Practical lessons from rolling-out web-based PHRs - Presentation Transcript
MY BACKGROUND
GP in London, retired
Co-director of PAERS
Lead for RAC
60% of practices in the UK can now offer full record access
Practices Hospitals SPINE – summary care record PRACTICE – Full GP elec record A+E Carers OPD
WHAT DO WE MEAN BY RECORD ACCESS, IDEALLY?
Patients able to see their full or partial record at will. Ideally:
The whole accurate, contemporaneous record, available anywhere
Data information knowledge
Tailored and targeted health information and decision-support
Patients entering data of their own
A portal to a range of facilities
Advice on improving health and managing disease
Interactive links to others
THE EMIS/PAERS PROCESS 1
Practice needs to decide to switch on the system
Photo –ID for individual authentication
Patient signs consent form
Pins+passwords
Off you go!
THE EMIS/PAERS PROCESS 2
No Spine – records are not held in any new place
Record disappears as soon as the patient logs out
Practices can exclude past non-coded data
The patient holds the key
THE LEGAL POSITION
DPA : Access can be denied where the information:
may cause serious harm to the physical or mental health, or condition of the patient or any other person
may relate to or be provided by a third person who had not consented to the disclosure.
ICO : this is not a subject access request under the Data Protection Act
GMC : contemporaneous record sharing is an extension of normal good practice
MPS+MDU : very supportive
We need to be writing notes for patient view now.
PATIENTS’ CONCERNS
Patient inertia
Concerns about privacy and security
Fears about new electronic systems (both technophobia and limitation of skills)
It’s not our record
New responsibilities
PROFESSIONALS ’ CONCERNS
Increased workload – worried well, too many Qs?
How will workflow have to change?
3 rd party information, dangerous information
Children
Patients with psychiatric problems
Technophobia and limitation of skills
Challenge to the White Knight
RECORD SHARING DOES REPRESENT A REAL TRANSFER OF POWER Fears of losing control over aspects of the clinical encounter and management of the patient. SOMETIMES, BUT THEY UNDERSTAND THE REASON Patients get upset COMPLEX, BUT RISKS CAN BE VIRTUALLY ELIMINATED Third party information HACKING VERY UNLIKELY IF DISTRIBUTED DATABASE Security and confidentiality NO EVIDENCE OF INCREASED LITIGATION THE ACCURACY OF THE RECORD IS IMPROVED RA will expose clinicians’ data quality and encourage litigation RECORD SHARING SAVES TIME Consultation length RESPONSES CONCERNS
BUILDING ON TRUST
Errors
Seeing clinicians’ muddles
Consultation notes are not a true record
Information is power
Handing power to the patient
They can reinterpret
They can remind us
They can correct us
This is a challenge
BENEFITS FOR PATIENTS
Increase self-care, confidence, understanding, relationships with the clinician
Save patients’ time, making best use of GP and hospital clinic consultations
Correct inaccuracies in the record
Improves compliance and preventative health behaviour.
YOU ARE A DIABETIC – WHAT IS POSSIBLE NOW
You attend different hospitals and the GP, you have arrays of tests at different times with varying advice that is sometimes contradictory.
You can keep clinicians in touch with each other if needed by showing them the record
You can check your test results without calling the practice
You can check what good practice looks like
You can share your information with a carer or family
Information buttons become a personalised health resource
YOU ARE A DIABETIC – WHAT IS POSSIBLE NOW
You can order rpt scripts and make appts online
You’re not clear what the clinician said to you. Look it up!
The clinician wrote R eye when it should be L. Correct it!
Look at the letters from the hospital – you don’t need to call the practice for them.
When does your certificate run out? What are you allergic to? When did you have that immunisation?
PRACTICE BENEFITS
Improved trust through transparency
Saving time – letters and results
Patients with RA use primary care less because better informed and involved patients have better outcomes and use less health care
Improved compliance when reminders are in place?
WEB 2.0? WEB 1.5?
WEB 2.0
User generated content
Content personalised
Interactive
Collaboration and sharing
I-PATIENT
Interaction is facilitated
Collaboration is facilitated
Personalised content
DEMO
POSSIBILITIES
New applications to support self-management
Patients writing in the record
Bluetoothed sphygs
Reminders
This technology is about relationships and trust
The power of the technology is dependent on the relationships between clinician and patient
Dr Brian Fisher's presentation explores the practic more
Dr Brian Fisher's presentation explores the practical lessons learned from the roll-out of web-based PHRs within his own practice and how they have influenced his predications for the future. less
0 comments
Post a comment