• Save
Effect of roof slope variations on the simple structure greenhouse
Upcoming SlideShare
Loading in...5

Like this? Share it with your network


Effect of roof slope variations on the simple structure greenhouse

Uploaded on


บริการทำโปรเจค รับทำแฟลช เกมส์ อนิเมชั่น และ แอพพลิเคชั่น
เขียนโปรแกรม งานเอกสาร รายงาน พิมพ์งาน สารนิพนธ์ วิทยานิพนธ์
งานด้าน Hardware และ อิเล็กทรอนิกส์
ตั้งแต่เที่ยงวัน-เที่ยงคืน (12.00 น.-24.00 น.)
โทร 0831585457
whatapps:: 0831585457
Contact us : project@rubtumproject.com
Our Website : http://www.รับทำโปรเจค.net
The Best Way For Your Project Solution

More in: Technology , Business
  • Full Name Full Name Comment goes here.
    Are you sure you want to
    Your message goes here
    Be the first to comment
No Downloads


Total Views
On Slideshare
From Embeds
Number of Embeds



Embeds 9

http://www.รับทําโปรเจค.net 4
http://www.xn--42ch8blg9bd2il6lta4k.net 4
http://www.slideshare.net 1

Report content

Flagged as inappropriate Flag as inappropriate
Flag as inappropriate

Select your reason for flagging this presentation as inappropriate.

    No notes for slide


  • 1. Effect of Roof Slope Variations on the Simple Structure Greenhouse 1School of Energy, Environment and Materials; 2School of Bioresources and Technology, King Mongkuts University of Technology, Thonburi*Corresponding author, Division of Energy Technology, School of Energy, Environment and Materials 126 King Mongkut’s University of Technology Thonburi, Thungkru, Bangmod, Bangkok, 10140, Thailand. Fax: +662AbstractThe natural ventilation system for a Simple Structure Greenhouse (SSG) with gable roof androof vent, each column of which is < 2.5 m high and average roof slope of which is < 15°causes the air temperature inside the greenhouse to be higher than the ambient air temperaturefor 6-8 Celsius degrees. This phenomenon occurs to the greenhouse that is covered by nets.The study by the consideration of the routine and form of the air flow in an unoccupied 6x8m2 greenhouse with the Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD) demonstrates that the wakeofthe hot air inside the greenhouse is in the form of the air flow under the canopy in the routineof Thermal Driven, bringing the hot air back to the greenhouse. The rest of the hot air is vent-ed out by the Wind Driven routine though the side wall opening of the greenhouse. The studyby varying the roof slope, at the 15°, 30° and 42° slopes, with the wind speed of <2.0 m s-1 tolower the air temperature inside the greenhouse to be equivalent to the ambient air tempera-ture in the environment. In addition, the wind load on the roof slope on the outside of thegreenhouse is considered. The result from the calculation of the equation between ventilationrate and the wind pressure coefficient indicates that the 30° slope is appropriate for a greenhouse. The ventilation system inside the greenhouse is the mixed convection where Gr/Re2 <1. The difference of the temperature is (Ti – To) at the <2.5 m height from the ground and the<2 Celsius degrees temperature.Keywords: Greenhouse, Air ventilation, Computational Fluids Dynamics, Roof slope,Temperature difference1. IntroductionIn Thailand, the high temperature inside the greenhouse causes the problem of the hot air ac-cumulation within the greenhouse. This phenomenon occurs in the greenhouse with the openside walls, which makes the temperature inside different from the temperature outside (Ti –To) different for 6–8 Celsius degrees depending on the ambient air temperature in the environ-ment.The solution to this problem is the application of natural ventilation which is a practicalmethod for controlling greenhouse microclimate because of its economic advantages. The75% of Thailand farmers have too low incomes and unable to afford equipments and materi-als to reduce hot air within their greenhouses. Most of these greenhouses are the SimpleStructure Greenhouses (SSG), as shown in Fig. 1. This type of greenhouses is appropriate forThailand climate because it protects the crops contained therein from rain and insects. Gener-ally, greenhouses that can reduce the hot air under their ceilings should have 3–4 m highcolumns [1, 2]. For a Simple Structure Greenhouse (SSG), this requirement is difficult to ac-complish due to the roof structure and the damage from strong winds. Thus, the air ventilationsystem that can reduce the hot air relies on the side wall opening. This method leads to theloss of humidity caused from the plant transpiration due to the high level of the velocity of thewind inside, and the decrease of carbon dioxide absorption. Kalma and Kuiper [3] proposedthat the optimal wind velocity within a greenhouse should be less than 1 m s-1 and be withinthe range of 0.1–0.6 m s-1 [4]. Thus, the control the internal wind speed depends on the sidewall opening. Kittas et al. [5] had applied a math model to calculate the size of the open partsof the side walls and concluded that the open parts of a side wall should be 15–25% of the en-
