• Share
  • Email
  • Embed
  • Like
  • Save
  • Private Content
The dark ages_of_the_universe
 

The dark ages_of_the_universe

on

  • 10,012 views

 

Statistics

Views

Total Views
10,012
Views on SlideShare
602
Embed Views
9,410

Actions

Likes
0
Downloads
1
Comments
0

4 Embeds 9,410

http://www.cienctec.com.br 8485
http://cienctec.com.br 911
http://blog.cienctec.com.br 12
http://www.google.com.br 2

Accessibility

Categories

Upload Details

Uploaded via as Adobe PDF

Usage Rights

© All Rights Reserved

Report content

Flagged as inappropriate Flag as inappropriate
Flag as inappropriate

Select your reason for flagging this presentation as inappropriate.

Cancel
  • Full Name Full Name Comment goes here.
    Are you sure you want to
    Your message goes here
    Processing…
Post Comment
Edit your comment

    The dark ages_of_the_universe The dark ages_of_the_universe Document Transcript

    • THE DARK SIDESPECIAL SECTION REVIEW The Dark Age of the Universe Jordi Miralda-Escude1,2,3 ´ The Dark Age is the period between the time when the cosmic microwave back- geneous and in thermal equilibrium) also ground was emitted and the time when the evolution of structure in the universe led reveal that for these primordial, small-am- to the gravitational collapse of objects, in which the first stars were formed. The plitude fluctuations to have grown into the period of reionization started with the ionizing light from the first stars, and it ended present galaxies, clusters, and large-scale when all the atoms in the intergalactic medium had been reionized. The most distant structures of the universe through gravita- sources of light known at present are galaxies and quasars at redshift z Х 6, and their tional evolution, the presence of dark mat- spectra indicate that the end of reionization was occurring just at that time. The Cold ter is required. More recently, another com- Dark Matter theory for structure formation predicts that the first sources formed ponent has been identified, called dark much earlier. energy, which has become the dominant component of the universe at the present It was only about 75 years ago when Edwin the wavelength of the light emitted by any epoch and is causing an acceleration of the Hubble discovered that we live in a universe object at that epoch and reaching us at the expansion of the universe (10, 11).The of galaxies in expansion. At about the same present time has been stretched, owing to the Wilkinson Microwave Anisotropy Probe time, Alexander Friedmann used the cosmo- expansion of the universe. (WMAP) (12, 13) showed that the baryonic logical principle (the assumption that the uni- matter accounts for only ϳ17% of all mat- verse can be approximated on large scales as The Cold Dark Matter Model ter, with the rest being the dark matter, and homogeneous and isotropic) to write down Cosmological observations can be accounted has confirmed the presence of the dark the basic equations governing the structure for by the Cold Dark Matter (CDM) model energy (14, 15). Although the CDM model and evolution of the universe in the Big Bang [see (1–3) for reviews]. The model assumes with the added dark energy agrees with model, starting from Einstein’s theory of that in addition to ordinary matter made of many observations, cosmologists have no General Relativity. By the end of the 20th protons, neutrons, and electrons (usually re- idea what the nature of the dark matter and century, much evidence had accumulated showing that the early universe was close to homogeneous, even on the small scales of the present galaxies. The fundamental question is how the universe went from this initial nearly ho- mogeneous state to the present-day extremely complex form, in which matter has collapsed into galaxies and smaller struc- tures. I will review the history of the universe from the time of emission of the cosmic microwave back- ground (CMB) to the time when the first objects col- Fig. 1. Overview of the main events discussed in this review, with the top axis showing the age of the universe and lapsed gravitationally. An the bottom axis the corresponding redshift, for the currently favored model (same parameters as in Fig. 2). Blue represents atomic regions, and red, ionized regions. Matter in the universe recombined in a homogeneous manner at overview of these events z Х 1200. Later, when the first stars formed and emitted ionizing radiation, ionized regions formed around the sources will be described, with re- that eventually overlapped, filling all of space. The size of the HII regions should be much smaller on the redshift scale spect to the time and the than shown here and is drawn only for illustration. redshift at which they take place (Fig. 1). Cosmologists generally use the ferred to as baryonic matter in cosmology), the dark energy may be, and why this mat- redshift z to designate a cosmic epoch. The there is also dark matter, which behaves as a ter and energy should have comparable quantity 1 ϩ z is the factor by which the collection of collisionless particles having no densities at the present time. universe has expanded from that epoch to the interactions other than gravity and which was Nevertheless, as the parameters of this present time and is also the factor by which initially cold (that is, the particles had a very CDM model are measured more precisely, small velocity dispersion). Observations have the predictions for the number of objects of confirmed the existence of dark matter in different mass that should be gravitationally 1 Department of Astronomy, The Ohio State Univer- galaxy halos and clusters of galaxies [e.g., collapsing at every epoch in the universe sity, Columbus, OH 43210, USA. 2Institute for Ad- (4–9)]. The intensity fluctuations of the CMB have become more robust. Bound objects vanced Study, Princeton, NJ 08540, USA. Institut 3 d’Estudis Espacials de Catalunya/ICREA, Barcelona, (the relic radiation that is left over from the form when the primordial fluctuations reach Spain. E-mail: jordi@astronomy.ohio-state.edu epoch when the universe was nearly homo- an amplitude near unity, entering the nonlin- 1904 20 JUNE 2003 VOL 300 SCIENCE www.sciencemag.org
