March 09 Planning Commission

Loading...

Flash Player 9 (or above) is needed to view presentations.
We have detected that you do not have it on your computer. To install it, go here.

0 comments

Post a comment

    Post a comment
    Embed Video
    Edit your comment Cancel

    Notes on slide 1

    Ethan Spoo – Senior Planner w/ the City of Oak Harbor. Were continuing our discussion the subdivision code updates.

    Favorites, Groups & Events

    March 09 Planning Commission - Presentation Transcript

      • SUBDIVISION CODE UPDATE
    1. PURPOSE
      • A) Present code changes for street widths and discuss review process
      • B) Obtain Planning Commission input on policy issues, especially provision of on-street parking .
    2. EXISTING PROCESS
      • 1. Design streets to meet standards
      • 2. Apply for a “waiver” or use PRD, both reviewed by PC.
    3. EXISTING STREET SECTION
    4. PROBLEMS
      • Currently, with narrower lots, less parking is being provided than one would expect; even with wide street sections
      • Significant staff, applicant and PC process time.
      • Waiver process for non-PRD applications - there is no other way to vary from street standard
    5. NEW “RULES”
      • New rules need to:
        • Introduce design flexibility for the applicant
        • Simpler review process for alternative street designs.
      • 1st tier - Standard Designs
      • 2nd tier – Administrative Variance ( NEW PROCESS)
      • 3rd tier – Waiver (PC)
      NEW “RULES” – CONT.
    6. 1 ST TIER TWO STANDARD DESIGNS
      • a). “narrow” section:
        • 5-foot sidewalks on both sides
        • 5-foot planter strip on both sides
        • 6-inch curb on both sides
        • 28 feet of pavement
        • Parking on one side.
        • Total right-of-way width is 50 feet.
    7. “ NARROW” SECTION
    8. 1 ST TIER TWO STANDARD DESIGNS
      • b). “wide” section
        • 5-foot sidewalks on both sides
        • 5-foot planter strip on both sides
        • 6-inch curb on both sides
        • 36-feet of pavement.
        • Parking on both sides
        • Total right-of-way width is 60 feet.
    9. “ Wide Section”
    10. 2 ND TIER ADMINISTRATIVE VARIANCE
      • Demonstrate - cannot provide standard sections
      • Unusual site or design reasons
      • Staff review Administrative Variance dimensions only – essential elements required
    11. 2 ND TIER ADMINISTRATIVE VARIANCE
      • Essential Elements?
        • Sidewalks - both sides OR ped connects
        • Landscape strip OR landscaping somewhere
        • Parking one side OR parking somewhere
        • Curbs on both sides
        • Two minimum 10-foot travel lanes
    12. ALTERNATIVE PARKING Mid-block off street parking & walkways through long blocks & parking one side of street Off-street parking & traffic calming
    13. 3 RD TIER WAIVER
      • Demonstrate cannot provide one of the essential elements
      • Waiver review by PC – i.e. bike path
    14. POLICY ISSUES PARKING
      • Benefits of reduced street widths include:
        • less costly to construct
        • less costly to maintain (non-LID)
        • less stormwater (LID)
        • smaller stormwater systems
        • improved visual quality
        • traffic calming effect
        • shorter crossing distances for pedestrians
    15. POLICY ISSUES PARKING
      • Costs of reduced street widths include:
        • less on-street parking
    16. POLICY ISSUES REVIEW PROCESS
      • Three-tiered review process?
        • Proposed to eliminate staff, applicant and PC time.
        • There would no longer be a need to for PC review of minor deviations.
        • Are we meeting the goal?
    17. POLICY ISSUES LANDSCAPE STRIP
      • How wide should the landscape strips be?
        • Propose a 5-foot landscape strip
        • Smaller = cracking
    18. POLICY ISSUES TRAFFIC CALMING
      • Narrow streets do not inhibit traffic calming, they promote it.
    19. FURTHER DISCUSSION
    20. “ NARROW” STREET SECTION
    21. “ WIDE” STREET SECTION
    SlideShare Zeitgeist 2009

    + Robert VoigtRobert Voigt Nominate

    custom

    179 views, 0 favs, 0 embeds more stats

    March 09 Oak Harbor Planning Commission presentatio more

    More info about this document

    © All Rights Reserved

    Go to text version

    • Total Views 179
      • 179 on SlideShare
      • 0 from embeds
    • Comments 0
    • Favorites 0
    • Downloads 1
    Most viewed embeds

    more

    All embeds

    less

    Flagged as inappropriate Flag as inappropriate
    Flag as inappropriate

    Select your reason for flagging this presentation as inappropriate. If needed, use the feedback form to let us know more details.

    Cancel
    File a copyright complaint
    Having problems? Go to our helpdesk?

    Categories