  • 2. tire floor area of a greenhouse, which is suitable for ventilation rate in a Mediterranean green-house (where the irradiation intensity is 1000 W m-2 and ΔT ≅ 5°C).Connellan [6] reported that, in a region with high temperature, a naturally ventilated green-house, the minimum ventilation opening area of 20% of the greenhouse floor area should bemaintained so that greenhouse temperature will be as equivalent as possible to the tempera-tures of the external environment.Albright [7] reported that the temperature inside a greenhouse will not begin to be transmittedto the ambient air temperatures until the ridge and side area is more than 10% of the floorarea. At the same time, Brugger et al. [8] who had studied on the ventilation in the ParralStyle greenhouse, when the external wind speed was > 2 m s-1, in the Computational FluidsDynamics (CFD) system and could achieve the results stating that the air exchange rate in-creased respectively with the roof slope. In other words, when the roof slope is higher than27°, there will be a minimal additional air exchange rate.As for this research, the natural ventilation is applied to the Simple Structure Greenhouse.Concerning the natural ventilation and the wind-induced ventilation systems in Thailand, thefactor that needs to be considered is the wind velocity. As for Thailand, the wind velocity datashow that the average external wind speed is inferior to 2 m s-1 [9], which makes the ventila-tion system inside the greenhouse become the mix convection. Around 50% of the ventilationsystems in a greenhouse are thermal driven ventilations (free convection). This effect has in-fluences on the air temperature under the ceiling of the greenhouse. Thus, the greenhouse withlow roof slope and low ceiling tend to face the problem concerning the increase of the insideair temperature.Therefore, this research focuses on lowering the air temperature inside the Simple StructureGreenhouse (SSG) with gable roof and roof vent, the columns of which are not high as 3 me-ters, so as that the temperature inside the greenhouse will be equivalent to the ambient air.This study examines the flow pattern and the temperature distribution inside the greenhousewith variable roof slopes and the CFD technique is utilized as the tool for the study. Further-more, this study also concentrates on the angles of roofs and the wind pressure applied to theroof structure outside the greenhouse by analyzing the ventilation performance with windpressure coefficient. The results from the study will specify the roof slope appropriate for thegreenhouse.2. Simple Structure Greenhouse, SSGThe Simple Structure Greenhouse (SSG) is constructed with the materials that are available inthe local area, e.g., wood and bamboo. This type of greenhouse can last for 1–2 years depend-ing on the treatment process. In constructing this type of greenhouse, the constructor willclump the wood or bamboo sticks together with screws or ropes so as to build the greenhouse.This construction scheme facilitates the repair or the relocation of the greenhouse. In additionto wood or bamboo sticks, soil or cement will be used for building the foundation of columns,each of which is 2.5 meters high.The typical roof style of this type of greenhouse is the gable roof. However, this roof style al-ways leads to the problems concerning the air temperature and heat under the canopy. The so-lution to such problems is to design the roof top with the additional 0.5 meter height for theroof vent and the side wall opening. The side wall opening needs to be open on the basis ofthe air temperature inside greenhouse.In Thailand, a greenhouse of this type is called a ‘flat-roof style greenhouse’ [1]. In general,the sidewalls and roof of the greenhouse are covered by PVC or PE film, and the gable roofslope ranks from 15° to 20° depending on the greenhouse span and the number of the wood or
  • 3. bamboo sticks that are clumped together. The SSG greenhouse has 6 meters width and 4 me-ters sectional depth, which is considered to be the normal span for an SSG.3. Theoretical Basis3.1 Theory on Ventilation SystemThe discussion on the ventilation system for a greenhouse that concerns the formation of freeconvection implies that, even in forced convection, the temperature gradients in the fluid maygive rise to free convection. Therefore, it is useful to have some criteria for the relative impor-tance of free convection in forced convection. It has been shown that the parameterสูตร คำำนวณ (1)is a mean to measure the relative importance of free convection in relation to forced convec-tion. When Gr/Re2 < 1, the ventilation system is considered to be primarily by force convec-tion (wind driven ventilation). On the contrary, when Gr/Re2 > 1, free convection is dominant(thermal driven ventilation). Furthermore, when Gr/Re2 ≅ 1, the ventilation system is consid-ered as mixed convection [10].In