    • THE DARK SIDE SPECIAL SECTION forms has a velocity dispersion v determined difficult to observe because of the foreground by its mass and the size of the region from emission by dust (24, 25). which it collapsed, v 2 ϳ GM/R, and a corre- sponding virialized temperature of the gas, How Did the First Stars Form? kTvir ϭ (␮mH) v 2, where ␮ is the mean The Dark Age ended when the first stars were particle mass in units of the hydrogen mass formed. In order to form stars, the atomic gas mH. It is this virialized temperature that de- must be able to follow the collapse of dark termines the physics of the rate at which gas matter halos. This happens when the halo can cool to form stars. This prediction of the mass is above the Jeans mass of the gas (26) number of objects that were forming at each at the virialized temperature and density of z forms the basis for our ideas on the end of the intergalactic medium, a condition that is the Dark Age, the formation of the first stars, fulfilled when Tvir տ 100 K (1, 27). In halos and the reionization. with lower temperature, the gas pressure is sufficient to prevent the gas from collapsing. The Dark Age In addition, there must be a radiative coolingFig. 2. The solid line shows the present time At very high z, the universe was practically mechanism for the gas to lose its energy and(z ϭ 0), linearly extrapolated rms fluctuation Ͻ homogeneous, and the temperature of matter concentrate to ever-higher densities in the(␦M/M)2 Ͼ 1/2 of the mass enclosed in a region and radiation dropped as the universe ex- halo centers until stellar densities arethat contains an average mass M, expressed in panded. Atoms formed at z Х 1100 when the reached; without cooling, the gas reaches hy-the horizontal axis in units of solar masses. The temperature was T ϭ 3000 K, a low enough drostatic equilibrium in the halo after theother two curves are for z ϭ 9 and z ϭ 19, value for the plasma to recombine. At this gravitational collapse and stays at a fixedwhen the universe was about 500 million and200 million years old, respectively. Fluctuations epoch of recombination, the CMB filled the density without forming stars. The ability ofgrow with time, and when they reach an am- universe with a red, uniformly bright glow of the gas to cool depends on Tvir and the chem-plitude near unity at some scale, nonlinear blackbody radiation, but later the temperature ical composition of the gas. Tvir was low forformation of halos takes place, and small halos dropped and the CMB shifted to the infrared. the first objects that formed and then it in-merge into larger ones as progressively larger To human eyes, the universe would then have creased rapidly with time (Fig. 3). The pri-scales undergo collapse. The flat CDM model appeared as a completely dark place. A long mordial gas in the first halos was mainlywith cosmological constant assumed here hasthe following parameters: Hubble constant period of time had to pass until the first composed of atomic H and He. Atomic HH0 ϭ 70 km sϪ1 MpcϪ1, matter density ⍀m0 ϭ objects collapsed, forming the first stars that induces radiative cooling only when Tvir Ͼ0.3, baryon density ⍀b ϭ 0.043, amplitude of shone in the universe with the first light ever 104 K, when collisions can excite and ionizefluctuations ␴8 ϭ 0.9, and primordial spectral emitted that was not part of the CMB (Fig. 1). H atoms (28); the gas can then readily con-index n ϭ 0.93. The period of time between the last scattering of the CMB radiation by the homogeneousear regime. The power spectrum of the fluc- plasma and the formation of the first star hastuations can be represented in terms of the come to be known as the Dark Age of theroot-mean-square (rms) fluctuation of the universe (17).mass, ␦M, enclosed by a sphere of radius R, Observations provide detailed informationwhich on average has a mass M, equal to its on the state of the universe when the CMBvolume times the mean density of the uni- radiation was last scattered at z Х 1100, andverse. The linearly extrapolated rms fluctua- we have also observed galaxies and quasarstion ␦M/M is shown in Fig. 2 as a function of up to z Х 6.5 (18–21). The theory suggestsM for the CDM model, at the present time that the first stars and galaxies should have(z ϭ 0) and at redshifts 1 ϩ z ϭ 10 and 1 ϩ formed substantially earlier, so we can expectz ϭ 20. Note that linear fluctuations grow to discover galaxies at progressively higher zgravitationally in proportion to (1 ϩ z)Ϫ1, as technology advances and fainter objectsexcept at z Շ 1, when the dark energy starts are detected. However, beyond a z of 10 toto dominate (16). At the present time, fluc- 20, the CDM theory with Gaussian fluctua- Fig. 3. The velocity dispersion v (right axis) ortuations are typically of order unity on scales tions predicts that the dark matter halos that virialized temperature Tvir divided by the meancontaining masses ϳ1014 MJ (where MJ is can host luminous objects become extremely particle mass ␮ in units of the hydrogen masssolar mass), corresponding to galaxy groups. rare, even for low-mass halos (Fig. 2). Dis- (left axis; ␮ ϭ 0.6 for ionized matter and ␮ ϭ 1.2 for atomic matter) of halos collapsing fromAt the epoch z ϭ 9, typical fluctuations were covering any objects at z տ 20 should be- a 1␴ fluctuation (of amplitude shown in Fig. 2)collapsing on much smaller scales of M ϳ come exceedingly difficult as we reach the is shown as a function of redshift, as the lowest106 MJ. Because the probability distribution period of the Dark Age. During the Dark thick solid line. At every redshift, the fluctua-of the mass fluctuation