PhD Symposium 2011


Published on

30th Mac 2011

Published in: Education
  • Be the first to comment

  • Be the first to like this

No Downloads
Total Views
On Slideshare
From Embeds
Number of Embeds
Embeds 0
No embeds

No notes for slide

PhD Symposium 2011

  1. 1. PhD Symposium 2011, Department of Chemical Engineering, Imperial College London Fabrication of 3-D Scaffolds from poly(3-hydroxybutyric acid) (PHB) and poly(3-hydroxybutyric acid-co-3-hydroxyvalerate) (PHBV) for Leukaemia Tissue Engineering Applications Saiful Zubairi1, Alexander Bismarck1, Apostolis Koutinas2, Nicki Panoskaltsis3 and Athanasios Mantalaris1 1Department of Chemical Engineering, Imperial College London, 2Department of Food Science and Technology, Agricultural University of Athens, and 3Department of Haematology, Northwick Park & St. Mark’s campus, Imperial College London. For additional information please contact: FIGURE 4 Polymer concentrations with respect to polymeric 3-D scaffolds thickness FIGURE 5 Fig. 4. Morphology of scaffolds at differentOver the past 30 years, polyhydroxy acids (PHA), particularly poly-3-hydroxybutyrate (PHB) and (a) (b) (a) (c) polymer concentrations (a) Aerial view ofcopolymers of 3-hydroxybutyrate with 3-hydroxyvalerate (PHBV) have been demonstrated to be PHB (5%, w/v), (b) Aerial view of PHBVsuitable for tissue engineering applications. Specifically, these polymers have been used as a wound PHB 5% (w/v) PHBV 5% (w/v) PHB (4%, w/v) PHBV (4%, w/v) (5%, w/v), (c) Aerial view of PHB (1%,healing matrix and also as a wrap-around implant. However, to our knowledge, scaffolds from PHB with w/v), (d) Aerial view of PHBV and PHBthickness greater than 1 mm have not been produced yet. In this work, PHB and PHBV porous 3-D (3%, w/v).scaffolds with an improved thickness greater than 4 mm were fabricated and evaluated. Fig. 5. Morphology of the polymeric (c) (d) (b) (d) INNER SIDE INNER SIDE porous 3-D scaffolds in a rectangularNOVELTY PHB (4%, w/v) PHBV (4%, w/v) shape with an approximate size of 10 × PHB 1% (w/v) PHB 3% (w/v) PHBV 3% (w/v) ∼10 mm ∼10 mm 10 × 5 mm3: (a) Aerial view of PHB (4%,Ability to fabricate porous 3-D scaffolds with an improved thickness greater than 4 mm from PHB and w/v), (b) Side view of PHB (4%, w/v), (c)PHBV without the presence of etching surfaces and structural instability. ∼ 5 mm Aerial view of PHBV (4%, w/v), (d) Side INNER SIDE INNER SIDE view of PHBV (4%, w/v).METHODOLOGY Efficacy of salt removal measured via ion conductivity and gravimetric analysis Effect of salt remnants in polymeric 3-D scaffolds on cell growth mediaDifferent concentrations of PHB and PHBV ranging from 1% to 5% (w/v) were prepared in chloroform. FIGURE 6 120 * * 20.85 NSPorous 3-D scaffold were fabricated using the Solvent-Casting Particulate-Leaching (SCPL) method. 110 20.8 99.67 99.97The efficacy of the SCPL method was determined using ion conductivity measurement and gravimetric 100 92.59 FIGURE 7 Conductivity (mS/cm) 90 82.20 20.75analysis (to determine any potential of polymer weight loss during the salt-leaching process). The salt 80 Fig. 7. Conductivity ( κ) of cell 20.7 growth media in the presenceremnants left inside the scaffolds were measured using ion conductivity as an ultimate validation prior % Efficacy 70 PHB (4%, w/v) porous 3-D scaffolds of scaffolds as a function ofto physico-chemical analysis and cell proliferation studies. Analysis of statistical significance was 60 20.65 time at 20 ± 1 oC (n = 3). PHBV (4%, w/v) porous 3-D scaffolds 50performed using one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) test and Students t-test with a significance 40 20.6 Control: Cell growth media without a scaffoldlevel of p<0.05. 