the Equation 9(1), β is the volume coefficient of thermal expansion, ΔT is the differencebetween internal and external air temperatures (°C), g is the gravitation acceleration (m s-2), his the vertical distance between the midpoints of the side wall vent and roof vent (m), and u isthe outside wind speed (m s-1).3.2 Theory of greenhouse ventilationNatural ventilation is caused by two physical factors known as stack and wind effects. Theformula for calculating ventilation that is caused by stack and wind effects was proposed byKittas et al. [5]. The assumption of this formula is that the air flows through ventilators at theroof or the side walls of a greenhouse, and the equation is as the follow:สูตรคำำนวณ (2)where Q is the ventilation rate (m3 s-1); AR and AS are the areas of the ventilating roof andsidewall openings (m2), AT is total area of vents (m2), respectively; and Cd is the discharge co-efficient of the ventilation opening; T is the mean of absolute temperature (°C); Cw is theglobalwind pressure coefficient; and u is the wind speed (m s-1).When the contribution of stack effect is negligible, the ventilation rate from Equation (2) canbe expressed by the following equation:สูตรคำำนวณ (3)To compare ventilation results obtained in the different greenhouse, the modification of thenon-dimension parameter of ventilation function, G(α), proposed by Bot [12] has been usedby a number of authors [13, 14]:สูตรคำำนวณ (4)where A is the area of the ventilation opening in the greenhouse surface (m-2). Under the Q isthe air ventilation output (m3 s-1), which is agreeable to that from equations (2) and (3).3.3 Wind pressure coefficientWind loads on the greenhouse cover are the results from external and internal pressures in-duced by the external wind on the cover. The aerodynamic or pressure coefficients, Cp, de-
  • 4. scribes the corresponding pressure distribution on the external or the internal surface of agreenhouse normalized by the dynamic wind pressure:สูตรคำำนวณ (5)where PG is the pressure on the greenhouse roof (Pa), Pref is the pressure reference (Pa), uref isthe wind velocity at a reference height (m s-1) and ρ is the air density (kg m-3).4. Method of study4.1 Problem definitionThe Simple Structure Greenhouse with the dimension of 6 m width × 8 m depth is construct-ed on the flat ground without impediment to the air flow, as shown in Fig. 1(b). The height ofthe greenhouse, from the ground level to gable roof top is 3.6 m, and each of the columns orsidewall is 2.5 m high. The greenhouse lies itself perpendicularly, in the north-south directionand across the wind direction.The sidewall and roof of the greenhouse in the east-west direction are covered by PVC filmwhilst the other side wall has an opening vent with the height of 0.4 m from the ground or15% of sidewall height. Likewise, the gable also has a vent the size of which is 0.5 m × 8 m.Thus, the total area of ventilation opening is 22% of the greenhouse floor area [6, 7].As for the roof slope variation, the average roof slopes studied in this research are 15°, 30°and 42°. The geometry is the roof slope as shown in Fig. 2 (a-c).4.2 Measurements of the air ventilation in the greenhouseIn this research, the simulation results from the database measurement by Tuntiwaranruk [15],who had studied on the SSG-greenhouse, are compared with the results from this study. Theair temperature is measured by 4 thermistor probe temperature sensors (XTI108-39+122,StowAway™ XTI Temp Temperature Data Logger), with the +0.5 Celsius degrees accuracyand 0.35 Celsius degrees resolution, placed at the height of 0.90 m, 1.5 m, 2.0 m and 2.50 mfrom the ground. The air ventilation is investigated by using air velocity transmitter (HVAC,EE65, Elektronik, Engerwitzdorf, Austria) with the accuracy of ±0.3 m s-1 which is accordingto ASHRAE standard, 2001. The transmitters are placed at the 25 point parallel to the lengthof side wall vent and at the gable. As a result the routines of the ventilation and temperaturedistribution inside the greenhouse are discovered and the guideline of the greenhouse ventila-tion is improved.5. Numerical methods5.1 Computational fluid dynamics methodConcerning the air flow in the steady condition which is related to the continuity equation ofmass conservation, it is practical to apply the Navier–Stokes’ momentum equation that con-siders the gravity body force, together with the energy equation with air physical property.In this ventilation prediction, the viscosity is included. In addition, the thermal driven refer-ence from ambient temperature in the form of Boussinesq’s approximation with standardKepsilon (turbulent kinetic energy and dissipation rate) model can represent the turbulenttransport within the greenhouse [16,17].To achieve accurate results, a second-order upwind discretization scheme is applied in themomentum, heat and turbulence transport equations. The convergence criterion for all vari-ables is 1×10-4.