on any given region is Age, before the collapse of any objects, not tion amplitude required for nonlinear collapseGaussian, there should be rare regions in the much was happening at all. The atomic gas is reached at progressively larger scales, form-universe with a density fluctuation of several was still close to homogeneous, and only a ing halos of increasing mass and velocity dis- persion. The higher solid thick lines indicatetimes the variance that will correspondingly tiny fraction of it formed the first molecules halos collapsing from (2,3,4,5)-␴ fluctuations,be able to collapse earlier. For example, our of H2, HD, and LiH as the temperature cooled which form increasingly rare objects from aMilky Way galaxy may have formed from the down [e.g., (22, 23)]. One of the few suggest- Gaussian distribution of fluctuations. Thecollapse of a 1012 MJ halo from a 1␴ fluctu- ed ideas for an observational probe of the dashed lines indicate halos of constant mass,ation at z Х 1, but at z ϭ 5 halos of the same Dark ge is to detect secondary anisotropies on and are separated by a factor 10 in mass,mass were already forming from 3␴ fluctua- the CMB that were imprinted by Li atoms as with values indicated for three lines. Objects of fixed mass have increasing velocity disper-tions. On a scale of 106MJ, a 1␴ fluctuation they recombined at z Х 400 through the sion as they form at higher redshift from acollapses at z Х 6, and a 3␴ fluctuation resonance line at 670.8 nm, which would be more rare, higher amplitude fluctuation be-collapses at z Х 20 (Fig. 3). Each object that redshifted to the far-infrared today, making it cause their size R is smaller. www.sciencemag.org SCIENCE VOL 300 20 JUNE 2003 1905
    • THE DARK SIDESPECIAL SECTION tract to form galaxies. In the intermediate form by cooling provided by heavy elements lead to the collapse of a halo and the forma- range 100 K Ͻ Tvir Ͻ 104 K, the gas settles (46), or by atomic H when Tvir Ͼ 104 K. tion of a star at z Х 30 (Fig. 3). A more into halos but atomic cooling is not available Abundances of heavy elements as low as specific question we can ask is: From a ran- and, in the absence of the heavy elements that 1000 times smaller than that of the sun can dom location in the universe, when would the were formed only after massive stars ejected increase the cooling rate over that provided first light from a star have been observed? their synthesized nuclei into space, the only by H2 and can also cool the gas to much Because an observer receives light only from available coolant is H2. Because two hydro- lower temperatures than possible with H2 the past light-cone (53), the further away one gen atoms cannot form a molecule by collid- alone, reducing the Jeans mass and allowing looks, the greater the volume that can be ing and emitting a photon, only a small frac- for the formation of low-mass stars (47–49). surveyed (and hence a more rare, higher- tion of the gas in these first objects could A fascinating probe to these early events amplitude fluctuation can be found) but also become H2 via reactions involving the spe- is provided by any stars that formed at that the further back into the past one observes, cies HϪ and H2ϩ, formed by the residual free time with mass ϳ0.8 solar masses, which which requires an even higher primordial electrons and protons left over from the early could be observed at the present time in our density fluctuation to form a star. By requir- universe (29–31), limiting the rate at which Galaxy’s halo as they start ascending the red ing that just one collapsed halo with Tvir Ͼ the gas could cool. Simulations (32–37) have 2000 K is observed on the past light-cone shown that the first stars form in halos with [and for the CDM model (Fig. 3)], a hypo- Tvir Х 2000 K and mass ϳ106 MJ; at lower thetical observer located at a random place, temperatures, the rotational transitions of H2 after having experienced the dark age, would do not provide sufficient cooling for the gas have seen the first star appear in the sky at z to dissipate its energy. The slow cooling in Х 38 (54), when the universe was 75 million these first objects leads to the formation of a years old. This star would have formed from central core with a mass of 100 to 1000 MJ of a 6.3␴ fluctuation (with a probability of only gas cooled to ϳ200 K, and this core may ͌2/␲ ͐ϱ eϪx 2/2 dx Х 3 ϫ10Ϫ10, implying 6.3 form a massive star. that a volume containing a mass of 106 MJ/ As soon as the first stars appeared, they 3ϫ10 Ϫ10 Х 3ϫ1015 MJ would need to be changed the environment in which they were searched to find one halo of 106MJ at this formed, affecting the formation of subse- early time). Soon after that first star, many quent stars. Massive stars emit a large frac- more would have appeared forming from less tion of their light as photons that can ionize H rare fluctuations. (with energies greater than 13.6 eV), creating Because we can now see the very first HII regions and heating the gas to T Х 104 K. stars that formed in the universe out to a very While these ionizing photons are all absorbed Fig. 4. Spectra of the Sloan Digital Sky Survey large distance on our past light-cone, we can at the HII region boundaries, in the vicinity of quasars J0019-0040 at z ϭ 4.32, and J1148ϩ5251 survey a much larger volume than could the the stars that emit them, photons with lower at z ϭ 6.37. The flux is shown in units of 10Ϫ17 erg overjoyed observer at z Х 38 at the sight of energy can travel greater distances through cmϪ2 sϪ1 as a function of wavelength. The peak the first star. With this larger volume, the the atomic medium and reach other halos. of the spectra is the redshifted broad Ly␣ emission highest z star on the sky should be one line of the quasars. Absorption by intervening Ultraviolet photons with energies above 11 hydrogen is seen at shorter wavelengths. At red- formed from an 8␴ fluctuation at