages political “contradictions” by showing viewers information they are likely to sympathize with
Combination of personal, demographic, political information and spending patterns
Message Tester Tool Software
Goal: predict voter reactions to campaign or PR by testing political messages to smaller sample audiences over the internet
Goal: figure out voters’ unmet desires
What do they WANT candidates to say or do?
Science of Private Opinion Measurement
As microscope is to natural science, hypermedia is to politics
It allows politicians, academics, consultants to examine political behavior at both individual and group levels of analysis, in great detail
Consultants can better predict/ensure campaign and legislative success
Political hypermedia study personality psychographics (interests, attitudes, opinions) as well as demographics
Some Problems:
This is essentially legal, wide scale socio-political surveillance
“ Citizen attributes were once the quietly held property of citizens. Now these attributes are quantified, bought, sold, and analyzed on a massive, yet personal, scale”. (234)
data is usually used for scare and smear tactics rather than to bow to public opinion
Questions
Do you think this style and amount of data mining is useful to the political system by informing politicians about the needs and wants of their constituents, or is it an abuse of information and privacy?
Do you think it encourages politicians to follow the will of the people, or is it just E-pandering?
0 comments
Post a comment