  • 5. 5.2 Computational meshesThe CFD simulation for this research relies on a general three-dimensional model and a sys-tem of equations built with variables, which is numerically solved with finite volume method.The computational mesh is a model which is similar to the experimental configuration (Fig. 1)on the basis of unstructured mesh. The area around of the greenhouse is extended in order toprevent blockage effects. However, it needs to be confirmed that extending the area will notsignificantly affect the accuracy of the simulations but will substantially increase thecomputing time and memory requirements. To obtain the accurate results and less comput-ing time, the simulations are run at three different grid resolutions, namely, 712,029, 852,550and 1,192,514 elements.5.3 Boundary conditionsTo determine the flow inlet boundary, an atmospheric wind velocity profiles is imposed. Themean velocity boundary condition prevailing windward is assumed to be incompressible, witha logarithmic relation between the height and the wind speed. Inlet velocity profile was de-fined by Richards and Hoxey [18].The outlet boundary specified with relative static pressure is zero; the normal gradient of oth-er variables is zero, i.e. ∂/∂x = 0. No-slip walls are used along the solid parts of the green-house (ground and greenhouse wall), where a classical logarithmic wall functions is imposed.The top and side boundaries of the computational domain-a symmetry-type boundary condi-tion, are used to describe both zero normal velocity and gradients of all variables at a symme-try plane.The inlet boundary of atmospheric wind velocity profile at 6 m is defined with initial velocityof 0.5, 1.5 and 2 m s-1, with the average ambient temperature of 32 °C. The inside boundaryconditions of greenhouse are based on the maximum temperature (ΔT = 8 °C), which is theresult from the outside solar radiation of 800 W m-2. The given heat flux of greenhouse roofboundary is 112 W m-2 [15]. The boundary details value and empirical formulae are used forthe simulations as shown in tables 1.6. Results and discussion6.1 Validation of predicted results against experimental resultsFig. 3 shows the comparison between the ventilation rate resulted from the data measurementand the simulated results the three different grid resolutions. The outcomes from the compari-son show that, where the sidewall opening that is 0.4 m high from the ground (or 15% of side-wall high), the outside wind speed ranks between 0.5 and 2.0 m s-1 and the roof of the green-house has low slope, the prediction on the coarse grid has the error of < 15%. This grid, com-pared with the result calculated from the Gr/Re2, with the data measurement on the verticalaxis in the middle of greenhouse as shown in Fig. 4, shows a high level of agreement to thesimulated results. Thus, as for the investigation on roof slope variations for theSSG-greenhouse, the computational grid should be the low resolution ranking between729,170 and 731,116 elements. These results will be used for analyzing the ventilation routinein the latter parts.6.2 The problems of low slope roof for the SSGFig. 5 shows the air flow pattern and air temperature distributions inside the greenhouse whenthe external wind speed is 1.6 m s-1. It is found that the external wind speed at the ventilationopening that is at the 0.4 m height from the ground causes the wake of air inside the green-house. This effect induces the air ventilation movement to roof vent and the other sidewall.However, when the inside air has a low pressure, the air ventilation at the roof vent is ob-structed by the external wind speed in the form of the backward wind on the roof top with ahigh pressure. As the result, the ventilation performance on roof vent drops. This also affects
  • 6. the heat storage under the greenhouse roof as shown in Fig. 5(b). The averaged air tempera-ture at the height of 1.5 m from ground is 35 °C which makes the air temperature differencerank between 6–8 °C.The investigation on the ventilation system in the greenhouse is performed by using the Gr/Re2, whereby the vertical line in the center of greenhouse at the height of 0.5 m to 2.5 mabove the ground is considered. The results calculated from the Gr/Re2 formula vary in therange of 0.3–0.8, and show that the ventilation system inside greenhouse is the wind driventype [10].This case, as shown in Fig. 5(a), reveals that the wind induces the wake of air and reduces thehot air at the height of < 0.7 m from the ground. At the height of > 0.7 m, the hot air inside thegreenhouse remains. In addition, when the Gr/Re2 ≥ 1 formula is used, the vertical line is >2.5 m high. Thus, the ventilation system trend in this zone is free convection or thermal driv-en ventilation, which influences the heat storage under the roof. Furthermore, the temperatureof the hot air inside the greenhouse needs to be lowered so as that it will be similar to the ex-ternal ambient air temperature.The results from the simulation of the temperature distribution in the SSG, as shown in Fig.5(b), reveal that the air temperature inside the greenhouse, at the height of 0.4 m from theground, is higher than the ambient