z Х 48 (54). eV can photodissociate H2, and this can sup- shifts below 6 (␭ Շ 850 nm), the medium is Although this first star would be too faint to press the cooling rate and the ability to form photoionized and the very small fraction of hydro- detect with current technology, brighter stars in low-mass halos that are cooling by H2 gen that is atomic produces a partial, strongly sources can pave the way to discover more when they are illuminated by the first stars fluctuating absorption reflecting the density vari- primitive objects than the presently known (38). The importance of this suppresion and ations of the intergalactic medium. At z Х 6, the most distant galaxies at z Х 6.5. Perhaps we absorption suddenly becomes complete. This other effects are being debated (37, 39–43). probably indicates the end of reionization. At z Ͼ may discover more objects at higher z than Such effects might imply that the first mas- 6, the medium still contained atomic patches that expected in the CDM model, for example due sive stars formed through the radiative cool- are highly opaque to Ly␣ photons, and, even in the to the presence of non-Gaussian primordial ing of H2 were a short-lived and self-destruc- reionized regions, the ionizing background inten- fluctuations on small scales [e.g., (55)]. tive generation, because their own light might sity was too low to reduce the neutral fraction to destroy the molecules that made their forma- the very low values required for Ly␣ transmission. The Reionization of the Universe This figure is reproduced from [(18) fig. 3] and tion possible. [(19) fig. 6]. The most important effect that the formation When some of these massive stars end of stars had on their environment is the reion- their lives in supernovae, they eject heavy ization of the gas in the universe. Even elements that pollute the universe with the giant branch (50) if the halos in which they though the baryonic matter combined into ingredients necessary to form dust and plan- formed were later incorporated into the Milky atoms at z Х 1100, the intergalactic matter ets (44). In a halo containing 106 MJ of gas, Way by mergers. These stars should carry the must have been reionized before the present. the photoionization and supernova explosions signature of the elements synthesized by the The evidence comes from observations of the from only a few massive stars can expel all first supernovae (51, 52). spectra of quasars. Quasars are extremely the gas from the potential well of the halo luminous objects found in the nuclei of gal- (45). For example, the energy of 10 superno- When Did the First Star Form? axies that are powered by the accretion of vae (about 1052 erg) is enough to accelerate Because the primordial density fluctuations matter on massive black holes (56). Because 106 MJ of gas to a speed of 30 km sϪ1, which in the universe are random, the question of of their high luminosity, they are used by will push the gas out of any halo with a much when the very first star formed does not have cosmologists as lamp posts allowing accurate lower velocity dispersion. The expelled gas a simple answer. The time when the first halo spectra to be obtained, in which the analysis can later fall back as a more massive object is with Tvir ϭ 2000 K collapsed depends on of absorption lines provides information on formed by mergers of pre-existing dark mat- how rare a fluctuation we are willing to con- the state of the intervening intergalactic mat- ter halos. The next generation of stars can sider. A 5␴ fluctuation in the density field can ter. The spectra of quasars show the presence 1906 20 JUNE 2003 VOL 300 SCIENCE www.sciencemag.org
    • THE DARK SIDE SPECIAL SECTIONof light at wavelengths shorter than the the gas in their own halos, allowing ionizing only, before reionization) ejected by massiveLyman-alpha (Ly␣) emission line of H. If the photons to escape. The reionization then pro- stars (71, 72).intergalactic medium is atomic, then any pho- ceeded by the expansion of ionization frontstons emitted at wavelengths shorter than Ly␣ around the sources (Fig. 5), separating the uni- Electron Scattering of the CMB by the(121.6 nm) would be scattered by H at some verse into ionized bubbles and an atomic me- Reionized Universepoint on their journey to us, when their wave- dium between the bubbles (63). The ionized Reionization made most of the electrons inlength is redshifted to the Ly␣ line. The mean bubbles grew and overlapped, until every low- the universe free of their atomic binding, anddensity of H in the universe, when it is all in density region of the universe was reionized; able to scatter the CMB photons again. Be-atomic form, is enough to provide a scatter- this moment defines the end of the reionization fore recombination at z ϭ 1100, the universeing optical depth as large as ϳ105 (57). The period. High-density regions that do not contain was opaque, but because of the large factorsuppression of the flux at wavelengths shorter a luminous internal source can remain atomic by which the universe expanded from recom-than the Ly␣ emission line is called the because the gas in them recombines sufficiently bination to the reionization epoch, the elec-Gunn-Peterson trough. fast, and they can self-shield against the exter- tron Thompson scattering optical depth pro- In quasars at z Ͻ 6, the Gunn-Peterson nal radiation. When the ionized bubbles over- duced by the intergalactic medium aftertrough is not observed. Instead, one sees the lap, photons are free to travel for distances reionization, ␶e, is low. If the universe hadflux partially absorbed by what is known as much larger than the size of a bubble before reionized suddenly at z ϭ 6, then ␶e Х 0.03.the Ly␣ forest: a large number of absorption being absorbed, and the increase in the mean Because the fraction of matter that is ionizedlines of different strength along the spectrum free path