30 20.55 20 20.5 10 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7RESULTS Porogen residual effect Vs. growth media Fig. 1. Schematic of the Solvent-Casting 0 Salt-leaching process Lyophilization process Time (days) Efficacy of Salt Removal Particulate-Leaching (SCPL) process. The Type of polyhydroxyalkanoates (PHAs) porous 3-D scaffolds Conductivity of cell growth media = 20.77 mS/cm @ 20 ±1 oC process comprises of (1) mixing of polymer Fig. 6. Efficacy of (A) salt-leaching process andFIGURE 1 Polymer concentration vs. thickness solution with porogen; (2) adding the polymer PHB (4%, w/v) PHBV (4%, w/v) (B) salt removal after lyophilization process viaPolymer solution in Solvent evaporation in fume solution with porogen into a Petri-dish and then gravimetric analysis for PHB and PHBV (4%, cupboard (Complied with UK- Polymer concentration vs. time Efficiency: PHB > PHBV → No lost of polymer massorganic solvent w/v). *Significant difference with p<0.05 between SED, 2002: <20 mg/m3) Porogen-DIW incubate it in lyophilization flask to avoid Hydrophilicity: PHB > PHBV throughout the SCPL process the samples were highlighted by lines (n = 10). Polymer solution leaching FABRICATION + Porogen development of etching surfaces; (3) 3 2 4 evaporation of solvent for 48 hrs in fume CONCLUSIONS 1 Porous 3-D 5 cupboard; (4) leaching out porogen from dried Dried cast scaffolds cast polymer + porogen using 10 liters of 1. Polymer concentration of 4% (w/v) was considered an optimal concentration to produce an ideal porous 3-D Polymer + Solvent + Polymer + Porogen deionized water for 48 hrs (changed twice/day) scaffolds with thickness greater than 4 mm without the presence of etching surfaces and structural instability. Porogen cast Porogen (i.e., NaCl, at 20 ± 1oC; (5) lyophilized porous 3-D 2. High efficacies of salt-leaching process for both polymeric 3-D porous scaffolds were observed (99%) with no sucrose etc.) scaffolds with the thickness greater than 4 mm. loss of polymer weight throughout the process. Polymer concentrations with respect to polymeric 3-D scaffolds thickness Polymer concentrations with respect to homogenization time 3. The small amount of salt left inside the porous 3-D scaffolds might not be producing any adverse effect to the cell Cut into 10 sections FIGURE 2 FIGURE 3 growth due to the electrolytes imbalance from the hypertonic media solution (excessive amount of salt in the cell 5.5 Fig. 2. Thickness of scaffolds at 5 Ψ * * growth media) - Insignificant changes of ion conductivity for both polymers as compared to the control. Randomly selected different polymer concentrations. Polymers concentration, % (w/v) Porous 3-D 4.5 of 5 sections Measurement was done using Digital (A) Inhomogeneous polymer solutions scaffolds Vernier Caliper (accuracy ± 0.01 mm). 4 3.5 *Ψ * contain glutinous semi-solid residual Fig. 3. Kinetics of PHB and PHBV homogenization ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS *Significant difference with p<0.05 as Ψ* process with respect to different concentration, % (w/v). Average thickness compared to PHB (n = 10). 3 * Replication (n = 10) 2.5 (A): Inhomogeneous polymer solutions were occurred The authors would like to thank the Malaysian Higher Education and 2 * Ψ * with the appearances of glutinous polymer materials at the Richard Thomas Leukemia Fund for providing financial support to Polymer General observation Thickness (mm) Poly(3-hydroxybutyric acid): PHB concentration 1.5 the bottom of the SCHOTT Duran bottle. The mean PHB PHBV Poly(3-hydroxybutyric acid-co-hydroxyvalerate): PHBV this project. 1% (w/v) Completely dissolved, homogenous solution appeared < 1.0 < 1.0 1 Ψ values obtained from 10 experiments ± SEM are shown 0.5 2% (w/v) Completely dissolved, homogenous solution appeared < 1.0 < 1.0 (n = 10). *Significant difference with p<0.05 for the value 0 3% (w/v) Completely dissolved, homogenous solution appeared 1.80 ± 0.79 1.60 ± 0.79* 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 changed as compared to the previous value. (Ψ) p<0.05 4% (w/v) Completely dissolved, homogenous solution appeared 5.25 ± 0.36 4.40 ± 0.52* Time of complete homogenization (mins) for solubility rate of PHB vs. PHBV.
  1. A particular slide catching your eye?

    Clipping is a handy way to collect important slides you want to go back to later.