air temperature for 2–3 °C where the external wind speedat the ventilation opening varies from 1.6 to 1.8 m s-1. In this case, the averaged value of theinternal wind speed inside the greenhouse is 0.638 ≤ ui ≤ 1.0 m s-1. This concurs with the re-sults reported by Kalma and Kuiper [3]. However, the internal wind speed that is suitable formaintaining the favorable environment for crop growth is in the range of 0.1–0.6 m s-1 [4].Fig. 5 (a) and (b) show that, at the wind speed of 0.6 m s-1, the air temperature inside is higherthan ambient air temperature for 5 °C. This is caused from the air ventilation inefficiency.Thus, in case of natural ventilation with roof and sidewall vent in the tropical climatic condi-tion where the external wind speed is less than 2 m s-1, the ventilation opening on the sidewallat the 0.4 m height from the ground is appropriate for controlling the wind speed [3,4], thefailure is caused from the incident where the air temperature inside is higher than the externalair temperature. To solve this problem, various roof slopes for reducing the air temperature in-side the greenhouse at the < 2.5 m height from the ground are examined.6.3 Effect of ventilation performance on roof slope variationsThe heat storage in the SSG depends on the low roof slope. Thus, when investigating on theroof slope variations for lowering the hot air inside the greenhouse at the height of < 2.5 mwhere the space under the gable roof is used as the zone for storing the heat before the hot airis transmitted through the roof vent.Fig. 6 shows the results from the calculation for ventilation rate in term of average ventilationfunction, G(α), as the function of the external wind speed for comparing various roof slopes.The results indicate that, when the wind speed is < 1.5 m s-1, the roof slope variation can varythe performances. At the wind speed of > 1.5 m s-1, the ventilation system is wind-influenced,and the roof slope variation is not influential. When the wind speed is < 1.5 m s-1, the inclineof roof reduces the drag force on thermal driven force, as shown in Fig. 7. This figure showsthe flow pattern and vector field of air inside the greenhouse.In addition, it is discovered that the ceiling of the roof slopes of 30° and 42° (Fig. 7, b-c) fa-cilitate the air movement under the roof to flow out through the roof vent with the speed high-er than the speed of the air flow in the center of the greenhouse.The results from the comparison between this finding and the results from the case of the 15°roof slope indicate that most of the air is waked inside the greenhouse and some of the air at-
  • 7. tempts to flow out off the greenhouse. Therefore, at the roof slope of 15°, the ventilation func-tion, G(α), decreases when the external wind speed is less than 1.5 m s-1.In other investigations, the ventilation function can be considered in term of ventilation resis-tance or ventilation requirement. For the example, in case of the roof slope of 42° with the ex-ternal wind speed of 0.5 m s-1, the ventilation resistance or ventilation requirement is 0.3 ofinlet air volume. When the wind speed is 2 m s-1, the ventilation resistance or ventilation re-quirement is less than 0.15 of inlet air volume. Thus, the higher the external of air wind speedis the lower the ventilation resistance or ventilation requirement is. However, the results fromthe investigation also show that the ventilation performance is dependent on the influencesfrom external wind whilst the roof slope is the feature of the greenhouse which can reduce theheat existing under the roof.The results from the examinations of the air temperature in term of temperature function,(ΔT/To), as shown in Fig. 8, show that the air temperature inside the greenhouse at variousroof slopes is affected by the external wind speed in the range of 0.5–2 m s-1. It is also foundthat the air temperature decreases and depends on the external wind speed.The results from the comparison among the roof slopes of 15°, 30° and 42° show that the airtemperature inside increases by 10–20% when the roof slope is 15°. This shows that the lowroof slope facilitates the increase of air temperature. In other words, the low roof slope doesnot provide the heat storage zone. As a result, the heat on the ceiling convection is transmit-ted, in the manner of the wake of air, into the greenhouse.Furthermore, Fig. 8 shows that when the slope of roof is higher than 30°, the air temperatureinside the greenhouse will not decrease much more. This phenomenon is emphasized on inFig. 