implies a similar increase in the back- must increase gradually, from the time the(Fig. 4). The H atoms in the intergalactic ground intensity. The exact way in which the first stars were formed to the end of reioniza-medium producing this absorption are a small background intensity should increase at the end tion at z ϭ 6, ␶e must include the contributionfraction of all of the H, which is in photoion- of reionization, depending on the luminosity from the partially ionized medium at z Ͼ 6,ization equilibrium with a cosmic ioniz- function and spatial distribution of the sources, and it must therefore be greater than 0.03.ing background pro- The sooner reioniza-duced by galaxies tion started, the larg-and quasars (58). The er the value of ␶e.absorption lines cor- The WMAP mis-respond to variations sion has measured ␶ein the density of the from the power spec-intergalactic matter. trum of the polariza-The observation that tion and temperaturea measurable fraction fluctuations of theof Ly␣ flux is trans- CMB. A model-inde-mitted through the pendent measurement Fig. 5. Results of a simulation of the reionization of the intergalactic medium in a cubic box ofuniverse implies that, co-moving side 4 h Ϫ1 Mpc, from (64) (Fig. 3B). The gas density (left panel), neutral fraction from the polarization-after z ϭ 6, the entire (central panel), and temperature (right panel) from a slice of the simulation are shown. The color temperature correla-universe had been coded values indicate the logarithms of the gas density divided by the mean baryon density, the tion gives ␶e ϭ 0.16 Ϯreionized. neutral fraction, and the gas temperature in Kelvin, respectively. The simulation is shown at z ϭ 9. 0.04 (73), but a fit to However, recent- The pink regions in the central panel are atomic, and the green regions are ionized. The sources of the CDM model withly discovered qua- ionizing photons generally appear in halo centers where the gas density is high, but once the six free parameters us- photons escape from the local high-density regions, the ionized bubbles expand most easily acrosssars (19, 59, 60) show the lowest density regions (compare left and central panels). The ionized regions are heated to ing both the correla-a complete Gunn- about 104 K (see right panel), and they grow with time until they fill the entire universe at the tion of temperaturePeterson trough start- end of reionization. and polarization fluc-ing at z Х 6 (Fig. 4). tuations found byAlthough the lack of transmission does not has not yet been predicted by theoretical models WMAP, and other data gives ␶e ϭ 0.17 Ϯ 0.06automatically imply that the intervening medi- of reionization [e.g., (64)], but a rapid increase (13). An optical depth as large as ␶e ϭ 0.16 isum is atomic (because the optical depth of the in the mean free path should, if present, tell us surprising because it implies that a large fractionatomic medium at mean density is ϳ105, and so the time at which the reionization of the low- of the matter in the universe was reionized aseven an atomic fraction as low as 10Ϫ3 produc- density intergalactic medium was completed. early as z Х 17, when halos with mass as low ases an optical depth of ϳ100, which implies an The observational pursuit of the reion- 107 MJ could collapse only from 3␴ peaks, andundetectable transmission fraction), analysis of ization epoch may be helped by the optical were therefore still very rare (Fig. 3). The errorsthe Ly␣ spectra in quasars at z Ͻ 6 (61, 62) afterglows of gamma-ray bursts, which can on ␶e will need to be reduced before we canindicates that the intensity of the cosmic ioniz- shine for a few minutes with a flux that is assign a high degree of confidence to its highing background increased abruptly at z Х 6. larger than even the most luminous quasars value (74).The reason for the increase has to do with the (65–70), probably due to beaming of the What are the implications of a high ␶e if itway in which reionization occurred. Ionizing radiation. Because gamma-ray bursts may is confirmed? Measurements of the emissionphotons in the far-ultraviolet have a short mean be produced by the death of a massive star, rate at z Х 4 from the Ly␣ forest show that tofree path through atomic gas in the universe, so they can occur even in the lowest-mass obtain ␶e Ͼ 0.1, the emission rate would needthey are generally absorbed as soon as they halos forming at the earliest times, with to increase with z (75), and a large increase isreach any region in which the gas is mostly fixed luminosities. Among other things, the required up to z Х 17 to reach ␶e ϭ 0.16. Inatomic. Initially, when the first stars and qua- absorption spectra of gamma-ray burst op- view of the smaller mass fraction in collapsedsars were formed, the ionizing photons they tical afterglows might reveal the damped halos at this high z, it is clear that a largeemitted were absorbed in the high-density gas Ly␣ absorption profile of the H in the increase in the ionizing radiation emitted perof the halos hosting the sources. The interga- intervening atomic medium (68) and ab- unit mass is required from z Ϸ 6 to 17.lactic medium started to be reionized when sorption lines produced by neutral oxygen Models have been proposed to account for ansufficiently powerful sources could ionize all (which can be present in the atomic medium early reionization, based on a high emission www.sciencemag.org SCIENCE VOL 300 20 JUNE 2003 1907
