Your SlideShare is downloading. ×
  • Like
Steering Committee 2-15-2013
Upcoming SlideShare
Loading in...5
×

Thanks for flagging this SlideShare!

Oops! An error has occurred.

×

Now you can save presentations on your phone or tablet

Available for both IPhone and Android

Text the download link to your phone

Standard text messaging rates apply

Steering Committee 2-15-2013

  • 872 views
Published

2/15/2013 Steering Committee

2/15/2013 Steering Committee

  • Full Name Full Name Comment goes here.
    Are you sure you want to
    Your message goes here
    Be the first to comment
    Be the first to like this
No Downloads

Views

Total Views
872
On SlideShare
0
From Embeds
0
Number of Embeds
2

Actions

Shares
Downloads
0
Comments
0
Likes
0

Embeds 0

No embeds

Report content

Flagged as inappropriate Flag as inappropriate
Flag as inappropriate

Select your reason for flagging this presentation as inappropriate.

Cancel
    No notes for slide
  • Paratransit trips: 15,000 trips/year @ $23/trip

Transcript

  • 1. Steering CommitteePeoria/Riverside Transit Study February 15, 2013
  • 2. Agenda1. Definitions of Alternatives2. Evaluation Results3. Preferred Alternative4. Next Steps2/19/2013 2
  • 3. Scenario Comparison Scenario A Scenario B Scenario C Scenario D Scenario E Based on technical analysis and public input, move forward with Scenario B (66th St. North to 81st & Lewis)Existing Transit Riders 4,050 4,050 3,950 3,950 3,690 2/19/2013 3
  • 4. Trip DestinationsDestinations for All trips on Route 105 Destinations for Work trips on Route 1052/19/2013 4
  • 5. Ride Check Survey• April 24-26, 2012 (Tuesday – Thursday)• 9 Routes surveyed• 9 routes accounted for 64% of total ridership, of which 25% was on Route 105 (Peoria)• 20% flag stops (5% of riders)• Major stops at Pine, DAS, 41st Street, 61st Street, and 81st Street• 4,000+ benefitting riders Grouping On Board + Boardings N Peoria + S Peoria 1,681 N Peoria + Downtown 2,819 S Peoria + Downtown 3,728 All Segments 4,114 2/19/2013 5
  • 6. Study Goals Peoria-Riverside Transit Study Goals• Goal 1: Improve Transit Access and Regional Mobility• Goal 2: Support Economic Development• Goal 3: Invest in Low-Cost, High-Impact Transit Infrastructure• Goal 4: Build Community Support for the Value of Transit2/19/2013 6
  • 7. Description of Alternatives• Bus Rapid Transit- BRT (based on MAP-21 requirement)• Bus Rapid Transit Light – BRT Light• Fast Bus• Tulsa Enhanced• Tulsa (+) Plus• “No Build”2/19/2013 7
  • 8. BRT • Bus Rapid Transit (BRT)  50 min. Trip Time  BRT stops at approx. ½ mi. intervals (36 stations at 19 locations)  10-15 minute headways  5:30am-8:30pm  Monday-Sunday  Shuttle 66th St. N. to 38th St. N.  Replaces Route 105  DEDICATED LANES  NEXT BUS ARRIVAL  TRAFFIC PRIORITY AT  PEDESTRIAN SIGNAL CROSSINGS  TICKET VENDING  SIDEWALKS MACHINES  ILLUMINATION2/19/2013 8
  • 9. BRT Light • BRT LIGHT  50 min. Trip Time  BRT Light stops at approx. ½ mi. intervals (36 stations at 19 locations)  15-20 minute headways  5:30am-8:30pm  Monday-Sunday  Shuttle 66th St. N. to 38th St. N.  Replaces Route 105 X DEDICATED LANES  NEXT BUS ARRIVAL  TRAFFIC PRIORITY AT  PEDESTRIAN SIGNAL CROSSINGS  TICKET VENDING  SIDEWALKS MACHINES  ILLUMINATION2/19/2013 9
  • 10. Fast Bus • FAST BUS  50 min. Trip Time  Fast Bus stops at approx. ½ mi. intervals (36 stations at 19 locations)  30 minute headways (15 min w/rte 105)  5:30am-10:30pm  Monday-Saturday  Local Rt. 105 remains unchanged X DEDICATED LANES  NEXT BUS ARRIVAL  TRAFFIC PRIORITY AT  PEDESTRIAN SIGNAL CROSSINGS  TICKET VENDING  SIDEWALKS MACHINES  ILLUMINATION2/19/2013 10