9, which shows the simulated results on the air temperature distributions of the air insidethe greenhouse at each roof slope. When the external wind speed is 0.5 m s-1 and the roofslope is 42° (Fig. 9(c)), which provide more space (point b) near the gable roof, the air tem-perature inside the greenhouse is not much different from the air temperature inside the green-house that has 30° roof slope. In addition, the heat storage in both cases occurrs inside thegreenhouse at the height of > 2.5 m from the ground.This case, compared with the results from case of the 15°roof slope, shows that the air tem-perature inside the greenhouse decreases (ΔT) for 1–2°C at the height of < 2.5 m from theground. According to a number of studies on the inside air temperature at various roof slopes,this air temperature difference correlates to the external wind speed. The results are shown intable 2, and indicate that when the roof slope varies between of 10°–15°, it can lower the in-side air temperature (ΔT) around 1–1.5 °C. This is based on the average of air temperaturedata on different external wind speeds.Since the inside of air temperature increases in accordance to the effects from the heat storedunder the roof, the entire ventilation system inside the greenhouse is affected by the storedheat as well. Thus, the data that can be applied to the creation of a guideline for the ventilationsystem inside the greenhouse for lowering the hot air temperature are shown in Fig, showingthe ventilation system under various roof slopes, on the bases of Gr/Re2 and the external windspeed, at the 2.5 m height from the ground.When the external wind speed is 0.5 m s-1 and the Gr/Re2 value at the roof slopes of 30° and42° is < 1, the dominating ventilation system inside the greenhouse is wind-induced one.When the Gr/Re2 is 1 and the roof slope is 15°, the ventilation system inside the greenhouse ismixed convection [10].However, when the external wind speed is < 0.5 m s-1 and the value of Gr/Re2 is > 1, the ven-tilation system in side the greenhouse will shift from the mixed convection to the free convec-
  • 8. tion or thermal driven ventilation. Thus, the air temperature inside the greenhouse will behigh.Likewise, Papadakis et al. [20], having studied on the ventilation system inside the green-house, discovered that, when the Gr/Re2 was < 1, the ventilation system was wind-induced.When the Gr/Re2 was higher than 0.1 and lower than 16 (0.1 < Gr/Re2 < 16), the dominatingventilation system would be the mixed convection.Fig. 10 shows that the ventilation system is the mixed convection when the external windspeed is < 1 m s-1; and the ventilation system in wind driven ventilation when the externalwind speed is > 1.5 m s-1. When the wind speed is 0.5 m s-1 and the Gr/Re2 is higher than 0.6and lower than 1 (0.6 < Gr/Re2 < 1), the ventilation system inside greenhouse will be themixed convection. Thus, to avoid the ventilation system of the free or mixed convection typewhen the external wind speed is < 1 m s-1, the greenhouse roof slope should be > 15° so as togenerate the wind-induced ventilation system inside the greenhouse.6.4 Effect of wind loads on roof slope variationsThe height of roof slope can be damaged by wind loads. Thus, it is essential to simulate theair flow on the outside so as to determine the effects from wind loads in term of wind pressurecoefficient which is applied to the outside of the roof.The results shown in Fig. 11, in this figure shows the wind pressure coefficient as the simulat-ed data on X axis to the span of greenhouse, S, which is presented by the comparison betweenthe results simulated by the CFD technique and the data measured by Oliveira and Younis[21] and Gingera and Holmes [22] who had studied on the effects from wind loads on the roofslopes of 27° and 35°, respectively.As for this study, the comparison is between the wind pressure coefficient on the roofs the av-erage slope of which is 15° (wind loads applied to the roof slope of 20°) and that on the roofthe average slope of which is 30° (wind loads applied to the roof slope of 33°). The resultsfrom the comparison indicate that the simulated results are not significantly different from theresults from the previous studied.From Fig. 11, concerning the wind pressure coefficient, Cp, when the roof slopes are 15°,30°and 42°, it is found that the value of Cp at the roof slopes of 30° is close to zero. However,when the roof slopes are 15° and 42°, the Cp values become -0.5 and 0.6, respectively.Theoretically, when the roof slope is 30°and the dp/dx ≅ 0, the air flow is regarded as a transi-tion. In this study, when the roof slope is 15°, the dp/dx is found to be < 0, so the air flow is afavorable pressure gradient, where the gutter and the small incline of roof are induced to thewind velocity increase and the flow direction change, which generates the wake of air on theroof. This creates the high pressure in the leeward wind floe applied to the roof. On the con-trary, when the roof slope is 42°, the dp/dx will be > 0; hence, the air flow is an adverse pres-sure gradient, where flow separation can never occur on the roof, and the windward flow hasthe high pressure on the roof side.6.5 The correlation between the air ventilation and wind load at various roof slopesIn this research, the ventilation performance is depends on the greenhouse geometry and thevent opening. Thus, the results from the study on roof slope and wind speed variations arecalculated so as to obtain the ventilation drag coefficient, Cd, at the roof slopes of 15°, 30°and 42°. The outcomes from the calculation are the Cd values of 0.641, 0.650 and 0.650, re-spectively. The average Cd is 0.636, which is close to the value obtained by Parra et al. [14]who had studied on the greenhouse with roof and side ventilation.