    • THE DARK SIDESPECIAL SECTION efficiency at high z (76–84). A possible rea- ature variations in the atomic medium (95–100). 33. T. Abel, G. L. Bryan, M. L. Norman, Astrophys. J. 540, son for this high efficiency is that if the first 39 (2000). Several radio observatories will be attempting to 34. T. Abel, G. L. Bryan, M. L. Norman, Science 295, 93 stars that formed with no heavy elements detect the signal (101). (2002). were all massive (34, 36), they would have The observation of the 21-cm signal on 35. V. Bromm, P. S.Coppi, R. B. Larson, Astrophys. J. 527, emitted as many as 105 ionizing photons per the CMB will be a challenge, because of the L5 (1999). 36. V. Bromm, P. S.Coppi, R. B. Larson, Astrophys. J. 564, baryon in stars (85), many more than emitted long wavelength and the faintness of the sig- 23 (2002) by observed stellar populations (86–89). It is nal. However the potential for the future is 37. N. Yoshida, T. Abel, L. Hernquist, N. Sugiyama, As- not clear, however, if enough of these mas- enormous: detailed information on the state trophys. J. in press (e-Print available at http://xxx. lanl.gov/abs/astro-ph/0301645). sive stars can form in the first low-mass halos of density fluctuations of the atomic medi- 38. Z. Haiman, M. J. Rees, A. Loeb, Astrophys. J. 476, 458 at z Ͼ 17, once the feedback effects of ultra- um at the epoch when the first stars were (1997). violet emission and supernovae ( 37, 38, 45) forming and the spin temperature variations 39. Z. Haiman, M. J. Rees, A. Loeb, Astrophys. J. 467, 522 (1996). are taken into account. A different possibility that were induced by the ultraviolet and 40. M. Ricotti, N. Y. Gnedin, J. M. Shull, Astrophys. J. might be that more objects than expected x-ray emission from the first sources are 560, 580 (2001). were forming at high z due to a fundamental both encoded in the fine ripples of the CMB 41. M. Ricotti, N. Y. Gnedin, J. M. Shull, Astrophys. J. 575, 33 (2002). change in the now favored CDM model. at its longest wavelengths. 42. M. Ricotti, N. Y. Gnedin, J. M. Shull, Astrophys. J. 575, 49 (2002). The Future: the 21-cm Signature of 43. M. E. Machacek, G. L. Bryan, T. Abel, Mon. Not. R. References and Notes the Atomic Medium 1. G. R. Blumenthal, A. Dekel, J. R. Primack, M. J. Rees, Astron. Soc. 338, 273 (2003). 44. Carbon and heavier elements were not synthesized Many of the observational signatures of the Nature 311, 517 (1984). in the Big Bang, and were all produced in stellar 2. G. Efstathiou, in Physics of the Early Universe, J. A. epoch of reionization probe regions of the uni- interiors. These elements therefore were not Peacock, A. E. Heavens, A. T. Davies, Eds. (Hilger, verse where stars have already formed and the present in the primordial gas, and their abundance Bristol, 1990) p. 361– 463. increased as supernovae and stellar winds delivered medium has been reionized or polluted by heavy 3. J. P. Ostriker, Annu. Rev. Astron. Astrophys. 31, 689 the products of the stellar nuclear furnaces to in- (1993). elements. But there is a way to study the undis- 4. S. M. Faber, J. S. Gallagher, Annu. Rev. Astron. As- terstellar space. turbed atomic medium. Nature turns out to be 45. V. Bromm, N.Yoshida, L. Hernquist, e-Print available trophys. 2, 135 (1979). at http://xxx.lanl.gov/abs/astro-ph/0305333. surprisingly resourceful in providing us with 5. D. Zaritsky, S. D. M. White, Astrophys. J. 435, 599 46. Species such as OI, FeII, and CII are the main cool- opportunities to scrutinize the most remote land- (1994). ants of gas at T Ͻ 104 K in the interstellar medium 6. T. A. McKay et al., Astrophys. J. 571, L85 (2002). scapes of the universe. The hyperfine structure of galaxies at the present time. 7. S. D. M. White, J. F. Navarro, A. E. Evrard, , C. S. 47. V. Bromm, A. Ferrara, P. S. Coppi, R. B. Larson, Mon. of H atoms, the 21-cm transition due to the spin Frenk, Nature 366, 429 (1993). Not. R. Astron. Soc. 328, 969 (2001). interaction of the electron and the proton, pro- 8. S. Ettori, A. C. Fabian, Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 305, 48. J. Mackey, V. Bromm, L. Hernquist, Astrophys. J. 586, 834 (1999). 1 (2003). vides a mechanism to probe the atomic medium. 9. S. W. Allen, Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 296, 392 49. R. Schneider, A. Ferrara, P. Natarajan, K. Omukai, When observing the CMB radiation, the inter- (1998). Astrophys. J. 571, 30 (2002). vening H can change the intensity at the red- 10. S. Perlmutter et al., Astrophys. J. 517, 565 (1999). 50. Stars of 0.8 solar masses have a lifetime about equal 11. A. G. Riess et al., Astrophys. J. 560, 49 (2001). to the present age of the universe, so that one shifted 21-cm wavelength by a small amount, 12. C. Bennett et al., Astrophys. J. in press (e-Print avail- formed in the early universe should be running out causing absorption if its spin temperature is able at http://xxx.lanl.gov/abs/astro-ph/0302208). of hydrogen in its core at present and becoming a lower than the CMB temperature, and emission 13. D. N. Spergel et al., e-Print available at http:// luminous red giant. More massive stars live shorter if the spin temperature is higher. The spin tem- xxx.lanl.gov/abs/astro-ph/0302209. and less massive ones live longer. 14. J. P. Ostriker, P. Steinhardt, Science 300, 1909 51. Y.-Z. Qian, G. J. Wasserburg, Astrophys. J. 567, 515 perature reflects the fraction of atoms in the (2003). (2002). ground and the excited hyperfine levels. The gas 15. R. P. Kirshner, Science 300, 1914 (2003). 52. N. Christlieb et al., Nature 419, 904 (2002). kinetic temperature cooled below the CMB tem- 16. Linear fluctuations grow in proportion to the scale 53. The past light-cone is the set of all events in the factor, (1 ϩ z)Ϫ1, when matter dominates the en- universe from which a light message would be perature during the Dark Age owing to adiabatic ergy density of the universe. The growth is being reaching us just at the present time. The further expansion, although the spin temperature was suppressed at present by the dark energy, and it was away we look, the further back into the past we are kept close to the CMB temperature (90). When also suppressed in the early universe when radiation observing. dominated over matter, at z տ 3500. 