  • 11. Tulsa Enhanced • TULSA ENHANCED  60 min. Trip Time  Stops every 2-3 Blocks (approx. 120 stops at 60 locations)  20 minute headways  5:30am-10:30pm  Monday-Saturday  Shuttle 66th St. N. to 38th St. N.  Replaces Route 105 X DEDICATED LANES  NEXT BUS ARRIVAL  TRAFFIC PRIORITY AT  PEDESTRIAN SIGNAL CROSSINGS X TICKET VENDING  SIDEWALKS MACHINES X ILLUMINATION2/19/2013 11
  • 12. Tulsa (+) Plus • TULSA (+) PLUS  70 min. Trip Time  Local and Flag Stops (196 stops in 98 locations)  30 minute headways  5:30am-10:30pm  Monday-Saturday  Improves existing 105 service X DEDICATED LANES X NEXT BUS ARRIVAL  TRAFFIC PRIORITY AT X PEDESTRIAN SIGNAL CROSSINGS X TICKET VENDING X SIDEWALKS MACHINES X ILLUMINATION2/19/2013 12
  • 13. No Build • NO BUILD  75 min. Trip Time  Local and Flag Stops (196 stops in 98 locations)  30 minute headways  5:30am-8:30pm  Monday-Saturday  No change for existing 105 X DEDICATED LANES X NEXT BUS ARRIVAL X TRAFFIC PRIORITY AT X PEDESTRIAN SIGNAL CROSSINGS X TICKET VENDING X SIDEWALKS MACHINES X ILLUMINATION2/19/2013 13
  • 14. Evaluation Results TULSA TULSA EXISTING Item Description BRT BRT LIGHT FAST BUS ENHANCED PLUS ROUTE 105TRAVEL TIMEVISIBILTY ANDPERCEPTIONCOMFORT ANDRELIABILITYSAFETYCAPITAL COST $ 20.6M $ 18.6M $16.0M $ 17.6M $ 12.2M $0OPERATING COST $ 3.1M $ 2.7M $ 2.6M $ 2.5M $1.5M $1.3M No Change fromchange from + $1.8M + $1.4M + $1.3M + $1.2M + $0.2M ExistingexistingFEASIBILITY - 17% 15% 15% 14% 8% 7%Percent of Tulsa TransitAnnual OperatingBudget* *Based on Tulsa Transit Annual Operating Budget of $18 M =1 = 2 = 3 = 4 = 5 2/19/2013 14
  • 15. Evaluation Results TULSA TULSA EXISTING Item Description BRT BRT LIGHT FAST BUS ENHANCED PLUS ROUTE 105TRAVEL TIMEVISIBILTY ANDPERCEPTIONCOMFORT ANDRELIABILITYSAFETYCAPITAL COSTOPERATING COSTchange fromexistingFEASIBILITY -Percent of Tulsa TransitAnnual OperatingBudget* 21 24 25 20 19 18 SUMMARY SCORE =1 = 2 = 3 = 4 = 5 2/19/2013 15
  • 16. Fast Bus • FAST BUS  50 min. Trip Time, Stops @ 1/2 –mi spacing  30 minute headways (15 min w/Rt. 105)  5:30am-10:30pm, Monday-Saturday CAPITAL COST $16.0 M OPERATING COST $2.6 M change from existing + $1.3 M FEASIBILITY - Percent of 15% Annual Operating Budget X DEDICATED LANES  NEXT BUS ARRIVAL  TRAFFIC PRIORITY AT  PEDESTRIAN SIGNAL CROSSINGS  TICKET VENDING  SIDEWALKS MACHINES  ILLUMINATION2/19/2013 16
  • 17. BRT Light • BRT LIGHT  50 min. Trip Time, Stops @ 1/2–mi spacing  15-20 minute headways  5:30am-10:30pm, Monday-Saturday CAPITAL COST $18.6 M OPERATING COST $2.7 M change from existing + $1.4 M FEASIBILITY - Percent of 15% Annual Operating Budget X DEDICATED LANES  NEXT BUS ARRIVAL  TRAFFIC PRIORITY AT  PEDESTRIAN SIGNAL CROSSINGS  TICKET VENDING  SIDEWALKS MACHINES  ILLUMINATION2/19/2013 17
  • 18. Big Questions• Which option do you think will be best for Tulsa?• Why is that your favored option?• Do you think that option will be likely to receive the needed financial support for implementation and operation?• Is there consensus among the Steering Committee members?2/19/2013 18
  • 19. Big QuestionsWrapping up the Planning Process• MTTA Board (Feb. 26th)• INCOG Transportation Policy Committee (Feb. 27)• INCOG Board (March 12)Potential Sponsors with funding commitment• City of Tulsa• MTTA• Tulsa County2/19/2013 19
  • 20. Next Steps• Environmental Clearance• Funding Commitments – Local commitment first – Federal grants?• Design• Implementation2/19/2013 20