  • 9. However, the Cd values for greenhouses with roof and side vent are in the range of 0.6–0.8,where the average value of Cd is 0.66 [19].The roof slope variations, thus, can be said to have influences on the air temperature and ven-tilation performance: the high gable is vulnerable to the wind loads.In addition, the ventilation rate and the pressure coefficient on wind force applied to the out-side structure of the greenhouses with different roof slopes are investigated by combining theventilation estimates in equation (2) with the pressure coefficient in equation (5), where thestack effect in equation (2) is negligible. The result from the combination of the two equationscan be expressed by the equation Cd 2 = (Cp / Cw)(ρ2/ΔP)(Q/ AT)2.The correlation between Cd 2 and (ρ2/ΔP)(Q/ AT)2, is shown in Fig. 12, and indicates that theresults from the combination between equations (2) and (5) shows the performance, when theroof the slope of which is 15°–30°, in terms of the ventilation efficiency and the loading effi-ciency when the wind force is applied to the structure on roof side. A roof slope the angle ofwhich is greater than 30° does not influence to the air ventilation rate increase or the inside airtemperature decrease. Thus, the 30° gable roof is best suitable for a greenhouse.7. ConclusionsThis research investigates the problem of air ventilation in a Simple Structure Greenhouse(SSG) with gable roof and roof vent via the Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD) technique.The results from the study on an empty 6m width x 8 m depth greenhouse indicate that theproblem of air temperature increase for 6–8 C° inside the greenhouse the roof slope of whichis ≅ 15° is caused from the stored heat.This problem also occurs to the greenhouse each column of which is not high as 2.5 m. As theresults, the ventilation system appears to be the thermal-driven one on heat convection. In ad-dition, the heat transmission between the roof top and the center of the greenhouse is induced.Furthermore, the 0.4 side opening is found to generate the wake of air and the wind-inducedventilation so as to lower the air temperature inside the greenhouse. This is possible when theinside wind speed ranks from 0.638 to 1.0 m s-1. Otherwise, it will not succeed in lowering theair temperature inside greenhouse. Thus, in this study, the researchers consider the effectsfrom roof slope variation, where the averaged roof slopes are 15°, 30° and 42°, with the ob-jective to lower the air temperature inside the greenhouse so as that it will be similar to theambient temperature.In this study, the ceiling of greenhouse is the heat storage zone where the hot air remains be-fore being ventilated out through the roof vent. The performance of roof slope is consideredin terms of ventilation function: G(α), temperature function: (ΔT/To), and Gr/Re2.This results from this study show that the 30° is the maximum degree of roof slope that facili-tates the justification of the air temperature inside the greenhouse to the outside ambient tem-perature.It is also found that the air temperature inside the greenhouse is different from that outside thegreenhouse (ΔT) for 2°C.When the Gr/Re2 is < 1, at the height of 2.5 m from the ground, the dominating ventilationsystem appears to be the wind-induced one.Since the height of roof slope causes the problem to the greenhouse structure, the ventilationperformance is considered to be related to the wind pressure applied to the greenhouse roof.
  • 10. The equation for calculating the output is the combination between the ventilation rate equa-tion and the pressure coefficient of the wind force at various roof slopes. The results from thecalculation, excluding the dimension, reveal that the roof slope that can influence the ventila-tion performance in justifying the air temperature to the ambient temperature under the windpressure on the greenhouse roof is < 30°. Thus, the suitable roof slope for a Simple StructureGreenhouse in a hot and humid region is 30°.AcknowledgementsThe authors would like to express their sincere appreciation to the Energy Policy and Plan-ning Office (EPPO) for the financial support to this research project.References[1] A. Krasaechai, Protective Structure for Flower Production of Royal Project Foundation,International seminar on Protective Structures for Improved crop Production, Korea, April12-17, 1999, X1-X18.[2] G.J. Connellan, Selection of greenhouse design and technology options for high tempera-ture regions, Acta Horticulturae 578 (2002) 113–117.[3] J.D. Kalma, F. Kuiper, Transpiration and growth of Phaseoulus vulgaris L. as affected bywind speed, Mededelingen Landbouwhogeschool, Wageningen 66(8) (1999) 1–9.[4] A. Robert and W. John, Greenhouse Engineering, Second edition, Northeast RegionalAgriculture Engineering Service, 1989, pp. 61–72.[5] C. Kittas, T. Boulard, G. Papadakis, Natural ventilation of a greenhouse with ridge andside openings: Sensitivity to temperature and wind effects, Transactions of the ASAE 40(2)(1997) 415–425.[6] G.J. Connellan, Australian Flower Conference: Greenhouse Design for a Healthy CutFlower Crop, Australia, August 2–6, 2000.