54. This simple calculation of the z at which the first the first stars appeared in the universe, a mech- 17. An excellent, more extensive review of the dark age object visible to an observer would collapse from anism for coupling the spin and kinetic temper- can be found in R. Barkana, A. Loeb [Phys. Rep. 349, a very rare fluctuation is based on the approxi- ature of the gas, and hence for lowering the spin 125 (2001)]. mation that the collapse takes place when the temperature and making the H visible in absorp- 18. X. Fan et al., Astron. J. 122, 2833 (2001). linearly extrapolated overdensity reaches a fixed 19. X. Fan et al., Astron. J., 25, 1649 (2003). value, and is known as the Press-Schechter model, tion against the CMB, started to operate. The 20. E. Hu et al., Astrophys. J. 568, L75 (2002). which was first proposed in (102) and is described ultraviolet photons emitted by stars that pene- 21. K. Kodaira et al. Publ. Astron. Soc. Jpn. 55, L17 in detail in its modern use in (103–105). The trated the atomic medium were repeatedly scat- (2003). redshifts given here for the first object that would 22. S. Lepp, J. M. Shull, Astrophys. J. 280, 465 (1984). become visible may be changed slightly by cor- tered by H atoms after being redshifted to the 23. F. Palla, D. Galli, J. Silk, Astrophys. J. 451, 44 (1995). rections to this approximate model, and by Ly␣ resonance line, and these scatterings redis- 24. A. Loeb, Astrophys. J. 555, L1 (2001). changes in the CDM power spectrum normaliza- tributed the occupation of the hyperfine struc- 25. P. C. Stancil, A. Loeb, M. Zaldarriaga, A. Dalgarno, S. tion and primordial spectral index. ture levels (90–93), bringing the spin tempera- Lepp, Astrophys. J. 580, 29 (2002). 55. P. P. Avelino, A. R. Liddle, e-Print available at http:// 26. The Jeans mass of gas at a certain temperature and xxx.lanl.gov/abs/astro-ph/0305357. ture down to the kinetic temperature and causing density is the minimum mass required for gravity to 56. M. C. Begelman, Science 300, 1898 (2003). absorption. As the first generation of stars overcome the pressure gradient and force the gas to 57. J. E. Gunn, B. A. Peterson, Astrophys. J. 142, 1633 evolved, supernova remnants and x-ray binaries collapse. (1965). 27. H. M. P. Couchman, M. J. Rees, Mon. Not. R. Astron. 58. M. Rauch, Annu. Rev. Astron. Astrophys. 36, 267 probably emitted x-rays that penetrated into the Soc. 221, 53 (1986). (1998). intergalactic medium and heated it by photoion- 28. Atomic helium needs even more energy to make a 59. R. H. Becker, et al., Astron. J. 122, 2850 (2001). ization; gas at high density could also be shock- transition to the first excited state than atomic 60. R. L. White, R. H. Becker, X. Fan, M. A. Strauss, hydrogen, and therefore it can induce cooling only Astron. J., in press (e-Print available at http://xxx. heated when collapsing into halos. The gas ki- at higher temperatures than hydrogen. lanl.gov/abs/astro-ph/0303476). netic and spin temperatures could then be raised 29. W. C. Saslaw, D. Zipoy, Nature 216, 976 (1967). 61. P. McDonald, J. Miralda-Escude, Astrophys. J. 549, ´ above the CMB, making the 21-cm signal ob- 30. P. J. E. Peebles, R. H. Dicke, Astrophys. J. 154, 891 L11 (2001). servable in emission (93, 94). This 21-cm signal (1968). 62. X. Fan et al., Astron. J. 123, 1247 (2002). 31. M. Tegmarket al., Astrophys. J. 474, 1 (1997). 63. J. Arons, D. W. Wingert, Astrophys. J. 177, 1 (1972). should reveal an intricate angular and frequency 32. T. Abel, P. Anninos, M. L. Norman, Y. Zhang, Astro- 64. N. Y. Gnedin, Astrophys. J. 535, 530 (2000). structure reflecting the density and spin temper- phys. J. 508, 518 (1998). 65. C. W. Akerlof et al., Nature 398, 400 (1999). 1908 20 JUNE 2003 VOL 300 SCIENCE www.sciencemag.org
    • THE DARK SIDE SPECIAL SECTION 66. P. Meszaros, M. J. Rees, Astrophys. J. 476, 231 (1997). ´ ´ 82. A. Sokasian, T. Abel, L.Hernquist, V. Springel, e-Print 95. P. Tozzi, P.Madau, A. Meiksin, M. J. Rees, Astrophys. 67. B. Zhang, S.Kobayashi, P. Meszaros, Astrophys. J., in ´ ´ available at http://xxx.lanl.gov/abs/astro-ph/0303098. J. 528, 597 (2000). press (e-Print available at http://xxx.lanl.gov/abs/ 83. R. Cen, e-Print available at http://xxx.lanl.gov/abs/ 96. I. T. Iliev, P. R. Shapiro, A. Ferrara, H. Martel, Astro- astro-ph/0302525). astro-ph/0303236. phys. J. 572, 123 (2002). 68. J. Miralda-Escude, Astrophys. J. 501, 15 (1998). ´ 84. W. A. Chiu, X. Fan, J. P. Ostriker, e-Print available 97. C. L. Carilli, N. Y. Gnedin, F. Owen, Astrophys. J. 577, 69. D. Q. Lamb, D. Reichart, Astrophys. J. 536, 1 (2000). at http://xxx.lanl.gov/abs/astro-ph/0304234. 22 (2002). 70. V. Bromm, A. Loeb, Astrophys. J. 575, 111 (2002). 85. The maximum theoretical upper limit for the num- 98. S. R. Furlanetto, A. Loeb, Astrophys. J. 588, 18 71. S. P. Oh, Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 336, 1021 (2002). ber of ionizing photons that can be emitted by a (2003). 72. S. R. Furlanetto, A. Loeb, Astrophys. J. 579, 1 (2002). star for every baryon it contains is obtained by 99. B. Ciardi, P. Madau, e-Print available at http://xxx. 73. A. Kogut et al., e-Print available at http://xxx.lanl. dividing the fusion energy per baryon released by lanl.gov/abs/astro-ph/0303249. gov/abs/astro-ph/0302213. fusion to helium, 7 MeV, by the average energy of 100. U.-L. Pen, e-Print available at http://xxx.lanl.gov/ 74. The errors are 1␴ and include the best estimate of an ionizing photon, ϳ20 eV, which gives ϳ3 ϫ 105. abs/astro-ph/0305387. the WMAP team of systematic uncertainties asso- Massive stars with no heavy elements can fuse 101. At present the Giant Metrewave Radio Telescope ciated with foreground Galactic emission; see table almost all their hydrogen content over their lifetime (www.gmrt.ncra.tifr.res.in) in India is already 2 of (73). and are hot enough to emit most of their radiation searching for high-z 21-cm signals, and more sen- 75. J. Miralda-Escude, e-Print available at http://xxx.lanl. ´ as ionizing photons (86–88). sitive observatories being designed now are the gov/abs/astro-ph/0211071. 