[7] L.D. Albright, Controlling greenhouse environments, Acta Horticulturae (2002) 121–125.[8] M. Brugger, J. Montero, E. Baezz, J. Pérez Parra, Computational fluid dynamic modellingto improve to design of the Spanish parral style greenhouse. Acta Horticulturae 691 (2005)425–432.[9] Thai Meteorological Department, Document climatologically data for the period 2000-2004.[10] A.F. Mills, Basic Heat and Mass Transfer, 2 ed, New Jersey, Prentice Hall Inc., 1999.[11] A. Mistriotis, C. Arcidianoco, P. Picuno, G.P.A. Bot, Computational analysis of the natu-ral ventilation in greenhouses at zero- and low-wind-speeds, Agriculture and Forest Meteorol-ogy 88 (1997) 121–135.[12] G.P.A. Bot, Greenhouse climate: From physical processes to a dynamic model, PhD.Thesis, Agricultural University, Wageningen, The Netherlands, 1983, pp. 240.[13] T. Boulard, A. Baille, Modelling of air exchange rate in a greenhouse equipped with con-tinuous roof vents, Journal of Agricultural Engineering Research 61 (1995) 37–48.[14] J. Pérez Parra, E. Baeza, J.I. Montero, B.J. Bailey, Natural ventilation of parral green-houses, Biosystems Engineering 87(3) (2004) 355–366.[15] U. Tuntiwaranuruk, S. Thepa, S. Tia, S. Bhumiratana, Comparison between measuredand Predicted Ventilation Rates in a Naturally Ventilated Greenhouse, Acta Horticulturae 699(2006) 439–448.[16] A. Mistriotis, D. Briassoulis, Numerical estimation of the internal and external aerody-namic coefficients of a tunnel greenhouse structure with openings, Computers and Electronicsin Agriculture 34 (2002) 191–205.[17] T. Ayata, Investigation of building height and roof effect on the air velocity and pressuredistribution around the detached houses in Turkey Applied Thermal Engineering 29(8-9)(2009) 1752–1758.[18] P.J. Richards, R.P. Hoxey, Appropriate boundary conditions for computational wind engi-neering models using the kappa–epsilon turbulence model. Journal of Wind Engineering andIndustrial Aerodynamics 46–7 (1993) 145–153
  • 11. [19] J.C. Roy, T. Boulard, C. Kittas, S. Wang, Convective and Ventilation Transfers in Green-houses, Part 1: the Greenhouse considered as a Perfectly Stirred Tank, Biosystems Engineer-ing 83(1) (2002) 1–20.[20] G. Papadakis, A. Frangoudakis, S. Kyritsis, Mixed, forced and free convection heattransfer at the greenhouse cover, Journal of Agricultural Engineering Research 51(1992) 191–205.[21] P.J. Oliveira, B.A. Younis, On the prediction of turbulent flows around full-scale build-ings, Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics, 86 (2000) 203–220[22] J.D. Gingera and J.D. Holmes, Effect of building length on wind loads on low-rise build-ings with a steep roof pitch, Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics 91(2003) 1377–1400.คำำบรรยำยภำพFig. 1 Prototype of a Simple Structure Greenhouse (SSG-greenhouse), built with a bamboostructure (a) and Schematic view of the empty SSG-greenhouse, with different sidewall open-ings (b)Fig. 2 Greenhouse configuration for roof slope difference (a) Average roof slope of 15° (b)Average roof slope of 30°; (c) Average roof slope of 42°
  • 12. Fig. 3 Comparison, in term of the ventilation rate as the function of wind speed outside thegreenhouse, between the results from the experiment by Tuntiwaranruk et al. [15] and the nu-merical results obtained from the examinations on the three different grid resolutionsFig. 4 Comparison, from the calculation of the measurement data in the middle distance of thegreenhouse by the Gr/Re2formula, from results from the experiment by Tuntiwaranruk et al.[15] and the results obtained from the simulation of the coarse grid resolutionFig. 5 Flow pattern (a) and temperature distributions (b) of air inside the SSG-greenhouse,where the side opening is 15% or 0.4 m from ground and the outside wind velocity is 1.6 m s-1with the wind direct of 0°Fig. 6 Comparison of the ventilation performance in term of ventilation function, G(α) for theroof slope variations, at the external wind speed of 0.5, 1.5 and 2.0 m s-1Fig. 7 Comparison of the velocity vector inside the greenhouse at different the roof slopeswith the wind speed of 0.5 m s-1: for the roof slopes of (a) 15°, (b) 30° and (c) 42°Fig. 8 Comparison of the different roof slopes for the variable the wind speeds resulted fromthe temperature function, (ΔT/To)Fig. 9 Comparison of the temperature distribution inside the greenhouse at different the roofslopes with the wind speed of 0.5 m s-1: for the roof slopes of (a) 15°, (b) 30° and (c) 42°Fig. 10 Comparison of the ventilation system with different roof slopes calculated from theGr/Re2, at the height of 2.5 m from the ground, as functional wind speedsFig. 11 Prediction resulted from roof slope variations, compared with measured pressure coef-ficients for roof pitch greenhouse, generated by Oliveira and Younis [21], and Gingera andHolmes [22] when the roof slopes are 27° and 35°, respectivelyFig. 12 Effects from the roof slope variation on the ventilation performance and wind pressurecoefficient, presented in the form of Cd 2 to (ρ2/ΔP)(Q/AT)2Table 1 Parameter values of boundary conditions used for the simulationsTable 2 Linear regression equations of temperature difference ΔT on wind speed uα