86. J. Tumlinson, J. M. Shull, Astrophys. J. 528, L65 (2000). Square Kilometer Array (www.skatelescope.org) and 76. S. Whyithe, A. Loeb, Astrophys. J. Lett., in press 87. V. Bromm, R. P. Kudritzki, A. Loeb, Astrophys. J. 552, the Low Frequency Array (www.lofar.org). (e-Print available at http://xxx.lanl.gov/abs/astro- 464 (2001). 102. W. H. Press, P. Schechter, Astrophys. J. 187, 425 ph/0302297). 88. D. Schaerer, Astron. Astrophys. 382, 28 (2002). (1974). 77. Z. Haiman, G. Holder, e-Print available at http:// 89. A. Venkatesan, J. Tumlinson, J. M. Shull, Astrophys. J. 103. J. R. Bond, S. Cole, G. Efstathiou, N. Kaiser, Astro- xxx.lanl.gov/abs/astro-ph/0302403. 584, 621 (2003). phys. J. 379, 440 (1991). 78. G. Holder, Z. Haiman, M. Kaplinghat, L. Knox, e-Print 90. D. Scott, M. J. Rees, Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 247, 104. R. J. Bower, Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 248, 332 (1991). available at http://xxx.lanl.gov/abs/astro-ph/0302404. 510 (1990). 105. C. Lacey, S. Cole, Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 262, 627 79. B. Ciardi, A. Ferrara, S. D. M. White, e-Print available 91. S. A. Wouthuysen, Astron. J. 57, 31 (1952). (1993). at http://xxx.lanl.gov/abs/astro-ph/0302451. 92. G. B. Field, Astrophys. J. 129, 551 (1959). 106. I thank X. Fan and N. Gnedin for their permission to 80. R. S. Somerville, M. Livio, e-Print available at http:// 93. P. Madau, A. Meiksin, M. J. Rees, Astrophys. J. 475, reproduce and their help in providing figures from xxx.lanl.gov/abs/ astro-ph/0303017. 492 (1997). their papers and P. Sieber for suggesting a good way to 81. R. S. Somerville, J. S. Bullock, M. Livio, e-Print available 94. X. Chen, J. Miralda-Escude, e-Print available at ´ start this article. I also thank T. Abel, A. Loeb, M. Rees, at http://xxx.lanl.gov/abs/astro-ph/0303481. http://xxx.lanl.gov/abs/astro-ph/0303395. and my referees for their comments. REVIEW New Light on Dark Matter Jeremiah P. Ostriker1 and Paul Steinhardt2 Dark matter, proposed decades ago as a speculative component of the universe, matter to explain the structure and nature of is now known to be the vital ingredient in the cosmos: six times more abundant the universe (7). The only thing dark energy than ordinary matter, one-quarter of the total energy density, and the compo- has in common with dark matter is that both nent that has controlled the growth of structure in the universe. Its nature components neither emit nor absorb light. On remains a mystery, but assuming that it is composed of weakly interacting a microscopic scale, they are composed of subatomic particles, is consistent with large-scale cosmic structure. However, different constituents. Most important, dark recent analyses of structure on galactic and subgalactic scales have suggested matter, like ordinary matter, is gravitationally discrepancies and stimulated numerous alternative proposals. We discuss how self-attractive and clusters with ordinary mat- studies of the density, demography, history, and environment of smaller-scale ter to form galaxies. Dark energy is gravita- structures may distinguish among these possibilities and shed new light on the tionally self-repulsive and remains nearly nature of dark matter. uniformly spread throughout the universe. Hence, a census of the energy contained inThe dark side of the universe first became vinced that the universe must be flat and that galaxies would miss most the dark energy.evident about 65 years ago when Fritz the total energy density must equal the value So, by positing the existence of a dark energyZwicky (1) noticed that the speed of galaxies (termed the critical value) that distinguishes a component, it became possible to account forin large clusters is much too great to keep positively curved, closed universe from a the 70 to 80% discrepancy between the mea-them gravitationally bound together unless negatively curved, open universe. Cosmolo- sured mass density and the critical energythey weigh over 100 times more than one gists became attracted to the beguiling sim- density predicted by inflation (8–11). Then,would estimate on the basis of the number of plicity of a universe in which virtually all of two independent groups (12, 13) found evi-stars in the cluster. Decades of investigation the energy density consists of some form of dence of the accelerated expansion of theconfirmed his analysis (2–5), and by the matter, about 4% being ordinary matter and universe from observations of supernovae,1980s, the evidence for dark matter with an 96% dark matter. In fact, observational stud- and the model with a dominant dark energyabundance of about 20% of the total energy ies were never really compliant with this component, as illustrated in Fig. 1, becamedensity of the universe was accepted, al- vision. Although there was a wide dispersion the concordance model of cosmology. Thethough the nature of the dark matter remained in total mass density estimates, there never existence of dark energy has recently beena mystery. developed any convincing evidence that there independently confirmed by observations by After the introduction of inflationary the- was sufficient matter to reach the critical the Wilkinson Microwave Anisotrope Probeory (6), many cosmologists became con- value. The discrepancy between observation [WMAP (14)] and has become accepted as and the favored theoretical model became an essential ingredient of the standard model1 Department of Astrophysical Sciences, 2Department increasingly sharp. (15).of Physics, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ 08544, Dark energy came to the rescue when it Dark energy has changed our view of theUSA. was realized that there was not sufficient role of dark matter in the universe. According to www.sciencemag.org SCIENCE VOL 300 20 JUNE 2003 1909